Abstract
Biometric registration may improve services associated with HIV research. A cross-sectional, observational survey was used to evaluate biometric fingerprint scanning for identification (ID) verification in the setting of an HIV prevention study. Survey outcomes were dichotomized (discouraged or not discouraged) by biometric scanning and statistical analyses were used to determine if participation decreased by greater than 10% overall and after stratifying by demographic variables and risk behaviors. 206 participants were recruited from a community-based HIV and sexual health research screening program. Participants completed a quantitative survey to assess their perceptions of biometric scanning for ID verification. The majority of participants (n = 160; 77.7%) indicated no deterrence from testing due to biometric scanning, yet a significant number (n = 45; 23.3%, P < .001) reported at least partial deterrence. Research using biometric scanning for ID verification may significantly limit access to HIV prevention services and may risk reducing meaningful participation among marginalized populations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fauci AS, Redfield RR, Sigounas G, Weahkee MD, Giroir BP. Ending the HIV epidemic: a plan for the United States. JAMA. 2019;321(9):844–5. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.1343.
Engel S, Gwadz MV, Cleland CM. The experience of screening for HIV/AIDS medical studies among African-American/Black and Latino/Hispanic persons living with HIV/AIDS: a mixed-methods exploration. J AIDS Clin Res. 2013. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6113.1000223.
Cargill VA, Stone VE. HIV/AIDS: a minority health issue. Med Clin North Am. 2005;89(4):895–912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2005.03.005.
Gwadz MV, Colon P, Ritchie AS, et al. Increasing and supporting the participation of persons of color living with HIV/AIDS in AIDS clinical trials. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2010;7(4):194–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11904-010-0055-3.
Castillo-Mancilla JR, Cohn SE, Krishnan S, et al. Minorities remain underrepresented in HIV/AIDS research despite access to clinical trials. HIV Clin Trials. 2014;15(1):14–26. https://doi.org/10.1310/hct1501-14.
Sullivan PS, McNaghten AD, Begley E, Hutchinson A, Cargill VA. Enrollment of racial/ethnic minorities and women with HIV in clinical research studies of HIV medicines. J Natl Med Assoc. 2007;99(3):242–50.
Mannheimer SB, Wang L, Wilton L, et al. Infrequent HIV testing and late HIV diagnosis are common among a cohort of black men who have sex with men in 6 US cities. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014;67(4):438–45. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000000334.
Hoenigl M, Green N, Mehta SR, Little SJ. Risk factors for acute and early HIV infection among men who have sex with men (MSM) in San Diego, 2008 to 2014: a cohort study. Medicine. 2015;94(30):e1242. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001242.
Gray KM, Valverde EE, Tang T, Siddiqi AE, Hall HI. Diagnoses and prevalence of HIV infection among Hispanics or Latinos - United States, 2008–2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64(39):1097–103. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6439a2.
Trepka MJ, Fennie KP, Sheehan DM, Lutfi K, Maddox L, Lieb S. Late HIV diagnosis: differences by rural/urban residence, Florida, 2007–2011. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2014;28(4):188–97. https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2013.0362.
Levison JH, Levinson JK, Alegria M. A critical review and commentary on the challenges in engaging HIV-infected Latinos in the continuum of HIV Care. AIDS Behav. 2018;22(8):2500–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-018-2187-1.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV incidence: estimated annual infections in the U.S., 2010–2016. 2019. https://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/2019/HIV-incidence.html. Accessed 29 July 2020
AIDS Clinical Trials Group. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycine to prevent hospitalization or death in persons with Covid-19. A5395 Manual of Procedures. 2020.
Sevelius JM, Gutierrez-Mock L, Zamudio-Haas S, et al. Research with marginalized communities: challenges to continuity during the COVID-19 pandemic. AIDS Behav. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-020-02920-3.
Ueda Y, Morishita J, Kudomi S, Ueda K. Usefulness of biological fingerprint in magnetic resonance imaging for patient verification. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2016;54(9):1341–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-015-1380-x.
Wall KM, Kilembe W, Inambao M, et al. Implementation of an electronic fingerprint-linked data collection system: a feasibility and acceptability study among Zambian female sex workers. Global Health. 2015;11:27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-015-0114-z.
Jeon B, Jeong B, Jee S, et al. A facial recognition mobile app for patient safety and biometric identification: design, development, and validation. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019;7(4):e11472. https://doi.org/10.2196/11472.
You WX, Comins CA, Jarrett BA, et al. Facilitators and barriers to incorporating digital technologies into HIV care among cisgender female sex workers living with HIV in South Africa. Mhealth. 2020;6:15. https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth.2019.12.07.
Kavanagh MM, Baral SD, Milanga M, Sugarman J. Biometrics and public health surveillance in criminalised and key populations: policy, ethics, and human rights considerations. Lancet HIV. 2019;6(1):e51–e5959.
Klausner A. Grade school rolls out fingerprint ID lunch system, parents don’t approve. 2018. https://nypost.com/2018/11/26/grade-school-rolls-out-fingerprint-id-lunch-system-parents-dont-approve/ Accessed 13 June 2019.
Bengtson AM, Kumwenda W, Lurie M, Klyn B, Owino M. Miller, WC Hosseinipour, M C Improving monitoring of engagement in HIV care for women in option B+: A pilot test of biometric fingerprint scanning in Lilongwe. Malawi AIDS Behav. 2020;24(2):551–9.
Gelb A, Clark J. Identification for development: the biometrics revolution—working paper 315. 2013. https://www.cgdev. org/publication/identification-development-biometrics-revolutionworking-paper-315. Accessed 20 July 2018.
Rothstein MA. Is deidentification sufficient to protect health privacy in research? Am J Bioeth. 2010;10:3–11.
Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. Developing and using individual identifiers for the provision of health services including HIV proceedings from a workshop. 2009. Ed. Montreux, Switzerland.
San Diego Regional Economic Development Corporation. San Diego region poverty statistics - summary of poverty throughout the region's cities. ACS 5-year estimates, 2010–2014; ACS 1-Year Estimates, 2010 and 2015.
Castiglione A, Choo KKR, Nappi M, Narducci F. Biometrics in the cloud: challenges and research opportunities. IEEE Cloud Comput. 2017;4(4):12–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCC.2017.379101228.
Wallerstein N, Muhammad M, SanchezYoungman S, et al. Power dynamics in community-based participatory research: a multiple-case study analysis of partnering contexts, histories, and practices. Health Educ Behav. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198119852998.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Terri Gotschall for her assistance with editing the manuscript. We also thank the funders for their support of this project.
Funding
This research was supported by funds from the following: National Institutes of Health Grants AI106039 and MH100974. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Dr. Little received Grant funding paid to her institution from Gilead Sciences. No other conflict of interest disclosures were reported.
Ethical Approval
The UCSD Human Research Protections Program approved the study protocol and consent with methods carried out in accordance with the UCSD Institutional Review Board’s approved guidelines and regulations. All participants provided voluntary, written informed consent before study enrollment.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix : Biometrics Survey: Questions and Responses
Appendix : Biometrics Survey: Questions and Responses
Question | Response | N (%) |
---|---|---|
Biometrics survey | ||
Question 1: Participant-management software will allow us to provide a summary of all your test results on a protected website. How important is this to you? | 1. Not so important | 14 (6.8) |
2. Slight important | 35 (17.0) | |
3. Very important | 85 (41.3) | |
4. Extremely important | 72 (35.0) | |
Question 2: Participant-management software will allow us to link your records without asking you to use another password or present a barcode card every time you test with us. Which of the following systems would you be willing to use? | 1. Fingerprint scanner | 79 (38.3) |
2. Palm scanner | 6 (2.9) | |
3. I don’t care, as long as it’s not complicated | 80 (38.8) | |
4. None of the above, I’d rather memorize another password | 28 (13.6) | |
5. None of the above, I am not interested in a person-specific identifier (if checked – skip next question) | 13 (6.3) | |
Question 3: If we decide to use a fingerprint scanner, would this discourage you from free HIV and STD testing with us? | 1. Not discourage me at all | 160 (77.7) |
2. Slightly discourage me | 14 (6.8) | |
3. Somewhat discourage me | 8 (3.9) | |
4. Very much discourage me | 6 (2.9) | |
5. Extremely discourage me | 4 (1.9) |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abrams, M.P., Torres, F.E. & Little, S.J. Biometric Registration to an HIV Research Study may Deter Participation. AIDS Behav 25, 1552–1559 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-020-02995-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-020-02995-y