Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of structural damage detection methods for steel structures using full-scale experimental data and nonlinear analysis

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rapid structural damage assessment methodologies are essential to properly allocate emergency response and minimize business interruption due to downtime in the aftermath of earthquakes. Within this context, data-driven algorithms supported by sensing capabilities can be potentially employed. In this paper, we evaluate an extensive number of damage indicators computed based on nonmodel-based system identification techniques and wavelet analysis. The efficiency of these indicators to infer the damage state of conventional steel moment-resisting frames (MRFs) and concentrically braced frames (CBFs) is evaluated through the utilization of landmark full-scale shake table experiments that examined the inelastic behavior of such frames at various seismic intensities. The same data is complemented with numerical simulations of multi-story steel MRFs and CBFs with the overarching goal to identify potential limitations and propose refinements in commonly used damage indicators for rapid seismic risk assessment. It is shown that wavelet-based damage sensitive features are well correlated with commonly used story-based engineering demand parameters that control structural and non-structural damage in conventional steel frame buildings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguirre DA, Gaviria CA, Montejo LA (2013) Wavelet-based damage detection in reinforced concrete structures subjected to seismic excitations. J Earthq Eng 17(8):1103–1125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AIJ (2007) Structural steelwork specification for building construction. Japanese Architectural Standard Specification (JASS) 6, Architecture Institute of Japan, Tokyo, Japan

  • AISC (2010a) Prequalified connections for special and intermediate steel moment frames for seismic applications. ANSI/AISC 358-10, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL

  • AISC (2010b) Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. ANSI/AISC 341-10, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL

  • Allemang RJ, Brown DL (1982) Correlation coefficient for modal vector analysis. In: Proceedings of the 1st international modal analysis conference (IMAC), Orlando, FL, pp 110–116

  • ASCE (2010) Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 7-10, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA

  • Balafas K, Kiremidjian AS (2015) Development and validation of a novel earthquake damage estimation scheme based on the continuous wavelet transform of input and output acceleration measurements. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 44(4):501–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bažant ZP, Cedolin L (1991) Stability of structures: elastic, inelastic, fracture and damage theories. Oxford University Press Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernal D, Gunes B (2004) Flexibility based approach for damage characterization: benchmark application. J Eng Mech 130(1):61–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley C, Sizemore J, Nelson J, Tremblay R, Hines EM, Fahnestock LA (2014) Large-scale testing of low-ductility, concentrically-braced frames. In: Proceedings of structures congress 2014, Boston, MA, pp 2417–2428

  • Brincker R, Zhang L, Andersen P (2001) Modal identification of output-only systems using frequency domain decomposition. Smart Mater Struct 10(3):441–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruneau M, Chang SE, Eguchi RT, Lee GC, O’Rourke TD, Reinhorn AM, Shinozuka M, Tierney K, Wallace WA, von Winterfeldt D (2003) A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthq Spectra 19(4):733–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caicedo JM, Dyke SJ, Johnson EA (2004) Natural excitation technique and eigensystem realization algorithm for phase I of the IASC-ASCE benchmark problem: simulated data. J Eng Mech 130(1):49–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang M, Pakzad SN (2013) Modified natural excitation technique for stochastic modal identification. J Struct Eng 139(10):1753–1762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang M, Pakzad SN (2014a) Observer Kalman filter identification for output-only systems using interactive structural modal identification toolsuite. J Bridge Eng 19(5):04014002-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang M, Pakzad SN (2014b) Optimal sensor placement for modal identification of bridge systems considering number of sensing nodes. J Bridge Eng 19(6):04014019-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz PJS, Salgado R (2009) Performance of vibration-based damage detection methods in bridges. Comput Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 24(1):62–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkady A, Lignos DG (2014) Modeling of the composite action in fully restrained beam-to-column connections: implications in the seismic design and collapse capacity of steel special moment frames. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 43(13):1935–1954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkady A, Lignos DG (2015) Effect of gravity framing on the overstrength and collapse capacity of steel frame buildings with perimeter special moment frames. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 44(8):1289–1307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FEMA (2012) Seismic performance assessment of buildings, volume 1-methodology. Tech. Rep. No. FEMA P-58-1, prepared by the Applied Technology Council for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC

  • Gilton C, Chi B, Uang CM (2000) Cyclic response of RBS moment connections: weak-axis configuration and deep column effects. Tech. Rep. No. SSRP-99/21, Department of Structural Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA

  • Han SW, Kim WT, Foutch DA (2007) Seismic behavior of HSS bracing members according to width-thickness ratio under symmetric cyclic loading. J Struct Eng 133(2):264–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hera A, Hou Z (2004) Application of wavelet approach for ASCE structural health monitoring benchmark studies. J Eng Mech 130(1):96–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang SH, Lignos DG (2017) Proposed methodology for earthquake-induced loss assessment of instrumented steel frame buildings: building-specific and city-scale approaches. In: Proceedings of the 6th ECCOMAS thematic conference on computational methods in structural dynamics and earthquake engineering (COMPDYN 2017), Rhodes Island, Greece

  • Ibarra LF, Medina RA, Krawinkler H (2005) Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 34(12):1489–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikeda Y (2016) Verification of system identification utilizing shaking table tests of a full-scale 4-story steel building. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 45(4):543–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji X, Fenves GL, Kajiwara K, Nakashima M (2011) Seismic damage detection of a full-scale shaking table test structure. J Struct Eng 137(1):14–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson EA, Lam HF, Katafygiotis LS, Beck JL (2004) Phase I IASC-ASCE structural health monitoring benchmark problem using simulated data. J Eng Mech 130(1):3–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karamanci E, Lignos DG (2014) Computational approach for collapse assessment of concentrically braced frames in seismic regions. J Struct Eng 140(8):A4014019-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, Lynch JP (2012) Subspace system identification of support-excited structures–part I: theory and black-box system identification. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 41(15):2235–2251

    Google Scholar 

  • Labuz EL, Chang M, Pakzad SN (2010) Local damage detection in beam-column connections using a dense sensor network. In: Proceedings of ASCE structures congress 2010, Orlando, FL, pp 3143–3154

  • Lai JW, Mahin SA (2014) Steel concentrically braced frames using tubular structural sections as bracing members: design, full-scale testing and numerical simulation. Int J Steel Struct 14(1):43–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehman DE, Roeder CW, Herman D, Johnson S, Kotulka B (2008) Improved seismic performance of gusset plate connections. J Struct Eng 134(6):890–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Kurata M, Suzuki A (2017) Decoupling algorithm for evaluating multiple beam damages in steel moment-resisting frames. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 46(7):1045–1064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lignos DG, Karamanci E (2013a) Drift-based and dual-parameter fragility curves for concentrically braced frames in seismic regions. J Constr Steel Res 90:209–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lignos DG, Karamanci E (2013b) Predictive equations for modeling cyclic buckling and fracture of steel braces. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on urban earthquake engineering (10CUEE), Tokyo, Japan, pp 105–107

  • Lignos DG, Krawinkler H (2011) Deterioration modeling of steel components in support of collapse prediction of steel moment frames under earthquake loading. J Struct Eng 137(11):1291–1302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lignos DG, Krawinkler H, Whittaker AS (2009) Collapse assessment of a 4-story steel moment resisting frame. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ECCOMAS Thematic conference on computational methods in structural dynamics and earthquake engineering (COMPDYN 2009), Rhodes Island, Greece

  • Lignos DG, Krawinkler H, Whittaker AS (2011) Prediction and validation of sidesway collapse of two scale models of a 4-story steel moment frame. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 40(7):807–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lignos DG, Karamanci E, Martin G (2012) A steel database for modeling post-buckling behavior and fracture of concentrically braced frames under earthquakes. In: Proceedings of the 15th world conference on earthquake engineering (15WCEE), Lisbon, Portugal, p 4366

  • Lignos DG, Hikino T, Matsuoka Y, Nakashima M (2013) Collapse assessment of steel moment frames based on E-Defense full-scale shake table collapse tests. J Struct Eng 139(1):120–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luş H, Betti R, Yu J, De Angelis M (2004) Investigation of a system identification methodology in the context of the ASCE benchmark problem. J Eng Mech 130(1):71–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch JP, Farrar CR, Michaels JE (2016) Structural health monitoring: technological advances to practical implementations. Proc IEEE 104(8):1508–1512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacRae GA, Clifton GC, Bruneau M, Kanvinde A, Gardiner S (2015) Lessons from steel structures in Christchurch earthquakes. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on behavior of steel structures in seismic areas (STESSA), Shanghai, China, pp 1474–1481

  • Mahin SA (1998) Lessons from damage to steel buildings during the Northridge earthquake. Eng Struct 20(4–6):261–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallat S (1999) A wavelet tour of signal processing, 2nd edn. Academic press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna FT (1997) Object oriented finite element programming frameworks for analysis, algorithms and parallel computings. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA

  • Medina RA, Krawinkler H (2003) Seismic demands for nondeteriorating frame structures and their dependence on ground motions. Tech. Rep. No. 144, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA

  • Moaveni B, He X, Conte JP, Restrepo JI, Panagiotou M (2011) System identification study of a 7-story full-scale building slice tested on the UCSD-NEES shake table. J Struct Eng 137(6):705–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morlet J, Arens G, Fourgeau E, Glard D (1982) Wave propagation and sampling theory–part I: complex signal and scattering in multilayered media. Geophysics 47(2):203–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair KK, Kiremidjian AS (2007) Damage diagnosis algorithms for wireless structural health monitoring. Tech. Rep. No. 165, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA

  • Nair KK, Kiremidjian AS (2009) Derivation of a damage sensitive feature using the Haar wavelet transform. J Appl Mech 76(6):061015-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakashima M, Ji X, Lignos DG (2010) Roles of large-scale shaking table testing for verification of advanced technologies on structural control and monitoring. In: Proceedings of the 5th world conference on structural control and monitoring (5WCSCM), Tokyo, Japan, p 002

  • NIST (2010) Evaluation of the FEMA P-695 methodology for quantification of building seismic performance factors. Tech. Rep. No. NIST GCR 10-917-8, prepared by the NEHRP Consultants Joint Venture for the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD

  • Noh HY, Nair KK, Lignos DG, Kiremidjian AS (2011) Use of wavelet-based damage-sensitive features for structural damage diagnosis using strong motion data. J Struct Eng 137(10):1215–1228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noh HY, Lignos DG, Nair KK, Kiremidjian AS (2012) Development of fragility functions as a damage classification/prediction method for steel moment-resisting frames using a wavelet-based damage sensitive feature. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 41(4):681–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okazaki T, Lignos DG, Hikino T, Kajiwara K (2013a) Dynamic response of a chevron concentrically braced frame. J Struct Eng 139(4):515–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okazaki T, Lignos DG, Midorikawa M, Ricles JM, Love J (2013b) Damage to steel buildings observed after the 2011 TohokuOki earthquake. Earthq Spectra 29(S1):S219–S243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overschee PV, Moor BD (1994) N4SID: subspace algorithms for the identification of combined deterministic-stochastic systems. Automatica 30(1):75–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozcelik O, Luco JE, Conte JP, Trombetti TL, Restrepo JI (2008) Experimental characterization, modeling and identification of the NEES-UCSD shake table mechanical system. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 37(2):243–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pakzad SN, Fenves GL (2009) Statistical analysis of vibration modes of a suspension bridge using spatially dense wireless sensor network. J Struct Eng 135(7):863–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PEER/ATC (2010) Modeling and acceptance criteria for seismic design and analysis of tall buildings. Tech. Rep. No. PEER/ATC 72-1, prepared by Applied Technology Council for Pacific Earthquake Engineering Center, Redwood City, CA

  • Peeters B, Ventura CE (2003) Comparative study of modal analysis techniques for bridge dynamic characteristics. Mech Syst Signal Process 17(5):965–988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers JE, Çelebi M (2006) Seismic response and damage detection analyses of an instrumented steel moment-framed building. J Struct Eng 132(10):1543–1552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saito T, Beck JL (2010) Bayesian model selection for ARX models and its application to structural health monitoring. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 39(15):1737–1759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen AD, Roeder CW, Berman JW, Lehman DE, Li CH, Wu AC, Tsai KC (2016) Experimental investigation of chevron concentrically braced frames with yielding beams. J Struct Eng 142(12):04016123-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shih C, Tsuei Y, Allemang R, Brown D (1988) Complex mode indication function and its applications to spatial domain parameter estimation. Mech Syst Signal Process 2(4):367–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solís M, Algaba M, Galvín P (2013) Continuous wavelet analysis of mode shapes differences for damage detection. Mech Syst Signal Process 40:645–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suita K, Yamada S, Tada M, Kasai K, Matsuoka Y, Shimada Y (2008) Collapse experiment of 4-story steel moment frame: part 2 detail of collapse behavior. In: Proceedings of the 14th world conference on earthquake engineering (14WCEE), Beijing, China, p 011

  • Tremblay R (2002) Inelastic seismic response of steel bracing members. J Constr Steel Res 58(5–8):665–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay R, Filiatrault A, Bruneau M, Nakashima M, Prion HGL, DeVall R (1996) Seismic design of steel buildings: lessons from the 1995 Hyogo-ken Nanbu earthquake. Can J Civ Eng 23(3):727–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uang CM, Yu QS, Sadre A, Bonowitz D, Youssef N, Vinkler J (1997) Seismic response of an instrumented 13-story steel frame building damaged in the 1994 Northridge earthquake. Earthq Spectra 13(1):131–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uriz P (2005) Towards earthquake resistant design of concentrically braced steel structures. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA

  • Yuen KV, Au SK, Beck JL (2004) Two-stage structural health monitoring approach for phase I benchmark studies. J Eng Mech 130(1):16–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is based on work supported by the Fonds de recherché du Québec - Nature et technologies, Projet de Recherché en Equipe, Award No. FQRNT 2013-PR-167747. Financial support was also provided by the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne (EPFL). The financial support is gratefully acknowledged. The authors also thank Dr. Ahmed Elkady for sharing his nonlinear building model of the 8-story steel moment-resisting frame. The authors also thank Dr. Tsuyoshi Hikino and Prof. Masayoshi Nakashima for providing the experimental data of the two structures tested at the E-Defense facility administered by the National Research Institute for Earth Science and Earthquake Mitigation (NIED). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dimitrios G. Lignos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hwang, SH., Lignos, D.G. Assessment of structural damage detection methods for steel structures using full-scale experimental data and nonlinear analysis. Bull Earthquake Eng 16, 2971–2999 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0288-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0288-2

Keywords

Navigation