Skip to main content
Log in

A room-temperature bonding technique for the packaging of hydrogel-based hybrid microfluidic devices

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Microfluidics and Nanofluidics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a room-temperature bonding technique which enables the sealing of micromolded water-swollen poly-2-hydroxy ethyl methacrylate (PHEMA)-based hydrogel modules to thermoplastic and elastomeric platforms. The core mechanism of the proposed method is to favor the formation of hydrogen bonds at the interface between the surface-reactive hydrated hydrogel components and the functionalized hydrophobic materials, by contacting the polymeric layers via a mild compression. Plasma oxygen and silanization processes using 3-amino-propyl trimethoxy silane have been optimized to generate surface hydroxyl functionalities on poly-methyl methacrylate (PMMA) and poly-dimethyl siloxane (PDMS) platforms which can react with the OH groups’ enriched surface of the microstructured PHEMA. The resulting microsystems can operate in a continuous perfusion mode while being soaked in water to keep the hydrogel hydrated. The method could also be applied to bond PHEMA thin layers (300 μm thick) to PMMA and PDMS microfluidic components. The sealing properties of the produced devices were demonstrated by liquid leakage tests and further validated by hydration–dehydration cycles of the systems and by monitoring methylene blue diffusion through the hydrogel matrix at the modules interface. The presented technique is suitable for cells-based hybrid materials microfluidic devices rapid prototyping.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

APS:

Ammonium persulfate

APTES:

3-Amino-propyl trimethoxy silane

EGDMA:

Ethylene glycol di-methacrylate

LOC:

Lab on a chip

PDMS:

Poly-dimethyl siloxane

PHEMA:

Poly-hydroxyl ethyl methacrylate

PMMA:

Poly-methyl methacrylate

TEMED:

Tetramethyl ethylene diamine

TMSPMA:

3-(Trimethoxysilyl)propyl methacrylates

References

  • Abraham S, Brahim S, Ishihara K, Guiseppi-Elie A (2005) Molecularly engineered p(HEMA)-based hydrogels for implant biochip biocompatibility. Biomaterials 26:4767–4778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antia M, Herricks T, Rathod PK (2007) Microfluidic modeling of cell-cell interactions in malaria pathogenesis. PLoS Pathog 3:0939–0948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes JM, Nauseef JT, Henry MD (2012) Resistance to fluid shear stress is a conserved biophysical property of malignant cells. PLoS ONE 7:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruus H (2008) Hydraulic resistance and compliance. In: Theoretical microfluidics. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 71–88

  • Burdick JA, Vunjak-Novakovic G (2009) Engineered microenvironments for controlled stem cell differentiation. Tissue Eng A 15:205–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cha C, Antoniadou E, Lee M, Jeong JH, Ahmed WW, Saif TA, Boppart SA, Kong H (2013) Tailoring hydrogel adhesion to polydimethylsiloxane substrates using polysaccharide glue. Angew Chem Int Ed 52:6949–6952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng SY, Heilman S, Wasserman M, Archer S, Shuler ML, Wu M (2007) A hydrogel-based microfluidic device for the studies of directed cell migration. Lab Chip 7:763–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chirila TV (2001) An overview of the development of artificial corneas with porous skirts and the use of PHEMA for such an application. Biomaterials 22:3311–3317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung BG, Lee KH, Khademhosseini A, Lee SH (2012) Microfluidic fabrication of microengineered hydrogels and their application in tissue engineering. Lab Chip 12:45–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cimetta E, Figallo E, Cannizzaro C, Elvassore N, Vunjak-Novakovic G (2009) Micro-bioreactor arrays for controlling cellular environments: design principles for human embryonic stem cell applications. Methods 47:81–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cimetta E, Sirabella D, Yeager K, Davidson K, Simon J, Moon RT, Vunjak-Novakovic G (2013) Microfluidic bioreactor for dynamic regulation of early mesodermal commitment in human pluripotent stem cells. Lab Chip 13:355–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushing MC, Anseth KS (2007) Hydrogel cell cultures. Science 316:1133–1134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deligkaris K, Tadele TS, Olthuis W, van den Berg A (2010) Hydrogel-based devices for biomedical applications. Sens Actuators B: Chem 147:765–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gan Z, Zhang L, Chen G (2011) Solvent bonding of poly(methyl methacrylate) microfluidic chip using phase-changing agar hydrogel as a sacrificial layer. Electrophoresis 32:3319–3323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greiner AM, Hoffmann P, Bruellhoff K, Jungbauer S, Spatz JP, Moeller M, Kemkemer R, Groll J (2014) Stable biochemically micro-patterned hydrogel layers control specific cell adhesion and allow long term cyclic tensile strain experiments. Macromol Biosci 14:1547–1555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guiseppi-Elie A, Dong C, Dinu CZ (2012) Crosslink density of a biomimetic poly(HEMA)-based hydrogel influences growth and proliferation of attachment dependent RMS 13 cells. J Mater Chem 22:19529–19539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta K, Kim D-H, Ellison D, Smith C, Kundu A, Tuan J, Suh K-Y, Levchenko A (2010) Lab-on-a-chip devices as an emerging platform for stem cell biology. Lab Chip 10:2019–2031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes JJ, Barber RW, Emerson DR, Coakley WT (2004) Continuous cell washing and mixing driven by an ultrasound standing wave within a microfluidic channel. Lab Chip 4:446–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegemann D, Brunner H, Oehr C (2003) Plasma treatment of polymers for surface and adhesion improvement. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 208:281–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong W, Liu Z, Suo Z (2009) Inhomogeneous swelling of a gel in equilibrium with a solvent and mechanical load. Int J Solids Struct 46:3282–3289

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hung PJ, Lee PJ, Sabounchi P, Lin R, Lee LP (2005) Continuous perfusion microfluidic cell culture array for high-throughput cell-based assays. Biotechnol Bioeng 89:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Chavarria EM, Agrawal U, Tanyeri M, Kuhlman TE, Schroeder CM (2014) Automated single cell microbioreactor for monitoring intracellular dynamics and cell growth in free solution. Lab Chip 14:2688–2697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kejlová K, Labský J, Jírová D, Bendová H (2005) Hydrophilic polymers–biocompatibility testing in vitro. Toxicol In Vitro 19:957–962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kermis HR, Rao G, Barbari TA (2003) Transport properties of pHEMA membranes for optical glucose affinity sensors. J Membr Sci 212:75–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khademhosseini A, Langer R (2007) Microengineered hydrogels for tissue engineering. Biomaterial 28:5087–5092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, Surapaneni R, Gale BK (2009) Rapid prototyping of microfluidic systems using a PDMS/polymer tape composite. Lab Chip 9:1290–1293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwang WO, Lee K, Ahna B, Furlanib EP (2012) Design of pressure-driven microfluidic networks using electric circuit analogy. Lab Chip 12:515–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai S, Cao X, Lee LJ (2004) A packaging technique for polymer microfluidic platforms. Anal Chem 76:1175–1183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee NY, Chung BH (2009) Novel poly(dimethylsiloxane) bonding strategy via room temperature “chemical gluing”. Langmuir 25:3861–3866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee HL, Boccazzi P, Ram RJ, Sinskey AJ (2006) Microbioreactor arrays with integrated mixers and fluid injectors for high-throughput experimentation with pH and dissolved oxygen control. Lab Chip 6:1229–1235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin C-C, Metters AT (2006) Hydrogels in controlled release formulations: network design and mathematical modeling. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 58:1379–1408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutolf MP, Raeber GP, Zisch AH, Tirelli N, Hubbell JA (2003) Cell-responsive synthetic hydrogels. Adv Mater 15:888–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makamba H, Kim JH, Lim K, Park N, Hahn JH (2003) Surface modification of poly(dimethylsiloxane) microchannels. Electrophoresis 24:3607–3619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcombe R, Cai S, Hong W, Zhao X, Lapusta Y, Suo Z (2010) A theory of constrained swelling of a pH-sensitive hydrogel. Soft Matter 6:784–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrett K, Griffith CM, Deslandes Y, Pleizier G, Sheardown H (2001) Adhesion of corneal epithelial cells to cell adhesion peptide modified pHEMA surfaces. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 12:647–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersson F, Åberg L, Swärd-Nilsson AM, Laurell T (2007) Free flow acoustophoresis: microfluidic-based mode of particle and cell separation. Anal Chem 79:5117–5123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren K, Zhou J, Wu H (2013) Materials for microfluidic chip fabrication. Acc Chem Res 46:2396–2406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Setsuhara Y, Cho K, Takenaka K, Shiratani M, Sekine M, Hori M, Ikenaga E, Zaima S (2010) Low-damage surface modification of polymethylmethacrylate with argon oxygen mixture plasmas driven by multiple low-inductance antenna units. Thin Solid Films 518:3561–3565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin H, Zygourakis K, Farach-Carson MC, Yaszemski MJ, Mikos AG (2004) Attachment, proliferation, and migration of marrow stromal osteoblasts cultured on biomimetic hydrogels modified with an osteopontin-derived peptide. Biomaterials 25:895–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunkara V, Park DK, Hwang H, Chantiwas R, Soper SA, Cho YK (2011) Simple room temperature bonding of thermoplastics and poly(dimethylsiloxane). Lab Chip 11:962–965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang L, Lee NY (2010) A facile route for irreversible bonding of plastic-PDMS hybrid microdevices at room temperature. Lab Chip 10:1274–1280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tennico YH, Koesdjojo MT, Kondo S, Mandrell DT, Remcho VT (2010) Surface modification-assisted bonding of polymer-based microfluidic devices. Sens Actuators B 143:799–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tong Z, Liu X (1994) Swelling equilibria and volume phase transition in hydrogels with strongly dissociating electrolytes. Macromolecules 27:844–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsougeni K, Tserepi A, Constantoudis V, Gogolides E, Petrou PS, Kakabakos SE (2010) Plasma nanotextured PMMA surfaces for protein arrays: increased protein binding and enhanced detection sensitivity. Langmuir 26:13883–13891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlachopoulou M-E, Tserepi A, Pavli P, Argitis P, Sanopoulou M, Misiakos K (2009) A low temperature surface modification assisted method for bonding plastic substrates. J Micromech Microeng 19:015007–015013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong I, Ho CM (2009) Surface molecular property modifications for poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) based microfluidic devices. Microfluid Nanofluidics 7:291–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeo Y, Geng W, Ito T, Kohane DS, Burdick JA, Radisic M (2007) Photocrosslinkable hydrogel for myocyte cell culture and injection. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 81B:312–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon J, Cai S, Suo Z, Hayward RC (2010) Poroelastic swelling kinetics of thin hydrogel layers: comparison of theory and experiment. Soft Matter 6:6004–6012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu W, Qu H, Hu G, Zhang Q, Song K, Guan H, Liu T, Qin J (2014) A microfluidic-based multi-shear device for investigating the effects of low fluid-induced stresses on osteoblasts. PLoS ONE 9:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Bian C, Jackson JK, Khademolhosseini F, Burt HM, Chiao M (2014) Fabrication of robust hydrogel coatings on polydimethylsiloxane substrates using micropillar anchor structures with chemical surface modification. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:9126–9133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao W, Lenardi C, Webb P, Liu C, Santaniello T, Gassa F (2013) A methodology to analyse and simulate mechanical characteristics of poly (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) hydrogel. Polym Int 62:1059–1067

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by Fondazione CARIPLO for the project ‘Hybrid Multifunctional Microdevices to Probe Cell Biology’, under the Program ‘Promuovere progetti internazionali finalizzati al reclutamento di giovani ricercatori’.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tommaso Santaniello.

Additional information

Tommaso Santaniello and Yunsong Yan have equally contributed to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Santaniello, T., Yan, Y., Tocchio, A. et al. A room-temperature bonding technique for the packaging of hydrogel-based hybrid microfluidic devices. Microfluid Nanofluid 19, 31–41 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-015-1544-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-015-1544-x

Keywords

Navigation