Skip to main content
Log in

Nonlinear damage model for seismic damage assessment of reinforced concrete frame members and structures

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Mechanica Sinica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A nonlinear damage model based on the combination of deformation and hysteretic energy and its validation with experiments are presented. Also, a combination parameter is defined to consider the mutual effect of deformation and hysteretic energy for different types of components in different loading stages. Four reinforced concrete (RC) columns are simulated and analyzed using the nonlinear damage model. The results indicate that the damage evolution evaluated by the model agrees well with the experimental phenomenon. Furthermore, the seismic damage evolution of a six-story RC frame was analyzed, revealing four typical failure modes according to the interstory drift distribution of the structure; the damage values calculated using the nonlinear damage model agree well with the four typical failure modes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhang, P.Z., Hou, S., Ou, J.P.: A beam–column joint element for analysis of reinforced concrete frame structures. Eng. Struct. 118, 125–136 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Banazadeh, M., Shokrabadi, M., Shokrabadi, M., et al.: Assessment of seismic risks in code conforming reinforced concrete frames. Eng. Struct. 98, 14–28 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sun, B.T., Zhang, G.X.: The Wenchuan earthquake creation of a rich database of building performance. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 53, 2668–2680 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rossetto, T., Peiris, N.: Observations of damage due to the Kashmir earthquake of October 8, 2005 and study of current seismic provisions for buildings in Pakistan. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 7, 681–699 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ning, N., Qu, W.J., Ma, Z.G.: Design recommendations for achieving ‘strong column–weak beam’ in RC frames. Eng. Struct. 126, 343–352 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ghannoum, W.M., Moehle, J.P., Bozorgnia, Y.: Analytical collapse study of lightly confined reinforced concrete frames subjected to Northridge earthquake ground motions. J. Earthq. Eng. 12, 1105–1119 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Colombo, A., Negro, P.: A damage index of generalised applicability. Eng. Struct. 27, 1164–1174 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Do, T., Filippou, F.: A damage model for structures with degrading response. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 47, 311–332 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim, T.H., Lee, K.M., Chung, Y.S., et al.: Seismic damage assessment of reinforced concrete bridge columns. Eng. Struct. 27, 576–592 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Martins, L., Silva, V., Marques, M., et al.: Development and assessment of damage-to-loss models for moment-frame reinforced concrete buildings. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 45, 797–817 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rodriguez, M.E., Padilla, D.: A damage index for the seismic analysis of reinforced concrete members. J. Earthq. Eng. 13, 364–383 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Park, Y.J., Ang, A.H.S.: Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete. J. Struct. Eng. 111, 722–739 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mander, J.B., Cheng, C.T.: Replaceable hinge detailing for bridge columns. Int. Concr. Abstr. Portal 187, 185–204 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lu, D.G., Wang, G.Y.: Decision-making method of optimal fortification level for aseismic structures based on damage performance. China Civil Eng. J. 7, 44–49 (2001). (in Chinese)

  15. Niu, D.T., Ou, J.P., Du, X.L.: Random earthquake ground motion model and its parameter determination used in aseismic design. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 11, 45–54 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brasiliano, A., Doz, G.N., Brito, J.L.V.: Damage identification in continuous beams and frame structures using the residual error method in the movement equation. Nucl. Eng. Des. 227, 1–17 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hognestad, E.: Study of combined bending and axial load in reinforced concrete members. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Illinois, New York (1951)

  18. Bonora, N.: A nonlinear CDM model for ductile failure. Eng. Fract. Mech. 58, 11–28 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang, G.J.: Research on seismic behavior of high strength reinforced concrete frame columns in large-scale thermal power plants. [Ph.D. Thesis], Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology, Xi’an (2003). (in Chinese)

  20. Deng, M.K.: Theory and experimental research on performance-based seismic design of high performance concrete shear wall. [Ph.D. Thesis], Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology, Xi’an (2006). (in Chinese)

  21. Ile, N., Reynouard, J.M.: Nonlinear analysis of reinforced concrete shear wall under earthquake loading. J. Earthq. Eng. 4, 183–213 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Thanh, N.T.C., Li, B.: Ultimate displacement of reinforced concrete columns with light transverse reinforcement. J. Earthq. Eng. 17, 282–300 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant 51578058) and the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (Grant 8172038).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Longhe Xu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiao, S., Xu, L. & Lu, X. Nonlinear damage model for seismic damage assessment of reinforced concrete frame members and structures. Acta Mech. Sin. 34, 949–962 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-018-0779-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-018-0779-7

Keywords

Navigation