Skip to main content
Log in

Limit states of modern unreinforced clay brick masonry walls subjected to in-plane loading

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent research showed that the in-plane horizontal displacement capacity of unreinforced masonry (URM) walls depends on numerous factors that are not yet captured by current empirical drift capacity models; e.g., axial stress, shear span, geometry of the walls and the material used. In order to improve the performance-based assessment of URM wall buildings, future research should aim at developing numerical and mechanical models that link the global force-displacement response of URM walls to local deformation measures such as strains. This paper addresses the behaviour of modern clay brick masonry and makes first contributions to such an endeavour by the evaluation of experimental results: first, two sets of limit states are proposed that link local damage limit states to characteristic points of the global force-displacement response of the URM wall. The two sets define limit states for walls developing a shear or a flexural mechanism respectively. Second, local deformation measures deemed suitable for the characterisation of these limit states are evaluated from optical measurement data of quasi-static cyclic wall tests. These include strains, compression zone depth and the ratio of shear to flexural deformations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams DP (2001) Performance-based engineering concepts for unreinforced masonry building structures. Prog Struct Mat Eng 3(1):48–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ATC (1998) FEMA-306: evaluation of earthquake damaged concrete and masonry wall buildings. Basic Procedures Manual, Applied Technology Council (ATC), Washington

  • Benedetti A, Benedetti L (2013) Interaction of shear and flexural collapse modes in the assessment of in-plane capacity of masonry walls. In: Proceedings of the 12th Canadian masonry symposium, Vancouver, Canada

  • Benedetti A, Steli E (2008) Analytical models for shear-displacement curves of unreinforced and FRP reinforced masonry panels. Constr Build Mater 22:175–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosiljkov V, Page A, Žarnič R (2003) Performance based studies of in-plane unreinforced masonry walls. Mason Int 16(2):39–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvi GM (1999) A displacement-based approach for vulnerability evaluation of classes of buildings. J Earthq Eng 3(3):411–438

    Google Scholar 

  • CEN (2005) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance: part 3: assessment and retrofitting of buildings EN 1998-3:2005. European Committee for Standardisation, Brussels, Belgium

  • Facconi L, Plizzari G, Vecchio F (2014) Disturbed stress field model for unreinforced masonry. J Struct Eng 140(4). doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000906

  • Fehling E, Stuerz J, Emami A (2007) D 7.1a Test results on the behaviour of masonry under static (monotonic and cyclic) in plane lateral loads. Technical report of the collective research project ESECMaSE

  • Frumento S, Magenes G, Morandi P, Calvi GM (2009) Interpretation of experimental shear tests on clay brick masonry walls and evaluation of q-factors for seismic design. Technical report, IUSS PRESS, Pavia, Italy

  • Furtmüller T, Adam C (2011) Numerical modeling of the in-plane behavior of historical brick masonry walls. Acta Mech 221:65–77. doi:10.1007/s00707-011-0493-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganz HR, Thürlimann B (1984) Versuche an Mauerwerksscheiben unter Normalkraft und Querkraft. Test report 7502-4, ETH Zürich, Switzerland (in German)

  • Grünthal G (ed.), Musson R, Schwarz J, Stucchi M (1998) European Macroseismic Scale 1998, Cahiers de Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Seismologie, vol 15, Luxembourg

  • Heyman J (1992) Leaning towers. Meccanica 27:153–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagomarsino S, Giovinazzi S (2006) Macroseismic and mechanical models for the vulnerability and damage assessment of current buildings. Bull Earthq Eng 4:415–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagomarsino S, Penna A, Galasco A, Cattari S (2013) TREMURI program: an equivalent frame model for the nonlinear seismic analysis of masonry buildings. J Eng Struct 56:1787–1799. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang K (2002) Seismic vulnerability of existing buildings. PhD Thesis, ETH Zürich, Switzerland

  • Lourenço PB (1996) Computation strategies for masonry structures. PhD Thesis, TU Delft, Netherlands

  • Lourenço PB, Rots JG (1997) Multisurface interface model for analysis of masonry structures. J Eng Mech 123(7):660–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magenes G, Morandi P, Penna A (2008) D 7.1c Test results on the behaviour of masonry under static cyclic in plane lateral loads. Technical report of the collective research project ESECMaSE

  • Mann W, Müller H (1982) Failure of shear-stressed masonry: an enlarged theory, tests and application to shear walls. In: Proceedings British Ceramic Society, vol 30, pp 223–235

  • Penna A, Lagomarsino S, Galasco A (2014) A nonlinear macroelement model for the seismic analysis of masonry buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 43(2):159–179. doi:10.1002/eqe.2335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petry S, Beyer K (2014) Influence of boundary conditions and size effect on the drift capacity of URM walls. Eng Struct 65:76–88. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.01.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petry S, Beyer K (2014b) Cyclic test data of six unreinforced masonry walls with different boundary conditions. Earthq spectra. doi:10.1193/101513EQS269

  • Petry S, Beyer K (2014c) Scaling unreinforced masonry for reduced-scale seismic testing. Bull Earthq Eng. doi:10.1007/s10518-014-9605-1

  • Priestley MJN, Calvi GM, Kowalsky MJ (2007) Displacement-based seismic design of structures. IUSS Press, Pavia

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfyl-Lang K, Braune F, Lestuzzi P (2011) SIA D 0237: Evaluation de la sécurité parasismique des bâtiments en maçonnerie. Documentation SIA D 0237 (in French). Swiss society of engineers and architects (SIA), Zürich, Switzerland

  • Tomaževič M (2007) Damage as a measure for earthquake-resistant design of masonry structures: Slovenian experience. Can J Civ Eng 34(11):1403–1412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S, Petry S, Beyer K (2014) Investigating the in-plane mechanical behavior of URM piers via DSFM. In: Second European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology, Istanbul, Turkey

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the three reviewers for the helpful comments, Morandi Frères SA for the donation of the bricks and the staff of the structural engineering laboratory at EPFL for the support during testing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Beyer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Petry, S., Beyer, K. Limit states of modern unreinforced clay brick masonry walls subjected to in-plane loading. Bull Earthquake Eng 13, 1073–1095 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9695-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9695-9

Keywords

Navigation