Skip to main content
Log in

An efficient feature extraction approach based on manifold learning for analogue circuits fault diagnosis

  • Published:
Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Automated fault diagnosis of analogue circuits makes use of dimension reduction (DR) technologies to extract fault features. Traditional DR methods such as the principal component analysis (PCA) and kernel based DR methods have achieved valuable results. However, these methods give inadequate consideration to the geometric structure of fault data which is embedded in high dimensional spaces (HDS). This negatively affects the low-dimensional features. Recently introduced, manifold learning methods have the ability to recover the intrinsic geometric structure of a data set in low dimensional spaces (LDS). Locally linear embedding (LLE) and diffusion maps (DM) are two popular approaches of manifold learning methods. The former preserves the local linear structure of a data set and the latter is resistant to outlier effects. We present a novel DR algorithm using both LLE and DM to extract fault features based on the analysis of the intrinsic geometric structure of fault data. First, by the correlation analysis of the original fault data, we conclude that they are locally linear dependent, and then use LLE to obtain mid-level fault features. The calculation of local outlier factor (LOF) values confirms the existence of outliers in the fault data with mid-level features. Then, we apply DM to eliminate the negative effect of outliers and derive visual data with high-level features. Our experimental results show that the proposed algorithm offers performance superior to the traditional DR methods regardless of whether the circuit is linear or non-linear.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pecht, M., & Jaai, R. (2010). A prognostics and health management roadmap for information and electronics-rich systems. Microelectronics Reliability,50(3), 317–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sikorska, J., Hodkiewicz, M., & Ma, L. (2011). Prognostic modeling options for remaining useful life estimation by industry. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing,25(5), 1803–1836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Long, Y., Xiong, Y., He, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2017). A new switched current circuit fault diagnosis approach based on pseudorandom test and preprocess by using entropy and haar wavelet transform. Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing,91(3), 445–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Butcher, S. G. W., & Sheppard, J. W. (2009). Distributional smoothing in Bayesian fault diagnosis. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation & Measurement,58(2), 342–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ma, Q., He, Y., & Zhou, F. (2016). A new decision tree approach of support vector machine for analog circuit fault diagnosis. Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing,88(3), 455–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Moura, M. D. C., Zio, E., Lins, I. D., et al. (2017). Failure and reliability prediction by support vector machines regression of time series data. Reliability Engineering & System Safety,96(11), 1527–1534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jiang, Y., Wang, Y., & Luo, H. (2015). Fault diagnosis of analog circuit based on a second map SVDD. Analog Integrated Circuits & Signal Processing,85(3), 395–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Xie, X., Li, X., Bi, D., et al. (2015). Analog circuits soft fault diagnosis using Rényi’s entropy. Journal of Electronic Testing,31(2), 217–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, J. (2012). Geometric structure of high-dimensional data and dimensionality reduction (pp. 204–220). Beijing: Higher Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lee, J. A., & Verleysen, M. (2007). Nonlinear dimensionality reduction (pp. 37–44). New York: Springer.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Sharifzadeh, S., & Sharifzadeh, S. (2017). Sparse supervised principal component analysis (SSPCA) for dimension reduction and variable selection. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence,65, 168–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hyvärinen, A., Hurri, J., & Hoyer, P. O. (2000). Independent component analysis. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks,15(2), 529.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smola, A. J. (1997). Kernel principal component analysis. In International conference on artificial neural networks (pp. 583–588).

  14. Jenssen, R. (2010). Kernel entropy component analysis. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,32(5), 847–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Roweis, S. T., & Saul, L. K. (2000). Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. Science,290(5500), 2323–2326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ma, M., Chen, X., Zhang, X., et al. (2017). Locally linear embedding on Grassmann manifold for performance degradation assessment of bearings. IEEE Transactions on Reliability,66, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang, T., Yang, J., Zhao, D., et al. (2007). Linear local tangent space alignment and application to face recognition. Neurocomputing,70(7), 1547–1553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shao, H., Jiang, H., Li, X., et al. (2018). Rolling bearing fault detection using continuous deep belief network with locally linear embedding. Computers in Industry,96, 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, X., Zhao, J., Zhu, B., et al. (2018). A side scan sonar image target detection algorithm based on a neutrosophic set and diffusion maps. Remote Sensing,10(2), 295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen, C., Zhang, L., Bu, J., et al. (2010). Constrained Laplacian Eigenmap for dimensionality reduction. Neurocomputing,73(4), 951–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Coifman, R. R., & Lafon, S. (2006). Diffusion maps. Applied & Computational Harmonic Analysis,21(1), 5–30.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Grzechca, D., Rutkowski, J., Golonek, T. (2010). PCA application to frequency reduction for fault diagnosis in analog and mixed electronic circuit. In IEEE international symposium on circuits and systems (pp. 1919–1922).

  23. Xiao, Y., & He, Y. (2011). A novel approach for analog fault diagnosis based on neural networks and improved kernel PCA. Neurocomputing,74(7), 1102–1115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang, C., He, Y., Zuo, L., et al. (2015). A novel approach to diagnosis of analog circuit incipient faults based on KECA and OAO LSSVM. Metrology & Measurement Systems,22(2), 251–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Coifman, R. R., Lafon, S., Lee, A. B., et al. (2005). Geometric diffusions as a tool for harmonic analysis and structure definition of data: Multiscale methods. In Proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the United States of America (Vol. 102, no. 21, pp. 7426–7431).

  26. Rui, X., Damelin, S., Nadler, B., et al. (2010). Clustering of high-dimensional gene expression data with feature filtering methods and diffusion maps. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine,48(2), 91–98.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ferguson, A. L., Panagiotopoulos, A. Z., Kevrekidis, I. G., et al. (2011). Nonlinear dimensionality reduction in molecular simulation: The diffusion map approach. Chemical Physics Letters,509(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Levina, E., Bickel, P. J. (2004). Maximum Likelihood estimation of intrinsic dimension. In international conference on neural information processing systems (pp. 777–784).

  29. You, S., & Ma, H. (2011). Manifold topological multi-resolution analysis method. Pattern Recognition,44(8), 1629–1648.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang, Z., Lan, H., & Zhao, T. (2017). Detection and mitigation of radiometers radio-frequency interference by using the local outlier factor. Remote Sensing Letters,8, 311–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 51577046, the State Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 51637004, the national key research and development plan “important scientific instruments and equipment development” Grant No. 2016YFF0102200, Anhui Provincial Science and Technology Foundation of China under Grant No. 1301022036.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yigang He.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yuan, Z., He, Y., Yuan, L. et al. An efficient feature extraction approach based on manifold learning for analogue circuits fault diagnosis. Analog Integr Circ Sig Process 102, 237–252 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10470-018-1377-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10470-018-1377-0

Keywords

Navigation