Skip to main content
Log in

Terrain and Direction Classification of Locomotion Transitions Using Neuromuscular and Mechanical Input

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

To perform seamless transitions in powered lower limb prostheses, accurate classification of transition type is required a priori. We propose a structure to detect direction (ascent or descent) and terrain (ramp or stairs) patterns when a person transitions from over ground to stairs or ramp locomotion. We compared electromyography (EMG) and accelerometry performance with an emphasis on sensor fusion for improving classification. Seven healthy subjects were recruited for this initial study. Data were collected with accelerometers and EMG electrodes on the dominant leg, while subjects transitioned from over ground to ramp (ascent and descent) and stair (ascent and descent) locomotion. Linear discriminant analysis and support vector machine approaches were used as classifiers using feature spaces of both sensor types. The results indicate that transitions are better classified as terrain type than direction type (p < 0.001), suggesting a terrain focused approach for an efficient structure. We also show that EMG and accelerometry data sources are complementary across the transitional gait cycle, suggesting sensor fusion for robust classification. These findings suggest that a terrain and direction focused classification approach will be useful for inclusion in classification approaches utilized in lower limb amputee samples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Au, S., M. Berniker, and H. Herr. Powered ankle-foot prosthesis to assist level-ground and stair-descent gaits. Neural Netw. 21:654–666, 2008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bao, L., and S. S. Intille. Activity Recognition from User-annotated Acceleration Data. Pervasive (LCNS 3001), Berlin: Springer, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bliss, C. I. The method of probits. Science 79:38–39, 1934.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chowdhury, R. H., M. B. Reaz, M. A. Ali, A. A. Bakar, K. Chellappan, and T. G. Chang. Surface electromyography signal processing and classification techniques. Sensors (Basel) 13:12431–12466, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Delagi, E. F., and A. Perotto. Anatomic Guide for the Electromyographer—The Limbs (2nd ed.)., Vol. xvi. Springfield: Thomas, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dillingham, T., L. Pezzin, and E. J. Mackenzie. Limb amputation and limb deficiency: epidemiology and recent trends in the united states. South. Med. J. 95:875–883, 2002.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Englehart, K., and B. Hudgins. A robust, real-time control scheme for multifunction myoelectric control. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 50:848–854, 2003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Graupe, D., J. Salahi, and K. H. Kohn. Multifunctional prosthesis and orthosis control via microcomputer identification of temporal pattern differences in single-site myoelectric signals. J. Biomed. Eng. 4:17–22, 1982.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gupta, P., and T. Dallas. Feature selection and activity recognition system using a single triaxial accelerometer. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 61:1780–1786, 2014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang, H., T. A. Kuiken, and R. D. Lipschutz. A strategy for identifying locomotion modes using surface electromyography. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 56:65–73, 2009.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang, H., F. Zhang, L. J. Hargrove, Z. Dou, D. R. Rogers, and K. B. Englehart. Continuous locomotion-mode identification for prosthetic legs based on neuromuscular-mechanical fusion. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 58:2867–2875, 2011.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang, H., P. Zhou, G. Li, and T. A. Kuiken. An analysis of EMG electrode configuration for targeted muscle reinnervation based neural machine interface. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 16:37–45, 2008.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Joshi, D., B. Nakamura, and M. Hahn. A novel approach for toe off estimation during locomotion and transitions on ramps and level ground. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 2014. doi:10.1109/JBHI.2014.2377749.

  14. Kumar, S., J. Ghosh, and M. M. Crawford. Hierarchical fusion of multiple classifiers for hyperspectral data analysis. Pattern Anal. Appl. 5:210–220, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Miller, J. D., M. S. Beazer, and M. E. Hahn. Myoelectric walking mode classification for transtibial amputees. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 60:2745–2750, 2013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Oskoei, M. A., and H. Hu. Support vector machine-based classification scheme for myoelectric control applied to upper limb. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 55:1956–1965, 2008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sejdic, E., K. A. Lowry, J. Bellanca, M. S. Redfern, and J. S. Brach. A comprehensive assessment of gait accelerometry signals in time, frequency and time-frequency domains. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 22:603–612, 2014.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Silla, C. N., and A. A. Freitas. A survey of hierarchical classification across different application domains. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 22:31–72, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sup, F., A. Bohara, and M. Goldfarb. Design and control of a powered transfemoral prosthesis. Int. J. Robot. Res. 27:263–273, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tkach, D. C., and L. J. Hargrove. Neuromechanical sensor fusion yields highest accuracies in predicting ambulation mode transitions for trans-tibial amputees. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 3074–3077:2013, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Young, A. J., A. M. Simon, and L. J. Hargrove. A training method for locomotion mode prediction using powered lower limb prostheses. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 22:671–677, 2014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yuan, K., Q. Wang, and L. Wang. Fuzzy-logic-based terrain identification with multisensor fusion for transtibial amputees. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechtron. 20:618–630, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ziegler-Graham, K., E. J. Mackenzie, P. L. Ephraim, T. G. Travison, and R. Brookmeyer. Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the united states: 2005 to 2050. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 89:422–429, 2008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Department of Defense under Grant W81XWH-09-2-0144. The authors are grateful to Bryson Nakamura and Eileen Deming for their help in data collection and post-processing.

Conflict of interest

The authors’ institution received grant sub-contract funds from the Seattle Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Research. This work is associated with a Patent PCT/US2014/045608 pending.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael E. Hahn.

Additional information

Associate Editor Michael R. Torry oversaw the review of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Joshi, D., Hahn, M.E. Terrain and Direction Classification of Locomotion Transitions Using Neuromuscular and Mechanical Input. Ann Biomed Eng 44, 1275–1284 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-015-1407-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-015-1407-3

Keywords

Navigation