Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The study of spermatozoa and sorting in relation to human reproduction

  • Review
  • Published:
Microfluidics and Nanofluidics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this review article, we seek to provide a link between our understanding of the spermatozoa on the physical aspects and applications involving assisted reproduction, so that future research in this field can be better poised for improving current procedures. A brief discussion is included regarding the difference in the fluid mechanics of a Newtonian and viscoelastic fluid medium. A review is then done on the current microfluidic sorting techniques applicable to spermatozoa, which includes the albumin gradient separation, fluorescence activated flow cytometry, electrophoresis, dielectrophoresis, countercurrent distribution, movement of motile sperms, accumulation at walls, and optical trapping. Common preparation methods for spermatozoa used in assisted reproduction are also introduced. A number of other general particle manipulation methods which could potentially be incorporated for sperm sorting are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal A, Said TM (2003) Role of sperm chromatin abnormalities and DNA damage in male infertility. Hum Reprod Update 9:331–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainsworth C, Nixon B, Aitken RJ (2005) Development of a novel electrophoretic system for the isolation of human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 20:2261–2270

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainsworth CJ, Nixon B, Aitken RJ (2011) The electrophoretic separation of spermatozoa: an analysis of genotype, surface carbohydrate composition and potential for capacitation. Int J Androl 34:e422–e434

    Google Scholar 

  • Aksoy E, Aktan TM, Duman S, Cuce G (2012) Assessment of spermatozoa morphology under light microscopy with different histologic stains and comparison of morphometric measurements. Int J Morphol 30:1544–1550

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen AMN, Wohlfahrt J, Christens P, Olsen J, Melbye M (2000) Maternal age and fetal loss: population based register linkage study. BMJ 320:1708–1712

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JD (1984) Fundamentals of aerodynamics. McGraw-Hill, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony S, Buitendijk SE, Dorrepaal CA, Lindner K, Braat DDM, den Ouden AL (2002) Congenital malformations in 4224 children conceived after IVF. Hum Reprod 17:2089–2095

    Google Scholar 

  • Aziz N, Said T, Paasch U, Agarwal A (2007) The relationship between human sperm apoptosis, morphology and the sperm deformity index. Hum Reprod 22:1413–1419

    Google Scholar 

  • Barroso G, Taylor S, Morshedi M, Manzur F, Gaviño F, Oehninger S (2006) Mitochondrial membrane potential integrity and plasma membrane translocation of phosphatidylserine as early apoptotic markers: a comparison of two different sperm subpopulations. Fertil Steril 85:149–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartoov B, Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Kogosowski A, Menezo Y, Barak Y (2002) Real-time fine morphology of motile human sperm cells is associated with IVF-ICSI outcome. J Androl 23:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Batchelor GK (1970) Slender-body theory for particles of arbitrary cross-section in Stokes flow. J Fluid Mech 44:419–440

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bayly PV, Lewis BL, Ranz EC, Okamoto RJ, Pless RB, Dutcher SK (2011) Propulsive forces on the flagellum during locomotion of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Biophys J 100:2716–2725

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker FF, Wang XB, Huang Y, Pethig R, Vykoukal J, Gascoyne PR (1995) Separation of human breast cancer cells from blood by differential dielectric affinity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:860–864

    Google Scholar 

  • Beernink FJ, Dmowski WP, Ericsson RJ (1993) Sex preselection through albumin separation of sperm. Fertil Steril 59:382–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Berke AP, Turner L, Berg HC, Lauga E (2008) Hydrodynamic attraction of swimming microorganisms by surfaces. Phys Rev Lett 101:038102

    Google Scholar 

  • Berli CL (2010) Output pressure and efficiency of electrokinetic pumping of non-Newtonian fluids. Microfluid Nanofluid 8:197–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagat AAS, Kuntaegowdanahalli SS, Papautsky I (2009) Inertial microfluidics for continuous particle filtration and extraction. Microfluid Nanofluid 7:217–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird RB, Wiest JM (1995) Constitutijbkoh1ve equations for polymeric liquids. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 27:169–193

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton VN, Braude PR (1984) Preparation of human spermatozoa for in vitro fertilization by isopycnic centrifugation on self-generating density gradients. Syst Biol Reprod Med 13:167–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennen C, Winet H (1977) Fluid mechanics of propulsion by cilia and flagella. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 9:339–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner H (1962) Effect of finite boundaries on the Stokes resistance of an arbitrary particle. J Fluid Mech 12:35–48

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Camalet S, Jülicher F (2000) Generic aspects of axonemal beating. New J Phys 2:24

    Google Scholar 

  • Campana A, Sakkas D, Stalberg A, Bianchi PG, Comte I, Pache T, Walker D (1996) Intrauterine insemination: evaluation of the results according to the woman’s age, sperm quality, total sperm count per insemination and life table analysis. Hum Reprod 11:732–736

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright EJ, Harrington PM, Cowin A, Sharpe PT (1993) Separation of bovine X-sperm and Y-sperm based on surface differences. Mol Reprod Dev 34:323–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho JO, Silva LP, Sartori R, Dode MAN (2013) Nanoscale differences in the shape and size of X and Y chromosome-bearing bovine sperm heads assessed by atomic force microscopy. PLoS ONE 8:59387

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan CLW, Yip PSF, Ng EHY, Ho PC, Chan CHY, Au JSK (2002) Gender selection in China: it’s meanings and implications. J Assist Reprod Genet 19:426–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Check JH, Katsoff D (1993) A prospective study to evaluate the efficacy of modified swim-up preparation for male sex selection. Hum Reprod 8:211–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen YA, Huang ZW, Tsai FS, Chen CY, Lin CM, Wo AM (2011) Analysis of sperm concentration and motility in a microfluidic device. Microfluid Nanofluid 10:59–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Li J, Sun Y (2012) Microfluidic approaches for cancer cell detection, characterization, and separation. Lab Chip 12:1753–1767

    Google Scholar 

  • Childress S (1981) Mechanics of swimming and flying. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chilukuri S, Collins CH, Underhill PT (2014) Impact of external flow on the dynamics of swimming microorganisms near surfaces. J Phys Condens Matter 26:115101

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiou PY, Ohta AT, Wu MC (2005) Massively parallel manipulation of single cells and microparticles using optical images. Nature 436:370–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho BS, Schuster TG, Zhu X, Chang D, Smith GD, Takayama S (2003) Passively driven integrated microfluidic system for separation of motile sperm. Anal Chem 75:1671–1675

    Google Scholar 

  • Chwang AT, Wu TYT (1975) Hydromechanics of low-Reynolds-number flow part 2: singularity method for Stokes flows. J Fluid Mech 67:787–815

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Dayag A, Tur-Kaspa I, Dor J, Mashiach S, Eisenbach M (1995) Sperm capacitation in humans is transient and correlates with chemotactic responsiveness to follicular factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:11039–11043

    Google Scholar 

  • Colon JM, Sarosi P, McGovern PG, Askin A, Dziedzic JM, Skurnick J, Weiss G, Bonder EM (1992) Controlled micromanipulation of human sperm in three dimensions with an infrared laser optical trap: effect on sperm velocity. Fertil Steril 57:695–698

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper TG, Yeung CH (2006) Computer-aided evaluation of assessment of “grade a” spermatozoa by experienced technicians. Fertil Steril 85:220–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui KH (1997) Size differences between human X and Y spermatozoa and prefertilization diagnosis. Mol Hum Reprod 3:61–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui W (2010) Mother or nothing: the agony of infertility. Bull World Health Organ 88(12):881–882

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui KH, Matthews CD (1993) X larger than Y. Nature 366:117–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis MP, Gaffney EA (2013) Three-sphere swimmer in a nonlinear viscoelastic medium. Phys Rev E 87:043006

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Avino G, Romeo G, Villone MM, Greco F, Netti PA, Maffettone PL (2012) Single line particle focusing induced by viscoelasticity of the suspending liquid: theory, experiments and simulations to design a micropipe flowfocuser. Lab Chip 12:1638–1645

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl E, Gupta RS, Beutel M, Stoebel-Richter Y, Brosig B, Tinneberg HR, Jain T (2006) Preconception sex selection demand and preferences in the United States. Fertil Steril 85:468–473

    Google Scholar 

  • David G, Serres C, Jouannet P (1981) Kinematics of human spermatozoa. Gamete Res 4:83–95

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vos A, Van De Velde H, Joris H, Verheyen G, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A (2003) Influence of individual sperm morphology on fertilization, embryo morphology, and pregnancy outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril 79:42–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Denissenko P, Kantsler V, Smith DJ, Kirkman-Brown J (2012) Human spermatozoa migration in microchannels reveals boundary-following navigation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:8007–8010

    Google Scholar 

  • Didar TF, Tabrizian M (2010) Adhesion based detection, sorting and enrichment of cells in microfluidic Lab-on-Chip devices. Lab Chip 10:3043–3053

    Google Scholar 

  • Dresdner RD, Katz DF (1981) Relationships of mammalian sperm motility and morphology to hydrodynamic aspects of cell function. Biol Reprod 25:920–930

    Google Scholar 

  • Durand RE, Olive PL (1982) Cytotoxicity, Mutagenicity and DNA damage by Hoechst 33342. J Histochem Cytochem 30:111–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelmann RJ, Connolly KJ (1986) Psychological aspects of infertility. Br J Med Psychol 59:209–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards RG (2000) Human embryos in vitro: pioneer illustrations of oocyte maturation, fertilization, cleavage and blastulation. Hum Reprod 15:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards RG (2001) The bumpy road to human in vitro fertilization. Nat Med 7:1091–1094

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenbach M (2004) Chemotaxis. Imperial College Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Ali J, Sorger PK, Jensen KF (2006) Cells on chips. Nature 442:403–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Elfring GJ, Pak OS, Lauga E (2010) Two-dimensional flagellar synchronization in viscoelastic fluids. J Fluid Mech 646:505–515

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Elgeti J, Kaupp UB, Gompper G (2010) Hydrodynamics of sperm cells near surfaces. Biophys J 99:1018–1026

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelmann U, Krassnigg F, Schatz H, Schill WB (1988) Separation of human X and Y spermatozoa by free-flow electrophoresis. Gamete Res 19:151–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson RJ (1994) Sex selection: sex selection via albumin columns: 20 years of results. Hum Reprod 9:1787–1788

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson RJ, Langevin CN, Nishino M (1973) Isolation of fractions rich in human Y sperm. Nature 246:421–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Evander M, Johansson L, Lilliehorn T, Piskur J, Lindvall M, Johansson S, Almqvist M, Laurell T, Nilsson J (2007) Noninvasive acoustic cell trapping in a microfluidic perfusion system for online bioassays. Anal Chem 79:2984–2991

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauci LJ, Dillon R (2006) Biofluidmechanics of reproduction. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 38:371–394

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fisch H, Lipshultz LI (1992) Diagnosing male factors of infertility. Arch Pathol Lab Med 116:398–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Flaherty SP, Michalowska J, Swann NJ, Dmowski WP, Matthews CD, Aitken RJ (1997) Albumin gradients do not enrich Y-bearing human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 12:938–942

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming SD, Ilad RS, Griffin AM, Wu Y, Ong KJ, Smith HC, Aitken RJ (2008) Prospective controlled trial of an electrophoretic method of sperm preparation for assisted reproduction: comparison with density gradient centrifugation. Hum Reprod 23:2646–2651

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich BM, Riedel-Kruse IH, Howard J, Jülicher F (2010) High-precision tracking of sperm swimming fine structure provides strong test of resistive force theory. J Exp Biol 213:1226–1234

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu HC, Wolgemuth CW, Powers TR (2008) Beating patterns of filaments in viscoelastic fluids. Phys Rev E 78:041913

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fu HC, Wolgemuth CW, Powers TR (2009) Swimming speeds of filaments in nonlinearly viscoelastic fluids. Phys Fluids 21:033102

    Google Scholar 

  • Fugger EF, Black SH, Keyvanfar K, Schulman JD (1998) Births of normal daughters after MicroSort sperm separation and intrauterine insemination, in vitro fertilization, or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 13:2367–2370

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadélha H, Gaffney EA, Smith DJ, Kirkman-Brown JC (2010) Non-linear instability in flagellar dynamics: a novel modulation mechanism in sperm migration? J R Soc Interface 7:1689–1697

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaffney EA, Gadêlha H, Smith DJ, Blake JR, Kirkman-Brown JC (2011) Mammalian sperm motility: observation and theory. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 43:501–528

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner DL (2001) Sex-sorting mammalian sperm: concept to application in animals. J Androl 22:519–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Gascoyne P, Mahidol C, Ruchirawat M, Satayavivad J, Watcharasit P, Becker FF (2002) Microsample preparation by dielectrophoresis: isolation of malaria. Lab Chip 2:70–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Gervais R, Dumur V, Letombe B, Larde A, Rigot JM, Roussel P, Lafitte JJ (1996) Hypofertility with thick cervical mucus: another mild form of cystic fibrosis? JAMA 276:1638

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillies EA, Cannon RM, Green RB, Pacey AA (2009) Hydrodynamic propulsion of human sperm. J Fluid Mech 625:445–474

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gleghorn JP, Pratt ED, Denning D, Liu H, Bander NH, Tagawa ST, Nanus DM, Giannakakou PA, Kirby BJ (2010) Capture of circulating tumor cells from whole blood of prostate cancer patients using geometrically enhanced differential immunocapture (GEDI) and a prostate-specific antibody. Lab Chip 10:27–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover JD, Wells M, Lewis FA, Lilford R (1990) Differentiation of X and Y spermatozoa by in situ hybridization. The IXth annual conference of the Fertility Society of Australia, Perth, WA

  • Gossett DR, Henry TK, Lee SA, Ying Y, Lindgren AG, Yang OO, Rao J, Clark AT, Di Carlo D (2012) Hydrodynamic stretching of single cells for large population mechanical phenotyping. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:7630–7635

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray J, Hancock JG (1955) The propulsion of sea-urchin spermatozoa. J Exp Biol 32:802–814

    Google Scholar 

  • Grier DG (2003) A revolution in optical manipulation. Nature 424:810–816

    Google Scholar 

  • Grow DR, Oehninger S, Seltman HJ, Toner JP, Swanson RJ, Kruger TF, Muasher SJ (1994) Sperm morphology as diagnosed by strict criteria: probing the impact of teratozoospermia on fertilization rate and pregnancy outcome in a large in vitro fertilization population. Fertil Steril 62:559–567

    Google Scholar 

  • Guidobaldi A, Jeyaram Y, Berdakin I, Moshchalkov VV, Condat CA, Marconi VI, Giojalas L, Silhanek AV (2014) Geometrical guidance and trapping transition of human sperm cells. Phys Rev E 89:032720

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammarström B, Evander M, Barbeau H, Bruzelius M, Larsson J, Laurell T, Nilsson J (2010) Non-contact acoustic cell trapping in disposable glass capillaries. Lab Chip 10:2251–2257

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock GJ (1953) The self-propulsion of microscopic organisms through liquids. Proc R Soc Lond A 217:96–121

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen M, Bower C, Milne E, de Klerk N, Kurinczuk JJ (2005) Assisted reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects—a systematic review. Hum Reprod 20:328–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkel RR, Schill WB (2003) Sperm preparation for ART. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 1:108

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkel RR, Franken DR, Lombard CJ, Schill WB (1994) Selective capacity of glass-wool filtration for the separation of human spermatozoa with condensed chromatin: a possible therapeutic modality for male-factor cases? J Assist Reprod Genet 11:395–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesketh T, Zhu WX (2006) Abnormal sex ratios in human populations: causes and consequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:13271–13275

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton RJ, Dobrota M (1978) Density gradient centrifugation. In: Work TS, Work E (eds) Laboratory techniques in biochemistry and molecular biology, vol 6. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Horsman K, Baker S, Ferrance J, Forrest K, Koen K, Landers J (2005) Separation of sperm and epithelial cells in a microfabricated device: potential application to forensic analysis of sexual assault evidence. Anal Chem 77:742–749

    Google Scholar 

  • Hruska KS, Furth PA, Seifer DB, Sharara FI, Flaws JA (2000) Clin Obstet Gynecol 43:821–829

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu HY, Ohta AT, Chiou PY, Jamshidi A, Neale SL, Wu MC (2010) Phototransistor-based optoelectronic tweezers for dynamic cell manipulation in cell culture media. Lab Chip 10:165–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Wang XB, Becker FF, Gascoyne PR (1997) Introducing dielectrophoresis as a new force field for field-flow fractionation. Biophys J 73:1118–1129

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Fertilisation Embryology Authority, United Kingdom (2003) Sex selection: options for regulations. http://www.hfea.gov.uk/docs/Final_sex_selection_main_report.pdf. Accessed 05 Dec 2014

  • Hunt JE, Wallach EE (1974) Uterine factors in infertility—an overview. Clin Obstet Gynecol 17:44–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishijima S, Oshio S, Mohri H (1986) Flagellar movement of human spermatozoa. Gamete Res 13:185–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe SB, Jewelewicz R, Wahl E, Khatamee MA (1991) A controlled study for gender selection. Fertil Steril 56:254–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Jen CP, Chen WF (2011) An insulator-based dielectrophoretic microdevice for the simultaneous filtration and focusing of biological cells. Biomicrofluidics 5:044105

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson LA, Flook JP, Look MV, Pinkel D (1987) Flow sorting of X and Y chromosome-bearing spermatozoa into two populations. Gamete Res 16:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson LA, Flook JP, Hawk HW (1989) Sex preselection in rabbits: live births from X and Y sperm separated by DNA and cell sorting. Biol Reprod 41:199–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaneko S, Iizuka R, Oshiro S, Nakajima H, Oshio S, Mohri H (1983) Separation of human X-and Y-bearing sperm using free-flow electrophoresis. P Jpn Acad B Phys 59:276–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Karabinus DS (2009) Flow cytometric sorting of human sperm: MicroSort® clinical trial update. Theriogenology 71:74–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Katalinic A, Rösch C, Ludwig M (2004) Pregnancy course and outcome after intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a controlled, prospective cohort study. Fertil Steril 81:1604–1616

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz DF, Davis RO (1987) Automatic analysis of human sperm motion. J Androl 8:170–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz DF, Mills RN, Pritchett TR (1978) The movement of human spermatozoa in cervical mucus. J Reprod Fertil 53:259–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz DF, Diel L, Overstreet JW (1982) Differences in the movement of morphologically normal and abnormal human seminal spermatozoa. Biol Reprod 26:566–570

    Google Scholar 

  • Khatamee MA, Horn SR, Weseley A, Farooq T, Jaffe SB, Jewelewicz R (1999) A controlled study for gender selection using swim-up separation. Gynecol Obstet Invest 48:7–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoshmanesha K, Nahavandia S, Baratchib S, Mitchellc A, Kalantarzadeh K (2011) Dielectrophoretic platforms for bio-microfluidic systems. Biosens Bioelectron 26:1800–1814

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidd SA, Eskenazi B, Wyrobek AJ (2001) Effects of male age on semen quality and fertility: a review of the literature. Fertil Steril 75:237–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman-Brown JC, Smith DJ (2011) Sperm motility: is viscosity fundamental to progress? Mol Hum Reprod 17:539–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehler SA, Powers TR (2000) Twirling elastica: kinks, viscous drag, and torsional stress. Phys Rev Lett 85:4827–4830

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh JBY, Marcos (2014) Effect of dielectrophoresis on spermatozoa. Microfluid Nanofluid 17:613–622

    Google Scholar 

  • Krans JL (2010) The sliding filament theory of muscle contraction. Nat Educ 3:66

    Google Scholar 

  • Krüger J, Singh K, O’Neill A, Jackson C, Morrison A, O’Brien P (2002) Development of a microfluidic device for fluorescence activated cell sorting. J Micromech Microeng 12:486–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai SK, Wang YY, Wirtz D, Hanes J (2009) Micro- and macrorheology of mucus. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 61:86–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Land JA, Evers JLH (2003) Risks and complications in assisted reproduction techniques: report of an ESHRE consensus meeting. Hum Reprod 18:455–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauga E (2007) Propulsion in a viscoelastic fluid. Phys Fluids 19:083104

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauga E (2011) Life around the scallop theorem. Soft Matter 7:3060–3065

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauga E, Powers TR (2009) The hydrodynamics of swimming microorganisms. Rep Prog Phys 72:096601

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lee H, Purdon AM, Westervelt RM (2004) Manipulation of biological cells using a microelectromagnet matrix. Appl Phys Lett 85:1063–1065

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson G, Keyvanfar K, Wu JC, Fugger EF, Fields RA, Harton GL, Palmer FT, Sisson ME, Starr KM, Dennison-Lagos L, Calvo L, Sherins RJ, Bick D, Schulman JD, Black SH (1995) Genetics and human conception: DNA-based X-enriched sperm separation as an adjunct to preimplantation genetic testing for the prevention of X-linked disease. Hum Reprod 10:979–982

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewpiriyawong N, Yang C (2014) Dielectrophoresis field-flow fractionation for continuous-flow separation of particles and cells in microfluidic devices. In: Wang L (ed) Advances in transport phenomena 2011. Springer, Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London, pp 29–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Lighthill J (1976) Flagellar hydrodynamics. SIAM Rev 18:161–230

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu B, Powers TR, Breuer KS (2011) Force-free swimming of a model helical flagellum in viscoelastic fluids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:19516–19520

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes S, Jurisicova A, Sun JG, Casper RF (1998) Reactive oxygen species: potential cause for DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 13:896–900

    Google Scholar 

  • Mach AJ, Di Carlo D (2010) Continuous scalable blood filtration device using inertial microfluidics. Biotechnol Bioeng 107:302–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Malo AF, Garde JJ, Soler AJ, García AJ, Gomendio M, Roldan ERS (2005) Male fertility in natural populations of red deer is determined by sperm velocity and the proportion of normal spermatozoa. Biol Reprod 72:822–829

    Google Scholar 

  • Malter HE, Cohen J (2002) Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: technical aspects. In: Vayena E, Rowe PJ, Griffin PD (eds) Current practices and controversies in assisted reproduction. World Health Organisation, Geneva, pp 126–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzur A, Cárdenas I, Macaya R, Almendra C, Gajardo G, Bianchi M, Durruty G (2004) Unbalanced sex ratio in newborns obtained by intrauterine inseminations. Int Congr Ser 1271:341–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchesi DE, Biederman H, Ferrara S, Hershlag A, Feng HL (2010) The effect of semen processing on sperm DNA integrity: comparison of two techniques using the novel Toluidine Blue Assay. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 151:176–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcos, Tran NP, Saini AR, Ong KCH, Chia WJ (2014) Analysis of a swimming sperm in a shear flow. Microfluid Nanofluid. doi:10.1007/s10404-014-1371-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin RH, Rademaker A (1988) The relationship between sperm chromosomal abnormalities and sperm morphology in humans. Mutat Res Lett 207:159–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda Y, Tobari I (1988) Chromosomal analysis in mouse eggs fertilized in vitro with sperma exposed to ultraviolet light (UV) and methyl and ethyl methanesulfonate (MMS and EMS). Mutat Res Fund Mol Mech Mutagen 198:131–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Menkveld R, Stander FSH, Kotze TJW, Kruger TF, Zyl JA (1990) The evaluation of morphological characteristics of human spermatozoa according to stricter criteria. Hum Reprod 5:586–592

    Google Scholar 

  • Moncada-Hernández H, Lapizco-Encinas BH (2010) Simultaneous concentration and separation of microorganisms: insulator-based dielectrophoretic approach. Anal Bioanal Chem 396:1805–1816

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan H, Hughes MP, Green NG (1999) Separation of submicron bioparticles by dielectrophoresis. Biophys J 77:516–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer D (2000) Sperm preparation methods. J Androl 21:357–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer ST, Swan MA (1995) Variable kinematics of capacitating human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 10:3178–3182

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer D, Pandya IJ, Sawers RS (1986) Relationship between human sperm motility characteristics and sperm penetration into human cervical mucus in vitro. J Reprod Fertil 78:93–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Munné S (1994) Human sperm sex selection flow cytometry separation of X and Y spermatozoa could be detrimental for human embryos. Hum Reprod 9:758

    Google Scholar 

  • Najafi A, Golestanian R (2005) Propulsion at low Reynolds number. J Phys Condens Matter 17:S1203–S1208

    Google Scholar 

  • Nallella KP, Sharma RK, Aziz N, Agarwal A (2006) Significance of sperm characteristics in the evaluation of male infertility. Fertil Steril 85:629–634

    Google Scholar 

  • Nascimento JL, Botvinick EL, Shi LZ, Durrant B, Berns MW (2006) Analysis of sperm motility using optical tweezers. J Biomed Opt 11:044001

    Google Scholar 

  • Normand T, Lauga E (2008) Flapping motion and force generation in a viscoelastic fluid. Phys Rev E 78:061907

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira RG, Tomasi L, Rovasio RA, Giojalas LC (1999) Increased velocity and induction of chemotactic response in mouse spermatozoa by follicular and oviductal fluids. J Reprod Fertil 115:23–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Ollero M, Pérez-Pé R, Gargallo I, Morlanes S, Osada J, Muiño-Blanco T, Cebrián-Pérez J (2000) Separation of ram spermatozoa bearing X and Y chromosome by centrifugal counter current distribution in an aqueous two-phase system. J Androl 21:921–928

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson CK, Keppler-Noreuil KM, Romitti PA, Budelier WT, Ryan G, Sparks AE, Van Voorhis BJ (2005) In vitro fertilization is associated with an increase in major birth defects. Fertil Steril 84:1308–1315

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual ML, Muino-Blanco T, Cebrián-Pérez JA, López-Pérez MJ (1993) Sperm cell heterogeneity revealed by centrifugal counter-current distribution in an aqueous two-phase system. J Chromatogr B 617:51–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauli GF, Pro SM, Friesen JB (2008) Countercurrent separation of natural products#. J Nat Prod 71:1489–1508

    Google Scholar 

  • Pethig R (2010) Dielectrophoresis: status of the theory, technology, and applications. Biomicrofluidics 4:022811

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt ED, Huang C, Hawkins BG, Gleghorn JP, Kirby BJ (2011) Rare cell capture in microfluidic devices. Chem Eng Sci 66:1508–1522

    Google Scholar 

  • Purcell EM (1977) Life at low Reynolds number. Am J Phys 45:3–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyrzak R (1994) Sex selection: separation of X-and Y-bearing human spermatozoa using albumin gradients. Hum Reprod 9:1788–1790

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyrzak R, Garrison CP (1990) Application of DNA in situ hybridization using biotinylated probes of human X and Y sperm. J Androl 11:46

    Google Scholar 

  • Qu BY, Wu ZY, Fang F, Bai ZM, Yang DZ, Xu SK (2008) A glass microfluidic chip for continuous blood cell sorting by a magnetic gradient without labeling. Anal Bioanal Chem 392:1317–1324

    Google Scholar 

  • Revzin A, Sekine K, Sin A, Tompkins RG, Toner M (2005) Development of a microfabricated cytometry platform for characterization and sorting of individual leukocytes. Lap Chip 5:30–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedel-Kruse IH, Hilfinger A, Howard J, Jülicher F (2007) How molecular motors shape the flagellar beat. HFSP J 1:192–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Risopatron J, Sanchez R, Sepulveda N, Peña P, Villagran E, Miska W (1996) Migration/sedimentation sperm selection method used in bovine in vitro fertilization: comparison with washing/centrifugation. Theriogenology 46:65–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson JA (2001) Preconception gender selection. Am J Bioeth 1:2–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Roosen-Runge EC (1977) The process of spermatogenesis in animals, vol 5. CUP Archive, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Rosales-Cruzaley E, Cota-Elizondo PA, Sánchez D, Lapizco-Encinas BH (2013) Sperm cells manipulation employing dielectrophoresis. Bioproc Biosyst Eng 36:1353–1362

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose GA, Wong A (1998) Experiences in Hong Kong with the theory and practice of the albumin column method of sperm separation for sex selection. Hum Reprod 13:146–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross A, Robinson JA, Evans HJ (1975) Failure to confirm separation of X-and Y-bearing human sperm using BSA gradients. Nature 253:354–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild L (1963) Non-random distribution of bull spermatozoa in a drop of sperm suspension. Nature 198:1221–1222

    Google Scholar 

  • Saliba AE, Saias L, Psychari E, Minc N, Simon D, Bidard FC, Viovy JL, Mathiot C, Pierga JY, Fraisier V, Salamero J, Saada V, Farace F, Vielh P, Malaquin L, Viovy JL (2010) Microfluidic sorting and multimodal typing of cancer cells in self-assembled magnetic arrays. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:14524–14529

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar S (1984) Human sperm swimming in flow. Differentiation 27:126–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Schieve LA, Meikle SF, Ferre C, Peterson HB, Jeng G, Wilcox LS (2002) Low and very low birth weight in infants conceived with use of assisted reproductive technology. N Engl J Med 346:731–737

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster TG, Cho B, Keller LM, Takayama S, Smith GD (2003) Isolation of motile spermatozoa from semen samples using microfluidics. Reprod Biomed Online 7:75–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwimmer WB, Ustay KA, Behrman SJ (1967) An evaluation of immunologic factors of infertility. Fertil Steril 18:167–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Seo DB, Agca Y, Feng ZC, Critser JK (2007) Development of sorting, aligning, and orienting motile sperm using microfluidic device operated by hydrostatic pressure. Microfluid Nanofluid 3:561–570

    Google Scholar 

  • Shao B, Shi LZ, Nascimento JM, Botvinick EL, Ozkan M, Berns MW, Esener SC (2007) High-throughput sorting and analysis of human sperm with a ring-shaped laser trap. Biomed Microdevices 9:361–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro HM (2005) Practical flow cytometry. Wiley Hoboken, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe JC, Evans KM (2009) Advances in flow cytometry for sperm sexing. Theriogenology 71:4–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen XN, Arratia PE (2011) Undulatory swimming in viscoelastic fluids. Phys Rev Lett 106:208101

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi L, Shao B, Chen T, Berns M (2009) Automatic annular laser trapping: a system for high-throughput sperm analysis and sorting. J Biophotonics 2:167–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith DJ, Gaffney EA, Gadélha H, Kapur N, Kirkman-Brown JC (2009) Bend propagation in the flagella of migrating human sperm, and its modulation by viscosity. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 66:220–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Spagnolie SE, Liu B, Powers TR (2013) Locomotion of helical bodies in viscoelastic fluids: enhanced swimming at large helical amplitudes. Phys Rev Lett 111:068101

    Google Scholar 

  • Spehr M, Schwane K, Riffell JA, Barbour J, Zimmer RK, Neuhaus EM, Hatt H (2004) Particulate adenylate cyclase plays a key role in human sperm olfactory receptor-mediated chemotaxis. J Biol Chem 279:40194–40203

    Google Scholar 

  • Suarez SS, Katz DF, Owen DH, Andrew JB, Powell RL (1991) Evidence for the function of hyperactivated motility in sperm. Biol Reprod 44:375–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramani E, Basu H, Thangaraju S, Dandekar S, Mathur D, Chaudhury K (2014) Rotational dynamics of optically trapped human spermatozoa. Sci World J 2014:154367

    Google Scholar 

  • Suh TK, Schenk JL, Seidel GE (2005) High pressure flow cytometric sorting damages sperm. Theriogenology 64:1035–1048

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers KE, Gibbons IR (1971) Adenosine triphosphate-induced sliding of tubules in trypsin-treated flagella of sea-urchin sperm. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 68:3092–3096

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe AG, Ludwig M (2007) Outcome of assisted reproduction. The Lancet 370:351–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Tea NT, Jondet M, Scholler R (1984) A ‘migration-gravity sedimentation’ method for collecting motile spermatozoa from human semen. In: Harrison RF, Bonnar J, Thompson W (eds) In vitro fertilization, embryo transfer and early pregnancy. Studies in fertility and sterility, vol 1. Springer, Netherlands, pp 117–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor G (1951) Analysis of the Swimming of Microscopic Organisms. Proc Roy Soc London A 209:447–461

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Teran J, Fauci L, Shelley M (2010) Viscoelastic fluid response can increase the speed and efficiency of a free swimmer. Phys Rev Lett 104:038101

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Ven HH, Jeyendran RS, Al-Hasani S, Tünnerhoff A, Hoebbel K, Diedrich K, Krebs D, Perez-Pelaez S (1988) Glass wool column filtration of human semen: relation to swim-up procedure and outcome of IVF. Hum Reprod 3:85–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Steirteghem A (2002) Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: micromanipulation in assisted fertilization. In: Vayena E, Rowe PJ, Griffin PD (eds) Current practices and controversies in assisted reproduction. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, pp 134–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Verheyen G, Tournaye H, Staessen C, De Vos A, Vandervorst M, Van Steirteghem A (1999) Controlled comparison of conventional in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in patients with asthenozoospermia. Hum Reprod 14:2313–2319

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidal F, Moragas M, Catala V, Torelló MJ, Santaló J, Calderón G, Gimenez C, Barri PN, Egozcue J, Veiga A (1993) Sephadex filtration and human serum albumin gradients do not select spermatozoa by sex chromosome: a fluorescent in situ hybridization study. Hum Reprod 8:1740–1743

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang MM, Tu E, Raymond DE, Yang JM, Zhang H, Hagen N, Dees B, Mercer EM, Forster AH, Kariv I, Marchand PJ, Butler WF (2005) Microfluidic sorting of mammalian cells by optical force switching. Nat Biotechnol 23:83–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Cheng C, Wang S, Liu S (2009) Electroosmotic pumps and their applications in microfluidic systems. Microfluid Nanofluid 6:145–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch GR, Waldbieser GC, Wall RJ, Johnson LA (1995) Flow cytometric sperm sorting and PCR to confirm separation of X- and Y-chromosome bearing bovine sperm. Anim Biotechnol 6:131–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Windsor DP, Evans G, White IG (1993) Sex predetermination by separation of X and Y chromosome-bearing sperm: a review. Reprod Fertil Dev 5:155–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf DP, Blasco L, Khan MA, Litt M (1978) Human cervical mucus. IV. Viscoelasticity and sperm penetrability during the ovulatory menstrual cycle. Fertil Steril 30:163–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolley DM, Crockett RF, Groom WD, Revell SG (2009) A study of synchronisation between the flagella of bull spermatozoa, with related observations. J Exp Biol 212:2215–2223

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (1991) Infertility: a tabulation of available data on prevalence of primary and secondary infertility. http://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/59769. Accessed 05 Dec 2014

  • Wu JM, Chung Y, Belford KJ, Smith GD, Takayama S, Lahann J (2006) A surface-modified sperm sorting device with long-term stability. Biomed Microdevices 8:99–107

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xue P, Ye K, Gao J, Wu Y, Guo J, Hui KM, Kang Y (2014) Isolation and elution of Hep3B circulating tumor cells using a dual-functional herringbone chip. Microfluid Nanofluid 16:605–612

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan J, Feng HL, Chen ZJ, Hu J, Gao X, Qin Y (2006) Influence of swim-up time on the ratio of X-and Y-bearing spermatozoa. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 129:150–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Younglai EV, Holt D, Brown P, Jurisicova A, Casper RF (2001) Sperm swim-up techniques and DNA fragmentation. Hum Reprod 16:1950–1953

    Google Scholar 

  • Zayed F, Lenton EA, Cooke ID (1997) Comparison between stimulated in vitro fertilization and stimulated intrauterine insemination for the treatment of unexplained and mild male factor infertility. Hum Reprod 12:2408–2413

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng J, Chen C, Vedantam P, Tzeng TR, Xuan X (2013) Magnetic concentration of particles and cells in ferrofluid flow through a straight microchannel using attracting magnets. Microfluid Nanofluid 15:49–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao C, Yang C (2009) Exact solutions for electro-osmotic flow of viscoelastic fluids in rectangular micro-channels. Appl Math Comput 211:502–509

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao C, Yang C (2013) Electrokinetics of non-Newtonian fluids: a review. Adv Colloid Interface 201:94–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu WX, Lu L, Hesketh T (2009) China’s excess males, sex selective abortion, and one child policy: analysis of data from 2005 national intercensus survey. BMJ 338:b1211

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is supported by the Academic Research Fund (AcRF) Tier1 (RG 49/11), Ministry of Education, Singapore, and NTU SUG grant M4080741.050. We would like to thank Kong Tian Fook for his comments on our manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore, 639798, Singapore

    James Boon Yong Koh &  Marcos

Authors
  1. James Boon Yong Koh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marcos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koh, J.B.Y., Marcos The study of spermatozoa and sorting in relation to human reproduction. Microfluid Nanofluid 18, 755–774 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-014-1520-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-014-1520-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation