Skip to main content
Log in

Enhanced indexing using weighted conditional value at risk

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We propose an enhanced indexing portfolio optimization model that not only seeks to maximize the excess returns over and above the benchmark index but simultaneously control the risk by introducing a constraint on the weighted conditional value at risk (WCVaR) of the portfolio. The constraint in the proposed model can be seen as hedging the risk described by WCVaR of the portfolio. To carry out a comparative analysis of the proposed model, we also suggest an enhanced indexing CVaR model. We analyze the performance of the proposed model at various risk levels on eight publicly available financial data sets from Beasley OR library, and S&P 500, S&P BSE 500, NASDAQ composite, FTSE 100 index, and their constituents, for average returns, Sharpe ratio, and upside potential ratio. Empirical analysis exhibits superior performance of the portfolios from the proposed WCVaR model over the respective benchmark indices and additionally the optimal portfolios obtained from various other enhanced indexing models that exist in the literature. Furthermore, we present evidence of better performance of WCVaR model over the CVaR model for long-term investment horizons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. \(L_0=0\) is selected only for computational convenience. However, an investor can select any value of \(L \in [L_{min},L_{max}]\).

References

  • Ahmed, P., & Nanda, S. (2005). Performance of enhanced index and quantitative equity funds. Financial Review, 40(4), 459–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beasley, J. E., Meade, N., & Chang, T. J. (2003). An evolutionary heuristic for the index tracking problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 148(3), 621–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruni, R., Cesarone, F., Scozzari, A., & Tardella, F. (2015). A linear risk-return model for enhanced indexation in portfolio optimization. OR Spectrum, 37(3), 735–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canakgoz, N. A., & Beasley, J. E. (2009). Mixed-integer programming approaches for index tracking and enhanced indexation. European Journal of Operational Research, 196(1), 384–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Paulo, W. L., De Oliveira, E. M., & Do Valle Costa, O. L. (2016). Enhanced index tracking optimal portfolio selection. Finance Research Letters, 16, 93–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiBartolomeo, D. (2000). The enhanced index fund as an alternative to indexed equity management. Boston: Northfield information services. http://www.northinfo.com/documents/70.pdf. Accessed 16 Jan 2019.

  • Edirisinghe, N. (2013). Index-tracking optimal portfolio selection. Quantitative Finance Letters, 1(1), 16–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilli, M., & Këllezi, E. (2002). The threshold accepting heuristic for index tracking. In P. Pardalos & V. K. Tsitsiringos (Eds.), Applied optimization series: Financial engineering, e-commerce and supply chain (pp. 1–18). Boston: Kluwer Academic.

  • Guastaroba, G., & Speranza, M. G. (2012). Kernel search: An application to the index tracking problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 217(1), 54–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guastaroba, G., Mansini, R., Ogryczak, W., & Speranza, M. G. (2016a). Linear programming models based on omega ratio for the enhanced index tracking problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 251(3), 938–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guastaroba, G., Mansini, R., Speranza, M. G., Ogryczak, W. (2016b). Enhanced index tracking with cvar-based measures. https://www.academia.edu/32399307/Enhanced_Index_Tracking_with_CVaR-Based_Measures. Accessed 16 Jan 2019.

  • Jeurissen, R., & Van den Berg, J. (2005). Index tracking using a hybrid genetic algorithm. In Proceedings of 2005 ICSC congress on computational intelligence methods and applications, Istanbul. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIMA. 2005.1662364.

  • Ji, R., Lejeune, M. A., & Prasad, S. Y. (2017). Properties, formulations, and algorithms for portfolio optimization using mean-gini criteria. Annals of Operations Research, 248(1–2), 305–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keating, C., & Shadwick, W. F. (2002). A universal performance measure. Journal of Performance Measurement, 6(3), 59–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koshizuka, T., Konno, H., & Yamamoto, R. (2009). Index-plus-alpha tracking subject to correlation constraint. International Journal of Optimization: Theory, Methods and Applications, 1(2), 215–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krokhmal, P., Palmquist, J., & Uryasev, S. (2002). Portfolio optimization with conditional value-at-risk objective and constraints. Journal of Risk, 4, 43–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Q., Sun, L., & Bao, L. (2011). Enhanced index tracking based on multi-objective immune algorithm. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(5), 6101–6106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linsmeier, T. J., Pearson, N. D., et al. (1996). Risk measurement: An introduction to value at risk. In Technical report 96-04. OFOR, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.

  • Lizyayev, A., & Ruszczyński, A. (2012). Tractable almost stochastic dominance. European Journal of Operational Research, 218(2), 448–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansini, R., Ogryczak, W., & Speranza, M. G. (2007a). Conditional value at risk and related linear programming models for portfolio optimization. Annals of Operations Research, 152(1), 227–256.

  • Mansini, R., Ogryczak, W., & Speranza, M. G. (2007b). Tail Gini’s risk measures and related linear programming models for portfolio optimization. In HERCMA conference proceedings, CD, LEA Publishers, Athens.

  • Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meade, N., & Beasley, J. E. (2011). Detection of momentum effects using an index out-performance strategy. Quantitative Finance, 11(2), 313–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogryczak, W., & Ruszczyński, A. (2002a). Dual stochastic dominance and quantile risk measures. International Transactions in Operational Research, 9(5), 661–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogryczak, W., & Ruszczynski, A. (2002b). Dual stochastic dominance and related mean-risk models. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 13(1), 60–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockafellar, R. T., & Uryasev, S. (2000). Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. Journal of Risk, 2, 21–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockafellar, R. T., & Uryasev, S. (2002). Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. Journal of Banking & Finance, 26(7), 1443–1471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roll, R. (1992). A mean/variance analysis of tracking error. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 18(4), 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roman, D., Mitra, G., & Zverovich, V. (2013). Enhanced indexation based on second-order stochastic dominance. European Journal of Operational Research, 228(1), 273–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudolf, M., Wolter, H. J., & Zimmermann, H. (1999). A linear model for tracking error minimization. Journal of Banking & Finance, 23(1), 85–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sant’Anna, L. R., Filomena, T. P., & Caldeira, J. F. (2017). Index tracking and enhanced indexing using cointegration and correlation with endogenous portfolio selection. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 65, 146–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scowcroft, A., & Sefton, J. (2003). Enhanced indexation. In S. Satchell & A. Scowcroft (Eds.), Advances in portfolio construction and implementation (pp. 95–124). Butterworth-Heinemann Finance.

  • Sharma, A., Agrawal, S., & Mehra, A. (2017). Enhanced indexing for risk averse investors using relaxed second order stochastic dominance. Optimization and Engineering, 18(2), 407–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, W. F. (1994). The sharpe ratio. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 21(1), 49–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sortino, F. A., Van Der Meer, R., & Plantinga, A. (1999). The dutch triangle. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 26(1), 50–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M., Xu, C., Xu, F., & Xue, H. (2012). A mixed 0–1 LP for index tracking problem with cvar risk constraints. Annals of Operations Research, 196(1), 591–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yitzhaki, S. (1982). Stochastic dominance, mean variance, and Gini’s mean difference. The American Economic Review, 72(1), 178–185.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are profoundly thankful to the Editor-in-Chief and the esteemed referees for their valuable comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruchika Sehgal.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sehgal, R., Mehra, A. Enhanced indexing using weighted conditional value at risk. Ann Oper Res 280, 211–240 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03132-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03132-2

Keywords

Navigation