Skip to main content
Log in

Present status of ultrasound elastography for the diagnosis of pancreatic tumors: review of the literature

  • Special Feature: Review Article
  • Ultrasonographic diagnosis of pancreatic diseases-This is all you need
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ultrasound elastography is a relatively new diagnostic technique for measuring tissue elasticity (hardness). This review describes the types and evaluation methods of elastographies used in diagnosing pancreatic tumors. It also evaluates the diagnostic ability of transabdominal (US) or endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) elastography for pancreatic tumors, based on findings from a search of published articles. Twenty articles (2096 cases) were selected from the databases. The types of elastography used for the diagnosis of pancreatic tumors were strain elastography and shear wave elastography. The evaluation methods of elastography and their diagnostic abilities (sensitivity and specificity) were 0.78 (95% confidence interval 0.65–0.87) and 0.82 (0.63–0.94) for color pattern diagnosis (US), 0.82 (0.77–0.86) and 0.70 (0.64–0.76) for color pattern diagnosis (EUS), 0.94 (0.90–0.97) and 0.87 (0.81–0.92) for strain ratio (EUS), 0.92 (0.90–0.94) and 0.79 (0.75–0.82) for histogram analysis (EUS), and 0.90 (0.82–0.95) and 0.82 (0.57–0.72) for shear wave elastography. In conclusion, there are many types of elastographies and evaluation methods, and the diagnostic ability for pancreatic tumors is high for each evaluation method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hu DM, Gong TT, Zhu Q. Endoscopic ultrasound elastography for differential diagnosis of pancreatic masses: a meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58:1125–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shiina T. JSUM ultrasound elastography practice guidelines: basics and terminology. J Med Ultrason. 2013;40:309–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nakashima K, Shiina T, Sakurai M, et al. JSUM ultrasound elastography practice guidelines: breast. J Med Ultrason. 2013;40:359–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lyshchik A, Higashi T, Asato R, et al. Thyroid gland tumor diagnosis at US elastography. Radiology. 2005;237:202–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tsutsumi M, Miyagawa T, Matsumura T, et al. The impact of real-time tissue elasticity imaging (elastography) on the detection of prostate cancer: clinicopathological analysis. Int J Clin Oncol. 2007;12:250–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kudo M, Shiina T, Moriyasu F, et al. JSUM ultrasound elastography practice guidelines: liver. J Med Ultrasonics. 2013;40:325–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hirooka Y, Kuwahara T, Irisawa A, et al. JSUM ultrasound elastography practice guidelines: pancreas. J Med Ultrason. 2015;42:151–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kuwahara T, Hirooka Y, Kawashima H, et al. Quantitative diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis using EUS-elastography. J Gastroenterol. 2017;52:868–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuwahara T, Hirooka Y, Kawashima H, et al. Usefulness of shear wave elastography as a quantitative diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;33:756–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuwahara T, Hirooka Y, Kawashima H, et al. Quantitative evaluation of pancreatic tumor fibrosis using shear wave elastography. Pancreatology. 2016;16:1063–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hashizume K, Hirooka Y, Kawashima H, et al. The propagation display method improves the reproducibility of pancreatic shear wave elastography. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019;45:2242–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ohno E, Hirooka Y, Kawashima H, et al. Feasibility and usefulness of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided shear-wave measurement for assessment of autoimmune pancreatitis activity: a prospective exploratory study. J Med Ultrason. 2001;2019(46):425–33.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Giovannini M, Hookey LC, Bories E, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound elastography: the first step towards virtual biopsy? Preliminary results in 49 patients. Endoscopy. 2006;38:344–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Itokawa F, Itoi T, Sofuni A, et al. EUS elastography combined with the strain ratio of tissue elasticity for diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses. J Gastroenterol. 2011;46:843–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Itoh Y, Itoh A, Kawashima H, et al. Quantitative analysis of diagnosing pancreatic fibrosis using EUS-elastography (comparison with surgical specimens). J Gastroenterol. 2014;49:1183–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Uchida H, Hirooka Y, Itoh A, et al. Feasibility of tissue elastography using transcutaneous ultrasonography for the diagnosis of pancreatic diseases. Pancreas. 2009;38:17–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kawada N, Tanaka S, Uehara H, et al. Feasibility of second-generation transabdominal ultrasound-elastography to evaluate solid pancreatic tumors: preliminary report of 36 cases. Pancreas. 2012;41:978–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Janssen J, Schlörer E, Greiner L. EUS elastography of the pancreas: feasibility and pattern description of the normal pancreas, chronic pancreatitis, and focal pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65:971–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hirche TO, Ignee A, Barreiros AP, et al. Indications and limitations of endoscopic ultrasound elastography for evaluation of focal pancreatic lesions. Endoscopy. 2008;40:910–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee TH, Cho YD, Cha SW, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound elastography for the pancreas in Korea: a preliminary single center study. Clin Endosc. 2013;46:172–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chantarojanasiri T, Hirooka Y, Kawshima H, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound in diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: elastography or contrast-enhanced harmonic alone versus the combination. Endosc Int Open. 2017;5:E1136–E1143143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ignee A, Jenssen C, Arcidiacono PG, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound elastography of small solid pancreatic lesions: a multicenter study. Endoscopy. 2018;50:1071–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kongkam P, Lakananurak N, Navicharern P, et al. Combination of EUS-FNA and elastography (strain ratio) to exclude malignant solid pancreatic lesions: a prospective single-blinded study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;30:1683–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rustemović N, Kalauz M, Grubelić Ravić K, et al. Differentiation of pancreatic masses via endoscopic ultrasound strain ratio elastography using adjacent pancreatic tissue as the reference. Pancreas. 2017;46:347–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Okasha H, Elkholy S, El-Sayed RW, et al. Real time endoscopic ultrasound elastography and strain ratio in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23:5962–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim SY, Cho JH, Kim YJ, et al. Diagnostic efficacy of quantitative endoscopic ultrasound elastography for differentiating pancreatic disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;32:1115–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Săftoiu A, Vilmann P, Gorunescu F, et al. Neural network analysis of dynamic sequences of EUS elastography used for the differential diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;68:1086–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Săftoiu A, Vilmann P, Gorunescu F, et al. Efficacy of an artificial neural network-based approach to endoscopic ultrasound elastography in diagnosis of focal pancreatic masses. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10(84–90):e1.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Opačić D, Rustemović N, Kalauz M, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound elastography strain histograms in the evaluation of patients with pancreatic masses. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:4014–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Iglesias-Garcia J, Larino-Noia J, Abdulkader I, et al. Quantitative endoscopic ultrasound elastography: an accurate method for the differentiation of solid pancreatic masses. Gastroenterology. 2010;139:1172–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Carrara S, Di Leo M, Grizzi F, et al. EUS elastography (strain ratio) and fractal-based quantitative analysis for the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:1464–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Goertz RS, Schuderer J, Strobel D, et al. Acoustic radiation force impulse shear wave elastography (ARFI) of acute and chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic tumor. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85:2211–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Onoyama T, Koda M, Fujise Y, et al. Utility of virtual touch quantification in the diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Clin Imaging. 2017;42:64–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kitano M, Kudo M, Yamao K, et al. Characterization of small solid tumors in the pancreas: the value of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:303–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takamichi Kuwahara.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Takamichi Kuwahara, Kazuo Hara, Nobumasa Mizuno, Shin Haba, and Nozomi Okuno declare no conflicts of interest related to this study.

Ethical statements

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuwahara, T., Hara, K., Mizuno, N. et al. Present status of ultrasound elastography for the diagnosis of pancreatic tumors: review of the literature. J Med Ultrasonics 47, 413–420 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-020-01026-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-020-01026-6

Keywords

Navigation