Skip to main content
Log in

Inelastic floor spectra for designing anchored acceleration-sensitive nonstructural components

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, inelastic floor spectra are developed for designing acceleration-sensitive nonstructural components (NSCs). The parameters response modification (reduction) factor, \( R_{\text{cc}} \), and inelastic displacement ratio, \( C_{\text{cc}} \), are evaluated to quantify the effects of NSCs inelasticity on their seismic-induced force and displacement demands, respectively. The results of the conducted response history analyses illustrate that the inelastic behavior of NSCs can significantly de-emphasize the effects of their tuning period ratio and viscous damping ratio, and of the characteristics of the primary structure and ground excitation. Due to the quasi-harmonic characteristic of building floor motions, NSC inelasticity is more effective for NSCs attached to buildings than for those attached to the ground. NSC inelasticity is most effective for a low-damping roof-mounted NSC tuned to the first modal period of an elastic building (i.e., the most critical NSC from the design point of view). Adopting even a mild level of inelasticity for tuned NSCs not only decreases their seismic force demands significantly but also reduces their displacement demands. For non-tuning conditions, particularly for rigid NSCs, achieving even a relatively small \( R_{\text{cc}} \) (i.e., a small reduction in force demand) leads to a significant increase in NSC displacement and ductility demands suggesting that these NSCs should be designed to remain elastic. Results illustrate that the amplitude of \( R_{\text{cc}} \) and \( C_{\text{cc}} \) depends on the tuning ratio, viscous damping, and level of inelasticity of NSCs, and to a lesser extent, on the characteristics of the primary structure and ground motion. Simplified yet reliable equations are proposed for the estimation of the parameter \( R_{\text{cc}} \) for non-rigid NSCs with different levels of inelasticity and viscous damping.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adam C, Fotiu P (2000) Dynamic analysis of inelastic primary–secondary systems. Eng Struct 22(1):58–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adam C, Furtmüller T (2008) Response of nonstructural components in ductile load-bearing structures subjected to ordinary ground motions. In: Proceedings of 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing, China, paper no. 05-01-0327

  • Adam C, Furtmüller T, Moschen L (2013) Floor response spectra for moderately heavy nonstructural elements attached to ductile frame structures. Comput Methods Earthq Eng 2:69–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al Atik L, Abrahamson N (2010) An improved method for nonstationary spectral matching. Earthq Spectra 26(3):601–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anajafi H (2018) Improved seismic design of non-structural components (NSCs) and development of innovative control approaches to enhance the seismic performance of buildings and NSCs. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of New Hampshire, NH, USA, https://pqdtopen.proquest.com/pubnum/10935426.html

  • Anajafi H, Medina RA (2018a) Evaluation of ASCE 7 equations for designing acceleration-sensitive nonstructural components using data from instrumented buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 47(4):1075–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anajafi H, Medina RA (2018b) Uncertainties in using the spectrum matching technique for generating synthetic ground motions. In: Proceedings of 11th national conference in earthquake engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA

  • Anajafi H, Medina RA (2019a) Damping modification factor for elastic floor response spectra. Bull Earthq Eng 17(11):6079–6108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anajafi H, Medina RA (2019b) Lessons learned from evaluating the responses of instrumented buildings in the United States: the effects of supporting building characteristics on floor response spectra. Earthq Spectra 35(1):159–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archila M, Ventura C, Figueira A, Yang Y (2012) Modal testing of non-structural components for seismic risk assessment. Top Dyn Civ Struct 1:239–246

    Google Scholar 

  • ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineers) (2016) Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 7-16, Reston, VA

  • Astroza R, Pantoli E, Selva F, Restrepo JI, Hutchinson TC, Conte JP (2015) Experimental evaluation of the seismic response of a rooftop-mounted cooling tower. Earthq Spectra 31(3):1567–1589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri SR, Villaverde R (2008) Effect of building nonlinearity on seismic response of nonstructural components: a parametric study. J Struct Eng 134(4):661–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clough RW, Johnston SB (1996) Effect of stiffness degradation on earthquake ductility requirements. In: Proceedings of second japan national conference on earthquake engineering, Japan, pp 227–232

  • Fathali S, Lizundia B (2011) Evaluation of current seismic design equations for nonstructural components in tall buildings using strong motion records. Struct Des Tall Spec Build 20(S1):30–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FEMA P695 (Federal Emergency Management Agency) (2009). “Quantification of building seismic performance factors. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC

  • Filiatrault A, Uang CM, Folz B, Chrstopoulos C, Gatto K (2001) Reconnaissance report of the February 28, 2001 nisqually (seattle-olympia) earthquake. In: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center and the Consortium of Universities for Earthquake Engineering (CUREE), University of California, San Diego

  • Filiatrault A, Christopoulos C, Stearns C (2002) Guidelines, specifications, and seismic performance characterization of nonstructural building components and equipment, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, San Diego

  • Gupta A, McDonald B (2008) Performance of building structures during the October 15, 2006 Hawaii earthquake. In: Proceedings of 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing, China, pp. 12–17

  • Igusa T (1990) Response characteristics of inelastic 2-DOF primary-secondary system. J Eng Mech 116(5):1160–1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazantzi A, Vamvatsikos D, Miranda E (2018) Effect of yielding on the seismic demands of nonstructural elements. In: Proceedings of 16th European conference on earthquake engineering, Thessaloniki, Greece

  • Lin J, Mahin SA (1985) Seismic response of light subsystems on inelastic structures. J Struct Eng 111(2):400–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKevitt W, Timler P, Lo K (1995) Nonstructural damage from the Northridge earthquake. Can J Civ Eng 22(2):428–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miranda E, Kazantzi AK, Vamvatsikos D (2018) Towards a new approach to design acceleration-sensitive non-structural components. In: Proceedings of 11th national conference in earthquake engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA

  • Myrtle RC, Masri SF, Nigbor RL, Caffrey JP (2005) Classification and prioritization of essential systems in hospitals under extreme events. Earthq Spectra 21(3):779–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naeim F, Lobo R, Martin JA (1998) Performance of nonstructural components during the January 17, 1994 northridge earthquake-case studies of six instrumented multi-story buildings. In: Proceedings of seminar on seismic design, retrofit, and performance of nonstructural components ATC-29-1, San Francisco, CA, USA, pp 107–119

  • NIST GCR 18-917-43 (2018) Recommendations for improved seismic design and installation of nonstructural components, Applied Technology Council, Redwood, CA

  • Obando J, Lopez-Garcia D (2018) Inelastic displacement ratios for nonstructural components subjected to floor accelerations. J Earthquake Eng 22(4):569–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez M, Restrepo J, Carr A (2002) Earthquake-induced floor horizontal accelerations in buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31(3):693–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sankaranarayanan R, Medina RA (2008) Statistical models for a proposed acceleration-response modification factor for nonstructural components attached to inelastic structures. In: Proceedings of 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing, China

  • Toro GR, McGuire RK, Cornell CA, Sewell RT (1989) Linear and nonlinear response of structures and equipment to California and Eastern United States earthquakes. Electric Power Research Inst, Palo Alto

    Google Scholar 

  • Villaverde R (2006) Simple method to estimate the seismic nonlinear response of nonstructural components in buildings. Eng Struct 28(8):1209–1221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viti G, Olivieri M, Travi S (1981) Development of non-linear floor response spectra. Nucl Eng Des 64(1):33–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vukobratović V, Fajfar P (2017) Code-oriented floor acceleration spectra for building structures. Bull Earthq Eng 15(7):3013–3026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Astroza R, Hutchinson T, Conte J, Bachman R (2014) Seismic demands on acceleration-sensitive nonstructural components using recorded building response data–case study. In: Proceedings of Tenth US National Conference on Earthquake, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Anchorage, AK

  • Watkins DA (2011) Seismic behavior and modeling of anchored nonstructural components considering the influence of cyclic cracks. University of California, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins DA, Chiu L, Hutchinson T, Hoehler M (2009) Survey and characterization of floor and wall mounted mechanical and electrical equipment in buildings. Structural Systems Research Project Report Series, SSRP 09/11, Department of Structural Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA

  • Wieser J, Pekcan G, Zaghi AE, Itani A, Maragakis M (2013) Floor accelerations in yielding special moment resisting frame structures. Earthq Spectra 29(3):987–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study presented in this paper was supported in part by the Applied Technology Council (ATC) through the ATC-120 project. Results and recommendations presented herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the ATC or its sponsoring organizations. The contribution of the members of the project management committee, especially M. Phips, R. Bachman, and B. Lizundia, is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hamidreza Anajafi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anajafi, H., Medina, R.A. & Santini-Bell, E. Inelastic floor spectra for designing anchored acceleration-sensitive nonstructural components. Bull Earthquake Eng 18, 2115–2147 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00760-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00760-8

Keywords

Navigation