Abstract
New marking methods for studying small biocontrol agents (especially predatory mites) are needed because many current techniques are expensive, ineffective or not applicable to small organisms. The objective of this study was to determine whether SmartWater, a liquid and permanent fluorescent dye, can be used to mark Phytoseiulus persimilis for experimentation without any deleterious effects on its dispersal, behavior, reproduction, and biocontrol efficacy. Our results show that there were no significant differences in movement, inter-plant dispersal, feeding behavior, survivability, and reproduction between marked P. persimilis and control individuals sprayed with water. We also found that the SmartWater mark lasted for the duration of the mites’ life, indicating strong durability over time. Marking efficacy may be reduced, due to a trade-off between batch marking efficacy and the possibility of drowning study organisms. However, we feel future research could improve liquid marking techniques that would reduce this risk. Overall, this study concludes that SmartWater could be a useful marking tool for predatory mites in both laboratory and field studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All the files with mite movement, dispersal, egg consumption, egg laying, and survival data are available online (Rosser et al. 2022).
References
Alatawi F, Nechols JR, Margolies DC (2011) Spatial distribution of predators and prey affect biological control of twospotted spider mites by phytoseiulus persimilis in greenhouses. Biol Control 56(1):36–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2010.09.006
Berry JS, Holtzer TO (1990) Ambulatory dispersal behavior of Neoseiulus fallacis (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) in relation to prey density and temperature. Exp Appl Acarol 8:253–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01202136
De Souza AR, Ribeiro B, José N, Prezoto F (2012) Paint marking social wasps: an evaluation of behavioral effects and toxicity. Entomol Exp Appl 144(2):244–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.2012.01285.x
Faiman R, Krajacich BJ, Graber L, Dao A, Yaro AS, Yossi O, Sanogo ZL, Diallo M, Samaké D, Sylla D, Coulibaly M, Kone S, Goita S, Coulibaly MB, Muratova O, McCormack A, Gonçalves BP, Hume J, Duffy P, Lehmann T (2021) A novel fluorescence and DNA combination for versatile, long-term marking of mosquitoes. Methods Ecol Evol 12(6):1008–1016. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.13592
Hagler JR, Jackson CG (2001) Methods for marking insects: current techniques and future prospects. Annu Rev Entomol 46(1):511–543. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.46.1.511
Hagler J, Naranjo S (2004) A multiple ELISA system for simultaneously monitoring intercrop movement and feeding activity of mass-released insect predators. Int J Pest Manag 50(3):199–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670870410001731934
Hagler JR, Hull AM, Casey MT, Machtley SA (2021) Use of a fluorophore to tag arthropods for mark-release-recapture type research. J Insect Sci. https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/ieab099
Hagler JR, Casey MT, Hull AM, Machtley SA (2022) Liquid fluorophore taggants for mark-release-recapture research: a survey of potential arthropod targets. Entomol Exp Appl Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/eea.13191
Harman DM (1975) Movement of individually marked White pine weevils, Pissodes Strobi1. Environ Entomol 4(1):120–124. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/4.1.120
Heimpel GE, Asplen MK (2011) A ‘goldilocks’ hypothesis for dispersal of biological control agents. Biocontrol 56(4):441–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-011-9381-7
Jung C, Croft BA (2001) Ambulatory and aerial dispersal among specialist and generalist predatory mites (acari: Phytoseiidae). Environ Entomol 30(6):1112–1118. https://doi.org/10.1603/0046-225x-30.6.1112
Knapp M, van Houten Y, van Baal E, Groot T (2018) Use of predatory mites in commercial biocontrol: current status and future prospects. Acarologia 58(Suppl):72–82
Macmillan CD, Costello MJ (2015) Evaluation of a brushing machine for estimating density of spider mites on grape leaves. Exp Appl Acarol 67(4):583–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-015-9972-6
McIntosh RL (1999) Technique for labeling individual pissodes STROBI (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) for mark-recapture studies. Can Entomol 131(1):131–136. https://doi.org/10.4039/ent131131-1
Miller LR (1993) Fluorescent dyes as markers in studies of foraging biology of termite colonies (Isoptera). Sociobiology, USA
Opp SB, Prokopy RJ (1987) Seasonal changes in resightings of marked, wild Rhagoletis Pomonella (Diptera: Tephritidae) flies in nature. Fla Entomol 70(4):449. https://doi.org/10.2307/3494787
Rhodes EM, Liburd OE, Kelts C, Rondon SI, Francis RR (2006) Comparison of single and combination treatments of phytoseiulus persimilis, Neoseiulus californicus, and acramite (bifenazate) for control of twospotted spider mites in strawberries. Exp Appl Acarol 39(3–4):213–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-006-9005-6
Rosser, E., Willden, S.A., Loeb, G.M. (2022). Data from: Effects of SmartWater (a traceable UV marking system) on the dispersal, behavior, and biocontrol efficacy of Phytoseiulus persimillis. OSF, https://osf.io/nugq9/?view_only=fd9dee5466944263bee80668a89ff49f
Sabelis MW, Nagelkerke CJ, Breeuwer AJ (2002) Sex ratio control in arrhenotokous and pseudoarrhenotokous mites. In: Hardy ICW (ed) Sex ratios: concepts and research methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 235–253
Schmidt-Jeffris RA, Beers EH (2016) Assessment of techniques for Markinggalendromus occidentalis(Nesbitt). Biocontrol Sci Tech 26(6):866–871. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2016.1158782
Southwood TR (1978) Absolute population estimates using marking techniques. Ecological Methods. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1225-0_3
Tracy EF (2015) The promise of biological control for sustainable agriculture: A stakeholder-based analysis. J Sci Policy Gov 5(1):13
Walzer A, Schausberger P (2011) Sex-specific developmental plasticity and specialist predatory mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in response to food stress. Biol J Linnean Soc 103(3):650–660. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01593.x
White A, Minch R, Bidder L, Gaff H (2020) A simple, inexpensive method for mark-recapture of ixodid ticks. J Insect Sci. https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/ieaa052
Wineriter SA, Walker TJ (1984) Insect marking techniques: durability of materials. Entomology News 95(3):117–123
Acknowledgements
This research was funded through the NYS Department of Agriculture and Markets (#C00184GG, #C00247GG). We thank our technical staff Stephen Hesler, Karen Wentworth, Gabrielle Brind’Amour, Linnea Meier, Yaro Grynyshyn, and Nick Afflito for their assistance in conducting this research. We thank Dr. Kerik Cox for the use of his low tunnel strawberry planting for the field dispersal study. We also thank the Cornell Statistical Consulting Unit for their guidance on experimental design and statistics. Finally, we extend our gratitude to our reviewers for their comments and suggestions on this manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded through the NYS Department of Agriculture and Markets (#C00184GG, #C00247GG).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All conceived the ideas and methodology for this research. ER. and SW. collected and analyzed the data, and ER. led the writing of the manuscript. All authors contributed significantly to the drafts and edits, ultimately giving approval for publication.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Ethical approval
No approval of research ethics committees was required to accomplish the goals of this study because no ethical regulations are suggested or required for our study organisms.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rosser, E., Willden, S.A. & Loeb, G.M. Effects of SmartWater, a fluorescent mark, on the dispersal, behavior, and biocontrol efficacy of Phytoseiulus persimilis. Exp Appl Acarol 87, 163–174 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-022-00732-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-022-00732-9