Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Impact of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis on Sexual Communication and Sexual Behavior of Urban Gay and Bisexual Men

  • Special Section: Social and Behavioral Science with Gay and Bisexual Men in the Era of Biomedical Prevention
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has altered the public health landscape for gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBM) by significantly increasing protection against HIV infection. Early epidemiologic data showed GBM generally used PrEP as prescribed, i.e., as an additional protective tool over and above barrier protection, although subsequent reports have been equivocal. Irrespective of population-level trends, some GBM appear to have reevaluated their HIV risk tolerance and changed their interactions with sex partners. Scant published data have focused on factors that influence PrEP-using GBM’s decisions about sexual behavior—including condom use as well as sex with HIV-positive partners—and sexual communication practices. Thus, in this study, we investigated those research concerns qualitatively via content analysis of individual interviews conducted with 103 GBM in New York City (M age 32.5 years, 50% White, 64% on PrEP > 6 months). Emergent themes reflect (1) participants’ strong HIV knowledge; (2) changing GBM community norms about condom use on PrEP; (3) increased focus on risk tolerance with individual differences in post-PrEP condom use; (4) appreciation for routine sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening in PrEP care concomitant with some STI knowledge deficits; (5) decreased stigma concerning, and greater comfort with, HIV-positive sex partners; and (6) increased confidence discussing HIV status and condom use preferences with partners. Findings have implications for future research as well as for clinical practice, such as enhanced STI education and provider-initiated discussions about risk compensation, serosorting, and sexual communication skills.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abaasa, A., Hendrix, C., Gandhi, M., Anderson, P., Kamali, A., Kibengo, F., & Haberer, J. E. (2018). Utility of different adherence measures for PrEP: Patterns and incremental value. AIDS and Behavior,22, 1165–1173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-017-1951-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P. L., Glidden, D. V., Liu, A., Buchbinder, S., Lama, J. R., Guanira, J. V., & Veloso, V. G. (2012). Emtricitabine-tenofovir concentrations and pre-exposure prophylaxis efficacy in men who have sex with men. Science Translational Medicine,4(151), 151ra125.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Blumenthal, J., & Haubrich, R. (2014). Risk compensation in PrEP: An old debate emerges yet again. The Virtual Mentor,16(11), 909–915.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R. A., Kaplan, R. L., Lieber, E., Landovitz, R. J., Lee, S. J., & Leibowitz, A. A. (2011). Motivators, concerns, and barriers to adoption of pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention among gay and bisexual men in HIV-serodiscordant male relationships. AIDS Care,23(9), 1136–1145.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. K., Diclemente, R. J., & Park, T. (1992). Predictors of condom use in sexually active adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health,13(8), 651–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calabrese, S. K., & Underhill, K. (2015). How stigma surrounding the use of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis undermines prevention and pleasure: A call to destigmatize “Truvada whores”. American Journal of Public Health,105(10), 1960–1964. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302816.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Celum, C., & Baeten, J. (2012). Tenofovir-based pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention: Evidence and evolving questions. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases,25(1), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1097/QCO.0b013e32834ef5ef.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2007). HIV/AIDS Surveillance report: Cases of HIV infection and AIDS in the United States and dependent areas, 2005. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/library/reports/surveillance/cdc-hiv-surveillance-report-2005-vol-17.pdf.

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2012a). CDC statement on FDA approval of drug for HIV prevention. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/2012/fda-approvesdrugstatement.html.

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2012b). HIV Surveillance report: Diagnoses of HIV infection and AIDS in the United States and dependent areas, 2010. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/library/reports/surveillance/cdc-hiv-surveillance-report-2010-vol-22.pdf.

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016). HIV surveillance report: Diagnoses of HIV infection in the United States and dependent areas, 2015. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/library/reports/surveillance/cdc-hiv-surveillance-report-2015-vol-27.pdf.

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2017). HIV surveillance report: Diagnoses of HIV infection in the United States and dependent areas, 2016. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/library/reports/surveillance/cdc-hiv-surveillance-report-2016-vol-28.pdf.

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2018a). HIV prevention pill not reaching most Americans who could benefitEspecially people of color. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/2018/croi-2018-PrEP-press-release.html.

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2018b). Sexually transmitted disease surveillance 2017. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/std/stats17/2017-STD-Surveillance-Report_CDC-clearance-9.10.18.pdf.

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2018c). U.S. Public Health Service: Preexposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV infection in the United States2017 update: A clinical practice guideline. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/risk/prep/cdc-hiv-prep-guidelines-2017.pdf.

  • Courtenay-Quirk, C., Wolitski, R. J., Parsons, J. T., Gomez, C. A., & Seropositive Urban Men’s Study Team. (2006). Is HIV/AIDS stigma dividing the gay community? Perceptions of HIV-positive men who have sex with men. AIDS Education & Prevention,18(1), 56–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crary, D. (2014). Gay men divided over use of HIV prevention drug. Associated Press News. Retrieved from https://apnews.com/c1442585f57b421abe7cc6b0c4f96141.

  • Dimotrov, D., Mâsse, B., & Donnell, D. (2016). PrEP adherence patterns strongly affect individual HIV risk and observed efficacy in randomized clinical trials. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes,72(4), 444–451. https://doi.org/10.1097/qai.0000000000000993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnell, D., Baeten, J. M., Bumpus, N. N., Brantley, J., Bangsberg, D. R., Haberer, J. E., & Celum, C. (2014). HIV protective efficacy and correlates of tenofovir blood concentrations in a clinical trial of PrEP for HIV prevention. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes,66(3), 340–348. https://doi.org/10.1097/qai.0000000000000172.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Earl, A., & Albarracín, D. (2007). Nature, decay, and spiraling of the effects of fear-inducing arguments and HIV counseling and testing: A meta-analysis of the short- and long-term outcomes of HIV-prevention interventions. Health Psychology,26(4), 496–506.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, L. A., Kalichman, S. C., Price, D., Finneran, S., Allen, A., & Maksut, J. (2017). Stigma and conspiracy beliefs related to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and interest in using PrEP among black and white men and transgender women who have sex with men. AIDS and Behavior,21(5), 1236–1246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-017-1690-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W. A., Fisher, J. D., & Harman, J. (2003). The information–motivation-behavioral skills model: A general social psychological approach to understanding and promoting health behavior. In J. Suls & K. A. Wallston (Eds.), Social psychological foundations of health and illness (pp. 82–106). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, D. T., & Wasserheit, J. N. (1999). From epidemiological synergy to public health policy and practice: The contribution of other sexually transmitted diseases to sexual transmission of HIV infection. Sexually Transmitted Infections,75(1), 3–17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Golub, S. A. (2014). Tensions between the epidemiology and psychology of HIV risk: Implications for pre-exposure prophylaxis. AIDS and Behavior,18(9), 1686–1693.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Golub, S. A. (2018). PrEP stigma: Implicit and explicit drivers of disparity. Current HIV/AIDS Reports,15(2), 190–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11904-018-0385-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Golub, S. A., Kowalczyk, W., Weinberger, C. L., & Parsons, J. T. (2010). Preexposure prophylaxis and predicted condom use among high-risk men who have sex with men. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes,54(5), 548–555. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181e19a54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, A. M., Beougher, S. C., Chakravarty, D., Neilands, T. B., Mandic, C. G., Darbes, L. A., & Hoff, C. C. (2012). Relationship dynamics as predictors of broken agreements about outside sexual partners: Implications for HIV prevention among gay couples. AIDS and Behavior,16(6), 1584–1588.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grov, C., Cruz, J., & Parsons, J. T. (2014). Men who have sex with men’s attitudes toward using color-coded wristbands to facilitate sexual communication at sex parties. Sexuality Research and Social Policy,11(1), 11–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grov, C., D’Angelo, A. B., Flynn, A. W., Lopez-Rios, J., Pantalone, D. W., Holloway, I. W., & Parsons, J. T. (2018). How do gay and bisexual men make up for missed PrEP doses, and what impact does missing a dose have on their subsequent sexual behavior? AIDS Education and Prevention,30(4), 275–286.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Grov, C., Rendina, H. J., Moody, R. L., Ventuneac, A., & Parsons, J. T. (2015). HIV serosorting, status disclosure, and strategic positioning among highly sexually active gay and bisexual men. AIDS Patient Care and STDs,29, 559–568. https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2015.0126.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Grov, C., Rendina, H. J., Whitfield, T. H. F., Ventuneac, A., & Parsons, J. T. (2016). Changes in familiarity with and willingness to take PrEP: Results from a longitudinal study of gay and bisexual men. LGBT Health,3, 252–257. https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2015.0123.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Harawa, N. T., Holloway, I. W., Leibowitz, A., Weiss, R., Gildner, J., Landovitz, R. J., & Shoptaw, S. (2017). Serious concerns regarding a meta-analysis of preexposure prophylaxis use and STI acquisition. AIDS,31(5), 739–740.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., & Williams, E. N. (1997). A guide to conducting consensual qualitative research. The Counseling Psychologist,25(4), 517–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoff, C. C., & Beougher, S. C. (2010). Sexual agreements among gay male couples. Archives of Sexual Behavior,39(3), 774–787.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hojilla, J. C., Koester, K. A., Cohen, S. E., Buchbinder, S., Ladzekpo, D., Matheson, T., & Liu, A. Y. (2016). Sexual behavior, risk compensation, and HIV prevention strategies among participants in the San Francisco PrEP demonstration project: A qualitative analysis of counseling notes. AIDS and Behavior,20(7), 1461–1469.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, I. W., Winder, T. J., Lea, C. H., III, Tan, D., Boyd, D., & Novak, D. (2017). Technology use and preferences for mobile phone-based HIV prevention and treatment among black young men who have sex with men: Exploratory research. JMIR mHealth and uHealth,5(4), e46. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.6436.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, M., Murphy, D. A., Callander, D., Ellard, J., Rosengarten, M., Kippax, S. C., & de Wit, J. B. (2012). Willingness to use HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis and the likelihood of decreased condom use are both associated with unprotected anal intercourse and the perceived likelihood of becoming HIV positive among Australian gay and bisexual men. Sexually Transmitted Infections,88(4), 258–263.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research,15(9), 1277–1288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, D. C., & O’Connell, R. J. (2017). Progress in HIV vaccine development. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics,13(5), 1018–1030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janz, N. K., & Becker, M. H. (1984). The health belief model: A decade later. Health Education Quarterly,11(1), 1–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jenness, S. M., Weiss, K., Goodreau, S. M., Gift, T., Chesson, H., Hoover, K. W., Smith, D. K., Sullivan, P., & Rosenberg, E. (2017). STI incidence among MSM following HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis: A modeling study. Poster presented at the Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, Seattle, WA.

  • Kelly, P. W. (2018). The end of safe gay sex? New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/26/opinion/gay-men-sex-condoms.html.

  • Kippax, S., Noble, J., Prestage, G., Crawford, J. M., Campbell, D., Baxter, D., & Cooper, D. (1997). Sexual negotiation in the AIDS era: Negotiated safety revisited. AIDS,11(2), 191–197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knox, D. C., Anderson, P. L., Harrigan, P. R., & Tan, D. H. (2017). Multidrug-resistant HIV-1 infection despite preexposure prophylaxis. New England Journal of Medicine,376(5), 501–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koester, K. A., Erguera, X. A., Kang Dufour, M. S., Udoh, I., Burack, J. H., Grant, R. M., & Myers, J. J. (2018). “Losing the phobia:” Understanding how HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis facilitates bridging the serodivide among men who have sex with men. Frontiers in Public Health,6, 250. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00250.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kojima, N., Davey, D. J., & Klausner, J. D. (2016). Pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV infection and new sexually transmitted infections among men who have sex with men. AIDS,30(14), 2251–2252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, A., Cohen, S., Follansbee, S., Cohan, D., Weber, S., Sachdev, D., & Buchbinder, S. (2014). Early experiences implementing pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention in San Francisco. PLoS Medicine,11(3), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, J. L., Glidden, D. V., Mayer, K. H., Liu, A. Y., Buchbinder, S. P., Amico, K. R., & Grant, R. M. (2013). No evidence of sexual risk compensation in the iPrEx trial of daily oral HIV preexposure prophylaxis. PLoS ONE,8(12), e81997. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081997

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. W., Harvey, S. M., Champeau, D., & Seal, D. W. (2012). Relationship factors associated with HIV risk among a sample of gay male couples. AIDS and Behavior,16(2), 404–411.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Molina, J. M., Capitant, C., Spire, B., Pialoux, G., Cotte, L., Charreau, I., & Raffi, F. (2015). On-demand preexposure prophylaxis in men at high risk for HIV-1 infection. New England Journal of Medicine,373(23), 2237–2246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mustanski, B., DuBois, L. Z., Prescott, T. L., & Ybarra, M. L. (2014). A mixed-methods study of condom use and decision-making among adolescent gay and bisexual males. AIDS and Behavior,18(10), 1955–1969.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Newcomb, M. E., Mongrella, M. C., Weis, B., McMillen, S. J., & Mustanski, B. (2016). Partner disclosure of PrEP use and undetectable viral load on geosocial networking apps: Frequency of disclosure and decisions about condomless sex. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes,71(2), 200–206. https://doi.org/10.1097/qai.0000000000000819.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Newcomb, M. E., Moran, K., Feinstein, B. A., Forscher, E., & Mustanski, B. (2018). Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) use and condomless anal sex: Evidence of risk compensation in a cohort of young men who have sex with men. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes,77(4), 358–364. https://doi.org/10.1097/qai.0000000000001604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Noar, S. M., Carlyle, K., & Cole, C. (2006). Why communication is crucial: Meta-analysis of the relationship between safer sexual communication and condom use. Journal of Health Communication,11(4), 365–390.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oldenburg, C. E., Nunn, A. S., Montgomery, M., Almonte, A., Mena, L., Patel, R. R., & Chan, P. A. (2018). Behavioral changes following uptake of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men in a clinical setting. AIDS and Behavior,22(4), 1075–1079. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-017-1701-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pantalone, D. W., Puckett, J. A., & Gunn, H. A. (2016). Psychosocial factors and HIV prevention for gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men. Social and Personality Psychology Compass,2(1), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, J. T., Rendina, H. J., Whitfield, T. H. F., & Grov, C. (2018). Changes in rectal STI incidence and behavioral HIV risk before, during, and after PrEP in a national sample of gay and bisexual men in the United States. Paper presented at the International AIDS Conference, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

  • Parsons, J. T., Schrimshaw, E. W., Wolitski, R. J., Halkitis, P. N., Purcell, D. W., Hoff, C. C., & Gómez, C. A. (2005). Sexual harm reduction practices of HIV-seropositive gay and bisexual men: Serosorting, strategic positioning, and withdrawal before ejaculation. AIDS,19, S13–S25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patten, S., LeBlanc, M. A., Jackson, E., & Adam, B. (2016). The resonance project community report: Emerging biomedical discourses on HIV among gay men and their service providers. Retrieved from https://www.catie.ca/sites/default/files/Resonance%20Project-Full%20Report.pdf.

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: A personal, experiential perspective. Qualitative Social Work,1(3), 261–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawson, M., & Grov, C. (2018). ‘It’s just an excuse to slut around’: Gay and bisexual mens’ constructions of HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) as a social problem. Sociology of Health & Illness, 40, 1391–1403. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, A. J., Bartels, R. D., Wlaschin, J., & Salovey, P. (2006). The strategic use of gain- and loss-framed messages to promote healthy behavior: How theory can inform practice. Journal of Communication,56(Suppl. 1), S202–S220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serovich, J. M., Mason, T. L., Bautista, D., & Toviessi, P. (2006). Gay men’s report of regret of HIV disclosure to family, friends, and sex partners. AIDS Education and Prevention,18(2), 132–138.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R., Rossetto, K., & Peterson, B. L. (2008). A meta-analysis of disclosure of one’s HIV-positive status, stigma and social support. AIDS Care,20(10), 1266–1275.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stahlman, S., Hargreaves, J. R., Sprague, L., Stangl, A. L., & Baral, S. D. (2017). Measuring sexual behavior stigma to inform effective HIV prevention and treatment programs for key populations. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance,3(2), e23. https://doi.org/10.2196/publichealth.7334.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Storholm, E. D., Volk, J. E., Marcus, J. L., Silverberg, M. J., & Satre, D. D. (2017). Risk perception, sexual behaviors, and PrEP adherence among substance-using men who have sex with men: A qualitative study. Prevention Science,18(6), 737–747.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, K. M. (2005). Male self-disclosure of HIV-positive serostatus to sex partners: A review of the literature. Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care,16(6), 33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, P. S., Smith, D. K., Mera-Giler, R., Siddiqi, A., Gunnels, B., Harris, N., et al. (2018). The impact of pre-exposure prophylaxis with TDF/FTC on HIV diagnoses, 2012–2016, United States. Presentation at the International AIDS Conference, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

  • Tharret, M. (2016). Grindr adds new filters for HIV status, PrEP use. Retrieved from http://www.newnownext.com/grindr-hiv-prep-filter/11/2016/.

  • Unemo, M., & Nicholas, R. A. (2012). Emergence of multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and untreatable gonorrhea. Future Microbiology,7(12), 1401–1422.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, D., Friderici, J., & Skiest, D. (2017). Primary care providers have limited knowledge about STI screening and HIV PrEP in men who have sex with men. Open Forum Infectious Diseases,4(1), S667. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1779.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ware, N. C., Wyatt, M. A., Haberer, J. E., Baeten, J. M., Kintu, A., Psaros, C., & Bangsberg, D. R. (2012). What’s love got to do with it? Explaining adherence to oral antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV serodiscordant couples. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes,59(5), 463–468.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watters, J. K., & Biernacki, P. (1989). Targeted sampling: Options and considerations for the study of hidden populations. Social Problems, 36, 416–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widman, L., Noar, S. M., Choukas-Bradley, S., & Francis, D. B. (2014). Adolescent sexual health communication and condom use: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology,33(10), 1113–1124.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs,59(4), 329–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, I., Flowers, P., & McDaid, L. M. (2014a). Barriers to uptake and use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among communities most affected by HIV in the UK: Findings from a qualitative study in Scotland. British Medical Journal Open,4(11), e005717. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005717

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, S. D., Holloway, I., Jaganath, D., Rice, E., Westmoreland, D., & Coates, T. (2014b). Project HOPE: Online social network changes in an HIV prevention randomized controlled trial for African American and Latino men who have sex with men. American Journal of Public Health,104(9), 1707–1712.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

PrEP & Me was funded by the National Institute of Drug Abuse (R21 DA 39019, PI: Grov). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The authors would like to acknowledge the contributions of other members of the PrEP & Me study team (Mark Pawson, Demetria Cain, Brian Salfas, Chloe Mirzayi, Juan Castiblanco, and Ruben Jimenez), and other staff from the Center for HIV/AIDS Educational Studies and Training (Chris Hietikko, Tina Koo, Desmond Dutcher, and Carlos Ponton). Finally, we thank Shoshana Kahana at NIDA and all of our participants who participated in PrEP & Me. NIDA/NIH had no role in the production of this manuscript nor necessarily endorses its findings. Funding was provided by National Institute on Drug Abuse (Grant No. R21DA39019).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David W. Pantalone.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures were continuously approved by the institutional review board of the City University of New York.

Informed Consent

All participants provided informed consent before the start of any study procedures.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pantalone, D.W., Holloway, I.W., Goldblatt, A.E.A. et al. The Impact of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis on Sexual Communication and Sexual Behavior of Urban Gay and Bisexual Men. Arch Sex Behav 49, 147–160 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01478-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01478-z

Keywords

Navigation