Skip to main content
Log in

Seismic fragility analysis of large unanchored steel tanks considering local instability and fatigue damage

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When unanchored steel liquid storage tanks are subjected to strong ground motions, the contained liquid may cause uplift of the tank base resulting in compressive buckling of the tank shell and or ultra low-cycle fatigue (ULCF) damage to the shell-to-base welded connections. This paper presents a method for investigating the shell buckling and connection ULCF vulnerability for unanchored steel tank geometries using simplified mass-spring models and incremental dynamic analysis. The presented simplified mass-spring models simulate resistance to local base uplift, tank rocking, and provide equilibrium-based approaches for determining tank shell compressive forces resulting from dynamic earthquake loadings. In this study, four existing tanks (considering both broad and slender geometries) are analyzed under 20 recorded ground motions, scaled at 30 different levels (from 0.05 to 1.5 g) for a total of 2400 dynamic analyses. Results from the incremental dynamic analyses are used to create fragility curves, wherein shell buckling and connection ULCF probabilities are related to the level of seismic excitation. Results from the analyses on the four existing tank geometries highlight shell buckling vulnerabilities for both broad and slender tank geometries under moderate seismic excitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahari MN, Eshghi S, Ashtiany MG (2009) The tapered beam model for bottom plate uplift analysis of unanchored cylindrical steel storage tanks. Eng Struct 31(2009):623–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ALA (2001) Seismic fragility formulations for water systems: part 1—guidelines. American Lifeline Allainces, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker JW (2015) Efficient analytical fragility function fitting using dynamic structural analysis. Earthq Spectra 31(1):579–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clough DP (1977) Experimental evaluation of seismic design methods for broad cylinder tanks. EERC 77/10. Earthquake Engineering Research Centre (EERC)

  • Clough DP, Clough RW (1978) Earthquake simulator studies of cylindrical tanks. Nucl Eng Des 46(2):367–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clough RN, Niwa A (1979) Static tilt tests of tall cylindrical liquid storage tanks. EERC 79/06. Earthquake Engineering Research Centre (EERC)

  • Cortes G, Nussbaumer A (2010) Seismic behavior of shell-to-base connections in large storage tanks. Rapport de mandat No. IC 495-1. Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland

  • EC8-1 (2014) Eurocode 8 Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. ENV 1998-1. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium

  • EC8-4 (1998) Eurocode 8 Part 4: Silos, Tanks, and Pipelines. ENV 1998-4. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium

  • FEMA (2003) Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology—earthquake model. HAZUS MR4 technical manual, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC

  • Fujikazu S, Akira I, Hajime H, Yukio M (1988) Experimental study on uplifting behavior of flat-based liquid storage tanks without anchors. In: Proceedings of the 9th world conference on earthquake engineering. Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan, pp 649–654

  • Haroun MA (1983) Behaviour of unanchored oil storage tanks: imperial valley earthquake. J Tech Top Civ Eng 109(1):23–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Haroun MA, Housner GW (1981) Seismic design of liquid storage tanks. In: Proceedings of the journal of technical councils, ASCE, vol 107, no TC-1, pp 191–207

  • Housner GW (1963) The dynamic behavior of water tanks. Bull Seismol Soc Am 53(2):381–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen LS (1949) Impulsive hydrodynamics of fluid inside a cylindrical tank and of fluid surrounding a cylindrical pier. Bull Seismol Soc Am 39(3):189–203

    Google Scholar 

  • K-NET (2010) Japanese National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention (NIED). http://www.k-net.bosai.go.jp/

  • Malhotra PK (1995) Base uplifting analysis of flexibly supported liquid-storage tanks. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 24:1591–1607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra PK (2000) Practical nonlinear seismic analysis of tanks. Earthq Spectra 16(2):473–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra PK, Veletsos AS (1994a) Beam model for base-uplifting analysis of cylindrical tanks. J Struct Eng 120(12):3471–3488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra PK, Veletsos AS (1994b) Uplifting analysis of base plates in cylindrical tanks. J Struct Eng 120(12):3489–3505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra PK, Veletsos AS, Tang HT (1993) Seismic response of unanchored liquid storage tanks. SMiRT-12, Stuttgart, Germany. August 15–20, 1993, pp 201–212

  • Manos GC (1993) Shell buckling of unanchored model storage tanks subjected to seismic lateral loading. SMiRT-12, Stuttgart, Germany, August 15–20, 1993, pp 225–230

  • Mazzoni S, McKenna F, Scott MH, Fenves GL (2006) The open system for earthquake engineering simulation (OpenSEES) user command-language manual. PEER. University of California, Berkeley, CA. http://opensees.berkeley.edu

  • NZSEE (2009) Seismic design of storage tanks. New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering Wellington, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Rourke MJ, So P (2000) Seismic fragility curves for on-grade steel tanks. Earthq Spectra 16(4):801–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peek R, Jennings PC (1988) Simplified analysis of unanchored tanks. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 16:1073–1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PEER (2000) Strong motion database. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center, Berkeley, CA. http://peer.berkeley.edu/smcat/

  • Prinz GS, Nussbaumer A (2012) On the low-cycle fatigue capacity of unanchored steel liquid storage tank shell-to-base connections. Bull Earthq Eng 10(6):1943–1958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prinz GS, Nussbaumer A (2014) Effect of radial base-plate welds on ULCF capacity of unanchored tank connections. J Constr Steel Res 103(2014):131–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Protezione C (2010) Italian Department of Civil Protection. http://www.protezionecivile.it/

  • Psycharis IN (1982) Dynamic behavior of rocking structures allowed to uplift. Ph.D. Dissertation, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA

  • Razzaghi MS, Eshghi S (2014) Probabilistic seismic safety evaluation of precode cylindrical oil tanks. J Perform Constr Facil 29(6):04014170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shih C (1981) Failure of liquid storage tanks due to earthquake excitation. Ph.D. Thesis, California Institute of Technology, California

  • Swiss Seismological Service (2004) Seismic hazard assessment of Switzerland. Swiss Seismological Service, Zurich

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. S. Prinz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cortes, G., Prinz, G.S. Seismic fragility analysis of large unanchored steel tanks considering local instability and fatigue damage. Bull Earthquake Eng 15, 1279–1295 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9984-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9984-6

Keywords

Navigation