Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Individual-Level and Partner-Level Predictors of Newly Diagnosed HIV Infection Among Black and White Men Who Have Sex with Men in Baltimore, MD

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Black MSM continue to be the group most disproportionately impacted by HIV in the United States. This study assesses the relationship between partner-level and respondent-level characteristics and newly diagnosed HIV infection among a sample of MSM. Ego-centric data were gathered using venue-based time–space sampling on 335 men who reported on a total of 831 male anal sex partners. In multivariate analyses, age of partner, HIV status of partner, and respondent having had an STD in the past twelve months were associated with a newly diagnosed HIV infection among black MSM. Efforts for black MSM are needed that aim to increase HIV and STD testing, foster open communication between partners about HIV status, and address social determinants of health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. CDC. HIV Surveillance Report, 2011. http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/statistics_2011_HIV_Surveillance_Report_vol_23.pdf. Published February 2013. Accessed September 13, 2013.

  2. CDC. Subpopulation estimates from the HIV incidence surveillance system–United States, 2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008;57(36):985–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Millett GA, Peterson JL, Wolitski RJ, Stall R. Greater risk for HIV infection of black men who have sex with men: a critical literature review. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(6):1007–19.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Maulsby C, Millett G, Lindsey K, Kelley R, Johnson K, Montoya D, et al. HIV among Black Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM) in the United States: a review of the literature. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(1):10–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Millett GA, Flores SA, Peterson JL, Bakeman R. Explaining disparities in HIV infection among black and white men who have sex with men: a meta-analysis of HIV risk behaviors. AIDS. 2007;21(15):2083–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Magnus M, Kuo I, Phillips G 2nd, Shelley K, Rawls A, Montanez L, et al. Elevated HIV prevalence despite lower rates of sexual risk behaviors among black men in the District of Columbia who have sex with men. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2010;24(10):615–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Newcomb ME, Mustanski B. Racial differences in same-race partnering and the effects of sexual partnership characteristics on HIV Risk in MSM: a prospective sexual diary study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;62(3):329–33.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Oster AM, Wiegand RE, Sionean C, Miles IJ, Thomas PE, Melendez-Morales L, et al. Understanding disparities in HIV infection between black and white MSM in the United States. AIDS. 2011;25(8):1103–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Beer L, Oster AM, Mattson CL, Skarbinski J. Disparities in HIV transmission risk among HIV-infected black and white MSM, Medical Monitoring Project, 2009. AIDS. 2013;28(1):105–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Perisse AR, Langenberg P, Hungerford L, Boulay M, Charurat M, Schechter M, et al. Egocentric network data provide additional information for characterizing an individual’s HIV risk profile. AIDS. 2010;24(2):291–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Morris M, Goodreau S, Moody J. Sexual networks, concurrency, and STD/HIV. In: Holmes KK, editor. Sexually transmitted diseases. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2008. p. 109–26.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Joseph HA, Marks G, Belcher L, Millett GA, Stueve A, Bingham TA, et al. Older partner selection, sexual risk behaviour and unrecognised HIV infection among black and Latino men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Infect. 2011;87(5):442–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Oster AM, Dorell CG, Mena LA, Thomas PE, Toledo CA, Heffelfinger JD. HIV risk among young African American men who have sex with men: a case–control study in Mississippi. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(1):137–43.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Berry M, Raymond HF, McFarland W. Same race and older partner selection may explain higher HIV prevalence among black men who have sex with men. AIDS. 2007;21(17):2349–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Raymond HF, McFarland W. Racial mixing and HIV risk among men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2009;13(4):630–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tieu HV, Murrill C, Xu G, Koblin BA. Sexual partnering and HIV risk among black men who have sex with men: New York City. J Urban Health. 2010;87(1):113–21.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Maulsby C, Sifakis F, German D, Flynn CP, Holtgrave D. Partner characteristics and undiagnosed HIV seropositivity among men who have sex with men only (MSMO) and men who have sex with men and women (MSMW) in Baltimore. AIDS Behav. 2012;16(3):543–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Millett GA, Ding H, Marks G, Jeffries WL, Bingham T, Lauby J, et al. Mistaken assumptions and missed opportunities: correlates of undiagnosed HIV infection among black and Latino men who have sex with men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011;58(1):64–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schneider JA, Cornwell B, Ostrow D, Michaels S, Schumm P, Laumann EO, et al. Network mixing and network influences most linked to HIV infection and risk behavior in the HIV epidemic among black men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(1):e28–36.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Heckman TG, Kelly JA, Bogart LM, Kalichman SC, Rompa DJ. HIV risk differences between African-American and white men who have sex with men. J Natl Med Assoc. 1999;91(2):92–100.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Harawa NT, Greenland S, Bingham TA, Johnson DF, Cochran SD, Cunningham WE, et al. Associations of race/ethnicity with HIV prevalence and HIV-related behaviors among young men who have sex with men in 7 urban centers in the United States. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004;35(5):526–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. German D, Sifakis F, Maulsby C, Towe VL, Flynn CP, Latkin CA, et al. Persistently high prevalence and unrecognized HIV infection among men who have sex with men in Baltimore: the BESURE study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011;57(1):77–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Liang K, Seger S, Qaqish B. Multivariate regression analysis using generalized linear models. J R Stat Soc B. 1992;54:3–40.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Spiegelman D, Hertzmark E. Easy SAS calculations for risk or prevalence ratios and differences. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;162(3):199–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Deddens JA, Petersen MR. Approaches for estimating prevalence ratios. Occup Environ Med. 2008;65(7):481, 501–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. McNutt LA, Wu C, Xue X, Hafner JP. Estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157(10):940–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Barros AJ, Hirakata VN. Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003;20(3):21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pan W. Akaike’s information criterion in generalized estimating equations. Biometrics. 2001;57:120–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gould W. Computing the Chow Statisitc 2005: Available from: http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/stat/chow.html. Accessed March 20, 2010.

  30. Koblin BA, Mayer KH, Eshleman SH, Wang L, Mannheimer S, del Rio C, et al. Correlates of HIV acquisition in a cohort of Black men who have sex with men in the United States: HIV prevention trials network (HPTN) 061. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e70413.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Monitoring selected national HIV prevention and care objectives by using HIV surveillance data—United States and 6 dependent areas—2011. HIV Supplemental Report 2013;18(5).

  32. Centers for Disease Control. HIV prevalence, unrecognized infection, and HIV testing among men who have sex with men: five cities, June 2004–April 2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005;54(24):597–601.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tobin KE, Yang C, Sun C, Spikes P, Latkin CA. Discrepancies between HIV prevention communication attitudes and actual conversations about HIV testing within social and sexual networks of African American men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Dis. 2014;41(4):221–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wei C, Raymond HF, Guadamuz TE, Stall R, Colfax GN, Snowden JM, et al. Racial/ethnic differences in seroadaptive and serodisclosure behaviors among men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2011;15(1):22–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Centers for Disease Control. CDC Fact Sheet: HIV and AIDS Among Gay and Bisexual Men. Retrieved October 7, 2013 from http://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/docs/2012/CDC-MSM-0612-508.pdf2012.

  36. Hurt CB, Beagle S, Leone PA, Sugarbaker A, Pike E, Kuruc J, et al. Investigating a sexual network of black men who have sex with men: implications for transmission and prevention of HIV infection in the United States. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012;61(4):515–21.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Stoner BP, Whittington WL, Aral SO, Hughes JP, Handsfield HH, Holmes KK. Avoiding risky sex partners: perception of partners’ risks v partners’ self reported risks. Sex Transm Infect. 2003;79(3):197–201.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to the BESURE Study field staff for their dedication and to the men who participated in this study. This study was supported by contracts to The Johns Hopkins University from the Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene and by cooperative agreements between the Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The analyses described here were supported by Award Number F31MH084767 from the National Institutes of Mental Health. The authors also acknowledge the Mentoring Program of The Center for Population Research in LGBT Health, supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) under Award Number R21HD051178. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NICHD, the National Institutes of Mental Health, or the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cathy Maulsby.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maulsby, C., Jain, K., Sifakis, F. et al. Individual-Level and Partner-Level Predictors of Newly Diagnosed HIV Infection Among Black and White Men Who Have Sex with Men in Baltimore, MD. AIDS Behav 19, 909–917 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-014-0861-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-014-0861-5

Keywords

Navigation