Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Discrimination of well-differentiated liposarcoma from benign lipoma on sonography: an uncontrolled retrospective study

  • Original Article–Orthopedics
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Well-differentiated liposarcoma, the most common subtype of liposarcoma, should be discriminated from benign lipoma. However, features on sonography for discriminating these two types of tumor have not been fully investigated. The present study was therefore aimed at clarifying differences in sonographic findings between well-differentiated liposarcoma and lipoma.

Methods

The study population comprised 23 cases of well-differentiated liposarcoma and 181 cases of lipoma. We investigated differences in sonographic appearance and pathological findings between the two types of tumor.

Results

Well-differentiated liposarcoma tended to develop more frequently in older patients and in the lower extremities including the gluteal region, compared with lipoma. Concerning sonographic findings, both tumors exhibited well-defined margins and heterogeneous internal echogenicity, including typical tiny striated hyperechoic lines. Well-differentiated liposarcoma was characterized by a higher frequency of the following findings compared with lipoma: (1) deep location, (2) irregular shape, (3) large diameter, (4) hyperechogenicity compared to surrounding tissue, and (5) presence of vascularity on Doppler sonography (p < 0.01 each). Notably, hyperechogenicity corresponded to the intermingled sclerosing component within the adipocytic component when sonographic findings were compared with those of pathology.

Conclusion

The present study suggests that several sonographic findings including hyperechogenicity and presence of vascularity might be key features for discriminating well-differentiated liposarcoma from lipoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jelinek JS, Kransdorf MJ, Shmookler BM, et al. Liposarcoma of the extremities: MR and CT findings in the histologic subtypes. Radiology. 1993;186:455–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Barile A, Zugaro L, Catalucci A, et al. Soft tissue liposarcoma: histological subtypes, MRI and CT findings. Radiol Med. 2002;104:140–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Burt AM, Huang BK. Imaging review of lipomatous musculoskeletal lesions. SICOT J. 2017;3:34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. El Ouni F, Jemni H, Trabelsi A, et al. Liposarcoma of the extremities: MR imaging features and their correlation with pathologic data. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010;96:876–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Murphey MD, Arcara LK, Fanburg-Smith J. From the archives of the AFIP: imaging of musculoskeletal liposarcoma with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2005;25:1371–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brisson M, Kashima T, Delaney D, et al. MRI characteristics of lipoma and atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma: retrospective comparison with histology and MDM2 gene amplification. Skeletal Radiol. 2013;42:635–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shimamori N, Kishino T, Morii T, et al. Sonographic appearances of liposarcoma: correlations with pathologic subtypes. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019;45:2568–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Futani H, Yamagiwa T, Yasojimat H, et al. Distinction between well-differentiated liposarcoma and intramuscular lipoma by power Doppler ultrasonography. Anticancer Res. 2003;23:1713–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Morii T, Kishino T, Shimamori N, et al. Differential diagnosis between benign and malignant soft tissue tumors utilizing ultrasound parameters. J Med Ultrason (2001). 2018;45:113–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Giovagnorio F, Andreoli C, De Cicco ML. Color Doppler sonography of focal lesions of the skin and subcutaneous tissue. J Ultrasound Med. 1999;18:89–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dei Tos AP. Liposarcoma: new entities and evolving concepts. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2000;4:252–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim T, Murakami T, Oi H, et al. CT and MR imaging of abdominal liposarcoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166:829–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bestic JM, Kransdorf MJ, White LM, et al. Sclerosing variant of well-differentiated liposarcoma: relative prevalence and spectrum of CT and MRI features. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201:154–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jaovisidha S, Suvikapakornkul Y, Woratanarat P, et al. MR imaging of fat-containing tumours: the distinction between lipoma and liposarcoma. Singapore Med J. 2010;51:418–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nagano S, Yokouchi M, Setoguchi T, et al. Differentiation of lipoma and atypical lipomatous tumor by a scoring system: implication of increased vascularity on pathogenesis of liposarcoma. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16:36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kransdorf MJ, Bancroft LW, Peterson JJ, et al. Imaging of fatty tumors: distinction of lipoma and well-differentiated liposarcoma. Radiology. 2002;224:99–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gritzmann N, Hollerweger A, Macheiner P, et al. Sonography of soft tissue masses of the neck. J Clin Ultrasound. 2002;30:356–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ahuja AT, King AD, Kew J, et al. Head and neck lipomas: sonographic appearance. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998;19:505–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ishida H, Naganuma H, Konno K, et al. Retroperitoneal liposarcoma: sonographic findings. Abdom Imaging. 2000;25:554–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Oebisu N, Hoshi M, Ieguchi M, et al. Contrast-enhanced color Doppler ultrasonography increases diagnostic accuracy for soft tissue tumors. Oncol Rep. 2014;32:1654–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a research fund from the Kyorin University Faculty of Health Sciences (Grant Number: R401010001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomonori Kishino.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Naoko Shimamori, Tomonori Kishino, Naota Okabe, Takeshi Morii, Satsuki Matsushima, Satoko Yamasaki, Kouki Ohtsuka, Junji Shibahara, Hiroaki Ohnishi, and Takashi Watanabe declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical statements

This was an uncontrolled retrospective study dealing with data from medical records. All study protocols were approved by the ethics committee at our institute (approval number: 780).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shimamori, N., Kishino, T., Okabe, N. et al. Discrimination of well-differentiated liposarcoma from benign lipoma on sonography: an uncontrolled retrospective study. J Med Ultrasonics 47, 617–623 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-020-01051-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-020-01051-5

Keywords

Navigation