Skip to main content
Log in

Morphological Criteria of Cell Differentiation Stages in Experimental Hepatocarcinoma and Evaluation of Antitumor Drug Efficiency

  • Published:
Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine Aims and scope

Structural polymorphism of 5 cell differentiation stages of hepatocarcinoma-29 from ascitic fluid is detected and the morphological criteria for identification of these stages are defined on the base of optic and electron microscopy findings, cytofluorometry, and DNA cytometry. The percentage of cells at differentiation stages 4 and 5 in the tumor structure increases after hepatocarcinoma cell inoculation into the hip. Injection of a cell cycle-modulating substance to animals with tumor growth shifts the proportion of cells with various differentiation stages. The morphological criteria of 5 stages of hepatocarcinoma-29 cell differentiation can be used for prospective drug testing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. P. Bgatova, Yu. I. Borodin, V. V. Makarova, et al., Bull. Exp. Biol. Med., 157, No. 1, 89-94 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. T. S. Gerashchenko, E. V. Denisov, N. V. Litvyakov, et al., Biokhimiya, 78, No. 11, 1531-1549 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  3. V. I. Kaledin, N. A. Zhukova, V. P. Nikolin, et al., Bull. Exp. Biol. Med., 148, No. 6, 903-907 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. E. V. Ovsjanko, A. V. Efremov, S. V. Michurina, et al., Bull. Exp. Biol. Med., 148, No. 3, 447-451 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. L. V. Omel’yachuk, V. F. Semeshin, A. L. Alekseeva, et al., Tsitologiya, 52, No. 4, 349-353 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  6. I. N. Tyuryaeva, N. A. Filatova, Yu. M. Rozanov, et al., Tsitologiya, 52, No. 10, 817-826 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  7. F. Colombo, F. Baldan, S. Mazzucchelli, et al., PLoS One, 6, No. 6, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021369 (2011).

  8. R. A. Gatenby, A. S. Silva, R. J. Gillies, and B. R. Frieden, Cancer Res., 69, No. 11, 4894-4903 (2009).

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. A. P. Kusumbe and S. A. Bapat, Cancer Res., 69, No. 24, 9245-9253 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. N. D. Marjanovic, R. A. Weinberg, and C. L. Chaffer, Clin. Chem., 59, No. 1, 168-179 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. C. E. Meacham and S. J. Morrison, Nature, 501, 328-337 (2013).

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. E. M. Rasch, C. E. Lee, and G. A. Wyngaard, Genome, 47, No. 3, 559-564 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Y. Shen and D. Cao, Front. Biosci., 4E, No. 3, 1157-169 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M. A. Walasek, L. Bystrykh, V. van den Bloom, et al., Blood, 119, No. 13, 3050-3059 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Q. Zhu, J. Yang, S. Han, et al., Prostate, 71, No. 8, 835-845 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. P. Bgatova.

Additional information

Translated from Byulleten’ Eksperimental’noi Biologii i Meditsiny, Vol. 160, No. 7, pp. 126-132, July, 2015

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bgatova, N.P., Omel’yanchuk, L.V., Pozhidaeva, A.A. et al. Morphological Criteria of Cell Differentiation Stages in Experimental Hepatocarcinoma and Evaluation of Antitumor Drug Efficiency. Bull Exp Biol Med 160, 109–114 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10517-015-3110-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10517-015-3110-7

Key Words

Navigation