Skip to main content
Log in

Dialogue protocols for formal fallacies: A reply to Kacprzak and Yaskorska

  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The Original Article was published on 15 August 2014

Abstract

This note comments on the paper ‘Dialogue protocols for formal fallacies’ by Kacprzak and Yaskorska (this issue). Points discussed include the use of the notions of ‘claiming’, ‘conceding’ and ‘commitment’, and the role of Lorenzen dialogues as a device for checking whether a proposition is a tautology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brandom, Robert B. 2008. Between saying and doing: Towards an analytic pragmatism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frege, Gottlob. 1906. Über die Grundlagen der Geometrie. Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematikervereinigung 15: 293–309, 377–403, 423–430.

  • Hamblin, C.L. 1970. Fallacies. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, Wilfrid. 2013. Logic and games. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy at http://plato.stanford.edu, February 2013.

  • Kacprzak, Magdalena, and Olena Yaskorska. Dialogue protocols for formal fallacies (this issue).

  • Lorenzen, P. 1961. Ein dialogisches Konstruktivitätskriterium. Infinitistic methods, Polish Academy of Sciences, Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warsaw, pp. 193–200.

  • Parsons, Simon, Michael Wooldridge, and Leila Amgoud. 2003. Properties and complexity of some formal inter-agent dialogues. Journal of Logic and Computation 13: 347–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaskorska, Olena, Katarzyna Budzynska, and Magdalena Kacprzak. 2013. Proving propositional tautologies in a natural dialogue. Fundamenta Informaticae 128: 239–253.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wilfrid Hodges.

Additional information

This comment refers to the article available at doi:10.1007/s10503-014-9324-4.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hodges, W. Dialogue protocols for formal fallacies: A reply to Kacprzak and Yaskorska. Argumentation 28, 371–377 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-014-9326-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-014-9326-2

Keywords

Navigation