Abstract
Aim
College students are presumed to be exposed to a vast amount of sexual health information and may participate in various sexual behaviors. Without appropriate sources of sexual health information, the sexual health of college students could be severely affected. The purpose of this study was to identify the sources of sexual information and determine the relationship between socio-demographic factors and discussing sexual matters with father, mother, brother, and/or sister.
Subject and method
A school-based cross-sectional study design was conducted in the spring of 2018 (January to May). A simple random sampling was used to select a total of 808 students attending Central Michigan University. Participants answered a questionnaire from the World Health Organization administrated through Qualtrics software. The data was extracted from Qualtrics, and further analysis was done using SPSS software. The outcome of interest was discussing sexual matters with father, mother, brother, and/or sister. Descriptive statistics and bivariate and logistic regression analyses were performed, and all associations were set by p-values less than 0.05 and reported by unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios with 95% CI.
Results
Nearly 80% of the study participants were females. Most of the respondents (39.7%) were first- and second-year university students, followed by third- to fifth-year students (38.4%). Approximately 59% of the study sample fell into the group 21 years of age and below. The majority (70.1%) of the study participants identified mothers (rather than fathers, brothers, or sisters) as a source of sexual health information. The majority of participants (39.4%) were non-religious, followed by Christians (35.6%). Most of the study participants (69.9%) earned less than $1000 per year. In a multivariate analysis, this study revealed that there was no statistically significant association between socio-demographic factors and obtaining sexually related information from mothers or sisters. Males also were three times more likely to discuss sexual matters with their fathers when compared to females [AOR: 3.09; 95% CI: 1.92–4.97]. Again, males were 96% more likely to discuss sexual matters with their brothers compared to females [AOR: 1.96; 95% CI:1.11–3.46]. In terms of education, first- and second-year students, and third- to fifth-year students were three times more likely to discuss sexual matters with their fathers compared to graduates [AOR: 3.41; 95% CI: 1.53–7.57, AOR: 3.02; 95% CI:1.53–6.02 respectively].
Conclusion
The majority of participants (70.1%) identified mothers as a source of sexual health matters. Therefore, mothers should be encouraged to be trained for effective communication regarding sexual health issues. Gender showed a significant association with discussing sex matters with fathers and brothers. The year of education also showed a significant association with discussing sexual matters with fathers. All findings suggest that family members need to be informed with correct sexuality information to better inform children/siblings.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angera JJ, Brookins-Fisher J, Inungu JN (2008) An investigation of parent/child communication about sexuality. Am J Sex Educ 3(2):165–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/15546120802104401
Basic J, Erdelez S (2015) The role of risky behaviors and health education in college students’ health information acquisition on the internet. Proc Assoc Inf Sci Technol 52(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010049
Baxter L, Egbert N, Ho E (2008) Everyday health communication experiences of college students. J Am Coll Heal 56(4):427–436. https://doi.org/10.3200/JACH.56.44.427-436
Bersamin M, Fisher D, Marcell A, Finan L (2017) Reproductive health services: barriers to use among college students. J Community Health 42(1):155–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-016-0242-2
Bleakley A, Hennessy M, Fishbein M, Jordan A (2009) How sources of sexual information relate to adolescents' beliefs about sex. Am J Health Behav 33(1):37–48. https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.33.1.4
Byers E, Sears H (2012) Mothers who do and do not intend to discuss sexual health with their young adolescents. Fam Relat 61(5):851–863. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2012.00740.x
CDC (2017). STDs in adolescents and young adults. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/std/stats17/adolescents.htm
Cleland J (2014). Asking young people about sexual and reproductive behaviors. WHO, Geneva. https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/adolescence/questionnaire/en
Guilamo-Ramos V, Bouris A, Lee J, McCarthy K, Michael SL, Pitt-Barnes S, Dittus P (2012) Paternal influences on adolescent sexual risk behaviors: a structured literature review. Pediatrics 130(5):e1313–e1325. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-2066
Harris AL, Sutherland MA, Hutchinson MK (2013) Parental influences of sexual risk among urban African American adolescent males. J Nurs Scholarsh 45(2):141–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12016
Henok A, Kassa A, Lenda A, Nibret A, Lamaro T (2015) Knowledge, attitude and practice of risky sexual behavior and condom utilization among regular students of Mizan-Tepi University, South West Ethiopia. J Child Adolesc Behav 3(5):1
Karofsky PS, Zeng L, Kosorok MR (2001) Relationship between adolescent–parental communication and initiation of first intercourse by adolescents. J Adolesc Health 28(1):41–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1054-139X(00)00156-7
Kurtuncu M, Akhan L, Tanir İ, Yildiz H (2015) The sexual development and education of preschool children: knowledge and opinions from doctors and nurses. Sex Disabil 33(2):207–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-015-9393-9
Lechner KE, Garcia CM, Frerich EA, Lust K, Eisenberg ME (2013) College students’ sexual health: personal responsibility or the responsibility of the college? J Am Coll Heal 61(1):28–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2012.750608
Power online calculator (2019) Retrieved from http://powerandsamplesize.com/Calculators/Test-1-Proportion/1-Sample-Equivalence
Qualtrics (2019) The Leading Research & Experience Software. Retrieved from https://www.qualtrics.com/
Rosengard C, Tannis C, Dove DC, van den Berg JJ, Lopez R, Stein LAR, Morrow KM (2012) Family sources of sexual health information, primary messages, and sexual behavior of at-risk, urban adolescents. Am J Health Educ 43(2):83–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2012.10599223
Walker J (2004) Parents and sex education—looking beyond "the birds and the bees". Sex Educ 4(3):239–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/1468181042000243330
Whitley E, Ball J (2002) Statistics review 4: sample size calculations. Crit Care 6(4):335–341
Wisnieski D, Sieving R, Garwick A (2015) Parent and family influences on young women's romantic and sexual decisions. Sex Educ 15(2):144–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2014.986798
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Dr. Jodi Brookins Fisher for editing the article. Dr. Fisher was a member of Samual Ankomah’s thesis committee, and Co-PI of the research project from which the paper was produced.
Funding
The study was not funded by any organization.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval was obtained from the ethics committee of the university. All information collected from this study was kept strictly confidential. All procedures performed in the study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the university research and ethics committee. Consent for participation was understood by the completion and submission of the survey.
Conflict of interest
All authors declare no conflict of interest.
Authors have no conflict of interest. Neither of the authors has any financial disclosure.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ankomah, S., Jahanfar, S. & Inungu, J. A study of sexual health information among Central Michigan University students. J Public Health (Berl.) 29, 913–919 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-020-01192-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-020-01192-4