Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sexual Selection and the Evolution of Human Appearance Enhancements

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arnocky, S., Carré, J. M., Bird, B. M., Moreau, B. J., Vaillancourt, T., Ortiz, T., & Marley, N. (2018). The facial width-to-height ratio predicts sex drive, sociosexuality, and intended infidelity. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47, 1375–1385.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, N. (2001). Mustache fashion covaries with a good marriage market for women. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 25, 261–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, K. R., Dixson, B. J., O’Dean, S. M., & Denson, T. F. (2016). Standardized protocols for characterizing women’s fertility: A data-driven approach. Hormones and Behavior, 81, 74–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boothroyd, L. G., Jones, B. C., Burt, D. M., DeBruine, L. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2008). Facial correlates of sociosexuality. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 211–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R. C., Jordan, A. L., Shelly, J., & Dixson, B. J. (2015). The multivariate evolution of female body shape in an artificial digital ecosystem. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36, 351–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R., Scott, I. M., Maklakov, A. A., Kasumovic, M. M., Clark, A. P., & Penton-Voak, I. S. (2011). National income inequality predicts women’s preferences for masculinized faces better than health does. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278, 810–812.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R., Shelly, J. P., Fan, J., Zhai, L., & Chau, D. K. P. (2010). Much more than a ratio: Multivariate selection on female bodies. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 23, 2238–2248.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caro, T. M. (1987). Human breasts: Unsupported hypotheses reviewed. Human Evolution, 2, 271–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashdan, E. (2008). Waist-to-hip ratio across cultures: Trade-offs between androgen-and estrogen-dependent traits. Current Anthropology, 49, 1099–1107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, T. R., Sidari, M. J., Sains, R., Alexander, M., Harrison, M., Mefodeva, V., Pearson, S., Lee, A. J., & Dixson, B. J. W. (2020). A multivariate analysis of women’s mating strategies and sexual selection on men’s facial morphology. Royal Society Open Science, 7. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191209.

  • Craig, B. M., Nelson, N. L., & Dixson, B. J. W. (2019). Sexual selection, agonistic signalling, and the effect of beards on men’s anger displays. Psychological Science, 30, 728–738.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A. C., & Arnocky, S. (2020). An evolutionary perspective on appearance enhancement behavior. Archives of Sexual Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01745-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • DeBruine, L. M. (2014). Women’s preferences for male facial features. In Evolutionary perspectives on human sexual psychology and behavior (pp. 261–275). New York: Springer.

  • DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Crawford, J. R., Welling, L. L. M., & Little, A. C. (2010). The health of a nation predicts their mate preferences: cross-cultural variation in women’s preferences for masculinized male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 277, 2405–2410.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBruine, L. M., Little, A., & Jones, B. C. (2012). Extending parasite-stress theory to variation in human mate preferences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 86–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, A., Dixson, B., & Anderson, M. (2005). Sexual selection and the evolution of visually conspicuous sexually dimorphic traits in male monkeys, apes, and human beings. Annual Review of Sex Research, 16, 1–19.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, B. J. W. (2018). Is male facial width-to-height ratio the target of sexual selection? [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47, 827–828.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, B. J. W. (2019). Sexual selection and extended phenotypes in humans. (2019). Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 5, 103–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, B. J., Blake, K. R., Denson, T. F., Gooda-Vossos, A., O’Dean, S. M., Sulikowski, D., & Brooks, R. C. (2018a). The role of mating context and fecundability in women’s preferences for men’s facial masculinity and beardedness. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 93, 90–102.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, B. J., & Brooks, R. C. (2013). The role of facial hair in women’s perceptions of men’s attractiveness, health, masculinity and parenting abilities. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34, 236–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, B. J., Dixson, A. F., Bishop, P. J., & Parish, A. (2010a). Human physique and sexual attractiveness in men and women: A New Zealand–U.S. comparative study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 798–806.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, B. J., Duncan, M., & Dixson, A. F. (2015). The role of breast size and areolar pigmentation in perceptions of women’s sexual attractiveness, reproductive health, sexual maturity, maternal nurturing abilities, and age. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 1685–1695.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, B. J., Dixson, A. F., Li, B., & Anderson, M. J. (2007a). Studies of human physique and sexual attractiveness: Sexual preferences of men and women in China. American Journal of Human Biology, 19, 88–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, B. J., Dixson, A. F., Morgan, B., & Anderson, M. J. (2007b). Human physique and sexual attractiveness: Sexual preferences of men and women in Bakossiland, Cameroon. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 369–375.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, B. J., Grimshaw, G. M., Linklater, W. L., & Dixson, A. F. (2011a). Eye-tracking of men’s preferences for waist-to-hip ratio and breast size of women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 43–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, B. J., Grimshaw, G. M., Ormsby, D. K., & Dixson, A. F. (2014). Eye-tracking women’s preferences for men’s somatotypes. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 73–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, B. J., Kennedy-Costantini, S., Lee, A. J., & Nelson, N. L. (2019a). Mothers are sensitive to men’s beards as a potential cue of paternal investment. Hormones and Behavior, 113, 55–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, B. J., & Lee, A. J. (2020). Cross-cultural variation in men’s beardedness. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 6, 490–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, B. J., Lee, A. J., Blake, K. R., Jasienska, G., & Marcinkowska, U. M. (2018b). Women’s preferences for men’s beards show no relation to their ovarian cycle phase and sex hormone levels. Hormones and Behavior, 97, 137–144.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, B. J. W., Lee, A. J., Sherlock, J. M., & Talamas, S. N. (2017a). Beneath the beard: Do facial morphometrics influence the strength of judgments of men’s beardedness? Evolution and Human Behavior, 38, 164–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, B. J., Little, A. C., Dixson, H. G., & Brooks, R. C. (2017b). Do prevailing environmental factors influence human preferences for facial morphology? Behavioral Ecology, 28, 1217–1227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, B. J. W., & Rantala, M. J. (2016). The role of facial and body hair distribution in women’s judgments of men’s sexual attractiveness. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 877–889.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, B. J., Rantala, M. J., & Brooks, R. C. (2019b). Cross-cultural variation in women’s preferences for men’s body hair. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 5, 131–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, B. J. W., Rantala, M. J., Melo, E. F., & Brooks, R. C. (2017c). Beards and the big city: Displays of masculinity may be amplified under crowded conditions. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38, 259–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, B. J., Sagata, K., Linklater, W. L., & Dixson, A. F. (2010b). Male preferences for female waist-to-hip ratio and body mass index in the highlands of Papua New Guinea. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 141, 620–625.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, B. J. W., Sherlock, J. M., Cornwall, W., & Kasumovic, M. M. (2018c). Contest competition and men’s facial hair: Beards may not provide advantages in combat. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39, 147–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, B. J., & Vasey, P. L. (2012). Beards augment perceptions of men’s aggressiveness, dominance and age, but not attractiveness. Behavioral Ecology, 23, 481–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, B. J., Vasey, P. L., Sagata, K., Sibanda, N., Linklater, W. L., & Dixson, A. F. (2011b). Men’s preferences for women’s breast morphology in New Zealand, Samoa, and Papua New Guinea. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 1271–1279.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Docherty, C., Lee, A. J., Hahn, A. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Jones, B. C. (2020). Do more attractive women show stronger preferences for male facial masculinity? Evolution and Human Behavior, 41, 312–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekrami, O., Claes, P., Shriver, M. D., Weinberg, S. M., Marazita, M. L., Walsh, S., & Van Dongen, S. (2021). Effects of male facial masculinity on perceived attractiveness. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 7, 73–88.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fink, B., Klappauf, D., Brewer, G., & Shackelford, T. K. (2014). Female physical characteristics and intra-sexual competition in women. Personality and Individual Differences, 58, 138–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 573–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garza, R., Pazhoohi, F., & Byrd-Craven, J. (2020). Does ecological harshness influence men’s perceptions of women’s breast size, ptosis, and intermammary distance? Evolutionary Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-020-00262-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gildersleeve, K., Haselton, M. G., & Fales, M. R. (2014). Do women’s mate preferences change across the ovulatory cycle? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1205–1259.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grueter, C. C., Isler, K., & Dixson, B. J. (2015). Are badges of status adaptive in large complex primate groups? Evolution and Human Behavior, 36, 398–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouda-Vossos, A., Brooks, R. C., & Dixson, B. J. (2019). The interplay between economic status and attractiveness, and the importance of attire in mate choice judgments. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 462. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00462

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gouda-Vossos, A., Dixson, B. J., & Brooks, R. C. (2016). Sexual conflict and gender gap effects: associations between social context and sex on rated attractiveness and economic status. PLoS ONE, 11(1), e0146269. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146269

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, P. B., Craig, L. K., Paiz-Say, J., Lavika, P., Kumar, S. A., & Rangaswamy, M. (2020). Sexual selection, signaling and facial hair: US and India ratings of variable male facial hair. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 6, 170–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havlíček, J., Třebický, V., Valentova, J. V., Kleisner, K., Akoko, R. M., Fialová, J., … Varella, M. A. C. (2017). Men’s preferences for women’s breast size and shape in four cultures. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38, 217–226.

  • Janif, Z. J., Brooks, R. C., & Dixson, B. J. (2014). Negative frequency-dependent preferences and variation in male facial hair. Biology Letters, 10, 20130958. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2013.0958

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jünger, J., Motta-Mena, N. V., Cardenas, R., Bailey, D., Rosenfield, K. A., Schild, C., … Puts, D. A. (2018). Do women’s preferences for masculine voices shift across the ovulatory cycle? Hormones and Behavior, 106, 122–134.

  • Jones, A. L., & Kramer, R. S. (2016). Facial cosmetics and attractiveness: Comparing the effect sizes of professionally applied cosmetics and identity. PLoS ONE, 11(10), e0164218. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164218

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. C., Hahn, A. C., Fisher, C. I., Wang, H., Kandrik, M., Han, C., … O’Shea, K. J. (2018). No compelling evidence that preferences for facial masculinity track changes in women’s hormonal status. Psychological Science, 29, 996–1005.

  • Kokko, H., Jennions, M. D., & Brooks, R. (2006). Unifying and testing models of sexual selection. Annual Reviews in Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 37, 43–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kościński, K. (2019). Breast firmness is of greater importance for women’s attractiveness than breast size. American Journal of Human Biology, 31, e23287. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.23287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kościński, K., Makarewicz, R., & Bartoszewicz, Z. (2020). Stereotypical and actual associations of breast size with mating-relevant traits. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49, 821–836.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Low, B. S. (1979). Sexual selection and human ornamentation. In N. A. Chagnon & W. Irons (Eds.), Evolutionary biology and human social behavior (pp. 462–487). Duxbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luoto, S. (2019). An updated theoretical framework for human sexual selection: From ecology, genetics, and life history to extended phenotypes. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 5, 48–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcinkowska, U. M., Galbarczyk, A., & Jasienska, G. (2018). La donna è mobile? Lack of cyclical shifts in facial symmetry, and facial and body masculinity preferences—A hormone-based study. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 88, 47–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marcinkowska, U. M., Kozlov, M. V., Cai, H., Contreras-Garduño, J., Dixson, B. J., Oana, G. A., … Rantala, M. J. (2014). Cross-cultural variation in men’s preference for sexual dimorphism in women’s faces. Biology Letters, 10(4), 20130850.

  • Marcinkowska, U. M., Rantala, M. J., Lee, A. J., Kozlov, M. V., Aavik, T., Cai, H., … Dixson, B. J. W. (2019). Women’s preferences for men’s facial masculinity are strongest under favorable ecological conditions. Scientific Reports, 9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39350-8.

  • Mefodeva, V., Sidari, M. J., Chau, H., Fitzsimmons, B., Strain, G., Clarkson, T. R., Pearson, S., Lee, A. J., & Dixson, B. J. W. (2020). Multivariate intra-sexual selection on men’s perceptions of male facial morphology. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 6, 143–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mileva, V. R., Jones, A. L., Russell, R., & Little, A. C. (2016). Sex differences in the perceived dominance and prestige of women with and without cosmetics. Perception, 45, 1166–1183.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, T. L., Lee, A. J., Sidari, M. J., Stower, R. E., Sherlock, J. M., & Dixson, B. J. W. (2017). Microbes and masculinity: Does exposure to pathogenic cues alter women’s preferences for male facial masculinity and beardedness? PLoS ONE, 12(6), e0178206.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Neave, N., & Shields, K. (2008). The effects of facial hair manipulation on female perceptions of attractiveness, masculinity, and dominance in male faces. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 373–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, N. L., Kennedy-Costantini, S., Lee, A. J., & Dixson, B. J. W. (2019). Children’s judgements of facial hair are influenced by biological development and experience. Evolution and Human Behavior, 113, 55–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pazhoohi, F., & Kingstone, A. (2020). Parasite prevalence and income inequality positively predict beardedness across 25 countries. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 6, 185–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pazhoohi, F., Garza, R., & Kingstone, A. (2020a). Effects of breast size, intermammary cleft distance (cleavage) and ptosis on perceived attractiveness, health, fertility and age: Do life history, self-perceived mate value and sexism attitude play a role? Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 6, 75–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pazhoohi, F., Macedo, A. F., Doyle, J. F., & Arantes, J. (2020b). Waist-to-hip ratio as supernormal stimuli: effect of contrapposto pose and viewing angle. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49, 837–847.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pollet, T. V., Tybur, J. M., Frankenhuis, W. E., & Rickard, I. J. (2014). What can cross-cultural correlations teach us about human nature? Human Nature, 25, 410–429.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, I. M., Clark, A. P., Boothroyd, L. G., & Penton-Voak, I. S. (2013). Do men’s faces really signal heritable immunocompetence? Behavioral Ecology, 24, 579–589.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, I. M., Clark, A. P., Josephson, S. C., Boyette, A. H., Cuthill, I. C., Fried, R. L., et al. (2014). Human preferences for sexually dimorphic faces may be evolutionarily novel. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 14388–14393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherlock, J. M., Tegg, B., Sulikowski, D., & Dixson, B. J. (2017). Facial masculinity and beardedness determine men’s explicit, but not their implicit, responses to male dominance. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 3, 14–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidari, M. J., Lee, A. J., Murphy, S. C., Sherlock, J. M., Dixson, B. J. W., & Zietsch, B. P. (2021). Preferences for sexually dimorphic body characteristics revealed in a large sample of speed daters. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12, 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619882925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 293–307.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D., Dixson, B. J., Jessop, T. S., Morgan, B., & Dixson, A. F. (2010). Cross-cultural consensus for waist–hip ratio and women’s attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 176–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Štěrbová, Z., Tureček, P., & Kleisner, K. (2019). She always steps in the same river: Similarity among long-term partners in their demographic, physical, and personality characteristics. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00052

  • Stern, J., Gerlach, T. M., & Penke, L. (2020). Probing ovulatory-cycle shifts in women’s preferences for men’s behaviors. Psychological Science, 31, 424–436.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, J., Kordsmeyer, T. L., & Lars Penke, L. (2021). A longitudinal evaluation of ovulatory cycle shifts in women’s mate attraction and preferences. Hormones and Behavior, 128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2020.104916.

  • Stower, R. E., Lee, A. J., McIntosh, T. L., Sidari, M. J., Sherlock, J. M., & Dixson, B. J. (2020). Mating strategies and the masculinity paradox: How relationship context, relationship status, and sociosexuality shape women’s preferences for facial masculinity and beardedness. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49, 809–820.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sugiyama, L. S. (2004). Is beauty in the context-sensitive adaptations of the beholder? Shiwiar use of waist-to-hip ratio in assessments of female mate value. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swami, V., Caprario, C., Tovee, M. J., & Furnham, A. (2006). Female physical attractiveness in Britain and Japan: A cross-cultural study. European Journal of Personality, 20, 69–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swami, V., Neto, F., Tovee, M. J., & Furnham, A. (2007). Preferences for female body weight and shape in three European countries. European Psychologist, 12, 220–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swami, V., & Tovee, M. J. (2005). Female physical attractiveness in Britain and Malaysia: A cross-cultural study. Body Image, 2, 115–128.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swami, V., & Tovée, M. J. (2013). Resource security impacts men’s female breast size preferences. PLoS ONE, 8(3), e57623. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057623

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Swami, V., & Tovee, M. J. (2007). Perceptions of female body weight and shape among in- digenous and urban Europeans. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 48, 43–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tybur, J. M., & Gangestad, S. W. (2011). Mate preferences and infectious disease: Theoretical considerations and evidence in humans. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366, 3375–3388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentova, J. V., Varella, M., Bártová, K., Štěrbová, Z., & Dixson, B. J. W. (2017). Mate preferences and choices for facial and body hair in heterosexual women and homosexual men: Effects of sex, population, homogamy, and imprinting-like effects. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38, 241–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, K. V., Conroy-Beam, D., Buss, D. M., Asao, K., Sorokowska, A., Sorokowski, P., … Zupančič, M. (2020). Sex differences in mate preferences across 45 countries: A large-scale replication. Psychological Science, 31, 408–423.

  • Watkins, C., & Leitch, A. (2020). Using sexual selection theories to examine contextual variation in heterosexual women’s orientation toward high heels. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49, 849–860.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wetsman, A., & Marlowe, F. W. (1999). How universal are preferences for female waist-to-hip ratios? Evidence from the Hadza of Tanzania. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 219–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, D. W., & Shepard, G. H. (1998). Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Nature, 396, 321–322.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zentner, M., & Mitura, K. (2012). Stepping out of the caveman’s shadow: Nations’ gender gap predicts degree of sex differentiation in mate preferences. Psychological Science, 23, 1176–1185.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zietsch, B. P., Lee, A. J., Sherlock, J. M., & Jern, P. (2015). Variation in women’s preferences regarding male facial masculinity is better explained by genetic differences than by previously identified context-dependent effects. Psychological Science, 26, 1440–1448.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of the Sunshine Coast, Petrie, QLD, Australia

    Barnaby J. W. Dixson

  2. School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia

    Barnaby J. W. Dixson

Authors
  1. Barnaby J. W. Dixson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barnaby J. W. Dixson.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dixson, B.J.W. Sexual Selection and the Evolution of Human Appearance Enhancements. Arch Sex Behav 51, 49–55 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-01946-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-01946-5

Search

Navigation