Abstract
Purpose
Well-differentiated liposarcoma, the most common subtype of liposarcoma, should be discriminated from benign lipoma. However, features on sonography for discriminating these two types of tumor have not been fully investigated. The present study was therefore aimed at clarifying differences in sonographic findings between well-differentiated liposarcoma and lipoma.
Methods
The study population comprised 23 cases of well-differentiated liposarcoma and 181 cases of lipoma. We investigated differences in sonographic appearance and pathological findings between the two types of tumor.
Results
Well-differentiated liposarcoma tended to develop more frequently in older patients and in the lower extremities including the gluteal region, compared with lipoma. Concerning sonographic findings, both tumors exhibited well-defined margins and heterogeneous internal echogenicity, including typical tiny striated hyperechoic lines. Well-differentiated liposarcoma was characterized by a higher frequency of the following findings compared with lipoma: (1) deep location, (2) irregular shape, (3) large diameter, (4) hyperechogenicity compared to surrounding tissue, and (5) presence of vascularity on Doppler sonography (p < 0.01 each). Notably, hyperechogenicity corresponded to the intermingled sclerosing component within the adipocytic component when sonographic findings were compared with those of pathology.
Conclusion
The present study suggests that several sonographic findings including hyperechogenicity and presence of vascularity might be key features for discriminating well-differentiated liposarcoma from lipoma.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jelinek JS, Kransdorf MJ, Shmookler BM, et al. Liposarcoma of the extremities: MR and CT findings in the histologic subtypes. Radiology. 1993;186:455–9.
Barile A, Zugaro L, Catalucci A, et al. Soft tissue liposarcoma: histological subtypes, MRI and CT findings. Radiol Med. 2002;104:140–9.
Burt AM, Huang BK. Imaging review of lipomatous musculoskeletal lesions. SICOT J. 2017;3:34.
El Ouni F, Jemni H, Trabelsi A, et al. Liposarcoma of the extremities: MR imaging features and their correlation with pathologic data. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010;96:876–83.
Murphey MD, Arcara LK, Fanburg-Smith J. From the archives of the AFIP: imaging of musculoskeletal liposarcoma with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2005;25:1371–95.
Brisson M, Kashima T, Delaney D, et al. MRI characteristics of lipoma and atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma: retrospective comparison with histology and MDM2 gene amplification. Skeletal Radiol. 2013;42:635–47.
Shimamori N, Kishino T, Morii T, et al. Sonographic appearances of liposarcoma: correlations with pathologic subtypes. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019;45:2568–74.
Futani H, Yamagiwa T, Yasojimat H, et al. Distinction between well-differentiated liposarcoma and intramuscular lipoma by power Doppler ultrasonography. Anticancer Res. 2003;23:1713–8.
Morii T, Kishino T, Shimamori N, et al. Differential diagnosis between benign and malignant soft tissue tumors utilizing ultrasound parameters. J Med Ultrason (2001). 2018;45:113–9.
Giovagnorio F, Andreoli C, De Cicco ML. Color Doppler sonography of focal lesions of the skin and subcutaneous tissue. J Ultrasound Med. 1999;18:89–93.
Dei Tos AP. Liposarcoma: new entities and evolving concepts. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2000;4:252–66.
Kim T, Murakami T, Oi H, et al. CT and MR imaging of abdominal liposarcoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166:829–33.
Bestic JM, Kransdorf MJ, White LM, et al. Sclerosing variant of well-differentiated liposarcoma: relative prevalence and spectrum of CT and MRI features. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201:154–61.
Jaovisidha S, Suvikapakornkul Y, Woratanarat P, et al. MR imaging of fat-containing tumours: the distinction between lipoma and liposarcoma. Singapore Med J. 2010;51:418–23.
Nagano S, Yokouchi M, Setoguchi T, et al. Differentiation of lipoma and atypical lipomatous tumor by a scoring system: implication of increased vascularity on pathogenesis of liposarcoma. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16:36.
Kransdorf MJ, Bancroft LW, Peterson JJ, et al. Imaging of fatty tumors: distinction of lipoma and well-differentiated liposarcoma. Radiology. 2002;224:99–104.
Gritzmann N, Hollerweger A, Macheiner P, et al. Sonography of soft tissue masses of the neck. J Clin Ultrasound. 2002;30:356–73.
Ahuja AT, King AD, Kew J, et al. Head and neck lipomas: sonographic appearance. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998;19:505–8.
Ishida H, Naganuma H, Konno K, et al. Retroperitoneal liposarcoma: sonographic findings. Abdom Imaging. 2000;25:554–8.
Oebisu N, Hoshi M, Ieguchi M, et al. Contrast-enhanced color Doppler ultrasonography increases diagnostic accuracy for soft tissue tumors. Oncol Rep. 2014;32:1654–60.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a research fund from the Kyorin University Faculty of Health Sciences (Grant Number: R401010001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Naoko Shimamori, Tomonori Kishino, Naota Okabe, Takeshi Morii, Satsuki Matsushima, Satoko Yamasaki, Kouki Ohtsuka, Junji Shibahara, Hiroaki Ohnishi, and Takashi Watanabe declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical statements
This was an uncontrolled retrospective study dealing with data from medical records. All study protocols were approved by the ethics committee at our institute (approval number: 780).
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Shimamori, N., Kishino, T., Okabe, N. et al. Discrimination of well-differentiated liposarcoma from benign lipoma on sonography: an uncontrolled retrospective study. J Med Ultrasonics 47, 617–623 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-020-01051-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-020-01051-5