Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A low-cycle fatigue approach to predicting shear strength degradation in RC joints subjected to seismic actions

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reinforced concrete (RC) structures realised in earthquake-prone regions are exposed to seismic shakings that may result in significant damage and even lead them to collapse. As well known, high stress concentration occurs at the end of both beams and columns of RC frames, making those members extremely prone to damage. Moreover, beam-to-column joints are particularly sensitive to brittle failure, especially in the cases of unreinforced and unconfined joints. This paper investigates the cyclic response of RC beam-to-column joints. Specifically, it is intended at demonstrating that the decay in shear strength due to cyclic actions can be interpreted in the light of the well-known low-cycle fatigue approach. To do so, cyclic experimental tests on RC joints reported in the scientific literature are collected and analysed. The obtained results show that the parameters governing the shear strength degradation are clearly influenced by both the layout of the RC joints and their actual design criteria. This finding highlights that low-cycle fatigue curves can be considered for describing the decay in shear strength due to cyclic actions; however, further well-documented experimental results are needed to completely identify the relationship between the relevant properties of the RC joint and the resulting low-cycle fatigue curve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adibi M, Marefat MS, Allahvirdizadeh R (2018) Nonlinear modeling of cyclic response of RC beam-column joints reinforced by plain bars. Bull Earthq Eng 16:5529–5556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bathias C, Pineau A (2010) Fatigue of materials and structures. Fundamentals. Wiley, Hoboken. ISBN 978-1-84821-051-6

    Google Scholar 

  • CEN “European Committee for Standardization” (2004) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance—Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. EN 1998-1

  • Chalioris CE, Favvata MJ, Karayannis CG (2008) Reinforced concrete beam-column joints with crossed-inclined bars under cyclic deformations. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 37:881–897. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chun SC, Kim DY (2004) Evaluation of mechanical anchorage of reinforcement by exterior beam-column joint experiments. In: 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, August 1–6, 2004; Paper no. 0326, Vancouver

  • Cosenza E, Manfredi G (2000) Damage indices and damage measures. Prog Struct Mater Eng 2:50–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1528-2716(200001/03)2:13.3.CO;2-J

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durrani AJ, Wight JK (1982) Experimental and analytical study of internal beam-to-column connections subjected to reversed cyclic loading. Report UMEE 82R3, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Michigan, Michigan

  • Ehsani MR, Alameddine F (1991) Design recommendations for type 2 high-strength reinforced concrete connections. ACI Struct J 88(3):227–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehsani MR, Wight JK (1985a) Effect of transverse beam and slab on behavior of reinforced concrete beam-to-column connections. ACI Struct J 82(17):188–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehsani MR, Wight JK (1985b) Exterior reinforced concrete beam-to-column connections subjected to earthquake type loading. ACI Struct J 82(43):492–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehsani MR, Moussa AE, Vallenilla CR (1987) Comparison of inelastic behavior of reinforced ordinary- and high-strength concrete frames. ACI Struct J 84(s17):161–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Faella C, Martinelli E, De Santo D, Nigro E (2006) Some Remarks on the seismic assessment of RC existing buildings in Italy according to the recent codes. In: Proceedings of the 1st European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology, paper 1375, Genève

  • fib “Fédération International du Béton” (2003) Bulletin 24: seismic assessment and retrofit of reinforced concrete buildings. Lausanne (CH). ISBN: 978-2-88394-064-2

  • Hakuto S, Park P, Tanaka H (2000) Seismic load tests on interior and exterior beam-column joints with substandard reinforcing details. ACI Struct J 97(1):11–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashin Z (1979) A reinterpretation of Palmgren–Miner rule for fatigue life prediction. Technical report no. 1. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, College of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

  • ISTAT “National Institute of Statistics” (2001) L’Italia in 150 anni. Sommario di statistiche storiche 1861-2010 (in Italian). RTI Poligrafica Ruggiero S.r.l.—ACM S.p.a., Avellino

  • Jiang HJ, Chen LZ, Chen Q (2011) Seismic damage assessment and performance levels of reinforced concrete members. Proc Eng 14:939–945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karayannis CG, Sirkelis GM (2008) Strengthening and rehabilitation of RC beam-column joints using carbon-FRP jacketing and epoxy resin injection. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 37:769–790. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karayannis CG, Chalioris CE, Sirkelis GM (2008) Local retrofit of exterior RC beam-column joints using thin RC jackets—an experimental study. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 37:727–746. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, LaFave JM, Song J (2007) A new statistical approach for joint shear strength determination of RC beam-column connections subjected to lateral earthquake loading. Struct Eng Mech 27(4):439–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, LaFave JM, Song J (2009) Joint shear behaviour of reinforced concrete beam-column connections. Mag Concrete Res 61(2):119–132. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.2008.00068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitayama K, Otani S, Aoyama H (1991) Development of design criteria for RC interior beam-column joints. In: James OJ (ed) Published in ACI SP123 design of beam-columns joints for seismic resistance. American Concrete Institute, Michigan, pp 97–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusuhara F, Azuwara K, Shiohara H, Otani S (2004) Tests of reinforced concrete interior beam-column joint subassemblage with eccentric beams. In: 13th world conference in earthquake engineering, August 1–6, 2004, paper 185, Vancouver

  • Lee HJ, Ko JW (2007) Eccentric reinforced concrete beam-column connections subjected to cyclic loading in Principal directions. ACI Struct J 104(4):459–467

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee JY, Kim JY, Oh GJ (2009) Strength deterioration of reinforced concrete beam-column joints subjected to cyclic loading. Eng Struct 31:2070–2085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.03.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leon RT (1990) Shear strength and hysteretic behaviour of interior beam-column joints. ACI Struct J 87(1):3–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Li B, Wu W, Pan TC (2002) Seismic behavior of nonseismically detailed interior beam-wide column joints—Part 1: experimental results and observed behaviour. ACI Struct J 99(6):791–802

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima C (2012) Beam-to-column joints in RC frames: capacity models and behaviour under seismic actions. Lap Lambert Academic Publishing. ISBN: 978-3-8484-2227-2

  • Lima C, Martinelli E, Faella C (2012a) Capacity models for shear strength of exterior joints in RC frames: state-of-the-art and synoptic examination. Bull Earthq Eng 10:967–983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-012-9340-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima C, Martinelli E, Faella C (2012b) Capacity models for shear strength of exterior joints in RC frames: experimental assessment and recalibration. Bull Earthq Eng 10:985–1007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-012-9342-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mander JB, Panthaki FD, Kasalanati A (1994) Low cycle fatigue behaviour of reinforcing steel. ASCE J Mater Civ Eng 6(4):453–468. ISSN: 0899-1561/94/0004-0453

  • Melo J, Varum H, Rossetto T (2015) Cyclic response of RC beam-column joints reinforced with plain bars. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 44:1351–1371. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M.II.TT. “Italian Ministry of Infrastructure and Transportation” (2008) Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni (in Italian). Gazzetta Ufficiale n. 29 del 4 febbraio 2008—Suppl. Ordinario n. 30

  • Miner MA (1945) Cumulative damage in fatigue. J Appl Mech 67:159–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmgren AZ (1924) Die Lebensdauer von Kugellagern. Z des Ver Dtsch Ing (VDI Zeitschrift), 68(14):339–341. ISSN: 0341-7258

  • Pampanin S, Calvi GM, Moratti M (2002) Seismic behaviour of RC beam-column joints designed for gravity loads. In: 12th European conference on earthquake engineering, Paper 726, London

  • Paulay T, Priestley MJN (1992) Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings. Wiley, New York. ISBN 0-471-54915-0

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shin M, LaFave JM (2004) Seismic performance of reinforced concrete eccentric beam-column connections with floor slabs. ACI Struct J 101(3):403–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiohara H, Zaid S, Otani S (2000) Test of an innovative reinforcing detail for high-performance RC interior beam-column connections subjected to seismic action. Report of University of Tokio, Tokio

    Google Scholar 

  • Takaine Y, Nagai S, Maruta M (2008) Structural performance of RC beams and beam-column subassemblages using reinforcement with sleeve joints at the end of beams. In: The 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, 12–17 October 2008, Beijing

  • Teng S, Zhou H (2003) Eccentric reinforced concrete beam-column joints subjected to cyclic loading. ACI Struct J 100(2):139–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsonos AG (2007) Cyclic load behaviour of reinforced concrete beam-column subassemblages of modern structures. ACI Struct J 104(4):468–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsonos AG, Tegos IA, Penelis GG (1992) Seismic resistance of type 2 exterior beam-column joints reinforced with inclined bars. ACI Struct J 89(1):3–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Verderame GM, Iervolino I, Ricci P (2009) Report on the damages on buildings following the seismic event of 6th of April 2009, V1.20. http://www.reluis.it/doc/pdf/Aquila/Rapporto_fotografico_V1.2.pdf. Accessed 21 March 2018

  • Wong HF, Kuang JS (2008) Effects of beam-column depth ratio on joint seismic behaviour. In: Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers, structures & buildings, 161(SB2):91–101, Paper 700010. https://doi.org/10.1680/stbu.2008.161.2.91

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has been developed as part of the DPC-ReLUIS 2010–2013 Project (Task 1.1.2).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132, 84084, Fisciano, SA, Italy

    Carmine Lima & Enzo Martinelli

Authors
  1. Carmine Lima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Enzo Martinelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enzo Martinelli.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lima, C., Martinelli, E. A low-cycle fatigue approach to predicting shear strength degradation in RC joints subjected to seismic actions. Bull Earthquake Eng 17, 6061–6078 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00688-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00688-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation