Skip to main content
Log in

Profiling medical specialties and informing aspiring physicians: a data-driven approach

  • Research
  • Published:
Advances in Health Sciences Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A detailed, unbiased perspective of the inter-relations among medical fields could help students make informed decisions on their future career plans. Using a data-driven approach, the inter-relations among different medical fields were decomposed and clustered based on the similarity of their working environments.

Publicly available, aggregate databases were merged into a single rich dataset containing demographic, working environment and remuneration information for physicians across Canada. These data were collected from the Canadian Institute for Health Information, the Canadian Medical Association, and the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, primarily from 2018 to 2019. The merged dataset includes 25 unique medical specialties, each with 36 indicator variables. Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) was used to group specialties into distinct clusters based on relatedness.

The 25 medical specialties were decomposed into seven clusters (latent variables) that were chosen based on the Bayesian Information Criterion. The Kruskal-Wallis test identified eight indicator variables that significantly differed between the seven profiles. These variables included income, work settings and payment styles. Variables that did not significantly vary between profiles included demographics, professional satisfaction, and work-life balance satisfaction.

The 25 analyzed medical specialties were grouped in an unsupervised manner into seven profiles via LPA. These profiles correspond to expected and meaningful groups of specialties that share a common theme and set of indicator variables (e.g. procedurally-focused, clinic-based practice). These profiles can help aspiring physicians narrow down and guide specialty choice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Borges, N. J., & Richard, G. V. (2018). Using the Delphi Method to Classify Medical Specialties. The Career Development Quarterly, 66(1), 85–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Medical Association (2019b). CMA Physician Workforce Surveys 2017-19. https://surveys.cma.ca/.

  • Canadian Medical Association (2019a). Canadian Specialty Profiles. https://www.cma.ca/canadian-specialty-profiles.

  • Canadian Institute for Health Information (2020b). Supply, Distribution and Migration of Physicians in Canada, 2019 — Methodology Notes. Ottawa, ON: CIHI; 2020.

  • Canadian Institute for Health Information. (2020a). National Physician Database Data Release, 2018–2019 — methodology notes. CIHI.

  • Chen, D., Lew, R., Hershman, W., & Orlander, J. (2007). A cross-sectional measurement of medical student empathy. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22(10), 1434–1438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creed, P. A., Searle, J., & Rogers, M. E. (2010). Medical specialty prestige and lifestyle preferences for medical students. Social Science and Medicine, 71(6), 1084–1088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraley, C., & Raftery, A. E. (1998). How many clusters? Which clustering method? Answers via model-based cluster analysis. The Computer Journal, 41(8), 578–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraley, C., & Raftery, A. E. (2002). Model-based clustering, discriminant analysis, and density estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97(458), 611–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, L. J., Gebhard, G. M., Blumhagen, R., Carlson, N. E., & Cabrera-Muffly, C. (2017). Applicant characteristics associated with successful matching into otolaryngology. The Laryngoscope, 127(5), 1052–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hojat, M., & Zuckerman, M. (2008). Personality and specialty interest in medical students. Medical Teacher, 30(4), 400–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howse, K., Harris, J., & Dalgarno, N. (2017). Canadian national guidelines and recommendations for integrating career advising into medical school curricula. Academic Medicine, 92(11), 1543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kremer, T. R., Kremer, M. J., Kremer, K. P., & Mihalic, A. (2021). Predictors of getting a residency interview: Differences by medical specialty. Medical Education, 55(2), 198–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, W. H., & Wallis, W. A. (1952). Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47(260), 583–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuriata, A., Borys, E., Misiołek, U., Gałczyński, A., Runowska, K., Krupa, A., Cyranka, K., Mielimąka, M., & Rutkowski, K. (2019). Choice of medical specialty and personality traits measured with the EPQ-R (S) in medical students and specialist doctors. Archives of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 21(2).

  • Lakoff, J., Howse, K., Cofie, N., Heeneman, S., & Dalgarno, N. (2020). Analysis of factors affecting canadian medical students’ success in the residency match. Canadian Medical Education Journal, 11(3), e43.

  • Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Henry, N. W. (1968). Latent structure analysis. Houghton Mifflin Co.

  • Lepièce, B., Reynaert, C., van Meerbeeck, P., & Dory, V. (2016). Social dominance theory and medical specialty choice. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 21(1), 79–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullola, S., Hakulinen, C., Presseau, J., de Porras, D. G. R., Jokela, M., Hintsa, T., & Elovainio, M. (2018). Personality traits and career choices among physicians in Finland: Employment sector, clinical patient contact, specialty and change of specialty. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(4), 535–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ontario Medical Association (2012). Review of Relativity Methodology Report. CANDI Relativity Implementation Committee (CRIC). http://www.oags.org/CRICRelativityMethodologyReviewApril2012.pdf.

  • Pedersen, L. T., Bak, N. H., Dissing, A. S., & Petersson, B. H. (2011). Gender bias in specialty preferences among danish medical students: A cross-sectional study. Danish Medical Bulletin, 58(9), A4304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resident Doctors of Canada (2019). Resident Transfer Principles for a Pan-Canadian Transfer System. https://residentdoctors.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/RDOC_Resident-Transfer-Principles-EN.pdf.

  • Rinard, J. R., Garol, B. D., Shenoy, A. B., & Mahabir, R. C. (2010). Successfully matching into surgical specialties: An analysis of national resident matching program data. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 2(3), 316–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, S., Glazier, R., Graves, E., Schull, M., & Sutradhar, R. (2019). Payments to Ontario physicians from Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care sources: Update 2005/06 to 2017/18. ICES.

  • Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, I., Gowans, M. C., Wright, B., & Brenneis, F. (2007). Why medical students switch careers: Changing course during the preclinical years of medical school. Canadian Family Physician, 53(1), 94–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, I. M., Wright, B. J., Brenneis, F. R., & Gowans, M. C. (2009). Whether or wither some specialties: A survey of canadian medical student career interest. BMC Medical Education, 9(1), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scrucca, L., Fop, M., Murphy, T. B., & Raftery, A. E. (2016). Mclust 5: Clustering, classification and density estimation using Gaussian finite mixture models. The R Journal, 8(1), 289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, J. P., Lagman, C., Nguyen, T., Yokoi, H., Jeong, S. H., Luong, P., Chen, C. H. J., Ong, V., French, A., & Franks, A. M. (2020). Analysis of academic publishing output among 1634 successful applicants in the 2011–2018 neurosurgery residency match. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 117186.

  • Taber, B. J., Hartung, P. J., & Borges, N. J. (2011). Personality and values as predictors of medical specialty choice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 78(2), 202–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vo, A., McLean, L., & McInnes, M. D. (2017). Medical specialty preferences in early medical school training in Canada. International Journal of Medical Education, 8, 400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, E., Yufit, R. I., & Pollock, G. H. (1969). Medical specialty choice and personality: II. Outcome and postgraduate follow-up results. Archives of General Psychiatry, 21(5), 529–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Y. G., Zisk-Rony, R. Y., Tandeter, H., Elchalal, U., Avidan, A., Schroeder, J. E., & Weissman, C. (2017). Using medical specialty and selection criteria clusters to study specialty selection by israeli medical students. BMC Medical Education, 17(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, S. A., Patterson, F. C., Wille, B., & Koczwara, A. (2016). Personality and occupational specialty: an examination of medical specialties using Holland’s RIASEC model. Career development international.

  • Yufit, R. I., Pollock, G. H., & Wasserman, E. (1969). Medical specialty choice and personality: I. initial results and predictions. Archives of General Psychiatry, 20(1), 89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeldow, P. B., Devens, M., & Daugherty, S. (1990). Do person-oriented medical students choose person-oriented specialties? Do technology-oriented medical students avoid person-oriented specialties? Academic Medicine, 65(9), S45–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher D. Witiw.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Unity Health Toronto Research Ethics Board (Toronto, Ontario, Canada).

Other disclosures

None.

Disclaimers

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

10459_2023_10283_MOESM1_ESM.tiff

Supplementary Material 1: Supplementary Fig. 1: BIC values for different mixture model parameterizations showing 1 to 19 components. The red dotted line corresponds to the EII model with maximum BIC in this graph. The blue dotted line corresponds to the EEI model with a similar BIC yet larger, more meaningful groups of specialties. Thus, the EEI model with seven components was selected to derive medical profiles from medical specialties.

10459_2023_10283_MOESM2_ESM.tiff

Supplementary Material 2: Supplementary Fig. 2: Parallel coordinates plot illustrating the distinction between profiles for different (aggregate) indicators. Asterisks indicate significant differences with Benjamini-Hochberg correction. Abbreviations: FFS = Fee-for-service; FTE = Full-time equivalent; Org.=Organization; WS = Work Setting

Supplementary Material 3

Supplementary Material 4

Supplementary Material 5

Supplementary Material 6

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Balas, M., Scheepers, R.M., Zador, Z. et al. Profiling medical specialties and informing aspiring physicians: a data-driven approach. Adv in Health Sci Educ (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-023-10283-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-023-10283-2

Keywords

Navigation