Abstract
The taxonomic status of 43 Psychrobacter species was examined based upon the genome sequences of their type strains. Three groups of type strains were found to be conspecific, Psychrobacter salsus Shivaji et al. (Syst Appl Microbiol 27:628–635, 2004. 10.1078/0723202042369956) and Psychrobacter submarinus Romanenko et al. (Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52:1291–1297, 2002. 10.1099/00207713-52-4-1291); Psychrobacter oceani Matsuyama et al. (Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 65:1450–1455, 2015. 10.1099/ijs.0.000118) and Psychrobacter pacificensis Maruyama et al. (Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50:835–846, 2000. 10.1099/00207713-50-2-835); and Psychrobacter proteolyticus Denner et al. (Syst Appl Microbiol 24:44–53, 2001. 10.1078/0723-2020-00006), Psychrobacter marincola Romanenko et al. (Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52:1291–1297, 2002. 10.1099/00207713-52-4-1291) and Psychrobacter adeliensis Shivaji et al. (Syst Appl Microbiol 27:628–635, 2004. 10.1078/0723202042369956). For all three groups, the average nucleotide identity (ANI) and digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) values are > 97.69% and > 80.2%, respectively. This conclusion is supported by similarities in morphology, growth properties, and fatty acid compositions. Based on this evidence, we propose the reclassification of Psychrobacter salsus Shivaji et al. (Syst Appl Microbiol 27:628–635, 2004. 10.1078/0723202042369956) as a later heterotypic synonym of Psychrobacter submarinus Romanenko et al. (Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52:1291–1297, 2002. 10.1099/00207713-52-4-1291); Psychrobacter oceani Matsuyama et al. (Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 65:1450–1455, 2015. 10.1099/ijs.0.000118) as a later heterotypic synonym of Psychrobacter pacificensis Maruyama et al. (Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50:835–846, 2000. 10.1099/00207713-50-2-835), and Psychrobacter marincola Romanenko et al. (Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52:1291–1297, 2002. 10.1099/00207713-52-4-1291) and Psychrobacter adeliensis Shivaji et al. (Syst Appl Microbiol 27:628–635, 2004. 10.1078/0723202042369956) as later heterotypic synonyms of Psychrobacter proteolyticus Denner et al. (Syst Appl Microbiol 24:44–53, 2001. 10.1078/0723-2020-00006).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bowman JP (2006) The genus Psychrobacter. In: Dworkin M, Falkow S, Rosenberg E, Schleifer KH, Stackebrandt E (eds) The Prokaryotes. Springer, New York, pp 920–930
Contreras-Moreira B, Vinuesa P (2013) GET_HOMOLOGUES, a versatile software package for scalable and robust microbial pangenome analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:7696–7701. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02411-13
Denner EB, Mark B, Busse HJ, Turkiewicz M, Lubitz W (2001) Psychrobacter proteolyticus sp. nov., a psychrotrophic, halotolerant bacterium isolated from the Antarctic krill Euphausia superba Dana, excreting a cold-adapted metalloprotease. Syst Appl Microbiol 24:44–53. https://doi.org/10.1078/0723-2020-00006
Felsenstein J (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat 125:1–15
Fitch WM (1977) On the problem of discovering the most parsimonious tree. Am Nat 111:223–257
Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P, Tiedje JM (2007) DNA–DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:81–91. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.64483-0
Hyatt D, Chen GL, LoCascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ (2010) Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinform 11:119. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-119
Jukes TH, Cantor CR (1969) Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro HN (ed) Mammalian protein metabolism. Academic Press, New York, pp 21–132
Juni E, Heym GA (1986) Psychrobacter immobilis gen. nov., sp. nov.: genospecies composed of Gram-negative, aerobic, oxidase-positive Coccobacilli. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 36:388–391
Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS (2017) ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat Methods 14:587–589. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4285
Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T (2002) MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res 30:3059–3066. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkf436
Kim SJ, Shin SC, Hong SG, Lee YM, Choi IG, Park H (2012) Genome sequence of a novel member of the genus Psychrobacter isolated from Antarctic soil. J Bacteriol 194:2403. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00234-12
Kim M, Oh HS, Park SC, Chun J (2014) Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:346–351. Erratum. In: Int J Syst Evol Microbiol (2014). 64:1825. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.059774-0
Kolde R, Kolde MR (2015) Package ‘pheatmap.’ R Package 1:790
Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM (2005a) Genomic insights that advance the species definition for prokaryotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:2567–2572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0409727102
Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM (2005b) Towards a genome-based taxonomy for prokaryotes. J Bacteriol 187:6258–6264. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.187.18.6258-6264.2005
Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rødland EA, Stærfeldt HH, Rognes T, Ussery DW (2007) RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 35:3100–3108. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm160
Letunic I, Bork P (2007) Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL): an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Bioinformatics 23:127–128. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl529
Ling X, Dong Z, Fang L, Luo Y, Wei Z, Guo H, Zhang G, Gu YQ, Coleman-Derr D, Xia Q, Wang Y (2019) OrthoVenn2: a web server for whole-genome comparison and annotation of orthologous clusters across multiple species. Nucleic Acids Res 47:W52–W58. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz333
Maruyama A, Honda D, Yamamoto H, Kitamura K, Higashihara T (2000) Phylogenetic analysis of psychrophilic bacteria isolated from the Japan Trench, including a description of the deep-sea species Psychrobacter pacificensis sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50:835–846. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-50-2-835
Matsuyama H, Minami H, Sakaki T, Kasahara H, Watanabe A, Onoda T, Hirota K, Yumoto I (2015) Psychrobacter oceani sp. nov., isolated from marine sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 65:1450–1455. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.000118
Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O, Schrempf D, Woodhams MD, von Haeseler A, Lanfear R (2020) IQ-TREE 2: New models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol Biol Evol 37:1530–1534. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaa015
Parker CT, Tindall BJ, Garitty GM (2019) International code of nomenclature of prokaryotes, 2008 revision. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 69:S1–S111. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.000778
Parte AC, Carbasse JS, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Reimer LC, Göker M (2020) List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 70:5607–5612. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.004332
Pritchard L, Cock P, Esen Ö (2019) pyani v0. 2.8: average nucleotide identity (ANI) and related measures for whole genome comparisons. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2584238
Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R (2009) Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:19126–19131. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0906412106
Romanenko LA, Schumann P, Rohde M, Lysenko AM, Mikhailov VV, Stackebrandt E (2002) Psychrobacter submarinus sp. nov. and Psychrobacter marincola sp. nov., psychrophilic halophiles from marine environments. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52:1291–1297. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-52-4-1291
Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454
Shivaji S, Reddy GS, Raghavan PU, Sarita NB, Delille D (2004) Psychrobacter salsus sp. nov. and Psychrobacter adeliensis sp. nov. isolated from fast ice from Adelie Land. Antarctica Syst Appl Microbiol 27:628–635. https://doi.org/10.1078/0723202042369956
Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S (2021) MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol 38:3022–3027. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab120
Welter DK, Ruaud A, Henseler ZM, De Jong HN, Groot PC, Michaux J, Gormezano L, Waters JL, Youngblut ND, Ley RE (2021) Free-living, psychrotrophic bacteria of the genus Psychrobacter are descendants of pathobionts. mSystems. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00258-21
Acknowledgements
J.K. thanks Gargi College, University of Delhi for providing infrastructural support. U.S. thanks Kirori Mal College, University of Delhi for providing infrastructural support. RL acknowledges Indian National Science Academy for support under the INSA Senior Scientist Programme and Alexander von Humboldt Foundation for the award of Fellowship under its Renewed Research Program.
Funding
The authors received no specific grant from any funding agency.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
US and RL conceived and designed the study. US and JK performed the analysis. US, JK, and CT analyzed the data. WBW and RL provided critical input regarding the international code for nomenclature of prokaryotes. All authors wrote and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare there are no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kaur, J., Sood, U., Talwar, C. et al. Phylogenomics-based reclassifications in the genus Psychrobacter including emended descriptions of Psychrobacter pacificensis, Psychrobacter proteolyticus and Psychrobacter submarinus. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 116, 1113–1121 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-023-01871-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-023-01871-8