Abstract
This paper presents the definition of the cotwists of a bicomonad, which offers a generalization of cotwists of bimonoids in duoidal categories. We show that a new bicomonad can be deduced from the cotwist, and their corepresentations are monoidal isomorphic. As applications, the cotwists of bialgebroids and of BiHom-bialgebras are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aguiar, M., Mahajan, S.: Monoidal Species and Hopf Algebras. CRM Monograph Series 29. American Math. Soc., Providence (2010)
Aljadeff, E., Etingof, P., Gelaki, S., Nikshych, D.: On twisting of finite-dimensional Hopf algebras. J. Algebra 256, 484–501 (2002)
Booker, T., Street, R.: Tannaka duality and convolution for duoidal categories. Theory Appl. Categ. 28(6), 166–205 (2013)
Bruguières, A., Lack, S., Virelizier, A.: Hopf monads on monoidal categories. Adv. Math. 227(2), 745–800 (2011)
Bruguières, A., Virelizier, A.: Hopf monads. Adv. Math. 215(2), 679–733 (2007)
Böhm, G., Lack, S., Street, R.: Weak bimonads and weak Hopf monads. J. Algebra 328, 1–30 (2011)
Böhm, G., Chen, Y.Y., Zhang, L.Y.: On Hopf monoids in duoidal categories. J. Algebra 394, 139–172 (2013)
Caenepeel, S., Goyvaerts, I.: Monoidal Hom-Hopf algebras. Comm. Algebra 39, 2216–2240 (2011)
Chen, Y.Y., Böhm, G.: Weak bimonoids in duoidal categories. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 218(12), 2240–2273 (2014)
Chikhladze, D., Lack, S., Street, R.: Hopf monoidal comonads. Theory Appl. Categ. 24(19), 554–563 (2010)
Drinfeld, V.G.: Quasi-Hopf algebras. Algebra i Analiz 1, 114–148 (1989). English translation: Leningrad Math. J. 1, 1419-1457, 1990
Eilenberg, S., Moore, J.C.: Adjoint functors and triples. Illinois J. Math. 9 (2), 381–398 (1965)
Forcey, S., Siehler, J., Sowers, E.S.: Operads in iterated monoidal categories. J. Homotopy Relat. Struct. 2(1), 1–43 (2007)
Graziani, G., Makhlouf, A., Menini, C., Panaite, F.: BiHom-associative algebras, BiHom-Lie algebras and BiHom-bialgebras. SIGMA 11(086), 086 (2015)
Guo, S.J., Zhang, X.H.: Separable functors for the category of Doi Hom-Hopf modules. Colloq. Math. 143, 23–37 (2016)
Guo, S.J., Zhang, X.H., Wang, S.X.: The construction and deformation of BiHom-Novikov algebras. J. Geom. Phys. 132, 460–472 (2018)
Kassel, C.: Quantum Groups. Springer, New York (1995)
Livernet, M., Mesablishvili, B., Wisbauer, R.: Generalised bialgebras and entwined monads and comonads. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 219, 3263–3278 (2015)
Lu, D.W., Zhang, X.H.: Hom-L-R-smash biproduct and the category of Hom-Yetter-Drinfel’d-Long bimodules. J. Algebra Appl. 17(7), 1850133 (2018)
Mac Lane, S.: Categories for the Working Mathematicians. Graduate Texts in Math. Springer, New York (1971)
Mac Lane, S.: Homologie Des Anneaux Et Des Modules. Colloque de topologie algebrique, Louvain (1956)
Makhlouf, A., Panaite, F.: Hom-L-R-smash products, Hom-diagonal crossed products and the Drinfeld double of a Hom-Hopf algebra. J. Algebra 441(1), 314–343 (2015)
Makhlouf, A., Panaite, F.: Yetter-Drinfeld modules for Hom-bialgebras. J. Math. Phys. 55, 013501 (2014)
Makhlouf, A., Silvestrov, S.D.: Hom-algebras and Hom-coalgebras. J. Algebra Appl. 09, 553–589 (2010)
Makhlouf, A., Silvestrov, S.D.: Hom-algebras structures. J. Gen. Lie Theory Appl. 2, 51–64 (2008)
Makhlouf, A., Silvestrov, S.D.: Hom-Lie Admissible Hom-coalgebras and Hom-Hopf Algebras. Generalized Lie theory in Mathematics, Physics and Beyond, pp Chp 17, 189–206. Springer, Berlin (2008)
McCrudden, P.: Opmonoidal monads. Theory Appl. Categ. 10(19), 469–485 (2002)
Mesablishvili, B.: Bimonads and Hopf monads on categories. J. K-theory 7(2), 349–388 (2011)
Mesablishvili, B., Wisbauer, R.: Galois functors and generalised Hopf modules. J. Homotopy Relat. Struct. 9(1), 199–222 (2014)
Mesablishvili, B., Wisbauer, R.: The fundamental theorem for weak braided bimonads. J. Algebra 490, 55–103 (2017)
Moerdijk, I.: Monads on tensor categories. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 168(2-3), 189–208 (2002)
Power, J., Watanabe, H.: Combining a monad and a comonad. Theor. Comput. Sci. 280(1-2), 137–162 (2002)
Street, R.: The formal theory of monads. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 2(2), 149–168 (1972)
Wang, D.G., Zhang, J.J., Zhuang, G.B.: Coassociative Lie algebras. Glasgow Math. J. 55, 195–215 (2013)
Xu, Y.J., Wang, D.G., Chen, J.L.: Analogues of quantum Schubert cell algebras in PBW-deformations of quantum groups. J. Algebra Appl. 15(10), 1650179 (2016)
Yau, D.: Hom-quantum groups I: Quasitriangular Hom-bialgebras. J. Phys. A 45(6), 065203 (2012)
Zhang, X.H., Dong, L.H.: Braided mixed datums and their applications on Hom-quantum groups. Glasgow Math. J. 60, 231–251 (2018)
Zhang, X.H., Wang, W., Zhao, X.F.: Drinfeld twists for monoidal Hom-bialgebras. Colloq. Math. 156(2), 199–228 (2019)
Zhang, X.H., Wang, W., Zhao, X.F.: Smash coproducts of bicomonads and Hom-entwining structures. e-Print arXiv:1601.07979 [math.RA] (2016)
Zhao, X.F., Zhang, X.H.: Lazy 2-cocycles over monoidal Hom-Hopf algebras. Colloq. Math. 142(1), 61–81 (2016)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Presented by: Michel Brion
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The work was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11801304, 11801306, 11871301), and the Project funded by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2018M630768).
Appendix: Some diagrammatic proofs
Appendix: Some diagrammatic proofs
Proof of Lemma 4.3.
⇒: If κ′ is the convolution inverse of κ, then for any \(X,Y \in \mathcal {M}\), we have
Thus \(\overline {\kappa ^{\prime }}\ast \overline {\kappa } = \varepsilon \diamond \varepsilon \). Note that in this diagram, the formulae (A2), (U4), (3.1) and the naturality are used. Similarly, one can check that \(\overline {\kappa }\ast \overline {\kappa ^{\prime }} = \varepsilon \diamond \varepsilon \). □
Proof of Proposition 4.4.
We only need to prove \({\overline {A^{\kappa }}}_{2} = {{\overline {A}}^{\overline {\kappa }}}_{2}\). To prove this, for any \(X,Y \in \mathcal {M}\), we have
This completes our substantiation. □
Proof of Lemma 4.7, verification of ⇒:
Suppose that Diagram (3.2) holds. For any \(X,Y,Z \in \mathcal {M}\), we compute as follows.
On the one hand, we have
Note that in this diagram, Eqs. (A1) and (3.2) are used.
On the other hand, we have
This completes the prove. □
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, X., Wang, D. Cotwists of Bicomonads and BiHom-bialgebras. Algebr Represent Theor 23, 1355–1385 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10468-019-09888-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10468-019-09888-2