Abstract
The nature of healthcare means doctors must continually calibrate the quality of their work within constantly changing standards of practice. As trainees move into working as fully qualified professionals, they can struggle to know how well they are practising in the absence of formal oversight. They therefore need to build their evaluative judgement: their capability to interpret cues and messages from the clinical environment, allowing them to judge quality of practice. This paper explores how Australian general practice (GP) trainees develop their evaluative judgement. We interviewed 16 GPs, who had recently completed certification requirements, asking them how they managed complex learning challenges across their training trajectory. A thematic analysis was sensitised by conceptualisations of evaluative judgement and feedback for future practice. Findings are reported via three themes: sources of performance relevant information; sense-making about progress within complex learning challenges; and changing practice as evaluative judgement develops. Trainees actively sought to understand what quality practice looked like within complex and ambiguous circumstances but often found it difficult to calibrate their performance. While reflective practice was key to developing evaluative judgment, feedback conversations could provide significant opportunities for trainees and supervisors to co-construct meaning. A ‘feedback community’ was available for frequent instances where supervisors were absent or not regarded as entirely credible, although feedback conversations in themselves did not necessarily assist trainees to develop evaluative judgement. There is room for a more active role for supervisors in assisting trainees to consider how to independently make sense of learning cues.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bearman, M., Brown, J., Kirby, C., & Ajjawi, R. (2021). Feedback that helps trainees learn to practice without supervision. Academic Medicine, 96(2), 205–209. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000003716.
Bing-You, R., Varaklis, K., Hayes, V., Trowbridge, R., Kemp, H., et al. (2018). The feedback tango: An integrative review and analysis of the content of the teacher-learner feedback exchange. Academic Medicine, 93(4), 657–663. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000001927.
Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2), 151–167.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Sage.
Denny, B., Brown, J., Kirby, C., Garth, B., Chesters, J., et al. (2019). ‘I’m never going to change unless someone tells me I need to’: Fostering feedback dialogue between general practice supervisors and registrars. Australian Journal of Primary Health, 25(4), 374–379. https://doi.org/10.1071/PY19037.
Fawns, T., & O’Shea, C. (2019). Evaluative judgement of working practices. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(1), 5–18.
Kilminster, S., Cottrell, D., Grant, J., & Jolly, B. (2007). AMEE Guide No. 27: Effective educational and clinical supervision. Medical Teacher. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701210907.
European Academic of Teachers in General Practice (2011). ‘The European Definition of General Practice/Family Medicine’. Retrieved from https://www.woncaeurope.org/file/3b13bee8-5891-455e-a4cb-a670d7bfdca2/Definition%20EURACTshort%20version%20revised%202011.pdf.
Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 1997(74), 5–12.
Molloy, E., Ajjawi, R., Bearman, M., Noble, C., Rudland, J., et al. (2020). Challenging feedback myths: Values, learner involvement and promoting effects beyond the immediate task. Medical Education, 54(1), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13802.
Ramani, S., Könings, K. D., Ginsburg, S., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2020). Relationships as the backbone of feedback: Exploring preceptor and resident perceptions of their behaviors during feedback conversations. Academic Medicine, 95(7), 1073–1081. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000002971.
Ritchie, J., & Spencer, L. (2002). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. The Qualitative Researcher’s Companion, 573(2002), 305–329.
Rudolph, J. W., Simon, R., Dufresne, R. L. & Raemer, D. B. (2006). There's no such thing as “Nonjudgmental” Debriefing: A theory and method for debriefing with good judgment. Simulation in Healthcare, 1 (1), 49–55. https://journals.lww.com/simulationinhealthcare/Fulltext/2006/00110/There_s_No_Such_Thing_as__Nonjudgmental_.6.aspx.
Sagasser, M. H., Kramer, A. W. M., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2012). How do postgraduate GP trainees regulate their learning and what helps and hinders them? A qualitative study. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-12-67.
Sehlbach, C., Teunissen, P. W., Driessen, E. W., Mitchell, S., Rohde, G. G. U., et al. (2020). Learning in the workplace: Use of informal feedback cues in doctor-patient communication. Medical Education, 54(9), 811–820. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14148.
Shiner, A., & Howe, A. (2013). Professional learning during the transition from trainee to newly qualified general practitioner. Education for Primary Care, 24(5), 346–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2013.11494199.
Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Panadero, E. (2018). Developing evaluative judgement: Enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work. Higher Education, 76(3), 467–481.
Tai, J., Canny, B. J., Haines, T. P., & Molloy, E. K. (2016). The role of peer-assisted learning in building evaluative judgement: Opportunities in clinical medical education. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 21(3), 659–676.
van der Leeuw, R. M., Teunissen, P. W., & van der Vleuten, C. P. (2018). Broadening the scope of feedback to promote its relevance to workplace learning. Academic Medicine, 93(4), 556–559.
Watling, C., Driessen, E., van der Vleuten, C. P., & Lingard, L. (2012). Learning from clinical work: The roles of learning cues and credibility judgements. Medical Education, 46(2), 192–200.
Watling, C., Driessen, E., van der Vleuten, C. P. M., Vanstone, M., & Lingard, L. (2013). Beyond individualism: Professional culture and its influence on feedback. Medical Education, 47(6), 585–594. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12150.
Westerman, M., Teunissen, P. W., Fokkema, J. P. I., Siegert, C. E. H., van der Vleuten, C. P. M., et al. (2013). New consultants mastering the role of on-call supervisor: A longitudinal qualitative study. Medical Education, 47(4), 408–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12129.
Wilkie, G., & Raffaelli, D. (2005). In at the deep end: Making the transition from SpR to consultant. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 11(2), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1192/apt.11.2.107.
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge the support and insights of the broader research team: Associate Professor Rola Ajjawi, Associate Professor James Brown, Dr Catherine Kirby and Associate Professor John Furler, with a particular thanks to Dr Aloechka Delamaine who contributed to the coding and analysis.
Funding
Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (AU), ERG022.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bearman, M., Dracup, M., Garth, B. et al. Learning to recognise what good practice looks like: how general practice trainees develop evaluative judgement. Adv in Health Sci Educ 27, 215–228 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-021-10086-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-021-10086-3