Skip to main content
Log in

Design optimization of the S-frame to improve crashworthiness

  • Research Paper
  • Solid Mechanics
  • Published:
Acta Mechanica Sinica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, the S-frames, the front side rail structures of automobile, were investigated for crashworthiness. Various cross-sections including regular polygon, non-convex polygon and multi-cell with inner stiffener sections were investigated in terms of energy absorption of S-frames. It was determined through extensive numerical simulation that a multi-cell S-frame with double vertical internal stiffeners can absorb more energy than the other configurations. Shape optimization was also carried out to improve energy absorption of the S-frame with a rectangular section. The center composite design of experiment and the sequential response surface method (SRSM) were adopted to construct the approximate design sub-problem, which was then solved by the feasible direction method. An innovative double S-frame was obtained from the optimal result. The optimum configuration of the S-frame was crushed numerically and more plastic hinges as well as shear zones were observed during the crush process. The energy absorption efficiency of the structure with the optimal configuration was improved compared to the initial configuration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lu, G.X., Yu, T.X.: Energy Absorption of Structures and Materials. Woodhead Publishing Ltd, Cambridge (2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Lei, Z.B., Wang, S.J., Fu, A.J., et al.: Safety and Energy Absorption of Vehicle Collision. Press of National University of Defense Technology, Changsha (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bahram, N.: Review of crashworthiness capability of optimum S-shape structure. Journal of Applied Sciences 11, 2878–2882 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ohkami, Y., Takada, K., Motomura, K., et al.: Collpase of thinwalled curved beam with closed-hat section—Part 1: Study on collaspe characteristics. SAE Paper No.900460 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Abe, K., Nishigaki, H., Ishiyama, S.I., et al.: Collpase of thinwalled curved beam with closed-hat section—Part 2: Simulation by plane plastic hinge model. SAE Paper No.900461 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Parisa, H.T., Mossa, N.: Two materials S-frame representation for improving crashworthiness and lightening. Thin-walled Structures 44, 407–414 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kim, H.S., Wierzbicki, T.: Effect of the cross-sectional shape of hat-type cross-sections on crash resistance of an “S”-frame. Thin-walled Structures 39, 535–554 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nishimura I., Sakurai T.: Prediction of the crashworthiness of vehicle body aided computer. SAE Paper No.912581 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Han, J., Yamazaki K.: Crashworthiness optimization of Sshape square tubes. International Journal of Vehicle Design 31, 72–85 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jong, K.Y., Luo, S.L., Hsieh, W.L.: The application of crashworthiness to the development of vehicle components. SAE Paper No.945166 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chen, W.G., Wierzbicki, T.: Relative merits of single-cell, multi-cell and foam-filled thin-walled structures in energy absorption. Thin-walled Structures 39, 287–306 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang, X., Cheng, G.D., Zhang, H.: Theoretical prediction and numerical simulation of multi-cell square thin-walled structures. Thin-Walled Struct. 44, 1185–1191 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhao, D., Xue, D.Y.: A comparative study of metamodeling methods considering sample quality merits. Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 42, 923–938 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kurtaran, H., Eskandarian, A., Marzougui, D., et al.: Crashworthiness design optimization using successive response surface approximations. Computational Mechanics 29, 409–421 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Forsberg, J., Nilsson, L.: Evaluation of response surface methodologies used in crashworthiness optimization. Int. J. Impact. Eng. 32, 759–777 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Myers, R.H., Montgomery, D.C.: Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization using Designed Experiments, (3rd edn). Wiley, Hoboken (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yang, R.J., Wang, N., Tho, Ch., et al.: Metamodeling development for vehicle frontal impact simulation. J. Mech. Des. 127, 1014–1020 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang, G.G., Shan, S.: Review of metamodeling techniques in support of engineering design optimization. J. Mech. Des. 129, 370–380 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Montgomery, D.C.: Design and Analysis of Experiments, (5th edn). Wiley, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shu-Tian Liu.

Additional information

The project was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (2011CB610304), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11172052), and the National S&T Major Project (2012ZX04010-0114).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, ST., Tong, ZQ., Tang, ZL. et al. Design optimization of the S-frame to improve crashworthiness. Acta Mech Sin 30, 589–599 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-014-0032-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-014-0032-y

Thin-walled structure

Navigation