Abstract
Personality variables, including sensation-seeking, interpersonal trust, avoidance of uncertainty, endorsement of social conformity, and love styles (Ludus, Eros, Pragma, Storge, Mania, and Agape), were examined as predictors of prejudicial attitudes toward individuals who practice polyamory and personal interest in engaging in consensual non-monogamy (CNM) among 1831 participants who completed anonymous surveys online. Personality characteristics were also compared between individuals who currently practice CNM (n = 67) and case-matched controls involved in monogamous relationships. As predicted, prejudicial attitudes and willingness to engage in CNM were positively and moderately correlated and there was substantial overlap in the predictors of both variables. However, the strongest predictors differed: prejudicial attitudes were best predicted, in a positive direction, by endorsement of social conformity and, to a lesser extent, Pragma love style, while willingness to engage in CNM was best predicted by the Ludus (positive) and Eros (negative) love styles. Individuals who practice monogamy and CNM were more similar than different: only two of the 12 variables tested significantly differed. CNM individuals are more ludic and more tolerant of cognitive uncertainty. Difficulty interpreting some of the results laid bare the need for relationship measures that are valid for individuals who practice CNM. Improving our understanding of the relation between personality traits and CNM may help us develop better interventions for clients who seek to transition from monogamy to CNM but struggle to adapt to the new challenges as well as design better efforts to increase acceptance and reduce discrimination against those who practice CNM.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data used in the research can be obtained at https://osf.io/94k25/?view_only=49e2a7c5418c45caba8fcff376eaeda6. The materials can be obtained by emailing: flicker@csus.edu.
Code Availability
Not applicable.
Change history
29 September 2022
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02431-3
Notes
This step deviates slightly from the plan reported in the pre-registration of the study, which states that the three love styles not included in hypotheses H1-H7 would be added in the last step of the modeling process, as exploratory analysis. However, to address H7 more concisely, it was best to include all personality variables at first in the model.
References
Allen, S. H., & Mendez, S. N. (2018). hegemonic heteronormativity: Toward a new era of queer family theory. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 10, 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12241
Aluja, A., García, Ó., & García, L. F. (2003). Psychometric properties of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman personality questionnaire (ZKPQ-III-R): A study of a shortened form. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 1083–1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00097-1
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (methodological), 57(1), 289–300.
Cohen, M. T., & Wilson, K. (2017). Development of the consensual non-monogamy attitude scale (CNAS). Sexuality & Culture, 21, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-016-9395-5
Conley, T. D., Matsick, J. L., Moors, A. C., & Ziegler, A. (2017). Investigation of consensually nonmonogamous relationships: Theories, methods, and new directions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(2), 205–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616667925
Conley, T. D., & Moors, A. C. (2014). More oxygen please!: How polyamorous relationship strategies might oxygenate marriage. Psychological Inquiry, 25(1), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2014.876908
Conley, T. D., Moors, A., Matsick, J., & Ziegler, A. (2013a). The fewer the merrier?: Assessing stigma surrounding consensually nonmonogamous romantic relationships. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 13(1), 1–30.
Conley, T. D., Ziegler, A., Moors, A. C., Matsick, J. L., & Valentine, B. (2013b). A critical examination of popular assumptions about the benefits and outcomes of monogamous relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17(2), 124–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868312467087
Costa, A. L., Sophia, E. C., Sanches, C., Tavares, H., & Zilberman, M. L. (2015). Pathological jealousy: Romantic relationship characteristics, emotional and personality aspects, and social adjustment. Journal of Affective Disorders, 174, 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2014.11.017
Feldman, S. (2003). Enforcing social conformity: A theory of authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 24(1), 41–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895x.00316
Galloway, L. F. E., (2013). Does movie viewing cultivate unrealistic expectations about love and marriage? UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. https://doi.org/10.34917/4478244
Greco, V., & Roger, D. (2001). Coping with uncertainty: The construction and validation of a new measure. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(4), 519–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(00)00156-2
Grenier, S., Barrette, A. M., & Ladouceur, R. (2005). Intolerance of uncertainty and intolerance of ambiguity: Similarities and differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 593–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.02.014
Grunt-Mejer, K., & Campbell, C. (2016). Around consensual nonmonogamies: Assessing attitudes toward nonexclusive relationships. The Journal of Sex Research, 53(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2015.1010193
Habarth, J. M. (2009). Thinking “straight”: Heteronormativity and associated outcomes across sexual orientation [ProQuest Information & Learning]. In: Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences. 69(9–A): 3777.
Haupert, M. L., Gesselman, A. N., Moors, A. C., Fisher, H. E., & Garcia, J. R. (2017). Prevalence of experiences with consensual nonmonogamous relationships: Findings from two national samples of single Americans. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 43(5), 424–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2016.1178675
Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. (1986). A Theory and method of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 392–402.
Hendrick, C., Hendrick, S., & Dicke, A. (1998). The love attitudes scale: Short form. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(2), 147–159.
Hendrick, S. S., & Hendrick, C. (1987). Love and sexual attitudes, self-disclosure and sensation seeking. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4(3), 281–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/026540758700400303
Hutzler, K. T., Giuliano, T. A., Herselman, J. R., & Johnson, S. M. (2016). Three’s a crowd: Public awareness and (MIS)perceptions of polyamory. Psychology & Sexuality, 7(2), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2015.1004102
Johnson, S., Giuliano, T., Herselman, J., & Hutzler, K. (2015). Development of a brief measure of attitudes towards polyamory. Psychology & Sexuality, 6(4), 325–339.
Klesse, C. (2006). Polyamory and its ‘Others’: Contesting the terms of non-monogamy. Sexualities, 9(5), 565–583. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460706069986
Lee, J. A. (1973). Colours of love: An exploration of the ways of loving. Toronto: New Press.
Lehmiller, J. J. (2020). Fantasies about consensual nonmonogamy among persons in monogamous romantic relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(8), 2799–2812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01788-7
Levine, E. C., Herbenick, D., Martinez, O., Tsung-Chieh, F., & Dodge, B. (2018). Open relationships, nonconsensual nonmonogamy, and monogamy among U.S. adults: findings from the 2012 national survey of sexual health and behavior. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(5), 1439–1450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1178-7
Major, B., & O’Brien, L. T. (2005). The social psychology of stigma. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 393–421. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070137
Moors, A. C., Matsick, J. L., Ziegler, A., Rubin, J. D., & Conley, T. D. (2013). Stigma toward individuals engaged in consensual nonmonogamy: Robust and worthy of additional research: Robust stigma. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 13(1), 52–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12020
Moors, A. C., Conley, T. D., Edelstein, R. S., & Chopik, W. J. (2015). Attached to monogamy? Avoidance predicts willingness to engage (but not actual engagement) in consensual non-monogamy. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32(2), 222–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407514529065
Moors, A., Selterman, D., & Conley, T. (2017). Personality correlates of desire to engage in consensual non-monogamy among lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals. Journal of Bisexuality, 17(4), 418–434.
Moors, A. C. (2017). Has the american public’s interest in information related to relationships beyond “The Couple” increased over time? The Journal of Sex Research, 54(6), 677–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1178208
Ritchie, A., & Barker, M. (2006). ‘There aren’t words for what we do or how we feel so we have to make them up’: Constructing polyamorous languages in a culture of compulsory monogamy. Sexualities, 9(5), 584–601. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460706069987
Rubin, J. D., Moors, A. C., Matsick, J. L., Ziegler, A., & Conley, T. D. (2014). On the margins considering diversity among consensually non-monogamous relationships [Special Issue on Polyamory]. Journal für Psychologie., 22(1), 19–37.
Schechinger, H., Sakaluk, J. K., & Moors, A. C. (2018). Harmful and helpful therapy practices with consensually non-monogamous clients: Toward an inclusive framework. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 86(11), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000349
Séguin, L. J., Blais, M., Goyer, M.-F., Adam, B. D., Lavoie, F., Rodrigue, C., & Magontier, C. (2017). Examining relationship quality across three types of relationship agreements. Sexualities, 20(1–2), 86–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460716649337
Sizemore, K. M., & Olmstead, S. B. (2017). A systematic review of research on attitudes towards and willingness to engage in consensual non-monogamy among emerging adults: Methodological issues considered. Psychology & Sexuality, 8(1/2), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2017.1319407
Sommers, R., & Burke, S. (2021). Reducing prejudice through law: Evidence from experimental psychology. U of Michigan Public Law Research Paper No. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3864515
Vaughan, M. D., & Flicker, S. M. (2021). An Exploratory Analysis of Demographic Differences in Experiences of Compersion [Conference presentation] APA Convention 2021, virtual.
Vaughan, M. D., Jones, P., Taylor, B. A., & Roush, J. (2019). Healthcare experiences and needs of consensually non-monogamous people: Results from a focus group study. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 16(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.11.006
Yamagishi, T., & Yamagishi, M. (1994). Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18(2), 129–166.
Funding
The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The second author conducted all analyses and wrote the results section. The first author completed all other work on the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (Exempt due to less than minimal risk and anonymous surveys; IRB approval numbers: flicker@csus.edu 19–20-3) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Human and Animal Rights
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original version of this article was revised: Placeholders in the form “[Blinded]” erroneously appeared in the Data Analytic Plan and Data Availability sections in this article as originally published.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Flicker, S.M., Sancier-Barbosa, F. Personality Predictors of Prejudicial Attitudes, Willingness to Engage, and Actual Engagement in Consensual Non-Monogamy. Arch Sex Behav 51, 3947–3961 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02393-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02393-6