Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Biometric Registration to an HIV Research Study may Deter Participation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biometric registration may improve services associated with HIV research. A cross-sectional, observational survey was used to evaluate biometric fingerprint scanning for identification (ID) verification in the setting of an HIV prevention study. Survey outcomes were dichotomized (discouraged or not discouraged) by biometric scanning and statistical analyses were used to determine if participation decreased by greater than 10% overall and after stratifying by demographic variables and risk behaviors. 206 participants were recruited from a community-based HIV and sexual health research screening program. Participants completed a quantitative survey to assess their perceptions of biometric scanning for ID verification. The majority of participants (n = 160; 77.7%) indicated no deterrence from testing due to biometric scanning, yet a significant number (n = 45; 23.3%, P < .001) reported at least partial deterrence. Research using biometric scanning for ID verification may significantly limit access to HIV prevention services and may risk reducing meaningful participation among marginalized populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fauci AS, Redfield RR, Sigounas G, Weahkee MD, Giroir BP. Ending the HIV epidemic: a plan for the United States. JAMA. 2019;321(9):844–5. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.1343.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Engel S, Gwadz MV, Cleland CM. The experience of screening for HIV/AIDS medical studies among African-American/Black and Latino/Hispanic persons living with HIV/AIDS: a mixed-methods exploration. J AIDS Clin Res. 2013. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6113.1000223.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Cargill VA, Stone VE. HIV/AIDS: a minority health issue. Med Clin North Am. 2005;89(4):895–912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2005.03.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gwadz MV, Colon P, Ritchie AS, et al. Increasing and supporting the participation of persons of color living with HIV/AIDS in AIDS clinical trials. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2010;7(4):194–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11904-010-0055-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Castillo-Mancilla JR, Cohn SE, Krishnan S, et al. Minorities remain underrepresented in HIV/AIDS research despite access to clinical trials. HIV Clin Trials. 2014;15(1):14–26. https://doi.org/10.1310/hct1501-14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Sullivan PS, McNaghten AD, Begley E, Hutchinson A, Cargill VA. Enrollment of racial/ethnic minorities and women with HIV in clinical research studies of HIV medicines. J Natl Med Assoc. 2007;99(3):242–50.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Mannheimer SB, Wang L, Wilton L, et al. Infrequent HIV testing and late HIV diagnosis are common among a cohort of black men who have sex with men in 6 US cities. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014;67(4):438–45. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000000334.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoenigl M, Green N, Mehta SR, Little SJ. Risk factors for acute and early HIV infection among men who have sex with men (MSM) in San Diego, 2008 to 2014: a cohort study. Medicine. 2015;94(30):e1242. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001242.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Gray KM, Valverde EE, Tang T, Siddiqi AE, Hall HI. Diagnoses and prevalence of HIV infection among Hispanics or Latinos - United States, 2008–2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64(39):1097–103. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6439a2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Trepka MJ, Fennie KP, Sheehan DM, Lutfi K, Maddox L, Lieb S. Late HIV diagnosis: differences by rural/urban residence, Florida, 2007–2011. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2014;28(4):188–97. https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2013.0362.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Levison JH, Levinson JK, Alegria M. A critical review and commentary on the challenges in engaging HIV-infected Latinos in the continuum of HIV Care. AIDS Behav. 2018;22(8):2500–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-018-2187-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV incidence: estimated annual infections in the U.S., 2010–2016. 2019. https://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/2019/HIV-incidence.html. Accessed 29 July 2020

  13. AIDS Clinical Trials Group. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycine to prevent hospitalization or death in persons with Covid-19. A5395 Manual of Procedures. 2020.

  14. Sevelius JM, Gutierrez-Mock L, Zamudio-Haas S, et al. Research with marginalized communities: challenges to continuity during the COVID-19 pandemic. AIDS Behav. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-020-02920-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ueda Y, Morishita J, Kudomi S, Ueda K. Usefulness of biological fingerprint in magnetic resonance imaging for patient verification. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2016;54(9):1341–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-015-1380-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wall KM, Kilembe W, Inambao M, et al. Implementation of an electronic fingerprint-linked data collection system: a feasibility and acceptability study among Zambian female sex workers. Global Health. 2015;11:27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-015-0114-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Jeon B, Jeong B, Jee S, et al. A facial recognition mobile app for patient safety and biometric identification: design, development, and validation. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019;7(4):e11472. https://doi.org/10.2196/11472.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. You WX, Comins CA, Jarrett BA, et al. Facilitators and barriers to incorporating digital technologies into HIV care among cisgender female sex workers living with HIV in South Africa. Mhealth. 2020;6:15. https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth.2019.12.07.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Kavanagh MM, Baral SD, Milanga M, Sugarman J. Biometrics and public health surveillance in criminalised and key populations: policy, ethics, and human rights considerations. Lancet HIV. 2019;6(1):e51–e5959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Klausner A. Grade school rolls out fingerprint ID lunch system, parents don’t approve. 2018. https://nypost.com/2018/11/26/grade-school-rolls-out-fingerprint-id-lunch-system-parents-dont-approve/ Accessed 13 June 2019.

  21. Bengtson AM, Kumwenda W, Lurie M, Klyn B, Owino M. Miller, WC Hosseinipour, M C Improving monitoring of engagement in HIV care for women in option B+: A pilot test of biometric fingerprint scanning in Lilongwe. Malawi AIDS Behav. 2020;24(2):551–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gelb A, Clark J. Identification for development: the biometrics revolution—working paper 315. 2013. https://www.cgdev. org/publication/identification-development-biometrics-revolutionworking-paper-315. Accessed 20 July 2018.

  23. Rothstein MA. Is deidentification sufficient to protect health privacy in research? Am J Bioeth. 2010;10:3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. Developing and using individual identifiers for the provision of health services including HIV proceedings from a workshop. 2009. Ed. Montreux, Switzerland.

  25. San Diego Regional Economic Development Corporation. San Diego region poverty statistics - summary of poverty throughout the region's cities. ACS 5-year estimates, 2010–2014; ACS 1-Year Estimates, 2010 and 2015.

  26. Castiglione A, Choo KKR, Nappi M, Narducci F. Biometrics in the cloud: challenges and research opportunities. IEEE Cloud Comput. 2017;4(4):12–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCC.2017.379101228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wallerstein N, Muhammad M, SanchezYoungman S, et al. Power dynamics in community-based participatory research: a multiple-case study analysis of partnering contexts, histories, and practices. Health Educ Behav. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198119852998.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Terri Gotschall for her assistance with editing the manuscript. We also thank the funders for their support of this project.

Funding

This research was supported by funds from the following: National Institutes of Health Grants AI106039 and MH100974. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Matthew P. Abrams or Susan J. Little.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Little received Grant funding paid to her institution from Gilead Sciences. No other conflict of interest disclosures were reported.

Ethical Approval

The UCSD Human Research Protections Program approved the study protocol and consent with methods carried out in accordance with the UCSD Institutional Review Board’s approved guidelines and regulations. All participants provided voluntary, written informed consent before study enrollment.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix : Biometrics Survey: Questions and Responses

Appendix : Biometrics Survey: Questions and Responses

Question

Response

N (%)

Biometrics survey

  

Question 1: Participant-management software will allow us to provide a summary of all your test results on a protected website. How important is this to you?

1. Not so important

14 (6.8)

2. Slight important

35 (17.0)

3. Very important

85 (41.3)

4. Extremely important

72 (35.0)

Question 2: Participant-management software will allow us to link your records without asking you to use another password or present a barcode card every time you test with us. Which of the following systems would you be willing to use?

1. Fingerprint scanner

79 (38.3)

2. Palm scanner

6 (2.9)

3. I don’t care, as long as it’s not complicated

80 (38.8)

4. None of the above, I’d rather memorize another password

28 (13.6)

5. None of the above, I am not interested in a person-specific identifier (if checked – skip next question)

13 (6.3)

Question 3: If we decide to use a fingerprint scanner, would this discourage you from free HIV and STD testing with us?

1. Not discourage me at all

160 (77.7)

2. Slightly discourage me

14 (6.8)

3. Somewhat discourage me

8 (3.9)

4. Very much discourage me

6 (2.9)

5. Extremely discourage me

4 (1.9)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abrams, M.P., Torres, F.E. & Little, S.J. Biometric Registration to an HIV Research Study may Deter Participation. AIDS Behav 25, 1552–1559 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-020-02995-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-020-02995-y

Keywords

Navigation