Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Role of Gay Neighborhood Status and Other Neighborhood Factors in Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Retention in Care and Viral Load Suppression Among Men Who Have Sex with Men, Florida, 2015

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study‘s objective was to examine the role of gay neighborhood residence and other neighborhood factors in racial/ethnic disparities in retention in HIV care and viral load suppression during 2015. Florida residents diagnosed 2000–2014 with HIV infection and with transmission mode of men who have sex with men (MSM) were included in multi-level logistic regression models. Of 29,156 MSM, 29.4% were not retained and 34.2% were not virally suppressed. Non-Hispanic Blacks (NHB) had a higher likelihood of not being retained (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24–1.38, p value < 0.0001) and not being virally suppressed (aPR 1.82, 95% CI 1.67–1.98, p value < 0.0001) compared with non-Hispanic Whites. Among NHBs, rural residence was protective for both outcomes. Although gay neighborhood residence was not associated with either outcome, the role of other neighborhood factors suggests that individual and neighborhood barriers to HIV care and treatment should be addressed among MSM.

Resumen

El objetivo de este estudio fue examinar el rol de residencia de vecindad gay y otros factores de vecindad en disparidades raciales/étnicas en la retención en el cuidado médico de VIH y la supresión de carga viral durante 2015. Los residentes de Florida diagnosticados con la infección de VIH 2000-2014 y con el modo de transmisión de hombres que tienen sexo con hombres (HSH) fueron incluidos en modelos de regresión logísticos de niveles múltiples. De 29,156 HSH, el 29.4% no fue retenido y el 34.2% no tuvo supresión de carga viral. Los Negros no Hispanos tuvieron una probabilidad más alta de no ser retenidos (razón de prevalencia ajustada [RPa] 1.31, intervalo de confianza de 95% [IC] 1.24–1.38, p valor < 0.0001) y de no tener la carga viral suprimida (RPa 1.82, 95% IC 1.67–1.98, p valor < 0.0001) comparado con Blancos no Hispanos. Entre Negros no Hispanos, residencia rural fue protectora para ambos resultados. Aunque la residencia de vecindad gay no fue asociada con ningún resultado, la función de otros factores de vecindad sugiere que barreras al cuidado y tratamiento de VIH a nivel del individuo y vecindad deberían de ser atendidos entre HSH.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Monitoring selected national HIV prevention and care objectives by using HIV surveillance data—United States and 6 dependent areas, 2015. HIV Surveillance Supplemental Report 2017;22(No. 2). https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/library/reports/hiv-surveillance.html. Published July 2017. Accessed 27 Sept 2017.

  2. Singh S, Mitsch A, Wu B. HIV care outcomes among men who have sex with men with diagnosed HIV infection—United States, 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017;66(37):969–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Phillips G, Wohl A, Xavier J, Jones K, Hidalgo J. Epidemiologic data on young men of color who have sex with men. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2011;25(S1):s3–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV Surveillance report, 2016; vol. 28. http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/library/reports/hiv-surveillance.html. Published Nov 2017. Accessed 2 Jan 2018.

  5. Buttram M, Kurtz S. Risk and protective factors associated with gay neighborhood residence. Am J Mens Health. 2013;7(2):110–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Frye V, Koblin B, Chin J, et al. Neighborhood-level correlates of consistent condom use among men who have sex with men: a multi-level analysis. AIDS Behav. 2010;14(4):974–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kelly B, Carpiano RM, Easterbrook A, Parsons JT. Sex and the community: the implications of neighbourhoods and social networks for risk behaviours among urban gay men. Sociol Health Illn. 2012;34(7):1085–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Carpiano RM, Kelly BC, Easterbrook A, Parsons JT. Community and drug use among gay men: the role of neighborhoods and networks. J Health Soc Behav. 2011;52(1):74–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. City of Wilton Manors. LGBT Life in Wilton Manors. http://www.wiltonmanors.com/290/LGBT-Life-in-Wilton-Manors. Accessed 11 Oct 2017.

  10. Phillips G, Birkett M, Kuhns L, Hatchel T, Garofalo R, Mustanski B. Neighborhood-level associations with HIV infection among young men who have sex with men in Chicago. Arch Sex Behav. 2015;44(7):1773–86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Wohl AR, Galvan FH, Myers HF, et al. Do social support, stress, disclosure, and stigma influence retention in HIV care for Latino and African American men who have sex with men and women? AIDS Behav. 2011;15(6):1098–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Friedman MR, Coulter RW, Silvestre AJ, et al. Someone to count on: social support as an effect modifier of viral load suppression in a prospective cohort study. AIDS Care. 2017;29(4):469–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Forsyth AD, Valdiserri RO. A state-level analysis of social and structural factors and HIV outcomes among men who have sex with men in the United States. AIDS Educ Prev. 2015;27(6):493–504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ghiam MK, Rebeiro PF, Turner M, et al. Trends in HIV continuum of care outcomes over ten years of follow-up at a large HIV primary medical home in the southeastern United States. AIDS Res Hum Retrovir. 2017;33(10):1027–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lahey T, Lin M, Marsh B, et al. Increased mortality in rural patients with HIV in New England. AIDS Res Hum Retrovir. 2007;23(5):693–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chakraborty H, Iyer M, Duffus WA, Samantapudi AV, Albrecht H, Weissman S. Disparities in viral load and CD4 counts trends among HIV-infected adults in South Carolina. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2015;29(1):26–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ford CL, Daniel M, Earp JA, Kaufman JS, Golin CE, Miller WC. Perceived everyday racism, residential segregation, and HIV testing among patients at a sexually transmitted disease clinic. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(S1):S137–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Lutfi K, Trepka MJ, Fennie KP, Ibanez G, Gladwin H. Racial residential segregation and risky sexual behavior among non-Hispanic blacks, 2006–2010. Soc Sci Med. 2015;140:95–103.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Richey LE, Halperin J, Pathmanathan I, Van Sickels N, Seal PS. From diagnosis to engagement in HIV care: assessment and predictors of linkage and retention in care among patients diagnosed by emergency department based testing in an urban public hospital. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2014;28(6):277–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hightow-Weidman LB, Jones K, Wohl AR, et al. Early linkage and retention in care: findings from the outreach, linkage, and retention in care initiative among young men of color who have sex with men. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2011;25(S1):s31–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dasgupta S, Oster A, Li J, Hall HI. Disparities in consistent retention in HIV care—11 states and the District of Columbia, 2011–2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(4):77–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wester C, Rebeiro PF, Shavor TJ, et al. The 2013 HIV continuum of care in Tennessee: progress made, but disparities persist. Public Health Rep. 2016;131(5):695–703.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Office of National AIDS Policy. National HIV/AIDS strategy updated to 2020, pp. 1–65. 2015. https://www.hiv.gov/federal-response/national-hiv-aids-strategy/overview/. Accessed 4 Aug 2017.

  24. Castro KG, Ward JW, Slutsker L, Buehler JW, Jaffee HW, Berkelman RL. 1993 Revised classification system for HIV infection and expanded surveillance case definition for AIDS among adolescents and adults. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1992;41(RR-17):1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Caldwell MB, Oxtoby MJ, Simonds RJ, Rogers MF. 1994 revised classification system for human immunodeficiency virus infection in children less than 13 years of age. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1994;43(RR-12):1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fleming PL, Ward JW, Janssen RS, De Cock KM, Valdiserri RO, Gayle HD. Guidelines for the national human immunodeficiency virus case surveillance, including monitoring for human immunodeficiency virus infection and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1999;48(RR-13):1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Schneider E, Whitmore S, Glynn MK, Dominguez K, Mitsch A, McKenna MT. Revised surveillance case definitions for HIV infection among adults, adolescents, and children aged < 18 months and for HIV infection and AIDS among children aged 18 months to < 13 years–United States, 2008. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2008;57(RR-10):1–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Selik RM, Mokotoff ED, Branson B, Owen SM, Whitmore S, Hall HI. Revised surveillance case definition for HIV infection—United States, 2014. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2014;63(RR-03):1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  29. US Census Bureau. American fact finder. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/index.xhtml. Accessed 4 Aug 2017.

  30. US Census Bureau. ZIP code TM tabulation areas (ZCTA™). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. http://www.census.gov/geo/reference/zctas.html. Accessed 4 Aug 2017.

  31. Sheehan DM, Trepka MJ, Fennie KP, Prado G, Ibanez G, Maddox LM. Racial/ethnic disparities in delayed HIV diagnosis among men who have sex with men, Florida, 2000–2014. AIDS Care. 2017;29(3):311–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Niyonsenga T, Trepka MJ, Lieb S, Maddox LM. Measuring socioeconomic inequality in the incidence of AIDS: rural-urban considerations. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(2):700–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Hart LG, Larson EH, Lishner DM. Rural definitions for health policy and research. Am J Public Health. 2005;95(7):1149–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. WWAMI Rural Health Research Center. Rural-Urban Commuting Areas (RUCA). http://depts.washington.edu/uwruca/ruca-uses.php. Accessed 4 Aug 2017.

  35. Alvarez KJ, Levy BR. Health advantages of ethnic density for African American and Mexican American elderly individuals. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(12):2240–2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Borrell LN, Kiefe CI, Diez-Roux AV, Williams DR, Gordon-Larsen P. Racial discrimination, racial/ethnic segregation, and health behaviors in the CARDIA study. Ethn Health. 2013;18(3):227–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kirby JB, Liang L, Chen HJ, Wang Y. Race, place, and obesity: the complex relationships among community racial/ethnic composition, individual race/ethnicity, and obesity in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(8):1572–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. SAS Institute, Cary, NC. 2002. https://www.sas.com/en_us/software/sas9.html. Accessed 7 Jul 2017.

  39. Rosenberg ES, Millett GA, Sullivan PS, Del Rio C, Curran JW. Understanding the HIV disparities between black and white men who have sex with men in the USA using the HIV care continuum: a modeling study. Lancet HIV. 2014;1(3):e112–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Millett GA, Peterson JL, Flores SA, et al. Comparisons of disparities and risks of HIV infection in black and other men who have sex with men in Canada, UK, and USA: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2012;380(9839):341–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Beer L, Oster AM, Mattson CL, Skarbinski J. Disparities in HIV transmission risk among HIV-infected black and white men who have sex with men, United States, 2009. AIDS. 2014;28(1):105–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Arnold EA, Rebchook GM, Kegeles SM. “Triply cursed”: racism, homophobia, and HIV-related stigma are barriers to regular HIV testing, treatment adherence, and disclosure among young Black gay men. Cult Health Sex. 2014;16(6):710–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Levy ME, Wilton L, Phillips G, et al. Understanding structural barriers to accessing HIV testing and prevention services among black men who have sex with men (BMSM) in the United States. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(5):972–96.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Eaton LA, Driffin DD, Kegler C, et al. The role of stigma and medical mistrust in the routine health care engagement of black men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(2):e75–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Rao D, Feldman BJ, Fredericksen RJ, et al. A structural equation model of HIV-related stigma, depressive symptoms, and medication adherence. AIDS Behav. 2012;16(3):711–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Rintamaki LS, Davis TC, Skripkauskas S, et al. Social stigma concerns and HIV medication adherence. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2006;20(5):359–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Vanable PA, Carey MP, Blair DC, Littlewood RA. Impact of HIV-related stigma on health behaviors and psychological adjustment among HIV-positive men and women. AIDS Behav. 2006;10(5):473–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Haile R, Rowell-Cunsolo TL, Parker EA, Padilla MB, Hansen NB. An empirical test of racial/ethnic differences in perceived racism and affiliation with the gay community: implications for HIV risk. J Soc Issues. 2014;70(2):342–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Grey JA, Bernstein KT, Sullivan PS, et al. Estimating the population sizes of men who have sex with men in US states and counties using data from the American Community Survey. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2016;2(1):e14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. O’Connell M, Feliz S. Same-sex couple household statistics from the 2010 Census. Bureau of the Census. 2011. https://www.census.gov/library/working-papers/2011/demo/SEHSD-WP2011-26.html. Accessed 28 Oct 2017.

  51. Krieder RM, Lofquist DA. Matching survey data with administrative records to evaluate reports of same-sex married couple households. Bureau of the Census. 2015. https://www.census.gov/library/working-papers/2015/demo/SEHSD-WP2014-36.html. Accessed 28 Oct 2017.

  52. Nelson JA, Kinder A, Johnson AS, et al. Differences in selected HIV care continuum outcomes among people residing in rural, urban, and metropolitan areas-28 US jurisdictions. J Rural Health. 2016; [Epub ahead of print].

  53. Weissman S, Duffus WA, Iyer M, Chakraborty H, Samantapudi AV, Albrecht H. Rural-urban differences in HIV viral loads and progression to AIDS among new HIV cases. South Med J. 2015;108(3):180–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Hubach RD, Dodge B, Li MJ, et al. Loneliness, HIV-related stigma, and condom use among a predominantly rural sample of HIV-positive men who have sex with men (MSM). AIDS Educ Prev. 2015;27(1):72–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Sheehan DM, Fennie KP, Mauck DE, Maddox LM, Lieb S, Trepka MJ. Retention in HIV care and viral suppression: individual- and neighborhood-level predictors of racial/ethnic differences, Florida, 2015. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2017;31(4):167–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Poon KK, Dang BN, Davila JA, Hartman C, Giordano TP. Treatment outcomes in undocumented Hispanic immigrants with HIV infection. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(3):e60022.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Ross J, Felsen UR, Cunningham CO, Patel VV, Hanna DB. Outcomes along the HIV care continuum among undocumented immigrants in clinical care. AIDS Res Hum Retrovir. 2017;33(10):1038–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Vargas Bustamante A, Fang H, Garza J, et al. Variations in healthcare access and utilization among Mexican immigrants: the role of documentation status. J Immigr Minor Health. 2012;14(1):146–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Levison JH, Regan S, Khan I, Freedberg KA. Foreign-born status as a predictor of engagement in HIV care in a large US metropolitan health system. AIDS Care. 2017;29(2):244–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Graham JL, Shahani L, Grimes RM, Hartman C, Giordano TP. The influence of trust in physicians and trust in the healthcare system on linkage, retention, and adherence to HIV care. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2015;29(12):661–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Dang BN, Westbrook RA, Hartman CM, Giordano TP. Retaining HIV patients in care: the role of initial patient care experiences. AIDS Behav. 2016;20(10):2477–87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute on Minority Health & Health Disparities (NIMHD) under Award Number 5R01MD004002. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIMHD or the National Institutes of Health. The authors thank Merhawi Gebrezgi for his assistance with the analysis.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Institute on Minority Health & Health Disparities (NIMHD) under Award Number 5R01MD004002.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary Jo Trepka.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Ethical Approval

The Florida International University Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved this study and the Florida Department of Health IRB designated this study to be non-human subjects research. This study used de-identified HIV surveillance records of Florida residents. Informed consent was not required for this secondary data analysis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mauck, D.E., Sheehan, D.M., Fennie, K.P. et al. Role of Gay Neighborhood Status and Other Neighborhood Factors in Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Retention in Care and Viral Load Suppression Among Men Who Have Sex with Men, Florida, 2015. AIDS Behav 22, 2978–2993 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-018-2032-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-018-2032-6

Keywords

Navigation