Abstract
It is well-documented that retrieval practice enhances the recall of simple and complex information (Karpicke and Aue in Educ Psychol Rev 27(2):317–326, 2015). Evidence is also accumulating that retrieval practice can enhance other cognitive processes such as the ability to critically evaluate research articles (Dobson et al. in Med Educ 52(5):513–525, 2018) and transfer of learning (Butler in J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 36(5):1118, 2010). One aim of this investigation was to explore the effects of retrieval practice on transfer of learning with physiology information. A second aim was to compare recall and transfer of physiology information following retrieval practice versus a judgment of learning task (JOL) that is potentially less time consuming for students to use. Participants were randomly assigned to learn three physiology texts using each of the following strategies: (1) studying a text four times (S–S–S–S), (2) studying and then retrieving a text two times (S–R–S–R), and (3) studying a text four times while completing multiple JOL during the second and fourth repetitions (S–S/J–S–S/J). Recall and accuracy on transfer questions were assessed 1 week after the learning phase, and the results were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVAs. The S–R–S–R strategy (21.35 ± 1.08%) produced significantly greater recall than the S–S–S–S strategy (17.35 ± 0.86%), and both the S–R–S–R (44.60 ± 2.55%) and S–S/J–S–S/J (41.79 ± 2.63%) strategies lead to significantly greater transfer than the S–S–S–S strategy (36.07 ± 2.40%). These results provide evidence that retrieval practice enhances recall and transfer of physiology information and that a JOL task can also prove to be beneficial but to a lesser degree.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Co.
Blunt, J. R., & Karpicke, J. D. (2014). Learning with retrieval-based concept mapping. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(3), 849.
Butler, A. C. (2010). Repeated testing produces superior transfer of learning relative to repeated studying. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(5), 1118.
Butler, A. C., Black-Maier, A. C., Raley, N. D., & Marsh, E. J. (2017). Retrieving and applying knowledge to different examples promotes transfer of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 23(4), 433.
Dobson, J. L., & Linderholm, T. (2015a). Self-testing promotes superior retention of anatomy and physiology information. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 20(1), 149–161.
Dobson, J. L., & Linderholm, T. (2015b). The effect of selected “desirable difficulties” on the ability to recall anatomy information. Anatomical Sciences Education, 8(5), 395–403.
Dobson, J., Linderholm, T., & Perez, J. (2018). Retrieval practice enhances the ability to evaluate complex physiology information. Medical Education, 52(5), 513–525.
Dobson, J. L., Linderholm, T., & Yarbrough, M. B. (2015). Self-testing produces superior recall of both familiar and unfamiliar muscle information. Advances in Physiology Education, 39(4), 309–314.
Dobson, J. L., Perez, J., & Linderholm, T. (2017). Distributed retrieval practice promotes superior recall of anatomy information. Anatomical Sciences Education, 10(4), 339–347.
Jönsson, F. U., Hedner, M., & Olsson, M. J. (2012). The testing effect as a function of explicit testing instructions and judgments of learning. Experimental Psychology, 59(5), 251–257.
Karpicke, J. D., & Aue, W. R. (2015). The testing effect is alive and well with complex materials. Educational Psychology Review, 27(2), 317–326.
Karpicke, J. D., & Blunt, J. R. (2011). Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science, 331, 772–775.
Karpicke, J. D., Lehman, M., & Aue, W. R. (2014). Retrieval-based learning: An episodic context account. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 61, pp. 237–284). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2008). The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Science, 319, 966–968.
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212–218.
Kulasegaram, K. M., Chaudhary, Z., Woods, N., Dore, K., Neville, A., & Norman, G. (2017). Contexts, concepts and cognition: Principles for the transfer of basic science knowledge. Medical Education, 51(2), 184–195.
Kulasegaram, K., Min, C., Ames, K., Howey, E., Neville, A., & Norman, G. (2012). The effect of conceptual and contextual familiarity on transfer performance. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 17(4), 489–499.
Larsen, D. P., Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2009). Repeated testing improves long-term retention relative to repeated study: A randomised controlled trial. Medical Education, 43(12), 1174–1181.
Larsen, D. P., Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2013). Comparative effects of test-enhanced learning and self-explanation on long-term retention. Medical Education, 47(7), 674–682.
Linderholm, T., Dobson, J., & Yarbrough, M. B. (2016). The benefit of self-testing and interleaving for synthesizing concepts across multiple physiology texts. Advances in Physiology Education, 40(3), 329–334.
Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognitive judgments and control of study. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(3), 159–163.
Nelson, T. O., & Dunlosky, J. (1991). When people’s judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: The “delayed-JOL effect”. Psychological Science, 2(4), 267–271.
Pan, S. C., & Rickard, T. C. (2018). Transfer of test-enhanced learning: Meta-analytic review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 144(7), 710.
Raupach, T., Andresen, J. C., Meyer, K., Strobel, L., Koziolek, M., Jung, W., et al. (2016). Test-enhanced learning of clinical reasoning: A crossover randomised trial. Medical Education, 50(7), 711–720.
Roediger, H. L., III, & Butler, A. C. (2011). The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(1), 20–27.
Roediger, H. L., III, & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(3), 181–210.
Rohrer, D., Taylor, K., & Sholar, B. (2010). Tests enhance the transfer of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(1), 233.
Smith, M. A., & Karpicke, J. D. (2014). Retrieval practice with short-answer, multiple-choice, and hybrid tests. Memory, 22(7), 784–802.
Son, L. K., & Metcalfe, J. (2005). Judgments of learning: Evidence for a two-stage process. Memory and Cognition, 33(6), 1116–1129.
Tauber, S. K. U., Dunlosky, J., & Rawson, K. A. (2015). The influence of retrieval practice versus delayed judgments of learning on memory: Resolving a memory-metamemory paradox. Experimental Psychology, 62(4), 254.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dobson, J.L., Linderholm, T. & Stroud, L. Retrieval practice and judgements of learning enhance transfer of physiology information. Adv in Health Sci Educ 24, 525–537 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-019-09881-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-019-09881-w