Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-sensory system for UAVs detection using Bayesian inference

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles UAVs have revolutionized a wide range of activities and businesses, creating new opportunities for commercial and military applications. However, they also pose potential risks for terrorist and criminal activities. Therefore, researchers have been examining potential drone threats and considering how to address security and privacy concerns related to this technology. This research topic has gained significant attention in recent years due to the rapid proliferation of commercial and recreational drones, as well as the associated risks to airspace safety and security. Various detection technologies have been developed, including radar, optical, and acoustic sensing systems. However, each detector has its own limitations, such as reduced effectiveness in low-light conditions, fog, and noise. To address these limitations, we have developed a drone detection technique that utilizes multiple detectors, including visual, acoustic, and magnetic field sensors applying artificial intelligence, to compensate for their shortcomings. In this approach, each detector makes an independent decision, which may be either consistent or conflicting with the other detectors. In our study, we employed the Bayesian Inference technique to optimize decision-making in cases where there was conflict among the decisions made by the multi-sensors. We used indicators such as the Ephemeris indicator (EI) and the Acoustic ambiance indicator (AI) to generate settings to determine the degree of conflict. The drone detection process was fully automated, and the conflict decision was optimized using this approach. Our results indicated that the automatic drone detection with Bayesian inference had the best performance for drone identification in terms of accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity, as well as the highest accuracy in preventing unwanted drone interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32
Fig. 33
Fig. 34
Fig. 35
Fig. 36
Fig. 37
Fig. 38
Fig. 39
Fig. 40

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Belmote ML, Morales R, Fernandez-Caballero A (2019) Computer vision in autonomous unmanned aerial vehivles-a systematic mapping study: A review. Academic Open Access Publishing (MDPI), 9

  2. Laith A, Diabat A, Putra S, Amir G (2021) Applications, deployments, and integration of internet of drones (iod): a review. IEEE Sensors J, 21

  3. Adel G, Anuar B, Ruzairi B, ASM S, Shukor MA (2022) Gismalla: Involvement of surveillance drones in smart cities: Asystematic review. IEEE Access Publishing

  4. Lykou G, Moustakas D, Gritzalis D (2020) Review: Defending airports from uas: A survey oncyber-attacks and counter-drone sensing. MDPI Academic Open Access Publishing

  5. Hassanalian Darvishpoor S, Roshanian J, Raissi A (2007) A review of configurations, flight mechanisms and applications of unmanned aerial systems. Prog Aerosp Sci, Science Direct, 121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.100694

  6. Seidaliyeva U, Akhmetov D, Llipbayeva L, Matson E (2020) Real-time and accurate drone detection in a video with static background. Sensors, 20

  7. Singhal G, Bansod B, Mathew L (2021) Unmanned aerial vehicles in smart agriculture: Applications, requirements, and challenges. IEEE Sensors J, 21

  8. Morrow A (2014) Review: Couple accuses neighbor of stalking with drone. USA Today

  9. Gritzalis DA, Grammati P, Roman Castro R (2021) Sensors cybersecurity. MDPI Sensors, 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21051762

  10. Hicks P (2020) Watch the skies. J Int Secur, 2:22–24

    Google Scholar 

  11. Seongjoon P, Hyeontae TK, Sangmin L, Hyeontae J, Hwangnam K (2021) Survey on anti-drone systems:components,designs,and challenges. J IEEE Access, 9

  12. Nguyen P, Truong H, Ravindranathan M, Nguyen A, Han R, Vu T (2018) Cost-effective and passive rf-based drone presence detection and characterization. Paper presented at ACM international conference on mobile systems, applications, and services with permission 21:30–34

  13. Mototolea D, Stolk C (2018) Detection and localization of small drones using commercial of the-shelf fpga based software defined radio systems. In: Proceedings of the international conference on communications(COMM), Bucharest, Romania, pp 465–470

  14. Bernardini A, Mangiatordi F, Pallotti E, Capodiferro L (2017) Drone detection by acoustic signature identification. Electron Imaging, 10:60–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Park S, Shin S, Kim Y, Matson ET, Lee K, Kolodzy PJ, Slater JC, Scherreik M, Sam M, Gallagher JC (2015) Combination of radar and audio sensors for identification of rotor-type unmanned aerial vehicles (uavs). In: Proceedings of the IEEE SENSORS, pp 1–4

  16. Goldman S, Borel-Donohue G, Christoph C (2017) Detection of unmanned aerial vehicles using a visible camera system. Appl Opt, 3:214–221

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tammina S (2019) Transfer learning using vgg-16 with deep convolutional neural network for classifying images. Int J Sci Res Publ, 9(10):143–150

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang L, Yingming GZZ, Nianyu Z (2020) a lightweight distributed measurement method used to study illuminance estimation. Elsevier

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Simon CL (2015) les archives sonores: de l’archivistique a la creation. In: Communication presented by canadienne association of bibliography,archives, and documentation center

  20. Ayodele AF, Johnson TS (2021) The effects of aircraft noise on psychosocial health. J Trans Health, Elsevier, 22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2021.101230

  21. Ripka P, Janosek M (2010) Advances in magnetic field sensors. IEEE Sensors J, 10:(06)

  22. Michael J, Caruso D, Carl TH, Smith, Bratland RS (1998) A new perspective on magnetic field sensing. Sensors-Petrbourough, pp 34–47

  23. Sentence S, Waite J, Yeomans UL, MacLeod E (2017) Teaching with physical computing devices: the bbc micro-bit initiative. ACM Digital Library, pp 87–96

  24. Colombo M, Series P (2012) Bayes in the brain -on bayesian modelling in neuroscience. Br J Philos Sci

  25. Baldo JV, Kacinuk N, Carl SN, Paulraj , Moncreif A, Piai V, Curran B, Herron T, Dronkers FN (2018) Voxel-based lesion analysis of brain regions underlying reading and writing. Elsevier, pp 51–59

  26. Adesnik H, Naka A (2018) Cracking the function of layers in the sensory cortex. Elsevier, 5

  27. Donoghue J (2001) Neural representations of intended movement in motor cortex. Pergamon

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Friston K, Schwartenbeck P, FitzGerald T, Moutoussis M, Behrens T, Dolan R (2022) The anatomy of choice: dopamine and decision-making. Phil Trans R Soc. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pinghe N, Jun L, Hong H, Qiang H, Xiuli D (2021) probalistic model updating via bayesian inference and adaptive gaussian process modeling. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng, Science Direct, 383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2021.113915

  30. Thrane E, Talbot C (2019) An introduction to bayesian inference in gravitational-wave astronomy: parameter estimation, model selection, and hierarchical models. Centre for Astrophysics, Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/pas.2020.xxx

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Taha B, Shoufan A (2019) Machine learning-based drone detection and classification: State-of-the-art in research. IEEE Access, 7

  32. Asif Khan M, Menouar H, Eldeeb A, Abu-Dayya A, Salim FD (2022) On the detection of unauthorized drones-techniques and future perspectives: A review. IEEE Sensors J, 22

  33. Nalamati M, Kapoor A, Saqib M, Sharma N, Blumenstein M (2019) Drone detection in long-range surveillance videos. In:16th IEEE International conference on advanced video and signal based surveillance (AVSS)

  34. Shovon MHI, Gopalan R, Campbell B (2023) A comparative analysis of deep learning algorithms for optical drone detection. In: 15th International conference on machine vision ICMV, 12701

  35. Utebayeva D, Ilipbayeva L, Matson ET (2022) Practical study of recurent neural networks for efficient real-time drone sound detection: A review. Drones MDP I:7

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lacava G, Mercaldo F, Martenelli F, Santone A, Pizzi M (2022) Drone audio recognition based on machine learning techniques. Proc Comput Sci, 207

  37. Lipovskýa P, Novotňáka J, Blažeka J (2022) Possible utilization of low frequency magnetic fields in short range multirotor uav detection system. In: 11th International conference on air transport - INAIR, 65

  38. Ding S, Guo X, Peng T, Huang X, Hong X (2023) Drone detection and tracking system based on fused acoustical and optical approaches. Adv Intell Syst

  39. Svanström F, Alonso-Fernandez F, Englund C (2021) A dataset for multi-sensor drone detection. Data in Brief

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, Commercial, or not -for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors designed the model and the computational framework and analysed the data, took the lead in writing the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fatima Zohra Saadaoui.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The study was in accordance with the ethical standards of our institutional research laboratory.

Consent for publication

I, the undersigned, give my consent for the publication of identifiable detatils to be published in the above journal and article

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saadaoui, F.Z., Cheggaga, N. & Djabri, N.E.H. Multi-sensory system for UAVs detection using Bayesian inference. Appl Intell 53, 29818–29844 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-023-05027-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-023-05027-z

Keywords

Navigation