Skip to main content
Log in

Examining military medical evacuation dispatching policies utilizing a Markov decision process model of a controlled queueing system

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Military medical planners must develop dispatching policies that dictate how aerial medical evacuation (MEDEVAC) units are utilized during major combat operations. The objective of this research is to determine how to optimally dispatch MEDEVAC units in response to 9-line MEDEVAC requests to maximize MEDEVAC system performance. A discounted, infinite horizon Markov decision process (MDP) model is developed to examine the MEDEVAC dispatching problem. The MDP model allows the dispatching authority to accept, reject, or queue incoming requests based on a request’s classification (i.e., zone and precedence level) and the state of the MEDEVAC system. A representative planning scenario based on contingency operations in southern Afghanistan is utilized to investigate the differences between the optimal dispatching policy and three practitioner-friendly myopic policies. Two computational experiments are conducted to examine the impact of selected MEDEVAC problem features on the optimal policy and the system performance measure. Several excursions are examined to identify how the 9-line MEDEVAC request arrival rate and the MEDEVAC flight speeds impact the optimal dispatching policy. Results indicate that dispatching MEDEVAC units considering the precedence level of requests and the locations of busy MEDEVAC units increases the performance of the MEDEVAC system. These results inform the development and implementation of MEDEVAC tactics, techniques, and procedures by military medical planners. Moreover, an analysis of solution approaches for the MEDEVAC dispatching problem reveals that the policy iteration algorithm substantially outperforms the linear programming algorithms executed by CPLEX 12.6 with regard to computational effort. This result supports the claim that policy iteration remains the superlative solution algorithm for exactly solving computationally tractable Markov decision problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alsalloum, O. I., & Rand, G. K. (2006). Extensions to emergency vehicle location models. Computers & Operations Research, 33(9), 2725–2743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandara, D., Mayorga, M. E., & McLay, L. A. (2012). Optimal dispatching strategies for emergency vehicles to increase patient survivability. International Journal of Operational Research, 15(2), 195–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandara, D., Mayorga, M. E., & McLay, L. A. (2014). Priority dispatching strategies for EMS systems. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 65(4), 572–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastian, N. D. (2010). A robust, multi-criteria modeling approach for optimizing aeromedical evacuation asset emplacement. The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation: Applications, Methodology, Technology, 7(1), 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastian, N. D., Fulton, L. V., Mitchell, R., Pollard, W., Wierschem, D., & Wilson, R. (2012). The future of vertical lift: Initial insights for aircraft capability and medical planning. Military Medicine, 177(7), 863–869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bixby, R. E. (2012). A brief history of linear and mixed-integer programming computation. Documenta Mathematica, Extra Volume: Optimization Stories, 107–121.

  • Carter, G. M., Chaiken, J. M., & Ignall, E. (1972). Response areas for two emergency units. Operations Research, 20(3), 571–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J. E., & Davis, P. R. (2012). Medical evacuation and triage of combat casualties in Helmand Province, Afghanistan: October 2010–April 2011. Military Medicine, 177(11), 1261–1266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, M. (2016). Bell touts future army helicopter design: ’V-280 is not a V-22’. http://www.military.com/daily-news/2016/01/15/bell-touts-future-army-helicopter-design-v280-is-not-a-v22.html. Accessed 7 September 2016.

  • De Lorenzo, R. A. (2003). Military casualty evacuation: MEDEVAC (pp. 45–59)., Aeromedical evacuation: Management of acute and stabilized patients New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Defense. (2016). Defense Casualties Analysis System (DCAS) Operation FREEDOM’S SENTINEL (OFS). https://www.dmdc.osd.mil/dcas/pages/casualties_ofs.xhtml. Accessed 22 December 2016.

  • Department of the Army. (2000). Field manual 8-10-6, medical evacuation in a theater of operations.

  • Department of the Army. (2016). Army Techniques Publication 4-02.2, medical evacuation. Change 1.

  • Eastridge, B. J., Mabry, R. L., Seguin, P., Cantrell, J., Tops, T., Uribe, P., et al. (2012). Death on the battlefield (2001–2011): Implications for the future of combat casualty care. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 73(6), S431–S437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fish, P. N. (2014). Army medical officer’s guide. Mechanicsburg: Stackpole Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, L. V., Lasdon, L. S., McDaniel, R. R., & Coppola, M. N. (2010). Two-stage stochastic optimization for the allocation of medical assets in steady-state combat operations. The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation: Applications, Methodology, Technology, 7(2), 89–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, L., McMurry, P., & Kerr, B. (2009). A Monte Carlo simulation of air ambulance requirements during major combat operations. Military Medicine, 174(6), 610–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, M. X. (2013). USCENTCOM review of MEDEVAC procedures in Afghanistan. Technical report, United States Central Command.

  • Grannan, B. C., Bastian, N. D., & McLay, L. A. (2015). A maximum expected covering problem for locating and dispatching two classes of military medical evacuation air assets. Optimization Letters, 9(8), 1511–1531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, L. V., & Kolesar, P. J. (2004). Anniversary article: Improving emergency responsiveness with management science. Management Science, 50(8), 1001–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, D., & Harris, C. M. (1998). Fundamentals of queueing theory (4th ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. (2015). Army wants more adaptive HH-60 medical evacuation systems. http://www.military.com/daily-news/2015/04/03/army-wants-more-adaptive-hh60-medical-evacuation-systems.html. Accessed 7 September 2016.

  • International Council on Security and Development (ICOS). (2008). Afghanistan–Pakistan Insurgent activities in Afghanistan and Pakistan (2007). http://www.icosgroup.net/wp-content/gallery/taliban-presence/016_map.png. Accessed 4 January 2017.

  • Jarvis, J. P. (1985). Approximating the equilibrium behavior of multi-server loss systems. Management Science, 31(2), 235–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keneally, S. K., Robbins, M. J., & Lunday, B. J. (2016). A Markov decision process model for the optimal dispatch of military medical evacuation assets. Health Care Management Science, 19(2), 111–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotwal, R. S., Howard, J. T., Orman, J. A., Tarpey, B. W., Bailey, J. A., Champion, H. R., et al. (2016). The effect of a golden hour policy on the morbidity and mortality of combat casualties. JAMA Surgery, 151(1), 15–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuisma, M., Holmström, P., Repo, J., Määttä, T., Nousila-Wiik, M., & Boyd, J. (2004). Prehospital mortality in an EMS system using medical priority dispatching: A community based cohort study. Resuscitation, 61(3), 297–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulkarni, V. G. (2009). Modeling and analysis of stochastic systems (2nd ed.). Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lejeune, M. A., & Margot, F. (2016). Aeromedical battlefield evacuation under endogenous uncertainty. Technical report, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburg, PA.

  • Leoni, R. D. (2007). Black hawk: The story of a world class helicopter. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MacFarlane, C., & Benn, C. (2003). Evaluation of emergency medical services systems: A classification to assist in determination of indicators. Emergency Medicine Journal, 20(2), 188–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malsby, R. F, I. I. I., Quesada, J., Powell-Dunford, N., Kinoshita, R., Kurtz, J., Gehlen, W., et al. (2013). Prehospital blood product transfusion by US Army MEDEVAC during combat operations in Afghanistan: A process improvement initiative. Military Medicine, 178(7), 785–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, M. S., Restrepo, M., Henderson, S. G., & Topaloglu, H. (2010). Approximate dynamic programming for ambulance redeployment. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 22(2), 266–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLay, L. A., & Mayorga, M. E. (2010). Evaluating emergency medical service performance measures. Health Care Management Science, 13(2), 124–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLay, L. A., & Mayorga, M. E. (2013). A model for optimally dispatching ambulances to emergency calls with classification errors in patient priorities. IIE Transactions, 45(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholl, J., Coleman, P., Parry, G., Turner, J., & Dixon, S. (1999). Emergency priority dispatch systemsa new era in the provision of ambulance services in the UK. Pre-Hospital Immediate Care, 3(2), 71–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Shea, B. (2011). Saving lives on the battlefield. Military Medical/CBRN Technology, 15(6), 8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. B. (2011). Approximate dynamic programming: Solving the curses of dimensionality (2nd ed.). Princeton: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Puterman, M. L. (1994). Markov decision processes: Discrete stochastic dynamic programming. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rettke, A. J., Robbins, M. J., & Lunday, B. J. (2016). Approximate dynamic programming for the dispatch of military medical evacuation assets. European Journal of Operational Research, 254(3), 824–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shenker, S., & Weinrib, A. (1989). The optimal control of heterogeneous queueing systems: A paradigm for load-sharing and routing. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 38(12), 1724–1735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stidham, S. (1985). Optimal control of admission to a queueing system. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 30(8), 705–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stidham, S, Jr. (2002). Analysis, design, and control of queueing systems. Operations Research, 50(1), 197–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stidham, S, Jr., & Weber, R. (1993). A survey of Markov decision models for control of networks of queues. Queueing Systems, 13(1–3), 291–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundstrom, S. C., Blood, C. G., & Matheny, S. A. (1996). The optimal placement of casualty evacuation assets: A linear programming model. In Proceedings of the 28th conference on winter simulation (pp. 907–911). IEEE Computer Society.

  • White, M. (2016). Operation ENDURING FREEDOM (OEF), Fatalities by Provinces. http://icasualties.org/OEF/ByProvince.aspx. Accessed 22 December 2016.

  • Zeto, J., Yamada, W., & Collins, G. (2006). Optimizing the emplacement of scarce resources to maximize the expected coverage of a geographically variant demand function. In Proceedings of technical report, US Center for Army Analysis, Ft Belvoir.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the United States Army, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or the United States Government. The authors would like to thank the United States Army Medical Evacuation Proponency Directorate for its support of this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew J. Robbins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jenkins, P.R., Robbins, M.J. & Lunday, B.J. Examining military medical evacuation dispatching policies utilizing a Markov decision process model of a controlled queueing system. Ann Oper Res 271, 641–678 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2760-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2760-z

Keywords

Navigation