Skip to main content
Log in

Recursive Ontology: A Systemic Theory of Reality

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Axiomathes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article introduces recursive ontology, a general ontology which aims to describe how being is organized and what are the processes that drive it. In order to answer those questions, I use a multidisciplinary approach that combines the theory of levels, philosophy and systems theory. The main claim of recursive ontology is that being is the product of a single recursive process of generation that builds up all of reality in a hierarchical fashion from fundamental physical particles to human societies. To support this assumption, I provide the general laws and the basic principles of recursive ontology as well as a semi-formalised model of the theory based on a recursive generative grammar. Recursive ontology not only actively promotes a multidisciplinary investigation of reality, but also can be used as a general framework to develop future domain-specific theories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahl V, Allen TF (1996) Hierarchy theory: a vision, vocabulary and epistemology. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen TF, Starr TB (1982) Hierarchy: perspectives for ecological complexity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin D (1969) The theory of integrative levels reconsidered as the basis of a general classification: classification and information control/Classification Research Group. Library Association, London, pp 81–95

  • Backlund A (2000) The definition of system. Kybernetes 29(4):444–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown R, Glazebrook JF, Baianu IC (2007) A conceptual construction of complexity levels theory in spacetime categorical ontology: non-abelian algebraic topology, many-valued logics and dynamic systems. Axiomathes 17(3–4):409–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capra F (1996) The web of life: a new scientific understanding of living systems. Random House LLC, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky N (1956) Three models for the description of language. IRE Trans Inform Theory 2(3):113–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky N (1991) Linguistics and cognitive science: problems and mysteries. In: Kasher A (ed) The Chomskyan turn. Blackwell, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky N (2002) Syntactic structures. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Corballis MC (2007) Recursion, language, and starlings. Cogn Sci 31(4):697–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corballis MC (2011) The recursive mind: the origins of human language, thought, and civilization. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (1999) The extended phenotype: the long reach of the gene. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (2006) The selfish gene. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans N, Stephen CL (2009) The myth of language universals: language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behav Brain Sci 32(5):429–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everett DL (2009) Pirahã culture and grammar: a response to some criticisms. Language 85(2):405–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feibleman JK (1954) Theory of integrative levels. Br J Philos Sci 5(17):59–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitch WT (2010) Three meanings of ‘recursion’: key distinctions for biolinguistics. In: Larson RK, Deprez V, Yamakido H (eds) The evolution of human language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fodor JA (1983) The modularity of mind: an essay on faculty psychology. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossmann R (1983) The categorial structure of the world. Indiana University Press, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann N (2012) New ways of ontology. Transaction Publishers, Piscataway

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser MD, Chomsky N, Fitch WT (2002) The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298(5598):1569–1579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter DR (1980) Goedel, Escher, Bach: an eternal golden braid. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jan SB (2007) The memetics of music: a neo-Darwinian view of musical structure and culture. Ashgate Publishing, Farnham

    Google Scholar 

  • Korn J (2007) Systems view, emergence and complexity. Kybernetes 36(5/6):776–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koschmann T (2010) On the universality of recursion. Lingua 120(12):2691–2694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (1995) Social systems. Stanford University Press, Redwood

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot BB (1983) The fractal geometry of nature. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins MJ, Fitch WT (2014) Investigating recursion within a domain-general framework. In: Lowenthal F, Lefebvre L (eds) Language and recursion. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Minati G, Pessa E, Abram MR (eds) (2006) Systemics of emergence: research and development. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsky M (1988) Society of mind. Simon and Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolescu B (2002) Manifesto of transdisciplinarity. Suny, Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolis G, Prigogine I (1977) Self-organization in nonequilibrium systems. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Novikoff AB (1945) The concept of integrative levels and biology. Science 101(2618):209–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattee HH (ed) (1973) Hierarchy theory: the challenge of complex systems. Braziller, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker S, Jackendoff R (2005) The faculty of language: what’s special about it? Cognition 95(2):201–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poli R (1998) Levels. Axiomathes 9(1–2):197–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poli R (2001) The basic problem of the theory of levels of reality. Axiomathes 12(3):261–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poli R (2009) Two theories of levels of reality. In dialogue with Barsab Nicolescu. Transdiscipl Sci Relig 6:135–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Progogine I, Stengers I (1984) Order out of chaos: man’s new dialogue with nature. Bantam Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Salthe SN (1985) Evolving hierarchical systems: their structure and representation. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1991) The architecture of complexity. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • von Bertalanffy L (1968) General system theory: foundations, development, applications. Braziller, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valerio Velardo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Velardo, V. Recursive Ontology: A Systemic Theory of Reality. Axiomathes 26, 89–114 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-015-9272-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-015-9272-0

Keywords

Navigation