Skip to main content
Log in

Factors associated with misdiagnosis of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound in patients with pancreatic cystic neoplasms undergoing surgical resection

  • Original Article–Gastroenterology
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) include various types of cysts. Accurate preoperative diagnosis is essential to avoid unnecessary surgery on benign cysts. In this study, we aimed to identify the factors associated with misdiagnosis in preoperative endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) imaging and clinicopathological findings for PCLs.

Methods

This study included 302 surgically resected patients with PCLs who underwent preoperative EUS. The preoperative EUS findings were re-evaluated and compared with the pathological diagnosis. Additionally, the factors associated with misdiagnosis of PCLs were investigated by multivariate analysis.

Results

The preoperative diagnoses of PCLs were intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) in 213 patients (70.5%), mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN) in 33 patients (10.9%), serous neoplasm (SN) in 7 patients (2.3%), cystic degeneration cyst of solid tumor in 46 patients (15.2%), and pancreatic cancer with cystic degeneration in three patients (1.0%). A discrepancy between preoperative and postoperative diagnosis was found in 47 patients (15.6%). Based on the pathological diagnosis, the sensitivity of preoperative EUS imaging was IPMN 97.6% (206/211), MCN 90.0% (18/19), cystic degeneration 87.1% (27/31), and SN 15.4% (2/13). Multivariate analysis revealed that main pancreatic duct (MPD) communication ( − ) (odds ratio (OR), 4.54; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.29–15.9), honeycomb-like structure ( +) (OR, 14.7; 95% CI 2.61–83.3), and MPD size ≦ 2 mm (OR, 16.3; 95% CI 3.93–67.6) were independently associated with misdiagnosis.

Conclusion

For cases in which MCN and cystic degeneration of solid tumor are presumed based on preoperative EUS imaging and cases with PCLs with a honeycomb-like structure, diagnosis with multimodalities or fluid analysis with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration should be considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zerboni G, Signoretti M, Crippa S, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis: prevalence of incidentally detected pancreatic cystic lesions in asymptomatic individuals. Pancreatology. 2019;19:2–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Matsubara S, Tada M, Akahane M, et al. Incidental pancreatic cysts found by magnetic resonance imaging and their relationship with pancreatic cancer. Pancreas. 2012;41:1241–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kromrey ML, Bülow R, Hübner J, et al. Prospective study on the incidence, prevalence and 5-year pancreatic-related mortality of pancreatic cysts in a population-based study. Gut. 2018;67:138–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kneuertz PJ, Pitt HA, Bilimoria KY, et al. Risk of morbidity and mortality following hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:1727–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Probst P, Hüttner FJ, Meydan Ö, et al. Evidence map of pancreatic surgery-a living systematic review with meta-analyses by the international study group of pancreatic surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2021;170:1517–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Min JH, Kim YK, Kim SK, et al. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: diagnostic performance of the 2017 international consensus guidelines using CT and MRI. Eur Radiol. 2021;31:4774–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ohno E, Hirooka Y, Kawashima H, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography for the evaluation of pancreatic cystic neoplasms. J Med Ultrason. 2020;47:401–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Alkaade S, Chahla E, Levy M. Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology, viscosity, and carcinoembryonic antigen in pancreatic cyst fluid. Endosc Ultrasound. 2015;4:299–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Singhi AD, McGrath K, Brand RE, et al. Preoperative next-generation sequencing of pancreatic cyst fluid is highly accurate in cyst classification and detection of advanced neoplasia. Gut. 2018;67:2131–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. McCarty TR, Garg R, Rustagi T. Pancreatic cyst fluid glucose in differentiating mucinous from nonmucinous pancreatic cysts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021;94:698–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hirooka Y, Goto H, Itoh A, et al. Case of intraductal papillary mucinous tumor in which endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy caused dissemination. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;18:1323–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yamabe A, Irisawa A, Shibukawa G, et al. Rare condition of needle tract seeding after EUS-guided FNA for intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma. Endosc Int Open. 2016;4:E756–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Minaga K, Takenaka M, Katanuma A, et al. Needle tract seeding: an overlooked rare complication of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. Oncology. 2017;93(Suppl 1):107–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Marchegiani G, Andrianello S, Crippa S, et al. Actual malignancy risk of either operated or nonoperated presumed mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas under surveillance. Br J Surg. 2021;108:1097–104.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. de Pretis N, Mukewar S, Aryal-Khanal A, et al. Pancreatic cysts: diagnostic accuracy and risk of inappropriate resections. Pancreatology. 2017;17:267–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hijioka S, Hara K, Mizuno N, et al. Morphological differentiation and follow-up of pancreatic cystic neoplasms using endoscopic ultrasound. Endosc Ultrasound. 2015;4:312–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tanaka M, Chari S, Adsay V, et al. International consensus guidelines for management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. Pancreatology. 2006;6:17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tanaka M, Fernández-del Castillo C, et al. International consensus guidelines 2012 for the management of IPMN and MCN of the pancreas. Pancreatology. 2012;12:183–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tanaka M, Fernández-Del Castillo C, Kamisawa T, et al. Revisions of international consensus Fukuoka guidelines for the management of IPMN of the pancreas. Pancreatology. 2017;17:738–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yamao K, Yanagisawa A, Takahashi K, et al. Clinicopathological features and prognosis of mucinous cystic neoplasm with ovarian-type stroma: a multi-institutional study of the Japan pancreas society. Pancreas. 2011;40:67–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kimura W, Moriya T, Hirai I, et al. Multicenter study of serous cystic neoplasm of the Japan pancreas society. Pancreas. 2012;41:380–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Terminology and Diagnostic Criteria Committee, Japan Society of Ultrasonics in Medicine. Ultrasonographic diagnostic criteria for pancreatic cancer. J Med Ultrason. 2013;40:497–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Khashab MA, Kim K, Lennon AM, et al. Should we do EUS/FNA on patients with pancreatic cysts? The incremental diagnostic yield of EUS over CT/MRI for prediction of cystic neoplasms. Pancreas. 2013;42:717–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ridtitid W, Halawi H, DeWitt JM, et al. Cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: outcomes of preoperative endosonography-guided fine needle aspiration, and recurrence during long-term follow-up. Endoscopy. 2015;47:617–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Simons-Linares CR, Yadav D, Lopez R, et al. The utility of intracystic glucose levels in differentiating mucinous from nonmucinous pancreatic cysts. Pancreatology. 2020;20:1386–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Reid MD, Choi HJ, Memis B, et al. Serous neoplasms of the pancreas: a clinicopathologic analysis of 193 cases and literature review with new insights on macrocystic and solid variants and critical reappraisal of so-called “serous cystadenocarcinoma.” Am J Surg Pathol. 2015;39:1597–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhao P, deBrito P, Ozdemirli M, et al. Solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas: awareness of unusual clinical presentations and morphology of the clear cell variant can prevent diagnostic errors. Diagn Cytopathol. 2013;41:889–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Springer S, Wang Y, Dal Molin M, et al. A combination of molecular markers and clinical features improve the classification of pancreatic cysts. Gastroenterology. 2015;149:1501–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Yoon WJ, Daglilar ES, Pitman MB, et al. Cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: endoscopic ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration characteristics. Endoscopy. 2013;45:189–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu Y, Shi S, Hua J, et al. Differentiation of solid-pseudopapillary tumors of the pancreas from pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors by using endoscopic ultrasound. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2020;44:947–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Hashimoto S, Hirooka Y, Kawabe N, et al. Role of transabdominal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions. J Med Ultrason. 2020;47:389–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kosmahl M, Pauser U, Anlauf M, et al. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas with cystic features: neither rare nor uniform. Mod Pathol. 2005;18:1157–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Youn SY, Rha SE, Jung ES, et al. Pancreas ductal adenocarcinoma with cystic features on cross-sectional imaging: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2018;24:5–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eizaburo Ohno.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Nagoya University Hospital (IRB approval No. 2015–0387) and was conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 266 KB)

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ohno, E., Ishikawa, T., Mizutani, Y. et al. Factors associated with misdiagnosis of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound in patients with pancreatic cystic neoplasms undergoing surgical resection. J Med Ultrasonics 49, 433–441 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-022-01205-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-022-01205-7

Keywords

Navigation