Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Effect of Social Networks and Social Constructions on HIV Risk Perceptions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Roughly 1 in 7 people living with HIV in the United States is unaware of their sero-status, signaling that individuals may be underestimating their risk for HIV. Few studies have examined the effect of socio-structural and socio-cognitive factors on HIV risk perceptions. This analysis identifies individual, interpersonal and network influences on HIV risk perceptions among high-risk heterosexuals. Data come from the Colorado Springs study, a CDC-funded project focused on HIV transmission among high-risk heterosexuals. Using social network data, analyses were first conducted at the individual-level using a partial proportional odds regression to identify predictors of self-perceived HIV risk. Next, multivariate binary logistic regression using GEE was used to examine  predictors of perceptions of network member's  HIV risk. Interpersonal characteristics such as perceptions of network member's HIV risk, racial homophily, and engagement in multiplexity (co-occurrence of drug-use, needle sharing and sex within relationships) were significantly associated with respondents’ self-perceived HIV risk. Factors associated with perceptions of network member's HIV risk include self-perceived HIV risk, emotional closeness within relationships, and density of drug ties. Analyses found HIV risk perception is the product of not only individual-level factors, but also interpersonal and social network processes. We also found a reciprocal relationship between individuals’ perceptions of their own risk and the risk of their associates/network members. Findings highlight the need for understanding risk perception as a function of interpersonal relationships, social constructions, including socio-cognitive processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV surveillance report; vol. 27. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/library/reports/surveillance/cdc-hiv-surveillance-report-2015-vol-27.pdf. Published Nov. 2016. Accessed 5 Jan 2017.

  2. CDC. HIV in the United States: At A Glance 2016. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/statistics/overview/ataglance.html.

  3. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. What is the U.S. Opioid Epidemic? 2018. https://www.hhs.gov/opioids/about-the-epidemic/index.html.

  4. CDC Joins Department of Public Health in investigating HIV cluster among people who inject drugs [press release]. 2018. mass.gov. Accessed 04 May 2018.

  5. DeMio T. CDC called into investigate HIV surges in the Cincinnati region. The Enquirer. 2018.

  6. Archibald A. HIV outbreak among homeless people worries health officials. Real Change. 2018.

  7. Peters PJ, Pontones P, Hoover KW, Patel MR, Galang RR, Shields J, et al. HIV infection linked to injection use of oxymorphone in Indiana, 2014–2015. New Engl J Med. 2016;375(3):229–39.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Van Handel MM, Rose CE, Hallisey EJ, Kolling JL, Zibbell JE, Lewis B, et al. County-level vulnerability assessment for rapid dissemination of HIV or HCV infections among persons who inject drugs, United States. JAIDS J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016;73(3):323–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Apa J. Public Health Investigates HIV Infections in Heterosexuals who Inject Drugs. Public Health Insider. 2018.

  10. CDC. HIV and injection drug use. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/risk/cdc-hiv-idu-fact-sheet.pdf. Accessed 30 Jan 2017.

  11. Deblonde J, De Koker P, Hamers FF, Fontaine J, Luchters S, Temmerman M. Barriers to HIV testing in Europe: a systematic review. Eur J Pub Health. 2010;20(4):422–32.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Prata N, Morris L, Mazive E, Vahidnia F, Stehr M. Relationship between HIV risk perception and condom use: evidence from a population-based survey in Mozambique. Int Fam Plann Perspect. 2006;32(14):192–200.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bailey SL, Ouellet LJ, Mackesy-Amiti ME, Golub ET, Hagan H, Hudson SM, et al. Perceived risk, peer influences, and injection partner type predict receptive syringe sharing among young adult injection drug users in five US cities. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007;91:S18–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Teuber A. Justifying risk. Daedalus. 1990;119:235–54.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Barden-O’Fallon JL, Bisika T, Sulzbach S, Benson A, Tsui AO. Factors associated with HIV/AIDS knowledge and risk perception in rural Malawi. AIDS Behav. 2004;8(2):131–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Macintyre K, Rutenberg N, Brown L, Karim A. Understanding perceptions of HIV risk among adolescents in KwaZulu-Natal. AIDS Behav. 2004;8(3):237–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Khawcharoenporn T, Kendrick S, Smith K. HIV risk perception and preexposure prophylaxis interest among a heterosexual population visiting a sexually transmitted infection clinic. AIDS patient care and STDs. 2012;26(4):222–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Maughan-Brown B, Venkataramani AS. Accuracy and determinants of perceived HIV risk among young women in South Africa. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):42.

    Google Scholar 

  19. MacKellar DA, Valleroy LA, Secura GM, Behel S, Bingham T, Celentano DD, et al. Perceptions of lifetime risk and actual risk for acquiring HIV among young men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2007;11(2):263–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sarker M, Milkowski A, Slanger T, Gondos A, Sanou A, Kouyate B, et al. The role of HIV-related knowledge and ethnicity in determining HIV risk perception and willingness to undergo HIV testing among rural women in Burkina Faso. AIDS Behav. 2005;9(2):243–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. London AS, Robles A. The co-occurrence of correct and incorrect HIV transmission knowledge and perceived risk for HIV among women of childbearing age in El Salvador. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51(8):1267–78.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Stapel DA, Reicher SD, Spears R. Social identity, availability and the perception of risk. Soc Cogn. 1994;12(1):1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Anderson KG, Beutel AM, Maughan-Brown B. HIV risk perceptions and first sexual intercourse among youth in Cape Town, South Africa. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2007;33(3):98–105.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Macintyre K, Brown L, Sosler S. “It’s not what you know, but who you knew”: examining the relationship between behavior change and AIDS mortality in Africa. AIDS Educ Prev. 2001;13(2):160–74.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wilde G. Risk homeostasis theory and its promise for improved safety. Challenges to Accident Prevention The Issue of Risk Compensation Behaviour. 1994.

  26. Hearst N, Chen S. Condom Promotion for AIDS Prevention in the Developing World: is It Working? Stud Fam Plan. 2004;35(1):39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cassell MM, Halperin DT, Shelton JD, Stanton D. Risk compensation: the Achilles’ heel of innovations in HIV prevention? BMJ. 2006;332(7541):605–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.332.7541.605.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Weinstein ND. Why it won’t happen to me: perceptions of risk factors and susceptibility. Health Psychol. 1984;3(5):431.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Helleringer S, Kohler HP. Social Networks, perceptions of risk, and changing attitudes towards HIV/AIDS: new evidence from a longitudinal study using fixed-effects analysis. Popul Stud. 2005;59(3):265–82.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kohler H-P, Behrman JR, Watkins SC. Social networks and HIV/AIDS risk perceptions. Demography. 2007;44(1):1–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Goedel WC, Halkitis PN, Greene RE, Duncan DT. Correlates of awareness of and willingness to use pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men who use geosocial-networking smartphone applications in New York City. AIDS Behav. 2016;20(7):1435.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mavhu W, Rowley E, Thior I, Kruse-Levy N, Mugurungi O, Ncube G, et al. Sexual behavior experiences and characteristics of male-female partnerships among HIV positive adolescent girls and young women: qualitative findings from Zimbabwe. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(3):e0194732.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Granovetter MS. The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol. 1973;78(6):1360–80.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Koku E. Risk capital: The consequences of network embeddness on HIV risk behaviors. Under Review.

  35. Newcomb ME, Mustanski B. Racial differences in same-race partnering and the effects of sexual partnership characteristics on HIV risk in MSM: a prospective sexual diary study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;62(3):329–33.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Neaigus A, Friedman SR, Jose B, Goldstein MF, Curtis R, Ildefonso G, et al. High-risk personal networks and syringe sharing as risk factors for HIV infection among new drug injectors. JAIDS J Acqui Immune Defic Syndr. 1996;11(5):499–509.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kapadia F, Latka M, Hudson S, Golub E, Campbell J, Bailey S, et al. Correlates of consistent condom use with main partners by partnership patterns among young adult male injection drug users from five US cities. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007;91:S56–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Klovdahl AS, Potterat JJ, Woodhouse DE, Muth JB, Muth SQ, Darrow WW. Social networks and infectious disease: the colorado springs study. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38(1):79–88.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Felsher M, Koku E. Explaining HIV risk multiplexity: a social network analysis. AIDS and Behav. 2018;22(11):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Rothenberg RB, Woodhouse DE, Potterat JJ, Muth SQ, Darrow WW, Klovdahl AS. Social networks in disease transmission: the Colorado Springs Study. NIDA Res Monogr. 1995;151:3–19.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Adams J, Moody J, Morris M. Sex, drugs, and race: how behaviors differentially contribute to the sexually transmitted infection risk network structure. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(2):322–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. 14th ed. College Station, TX: StataCorp; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Liu X. Applied ordinal logistic regression using Stata: from single-level to multilevel modeling. Los Angeles: Sage Publications; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Williams R. Gologit2: A program for generalized logistic regression/partial proportional odds models for ordinal variables. Accessed 12 May 2005.

  45. Williams R. Generalized ordered logit/partial proportional odds models for ordinal dependent variables. Stata Journal. 2006;6(1):58.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Liang K-Y, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika. 1986;73(1):13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A. Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata. College Station: STATA press; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Strathdee SA, Sherman SG. The role of sexual transmission of HIV infection among injection and non-injection drug users. J Urban Health. 2003;80:iii7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Grove KA, Kelly DP, Liu J. “BUT NICE GIRLS DON’T GET IT” women, symbolic capital, and the social construction of AIDS. J Contem Ethnogr. 1997;26(3):317–37.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Clerkin EM, Newcomb ME, Mustanski B. Unpacking the racial disparity in HIV rates: the effect of race on risky sexual behavior among Black young men who have sex with men (YMSM). J Behav Med. 2011;34(4):237–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Van der Pligt J, Otten W, Richard R, van der Velde F. Perceived risk of AIDS: Unrealistic optimism and self-protective action. 1993.

  52. Misovich SJ, Fisher JD, Fisher WA. Close relationships and elevated HIV risk behavior: evidence and possible underlying psychological processes. Rev General Psychol. 1997;1(1):72.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Mkandawire-Valhmu L, Wendland C, Stevens PE, Kako PM, Dressel A, Kibicho J. Marriage as a risk factor for HIV: learning from the experiences of HIV-infected women in Malawi. Global Public Health. 2013;8(2):187–201.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Cooley CH. Human nature and the social order. London: Routledge; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Else-Quest NM, LoConte NK, Schiller JH, Hyde JS. Perceived stigma, self-blame, and adjustment among lung, breast and prostate cancer patients. Psychology and Health. 2009;24(8):949–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Bernardi L. Determinants of individual AIDS risk perception: knowledge, behavioural control and social influence. Afr J AIDS Res. 2002;1(2):111–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Buhler C, Kohler H-P. Talking about AIDS: the influence of communication networks on individual risk perceptions of HIV/AIDS infection and favored protective behaviors in South Nyanza District, Kenya. Demogr Res. 2003;19(1):13.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Hughes R. “Friendships are a big part of it”: social relationships, social distance, and HIV risks. Subst Use Misuse. 2000;35(9):1149–76.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Dolcini MM, Harper GW, Boyer CB, Pollack LM. Project ORE: a friendship-based intervention to prevent HIV/STI in urban African American adolescent females. Health Educ behav. 2010;37(1):115–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Dolcini MM, Harper GW, Boyer CB, Pollack LM. Project ORE: a friendship-based intervention to prevent HIV/STI in urban African American adolescent females. Health Educ Behav. 2010;37(1):115–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Rudolph AE, Crawford ND, Latkin C, Lewis CF. Multiplex relationships and HIV: implications for network-based interventions. AIDS Behav. 2017;21(4):1219–27.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Fortson JG. The gradient in sub-Saharan Africa: socioeconomic status and HIV/AIDS. Demography. 2008;45(2):303–22.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Harling G, Bärnighausen T. The role of partners’ educational attainment in the association between HIV and education amongst women in seven sub-Saharan African countries. J Int AIDS Soc. 2016;19(1):20038.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Chan BT, Tsai AC. Personal contact with HIV-positive persons is associated with reduced HIV-related stigma: cross-sectional analysis of general population surveys from 26 countries in sub-Saharan Africa. J Int AIDS Soc. 2017. https://doi.org/10.7448/ias.20.1.00000.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Smith RA, Morrison D. The impact of stigma, experience, and group referent on HIV risk assessments and HIV testing intentions in Namibia. Soc Sci Med. 2006;63(10):2649–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Chan BT, Tsai AC, Siedner MJ. HIV treatment scale-up and HIV-related stigma in sub-Saharan Africa: a longitudinal cross-country analysis. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(8):1581–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Janulis P, Phillips G, Birkett M, Mustanski B. Sexual networks of racially diverse young MSM differ in racial homophily but not concurrency. JAIDS J Acqui Immune Defic Syndr. 2018;77(5):459–66.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Cortopassi AC, Driver R, Eaton LA, Kalichman SC. A new era of HIV risk: it’s not what you know, it’s who you know (and how infectious). Annu Rev Psychol. 2019;70:673–701.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the support of Stephen Q Muth, Director Quintus-ential Solutions, for help with generation and processing of the network dataset.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Emmanuel Koku and Marisa Felsher have shared equal Authorship.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, Drexel University, 3201 Arch Street ~ Room 288, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA

    Emmanuel Koku

  2. Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, 3215 Market St., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA

    Marisa Felsher

Authors
  1. Emmanuel Koku
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marisa Felsher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marisa Felsher.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koku, E., Felsher, M. The Effect of Social Networks and Social Constructions on HIV Risk Perceptions. AIDS Behav 24, 206–221 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-019-02637-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-019-02637-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation