Skip to main content
Log in

Integrated strategic and tactical supply chain planning with price-sensitive demands

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with the supply chain network design and planning for a multi-commodity and multi-layer network over a planning horizon with multiple periods in which demands of customer zones are considered to be price dependent. These prices determine the demands using plausible price–demand relationships of customer zones. The net income of the supply chain is maximized, while satisfying budget constraints for investment in network design. In addition, a new approach is considered for capacity planning to make the problem more realistic. In this regard, when production plants are opened and expanded, capacity options are taken into account for manufacturing operations. Furthermore, several aspects relevant to real world applications are captured in the problem. Different interconnected time periods in the planning horizon are considered for strategic and tactical decisions in the problem and then, a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model is developed. The performance and applications of the model are investigated by several test problems with reasonable sizes. The numerical results illustrate that obtained solutions after solving the MILP model by using CPLEX solver are acceptable. Moreover, using an alternative pricing approach, a tight upper bound is provided for the problem. In addition, a deep sensitivity analysis is conducted to show the validity and performance of the proposed model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abouei Ardakan, M., Hakimian, A., & Rezvan, M. T. (2013). A branch-and-bound algorithm for minimising the number of tardy jobs in a two-machine flow-shop problem with release dates. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 27(6), 519–528. doi:10.1080/0951192x.2013.820349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aghezzaf, E. (2005). Capacity planning and warehouse location in supply chains with uncertain demands. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 56(4), 453–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadi-Javid, A., & Ghandali, R. (2014). An efficient optimization procedure for designing a capacitated distribution network with price-sensitive demand. Optimization and Engineering, 15(3), 801–817. doi:10.1007/s11081-013-9245-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadi-Javid, A., & Hoseinpour, P. (2015). Incorporating location, inventory and price decisions into a supply chain distribution network design problem. Computers and Operations Research, 56, 110–119. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2014.07.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akçalı, E., Çetinkaya, S., & Üster, H. (2009). Network design for reverse and closed-loop supply chains: An annotated bibliography of models and solution approaches. Networks, 53(3), 231–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badri, H., Bashiri, M., & Hejazi, T. H. (2013). Integrated strategic and tactical planning in a supply chain network design with a heuristic solution method. Computers and Operations Research, 40(4), 1143–1154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballou, R. H. (1968). Dynamic warehouse location analysis. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 5(3), 271–276.

  • Bashiri, M., Badri, H., & Talebi, J. (2012). A new approach to tactical and strategic planning in production-distribution networks. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 36(4), 1703–1717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canel, C., Khumawala, B. M., Law, J., & Loh, A. (2001). An algorithm for the capacitated, multi-commodity multi-period facility location problem. Computers and Operations Research, 28(5), 411–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chardaire, P., Sutter, A., & Costa, M. C. (1996). Solving the dynamic facility location problem. Networks, 28(2), 117–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correia, I., Melo, T., & Saldanha-da-Gama, F. (2013). Comparing classical performance measures for a multi-period, two-echelon supply chain network design problem with sizing decisions. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 64(1), 366–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dias, J., Eugénia Captivo, M., & Clímaco, J. (2007). Efficient primal-dual heuristic for a dynamic location problem. Computers and Operations Research, 34(6), 1800–1823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esmaeilikia, M., Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J., Govindan, K., Kumar, A., & Mo, J. (2014). Tactical supply chain planning models with inherent flexibility: Definition and review. Annals of Operations Research, 1–21. doi:10.1007/s10479-014-1544-3.

  • Galvao, R. D., & Santibanez-Gonzalez, E. R. (1992). A Lagrangean heuristic for the \(p_k\)-median dynamic location problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 58(2), 250–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgiadis, M. C., Tsiakis, P., Longinidis, P., & Sofioglou, M. K. (2011). Optimal design of supply chain networks under uncertain transient demand variations. Omega, 39(3), 254–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goetschalckx, M., Vidal, C. J., & Dogan, K. (2002). Modeling and design of global logistics systems: A review of integrated strategic and tactical models and design algorithms. European Journal of Operational Research, 143(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanjoul, P., Hansen, P., Peeters, D., & Thisse, J.-F. (1990). Uncapacitated plant location under alternative spatial price policies. Management Science, 36(1), 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, P., Peeters, D., & Thisse, J. F. (1997). Facility location under zone pricing. Journal of Regional Science, 37(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, P., Thisse, J.-F., & Hanjoul, P. (1981). Simple plant location under uniform delivered pricing. European Journal of Operational Research, 6(2), 94–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinojosa, Y., Kalcsics, J., Nickel, S., Puerto, J., & Velten, S. (2008). Dynamic supply chain design with inventory. Computers and Operations Research, 35(2), 373–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinojosa, Y., Puerto, J., & Fernández, F. R. (2000). A multiperiod two-echelon multicommodity capacitated plant location problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 123(2), 271–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keyvanshokooh, E., Fattahi, M., Seyed-Hosseini, S. M., & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. (2013). A dynamic pricing approach for returned products in integrated forward/reverse logistics network design. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(24), 10182–10202. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2013.05.042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longinidis, P., & Georgiadis, M. C. (2011). Integration of financial statement analysis in the optimal design of supply chain networks under demand uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, 129(2), 262–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melo, M., Nickel, S., & Saldanha-da-Gama, F. (2012). A tabu search heuristic for redesigning a multi-echelon supply chain network over a planning horizon. International Journal of Production Economics, 136(1), 218–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melo, M. T., Nickel, S., & Saldanha-Da-Gama, F. (2009). Facility location and supply chain management: A review. European Journal of Operational Research, 196(2), 401–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melo, M. T., Nickel, S., & Saldanha-da-Gama, F. (2014). An efficient heuristic approach for a multi-period logistics network redesign problem. TOP, 22(1), 80–108. doi:10.1007/s11750-011-0235-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melo, M. T., Nickel, S., & Saldanha da Gama, F. (2006). Dynamic multi-commodity capacitated facility location: A mathematical modeling framework for strategic supply chain planning. Computers and Operations Research, 33(1), 181–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickel, S., Saldanha-da-Gama, F., & Ziegler, H.-P. (2012). A multi-stage stochastic supply network design problem with financial decisions and risk management. Omega, 40(5), 511–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, R. (2005). Pricing and revenue optimization. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, B. S., Mateus, G. R., & Almeida, F. A. (2013). Stochastic capacity planning and dynamic network design. International Journal of Production Economics, 145(1), 139–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ReVelle, C. S., Eiselt, H. A., & Daskin, M. S. (2008). A bibliography for some fundamental problem categories in discrete location science. European Journal of Operational Research, 184(3), 817–848. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.12.044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salema, M. I. G., Barbosa-Povoa, A. P., & Novais, A. Q. (2010). Simultaneous design and planning of supply chains with reverse flows: A generic modelling framework. European Journal of Operational Research, 203(2), 336–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schütz, P., Tomasgard, A., & Ahmed, S. (2009). Supply chain design under uncertainty using sample average approximation and dual decomposition. European Journal of Operational Research, 199(2), 409–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. J. (1971). Dynamic location–allocation systems: Some basic planning strategies. Environment and Planning, 3(1), 73–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, Z.-J. M. (2006). A profit-maximizing supply chain network design model with demand choice flexibility. Operations Research Letters, 34(6), 673–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talluri, K. T., & Ryzin, G. J. (2006). The theory and practice of revenue management (Vol. 68). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, L., Jiang, W., & Saharidis, G. D. (2013). An improved Benders decomposition algorithm for the logistics facility location problem with capacity expansions. Annals of Operations Research, 210(1), 165–190. doi:10.1007/s10479-011-1050-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thanh, P. N., Bostel, N., & Péton, O. (2008). A dynamic model for facility location in the design of complex supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 113(2), 678–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thanh, P. N., Péton, O., & Bostel, N. (2010). A linear relaxation-based heuristic approach for logistics network design. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 59(4), 964–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vila, D., Martel, A., & Beauregard, R. (2006). Designing logistics networks in divergent process industries: A methodology and its application to the lumber industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 102(2), 358–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J., & Falkson, L. (1975). The optimal nodal location of public facilities with price-sensitive demand. Geographical Analysis, 7(1), 69–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm, W., Han, X., & Lee, C. (2013). Computational comparison of two formulations for dynamic supply chain reconfiguration with capacity expansion and contraction. Computers and Operations Research, 40(10), 2340–2356. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2013.04.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarandi, M. F., Mosadegh, H., & Fattahi, M. (2013). Two-machine robotic cell scheduling problem with sequence-dependent setup times. Computers and Operations Research, 40(5), 1420–1434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, S. (2001). On a profit maximizing location model. Annals of Operations Research, 103(1–4), 251–260. doi:10.1023/a:1012963324046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Mahootchi.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Pricing parameters

In the pricing framework, in each tactical period, each customer zone has a willingness to pay distribution function for each product. Therefore, a price–demand relation is assumed for any customer in each time period and for each product. The relation between price \((P_{i, k,p, t} )\) and demand \((D_{i, k,p, t} )\) can be generally illustrated as in Fig. 17. This price response function is a special case of logit function. For more detailed explanations, one can refer to Phillips (2005) and Talluri and Ryzin (2006).

Fig. 17
figure 17

The price-response function

In the test problems, \(DMAX_{i, k,p, t} ,a_{i, k,p, t} ,\) and \(b_{i, k,p, t}\) are generated as \(DMAX_{i, k,p, t} \sim U\left( {500,1200} \right) \), \(a_{i, k,p, t} \sim U\left( {140,150} \right) \), and \(b_{i, k,p, t} \sim U\left( {190,200} \right) \), successively. Since a unique price for all customers is considered in the optimization problem to avoid cannibalization and arbitrage opportunity, the assumed price levels for all customers are the similar in each time period. Therefore, in each time period and for each product, the price level l is obtained as follows:

$$\begin{aligned} \hbox {PR}_{k, l, p, t}= & {} \frac{\sum \nolimits _{i\in C} {a_{i, k,p, t} } }{\left| C \right| }+\frac{\left( {l-1} \right) }{\left( {\left| L \right| -1} \right) }\left( {\frac{\sum \nolimits _{i\in C} {b_{i, k,p, t} } }{\left| C \right| }-\frac{\sum \nolimits _{i\in C} {a_{i, k,p, t} } }{\left| C \right| }} \right) \nonumber \\&\quad l\in L, k\in K, p\in P/\left\{ 0 \right\} , t\in T, \end{aligned}$$
(50)

In each time period, the customer product demand for every price level should be obtained using the corresponding price-response function. Figure 18 shows the levels of price and demand for customer i and product k in strategic period p and tactical period t.

Fig. 18
figure 18

The levels of price and demand

Appendix 2

See Table 7.

Table 7 Parameters generation for test problems

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fattahi, M., Mahootchi, M. & Moattar Husseini, S.M. Integrated strategic and tactical supply chain planning with price-sensitive demands. Ann Oper Res 242, 423–456 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-1924-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-1924-3

Keywords

Navigation