Abstract
Cognitive and affective antecedents of the desire to avoid or punish non-offending pedophilic individuals are not well understood. In this article, we examined the effects of non-offending motivation (internal vs. external) and sexual orientation (pedophilic vs. teleiophilic) on cognitive apprehensions (amorality, dangerousness, abnormality), emotions (fear, anger, disgust), punitive attitudes, and social distance toward a man experiencing a sexually transgressive impulse. A total of 205 U.S.-based MTurk workers were randomly assigned to one of four groups in this 2 × 2 factorial vignette study. As expected, pedophilic orientations and extrinsic non-offending motivations led to stronger negative apprehensions and emotions, as well as higher social distance and punitive attitudes. When controlling for the other emotions, disgust mediated the effect of pedophilic orientation on social distance, while anger and fear mediated the effect of non-offending motivation on punitive attitudes. Disgust, fear, and anger were furthermore differentially associated with perceived amorality, dangerousness, and abnormality. This research helps clarify why desires to punish or avoid non-offending pedophilic men are so strong, even when they never commit sexual crimes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Press.
Angermeyer, M. C., & Matschinger, H. (2003). The stigma of mental illness: Effects of labelling on public attitudes towards people with mental disorder. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 108(4), 304–309. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0447.2003.00150.x.
Bailey, J. M., Bernhard, P. A., & Hsu, K. J. (2016a). An Internet study of men sexually attracted to children: Correlates of sexual offending against children. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125(7), 989–1000. doi:10.1037/abn0000213.
Bailey, M. J., Hsu, K. J., & Bernhard, P. A. (2016b). An Internet study of men sexually attracted to children: Sexual attraction patterns. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125(7), 976–988. doi:10.1037/abn0000212.
Beier, K. M., Grundmann, D., Kuhle, L. F., Scherner, G., Konrad, A., & Amelung, T. (2015). The German Dunkelfeld Project: A pilot study to prevent child sexual abuse and the use of child abusive images. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12(2), 529–542. doi:10.1111/jsm.12785.
Berlin, F. S. (2014). Pedophilia and DSM-5: The importance of clearly defining the nature of a pedophilic disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online, 42(4), 404–407.
Chandler, J., & Shapiro, D. (2016). Conducting clinical research using crowdsourced convenience samples. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 12(1), 53–81. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093623.
Chapman, H. A., & Anderson, A. K. (2013). Things rank and gross in nature: A review and synthesis of moral disgust. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 300–327. doi:10.1037/a0030964.
Corrigan, P., Markowitz, F. E., Watson, A., Rowan, D., & Kubiak, M. A. (2003). An attribution model of public discrimination towards persons with mental illness. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 44(2), 162–179. doi:10.2307/1519806.
Dombert, B., Schmidt, A. F., Banse, R., Briken, P., Hoyer, J., Neutze, J., & Osterheider, M. (2016). How common is men’s self-reported sexual interest in prepubescent children? Journal of Sex Research, 53(2), 214–223. doi:10.1080/00224499.2015.1020108.
Ekman, P., & Cordaro, D. (2011). What is meant by calling emotions basic. Emotion Review, 3(4), 364–370. doi:10.1177/1754073911410740.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191.
Feldman, D. B., & Crandall, C. S. (2007). Dimensions of mental illness stigma: What about mental illness causes social rejection? Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26, 137–154. doi:10.1521/jscp.2007.26.2.137.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Standford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Furnham, A., & Haraldsen, E. (1998). Lay theories of etiology and “cure” for four types of paraphilia: Fetishism; pedophilia; sexual sadism; and voyeurism. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54(5), 689–700.
Giner-Sorolla, R., Bosson, J. K., Caswell, T. A., & Hettinger, V. E. (2012). Emotions in sexual morality: Testing the separate elicitors of anger and disgust. Cognition and Emotion, 26(7), 1208–1222. doi:10.1080/02699931.2011.645278.
Gutierrez, R., Giner-Sorolla, R., & Vasiljevic, M. (2012). Just an anger synonym? Moral context influences predictors of disgust word use. Cognition and Emotion, 26(1), 53–64. doi:10.1080/02699931.2011.567773.
Harper, C. A., Bartels, R. M., & Hogue, T. E. (2016). Reducing stigma and punitive attitudes toward pedophiles through narrative humanization. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. doi:10.1177/1079063216681561.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0999152X.
Hodson, G., & Costello, K. (2007). Interpersonal disgust, ideological orientations, and dehumanization as predictors of intergroup attitudes. Psychological Science, 18(8), 691–698. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01962.x.
Imhoff, R. (2015). Punitive attitudes against pedophiles or persons with sexual interest in children: Does the label matter? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(1), 35–44. doi:10.1007/s10508-014-0439-3.
Imhoff, R., & Jahnke, S. (2017). Determinants of punitive attitudes towards people with pedophilia: Dissecting effects of the label and intentionality ascriptions. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi:10.1007/s10508-017-1048-8.
Jahnke, S., & Hoyer, J. (2013). Stigmatization of people with pedophilia: A blind spot in stigma research. International Journal of Sexual Health, 25(3), 169–184. doi:10.1080/19317611.2013.795921.
Jahnke, S., & Hoyer, J. (2017). The stigma of pedophilia: Retest-reliability and validity of the social distance and the punitive attitudes scale. Unpublished raw data.
Jahnke, S., Imhoff, R., & Hoyer, J. (2015a). Stigmatization of people with pedophilia: Two comparative surveys. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(1), 21–34. doi:10.1007/s10508-014-0312-4.
Jahnke, S., Philipp, K., & Hoyer, J. (2015b). Stigmatizing attitudes towards people with pedophilia and their malleability among psychotherapists in training. Child Abuse and Neglect, 40, 93–102. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.07.008.
Jahnke, S., Schmidt, A. F., Geradt, M., & Hoyer, J. (2015c). Stigma-related stress and its correlates among men with pedophilic sexual interests. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(8), 2173–2187. doi:10.1007/s10508-015-0503-7.
Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. (1999). Social functions of emotions at four levels of analysis. Cognition and Emotion, 13(5), 505–521. doi:10.1080/026999399379168.
Lasher, M. P., & Stinson, J. D. (2017). Adults with pedophilic interests in the United States: Current practices and suggestions for future policy and research. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 659–670. doi:10.1007/s10508-016-0822-3.
Mann, R., Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2010). Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: Some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22(2), 191–217. doi:10.1177/1079063210366039.
Marks, I. M., & Nesse, R. M. (1994). Fear and fitness: An evolutionary analysis of anxiety disorders. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15(5), 247–261. doi:10.1016/0162-3095(94)90002-7.
Marzillier, S., & Davey, G. (2004). The emotional profiling of disgust-eliciting stimuli: Evidence for primary and complex disgusts. Cognition and Emotion, 18(3), 313–336. doi:10.1080/02699930341000130.
Olszanowski, M., Pochwatko, G., Kuklinski, K., Scibor-Rylski, M., Lewinski, P., & Ohme, R. K. (2015). Warsaw set of emotional facial expression pictures: A validation study of facial display photographs. Emotion Science, 5, 1–9. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01516.
Ray, J. J. (1984). The reliability of short social desirability scales. Journal of Social Psychology, 123(1), 133.
Rüsch, N., Angermeyer, M. C., & Corrigan, P. W. (2005). Mental illness stigma: Concepts, consequences, and initiatives to reduce stigma. European Psychiatry, 20(8), 529–539. doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2005.04.004.
Russell, P. S., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (2011). Moral anger is more flexible than moral disgust. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(4), 360–364. doi:10.1177/1948550610391678.
Russell, P. S., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (2013). Bodily moral disgust: What it is, how it is different from anger, and why it is an unreasoned emotion. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 328–351. doi:10.1037/a0029319.
Russell, P. S., & Piazza, J. (2015). Consenting to counter-normative sexual acts: Differential effects of consent on anger and disgust as a function of transgressor or consenter. Cognition and Emotion, 29(4), 634–653. doi:10.1080/02699931.2014.930420.
Seto, M. C. (2012). Is pedophilia a sexual orientation? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(1), 231–236. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9882-6.
Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., Kurzban, R., & DeScioli, P. (2013). Disgust: Evolved function and structure. Psychological Review, 120(1), 65–84. doi:10.1037/a0030778.
Zick, A., Wolf, C., Kuepper, B., Davidov, E., Schmidt, P., & Heitmeyer, W. (2008). The syndrome of group-focused enmity: The interrelation of prejudices tested with multiple cross-sectional and panel data. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 363–383. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00566.x.
Acknowledgements
The author is indebted to Dr. Ralph Massarczyk for his help with the data collection and Brittany Smelquist for her excellent copy-editing.
Funding
This work was supported by internal grant funding from the Technische Universität Dresden (Germany).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
The study has been approved by the internal review board of the Technische Universität Dresden (Germany).
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Appendix
Appendix
Vignette 1: Pedophilia, Intrinsic Non-Offending Motivation
While going on a walk, Jim sees a 9- or 10-year old girl, whom he has never met before, walking toward him from the opposite direction. Jim, who is sexually interested in female children, realizes that he finds her very attractive and feels a strong impulse to touch her buttocks and her genital area while she is walking past him. As there are no witnesses, it is unlikely that he would be punished for this action. He does not do it though because he thinks it is wrong and morally unacceptable. As he always behaves like that in similar situations, Jim will never in his life harass another person or commit a sexual crime.
Vignette 2: Pedophilia, Extrinsic Non-Offending Motivation
While going on a walk, Jim sees a 9- or 10-year old girl, whom he has never met before, walking toward him from the opposite direction. Jim, who is sexually interested in female children, realizes that he finds her very attractive and feels a strong impulse to touch her buttocks and her genital area while she is walking past him. As there are no witnesses, it is unlikely that he would be punished for this action. He does not do it though because he is afraid that he could possibly still be identified and punished. As he always behaves like that in similar situations, Jim will never in his life harass another person or commit a sexual crime.
Vignette 3: Teleiophilia, Intrinsic Non-Offending Motivation
While going on a walk, Jim sees a young woman, whom he has never met before, walking toward him from the opposite direction. Jim, who is sexually interested in women, realizes that he finds her very attractive and feels a strong impulse to touch her buttocks and her genital area while she is walking past him. As there are no witnesses, it is unlikely that he would be punished for this action. He does not do it though because he thinks it is wrong and morally unacceptable. As he always behaves like that in similar situations, Jim will never in his life harass another person or commit a sexual crime.
Vignette 4: Teleiophilia, Extrinsic Non-Offending motivation
While going on a walk, Jim sees a young woman, whom he has never met before, walking toward him from the opposite direction. Jim, who is sexually interested in women, realizes that he finds her very attractive and feels a strong impulse to touch her buttocks and her genital area while she is walking past him. As there are no witnesses, it is unlikely that he would be punished for this action. He does not do it though because he is afraid that he could possibly still be identified and punished. As he always behaves like that in similar situations, Jim will never in his life harass another person or commit a sexual crime.
Punitive Attitudes Scale
How do you think that society should deal with people like Jim?
-
1.
People like Jim should be preemptively taken into custody.
-
2.
One should not condemn people like Jim too harshly.
-
3.
People like Jim should be castrated.
-
4.
People like Jim should be sentenced for life as deterrence.
-
5.
People like Jim should be forced to undergo therapy.
-
6.
People like Jim should be chemically castrated.
-
7.
People like Jim should be sentenced to death as deterrence.
Item 2 is reverse-coded.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jahnke, S. Emotions and Cognitions Associated with the Stigma of Non-Offending Pedophilia: A Vignette Experiment. Arch Sex Behav 47, 363–373 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1073-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1073-7