Skip to main content
Log in

Antitumor Activity of Rat Mesenchymal Stem Cells during Direct or Indirect Co-Culturing with C6 Glioma Cells

  • CELL TECHNOLOGIES IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
  • Published:
Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine Aims and scope

The tumor-suppressive effect of rat mesenchymal stem cells against low-differentiated rat C6 glioma cells during their direct and indirect co-culturing and during culturing of C6 glioma cells in the medium conditioned by mesenchymal stem cells was studied in an in vitro experiment. The most pronounced antitumor activity of mesenchymal stem cells was observed during direct co-culturing with C6 glioma cells. The number of live C6 glioma cells during indirect co-culturing and during culturing in conditioned medium was slightly higher than during direct co-culturing, but significantly differed from the control (C6 glioma cells cultured in medium conditioned by C6 glioma cells). The cytotoxic effect of medium conditioned by mesenchymal stem cells was not related to medium depletion by glioma cells during their growth. The medium conditioned by other “non-stem” cells (rat astrocytes and fibroblasts) produced no tumor-suppressive effect. Rat mesenchymal stem cells, similar to rat C6 glioma cells express connexin 43, the main astroglial gap junction protein. During co-culturing, mesenchymal stem cells and glioma C6 cells formed functionally active gap junctions. Gap junction blockade with connexon inhibitor carbenoxolone attenuated the antitumor effect observed during direct co-culturing of C6 glioma cells and mesenchymal stem cells to the level produced by conditioned medium. Cell–cell signaling mediated by gap junctions can be a mechanism of the tumor-suppressive effect of mesenchymal stem cells against C6 glioma cells. This phenomenon can be used for the development of new methods of cell therapy for high-grade malignant gliomas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. N. Gabashvili, V. P. Baklaushev, N. F. Grinenko, et al., Bull. Exp. Biol. Med., 159, No. 1, 173-179 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. G. M. Yusubalieva, V. P. Baklaushev, O. I. Gurina, et al., Bull. Exp. Biol. Med., 157, No. 4, 510-515 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. K. S. Aboody, A. Brown, N. G. Rainov, et al., Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 97, No. 23, 12,846-12,851 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. V. P. Baklaushev, N. F. Grinenko, E. A. Savchenko, et al., Bull. Exp. Biol. Med., 152, No. 4, 497-503 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. V. Barresi, N. Belluardo, S. Sipione, et al., Cancer Gene Ther., 10, No. 5, 396-402 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. R. Caltabiano, A. Torrisi, D. Condorelli, et al., Acta Histochem., 112, No. 6, 529-535 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. S. R. Chirasani, A. Sternjak, P. Wend, et al., Brain, No. 133, Pt 7, 1961-1972 (2010).

  8. R. Glass, M. Synowitz, G. Kronenberg, et al., J. Neurosci., 25, No. 10, 2637-2646 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Gnecchi and L. G. Melo, Methods Mol. Biol., 482, 281-294 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. J. C. Herve, N. Bourmeyster, D. Sarrouilhe, and H. S. Duffy, Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol., 94, Nos. 1-2, 29-65 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. B. E. Huber, E. A. Austin, C. A. Richards, et al., Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 91, No. 17, 8302-8306 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Ilkanizadeh, J. Lau, M. Huang, et al., Adv. Cancer Res., 121, No. 7, 1-65 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. P. Kovarikova, E. Michalova, L. Knopfova, and P. Bouchal, Klin. Onkol., 27, Suppl 1, S22-S27 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. L. Kucerova, J. Zmajkovic, L. Toro, et al., Cancer Microenviron., 8, No. 1, 1-14 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. J. H. Lin, T. Takano, M. L. Cotrina, et al., J. Neurosci., 22, No. 11, 4302-4311 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. H. Mohammadpour and A. K. Majidzadeh, Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Ther., 12, No. 2, 238-243 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. T. Mosmann, J. Immunol. Methods, 65, Nos. 1-2, 55-63 (1983).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. R. Oliveira, C. Christov, J. S. Guillamo, et al., BMC Cell Biol., 6, No. 1, 7 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. S. Sathornsumetee and J. N. Rich, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., No. 1142, 108-132 (2008).

  20. C. Schichor, V. Albrecht, B. Korte, et al., Exp. Neurol., 234, No. 1, 208-219 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. S. Ströjby, S. Eberstal, A. Svensson, et al., J. Neuroimmunol., 274, Nos. 1-2, 240-243 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. B. Thaci, A. U. Ahmed, I. V. Ulasov, et al., Cancer Gene Ther., 19, No. 6, 431-442 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. M. A. Tyler, I. V. Ulasov, A. M. Sonabend, et al., Gene Ther., 16, No. 2, 262-278 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. M. N. Walter, K. T. Wright, H. R. Fulur, et al., Exp. Cell Res., 316, No. 7, 1271-1281 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. P. Y. Wen and S. Kesari, N. Engl. J. Med. 359, No. 5, 492-507 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. G. Xu, X. D. Jiang, Y. Xu, et al., Cell Biol. Int., 33, No. 4, 466-474 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. L. Xue, J. Wang, W. Wang, et al., Cell Biochem. Biophys., 70, No. 3, 1609-1616 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. X. H. Zhang, Y. Sun, Z. Y. Wang, et al., Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi, 34, No. 9, 788-793 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. W. Zhang, C. Nwagwu, D. M. Le, et al., J. Neurosurg., 99, No. 6, 1039-1046 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. C. Yang, D. Lei, W. Ouyang, et al., Biomed. Res. Int., doi:10.1155/2014/109389 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. N. Gabashvili.

Additional information

Translated from Kletochnye Tekhnologii v Biologii i Meditsine, No. 4, pp. 207-212, October, 2015

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gabashvili, A.N., Baklaushev, V.P., Grinenko, N.F. et al. Antitumor Activity of Rat Mesenchymal Stem Cells during Direct or Indirect Co-Culturing with C6 Glioma Cells. Bull Exp Biol Med 160, 519–524 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10517-016-3211-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10517-016-3211-y

Key Words

Navigation