Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Determinants of environmental disclosure: investigating new and conventional corporate governance characteristics

  • S.I.: BALCOR-2017
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated corporate governance factors that could shape the decision for sustainability reporting. Specifically, this paper sets out to investigate the environmentally sensitive properties of distinct corporate governance characteristics vis-à-vis sustainable concerns strengthening the decision to develop environmental disclosures. Regarding explanatory variables, the study focused on corporate governance because it sets the rules and processes by which a firm is managed. Five plausible individual characteristics were employed in our proposed model, namely, “Independent Directors”, “presence of Lead Independent Director”, “frequency of Audit Committee Meetings”, “presence of Sustainable Committee”, and the “Age of the Youngest Director”. We utilized the Environmental facet of Environmental, Social and Governance score calculated by Bloomberg as a proxy driving the decision to disseminate environmental information. Hypotheses were tested using a Logit model for a sample of a total of 278 firms from the United States listed S&P 500. Results revealed that the “Age of the Youngest Director” has a negative effect, while “Independent Directors” and the “presence of Lead Independent Director” variables seem to strengthen the decision to develop environmental disclosures. Implications are valuable to different stakeholders and policy makers interested in improving corporate governance initiatives to reducing agency costs and enhancing corporate sustainable transparency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Global Reporting Initiative: https://www.globalreporting.org/Pages/default.aspx. Access 28 May 2018.

  2. Carbon Disclosure Project: https://www.cdp.net/en. Access 15 May 2018.

  3. Information regarding the development of ESG is retrieved by Bloomberg Online database.

References

  • Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., & Peters, G. F. (2004). Audit committee characteristics and restatements: A study of efficacy of certain Blue Ribbon Committee recommendations. A Journal of Practice and Theory, 23(1), 69–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali Fekrat, M., Inclan, C., & Petroni, D. (1996). Corporate environmental disclosures: Competitive disclosure hypothesis using 1991 annual report data. International Journal of Accounting, 31(2), 175–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alsaeed, K. (2006). The association between firm-specific characteristics and disclosure: The case of Saudi Arabia. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(5), 476–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Shaer, H., Salama, A., & Toms, S. (2017). Audit committees and financial reporting quality: Evidence from UK environmental accounting disclosures. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 18(1), 2–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Tuwaijri, S. A., Christensen, T. E., & Hughes, K. E., II. (2004). The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: A simultaneous equations approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(5–6), 447–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrikopoulos, A., & Kriklani, N. (2013). Environmental disclosure and financial characteristics of the firm: The case of Denmark. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(1), 55–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrikopoulos, A., Samitas, A., & Bekiaris, M. (2014). Corporate social responsibility reporting in financial institutions: Evidence from Euronext. Research in International Business and Finance, 32, 27–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appuhami, R., & Tashakor, S. (2017). the impact of audit committee characteristics on CSR disclosure: An analysis of Australian Firms. Australian Accounting Review, 27(4), 400–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aras, G., & Crowther, D. (2008). Governance and sustainability: An investigation into the relationship between corporate governance and corporate sustainability. Management Decision, 46(3), 433–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bantel, K. A., & Jackson, S. E. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10(S1), 107–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, M., & James, P. (1998). The green bottom line: Current practice and future trends in environmental management accounting. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas, P. K., Mansi, M., & Pandey, R. (2018). Board composition, sustainability committee and corporate social and environmental performance in Australia. Pacific Accounting Review, 30(4), 517–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, F. E. (2000). Environmental visibility: A trigger of green organisational responsiveness? Business Strategy and the Environment, 9(2), 92–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braam, G., & Peeters, R. (2018). Corporate sustainability performance and assurance on sustainability reports: Diffusion of accounting practices in the realm of sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(2), 164–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Voluntary environmental disclosures by large UK companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33(7–8), 1168–1188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2008). Factors influencing the quality of corporate environmental disclosure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17, 120–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2008). Factors influencing social responsibility disclosure by Portuguese companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(4), 685–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bushman, R. M., & Smith, A. J. (2001). Financial accounting information and corporate governance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32(1–3), 237–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadez, S., & Czerny, A. (2016). Climate change mitigation strategies in carbon-intensive firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112(5), 4132–4143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carcello, J. V. (2008). Governance and the common good. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(S1), 11–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., & Jaggi, B. (2000). Association between independent non-executive directors, family control, and financial disclosures in Hong Kong. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 19, 285–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, P., Li, Y., Richardson, G., & Vasvari, F. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4/5), 303–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowen, S. S., Ferreri, L. B., & Parker, L. D. (1987). The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: A typology and frequency-based analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(2), 111–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Amico, E., Coluccia, D., Fontana, S., & Solimene, S. (2016). Factors influencing corporate environmental disclosure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(3), 178–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, C., & Rankin, M. (1996). Do Australian companies report environmental news objectively? An analysis of environmental disclosures by firms prosecuted successfully by the environmental protection authority. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 9(2), 50–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delmas, M., & Blass, V. D. (2010). Measuring corporate environmental performance: The trade-offs of sustainability ratings. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(4), 245–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte. (2016). Sustainability disclosure Getting ahead of the curve. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/us/Documents/risk/us-risk-sustainability-disclosure.pdf. Access May 15, 2018.

  • Despotovic, D., Cvetanovic, S., Nedic, V., & Despotovic, M. (2016). Economic, social and environmental dimension of sustainable competitiveness of European countries. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 59(9), 1656–1678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case of corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(2), 130–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, R. G., Serafeim, G., & Krzus, M. P. (2011). Market interest in nonfinancial information. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 23(4), 113–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, F. R. (2003) U.S. Corporate Governance: What went wrong and can it be fixed? Paper for B.I.S. and Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Conference. https://www0.gsb.columbia.edu/mygsb/faculty/research/pubfiles/1661/U.S.%20Corporate%20Governance%2010-05.pdf. Access May 15, 2018.

  • Eleftheriadis, I. M., & Anagnostopoulou, E. G. (2015). Relationship between corporate climate change disclosures and firm factors. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(8), 780–789.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of the 21st century Business. Oxford: Capstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ezhilarasi, G., & Kabra, K. C. (2017). The impact of corporate governance attributes on environmental disclosures: Evidence from India. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 10(1), 24–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Feijoo, B., Romero, S., & Ruiz-Blanco, S. (2014). Women on boards: Do they affect sustainability reporting? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21(6), 351–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrero-Ferrero, I., Fernández-Izquierdo, M. A., & Muñoz-Torres, M. J. (2015). Integrating sustainability into corporate governance: An empirical study on board diversity. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(4), 193–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forker, J. J. (1992). Corporate governance and disclosure quality. Accounting and Business Research, 22, 111–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamerschlag, R., Möller, K., & Verbeeten, F. (2010). Determinants of voluntary CSR disclosure: Empirical evidence from Germany. Review of Managerial Science, 5(2), 233–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, A. S., Mendes-Da-Silva, W., & Orsato, R. (2017). Sensitive industries produce better ESG performance: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of Cleaner Production, 150, 135–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Sanchez, I. M., Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., & Sepulveda, C. (2014). Does media pressure moderate CSR disclosures by external directors? Management Decision, 52(6), 1014–1045.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Torea, N., Fernandez-Feijoo, B., & de la Cuesta, M. (2016). Board of director’s effectiveness and the stakeholder perspective of corporate governance: Do effective boards promote the interests of shareholders and stakeholders? BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 19(4), 246–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Germain, L., Galy, N., & Lee, W. (2015). Corporate governance reform in Malaysia: Board size, independence and monitoring. Journal of Economics and Business, 75, 126–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Reporting Initiatives. (2017), GRI Report List Limited. www.globalreporting.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/GRI-Reports-List-Limited.xlsx. Access May 15, 2018.

  • Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995). Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability, 8(2), 47–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, E., & Boury, P.-M. (2003). Post-Sarbanes-Oxley corporate governance in Europe and the USA: Americanisation or convergence? International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 1(1), 21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haniffa, R. M., & Cooke, T. E. (2002). Culture, corporate governance and disclosure in Malaysian corporations. Abacus, 38(3), 317–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haniffa, R. M., & Cooke, T. E. (2005). The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(5), 391–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbohn, K. F., Harrison, S. R., & Herbohn, J. L. (2000). An alternative approach to accounting for natural resources: The case of multipurpose forestry in Australia. Society and Natural Resources: An International Journal, 13(7), 663–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom, B., & Kaplan, S. N. (2003). The State Of U.S. Corporate Governance: What’s right and what’s wrong? Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 15(3), 8–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, M., & Reaz, M. (2007). The determinants and characteristics of voluntary disclosure by Indian banking companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 14(5), 274–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou, C. E, Lu, W. M., & Hung, S. W. (2018). Does CSR matter? Influence of corporate social responsibility on corporate performance in the creative industry. Annals of Operations Research, 1–25 (Article in press).

  • Htay, S. N. N., Rashid, H. M. A., Adnan, M. A., & Meera, A. K. M. (2012). Impact of corporate governance on social and environmental information disclosure of Malaysian listed banks: Panel data analysis. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 4(1), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, S. K. (2013). The impact of CEO characteristics on corporate sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(4), 234–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huisingh, D., Zhang, Z., Moore, J. C., Qiao, Q., & Li, Q. (2015). Recent advances in carbon emissions reduction: Policies, technologies, monitoring, assessment and modeling. Journal of Cleaner Production, 103, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izadikhah, M., Saen, R. F., & Roostaee, R. (2018). How to assess sustainability of suppliers in the presence of volume discount and negative data in data envelopment analysis? Annals of Operations Research, 69(1–2), 241–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, G. (2010). Understanding Corporate Governance in the United States. Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, 2010. https://www.boeckler.de/pdf/p_arbp_223.pdf. Access May 15, 2018.

  • Jennifer Ho, L. C., & Taylor, M. E. (2007). An empirical analysis of triple bottom-line reporting and its determinants: Evidence from the United States and Japan. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 18(2), 123–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jitmaneeroj, B. (2016). Reform priorities for corporate sustainability: Environmental, social, governance, or economic performance? Management Decision, 54(6), 1497–1521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakabadse, A. P. (2007). Being responsible: Boards are reexamining the bottom line. Leadership in Action, 27(1), 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karl, H., & Orwat, C. (1999). Environmental labelling in Europe: European and National Tasks. European Environment, 9(5), 212–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassinis, G., & Vafeas, N. (2002). Corporate boards and outside stakeholders as determinants of environmental litigations. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 399–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelton, A. S., & Yang, Y. W. (2008). The impact of corporate governance on internet financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 27(1), 62–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, H.-U.-Z. (2010). The effect of corporate governance elements on corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting: Empirical evidence from private commercial banks of Bangladesh. International Journal of Law and Management, 52(2), 82–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, A. (2002). Economic determinants of audit committee independence. The Accounting Review, 77(2), 435–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • KPMG. (2017). The road ahead The KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2017. https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/be/pdf/2017/kpmg-survey-of-corporate-responsibility-reporting-2017.pdf. Access December 18, 2018.

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (2000). Investor protection and corporate valuation. Journal of Finance, 57(3), 1147–1170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, S., & Coderre, F. (2013). Determinants of GRI G3 application levels: The case of the fortune global 500. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(3), 182–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao, L., Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2015). Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure. The British Accounting Review, 47(7), 409–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y.-C., Chang, H., Chen, J., & Wu, G. S. (2014). Accounting disclosure quality, capital market intensity and national productivity. Annals of Operations Research, 221, 239–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorek, S., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2014). Sustainable consumption within a sustainable economy—Beyond green growth and green economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 33–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2014). Does voluntary carbon disclosure reflect underlying carbon performance? Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 10(3), 191–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2016). Determinants of the quality of corporate carbon management systems: An international study. International Journal of Accounting, 51(2), 275–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood, Z., Kouser, R., Ali, W., Ahmad, Z., & Salman, T. (2018). Does corporate governance affect sustainability disclosure? A mixed methods study. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(1), 207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masulis, R. W., & Mobbs, S. (2014). Independent director incentives: Where do talented directors spend their limited time and energy? Journal of Financial Economics, 111(2), 406–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng, X. H., Zeng, S. X., Shi, J. J., Qi, G. Y., & Zhang, Z. B. (2014). The relationship between corporate environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical study in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 145, 357–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelon, G., & Parbonetti, A. (2012). The effect of corporate governance on sustainability disclosure. Journal of Management and Governance, 16(3), 477–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohd Ghazali, N. A. (2007). Ownership structure and corporate social responsibility disclosure: Some Malaysian evidence. Corporate Governance, 7(3), 251–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neu, D., Warsame, H., & Pedwell, K. (1998). Managing public impressions: Environmental disclosures in annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(3), 265–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandit, G. M., Subrahmanyam, V., & Conway, G. M. (2006). Are the audit committee reports disclosing enough after the Sarbanes-Oxley Act? A study of NYSE companies. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(1), 34–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, S. A., Balic, A., & Bwakira, L. (2002). Measuring transparency and disclosure at firm level in emerging market. Emerging Markets Review, 3, 325–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, A. (2006). Corporate governance in the USA and Europe: They are closer than you might think. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 6(1), 69–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, J. E., Preston, L. E., & Sachs, S. (2002). Managing the extended enterprise: The new stakeholder view. California Management Review, 45(1), 6–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prado-Lorenzo, J.-M., & Garcia-Sanchez, I.-M. (2010). The role of the board of directors in disseminating relevant information on greenhouse gases. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(3), 391–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rankin, M., Windsor, C., & Wahyuni, D. (2011). An investigation of voluntary corporate greenhouse gas emissions reporting in a market governance system: Australian evidence. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 24(8), 1037–1070.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, K., & Tilt, C. (2016). Board composition and corporate social responsibility: The role of diversity, gender, strategy, and decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(2), 327–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, K., Tilt, C. A., & Lester, L. H. (2012). Corporate governance and environmental reporting: An Australian study. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 12(2), 143–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rentizelas, A., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., Al Balushi, A. D., & Tuni, A. (2018) Social sustainability in the oil and gas industry: institutional pressure and the management of sustainable supply chains. Annals of Operations Research, 1–22 (Article in press).

  • Said, R., Zainuddin, Y. H., & Haron, H. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility disclosure and corporate governance characteristics in Malaysian public listed companies. Social Responsibility Journal, 5(2), 212–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, D. A., & Cording, M. (2006). A corporate social performance–corporate financial performance behavioral model for consumers. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 540–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sierra, L., Zorio, A., & García-Benau, M. A. (2013). Sustainable development and assurance of corporate social responsibility reports published by Ibex-35 companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(6), 359–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J. M., Beyer, J. M., & Trice, H. M. (1978). Assessing personal, role, and organizational predictors of managerial commitment. The Academy of Management Journal, 21(3), 380–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tauringana, V., & Chithambo, L. (2015). The effect of DEFRA guidance on greenhouse gas disclosure. British Accounting Review, 47(4), 425–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Greenhouse Gas Protocol. (2004). A corporate accounting and reporting standard revised edition. World Resources Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development.

  • The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Pub.L. 107–204, 116 Stat. 745. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-107publ204/pdf/PLAW-107publ204. Access May 26, 2018.

  • Tricker, R. I. (1984) Corporate governance: Practices, procedures and powers in British Companies and Their Boards Directors. Gower Publishing.

  • Ullman, A. (1985). Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationship among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 540–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veronica Siregar, S., & Bachtiar, Y. (2010). Corporate social reporting: Empirical evidence from Indonesia Stock Exchange. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 3(3), 241–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, V. H., & Pahl, B. (1971). Relationship between age and risk taking among managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55(5), 399–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M.-C. (2017). The relationship between firm characteristics and the disclosure of sustainability reporting. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(4), 624–637.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Business Council for Sustainable Development. (2002). Sustainable development reporting: Striking the balance. Geneva: World Business Council for Sustainable Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yekini, K. C., Adelopo, I., Andrikopoulo, P., & Yekini, S. (2015). Impact of board independence on the quality of community disclosures in annual reports. Accounting Forum, 39, 249–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, S. X., Xu, X. D., Dong, Z. Y., & Tam, V. W. Y. (2010). Towards corporate environmental information disclosure: An empirical study in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(12), 1142–1148.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Business Administration, University of Western Macedonia, 6 km Paleas E.O Grevenon Kozanis, 51100, Grevena, Greece

    Grigoris Giannarakis

  2. Department of Business Administration, University of Macedonia, 156, Egnatia str, 54636, Thessaloniki, Greece

    Andreas Andronikidis

  3. Department of Accounting and Finance, University of Western Macedonia, Kila, 50100, Kozani, Greece

    Nikolaos Sariannidis

Authors
  1. Grigoris Giannarakis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andreas Andronikidis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nikolaos Sariannidis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grigoris Giannarakis.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Giannarakis, G., Andronikidis, A. & Sariannidis, N. Determinants of environmental disclosure: investigating new and conventional corporate governance characteristics. Ann Oper Res 294, 87–105 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03323-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03323-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation