Abstract
Background
Colorectal cancer (CRC) has a high incidence worldwide, especially in high-income countries. In France, a national CRC screening program targeting residents aged 50–74 years has been in place since 2009. Little is known about CRC screening practices in cancer survivors, even though some have an increased risk of developing a second cancer in the colorectum. This study aims to identify the barriers to CRC screening among cancer survivors.
Methods
This cross-sectional study based on the French national VICAN survey included individuals diagnosed in 2010 with a cancer in 1 of 11 locations other than the colorectum and interviewed 5 years after diagnosis about various health-related issues. Binary logistic regression was used to identify the factors associated with lack of up-to-date CRC screening in cancer survivors without cancer progression.
Results
Of the 2935 cancer survivors included in the study, 35.3% reported undergoing a screening test in the previous 2 years. The rate of up-to-date CRC screening rose to 49.3% in survivors aged 51–75 years. Among these, lack of CRC screening in the recommended time frame was associated with obesity, current smoking, non-use of complementary medicine, perceived financial difficulties, and poor access to general practitioners.
Conclusions
Barriers to CRC screening can be personal and/or institutional.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baier M, Calonge N, Cutter G, McClatchey M, Schoentgen S, Hines S, Marcus A, Ahnen D (2000) Validity of self-reported colorectal cancer screening behavior. Cancer Epidemiol Prev Biomark 9:229–232
Baxter NN, Tepper JE, Durham SB, Rothenberger DA, Virnig BA (2005) Increased risk of rectal cancer after prostate radiation: a population-based study. Gastroenterology 128:819–824. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2004.12.038
Bluethmann SM, Basen-Engquist K, Vernon SW, Cox M, Gabriel KP, Stansberry SA, Carmack CL, Blalock JA, Demark-Wahnefried W (2015) Grasping the ‘teachable moment’: time since diagnosis, symptom burden and health Behaviors in breast, colorectal and prostate cancer survivors. Psychooncology 24:1250–1257. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3857
Bouhnik A-D, Bendiane M-K, Cortaredona S, Teyssier LS, Rey D, Berenger C, Seror V, Peretti-Watel P, Group members of the VICAN survey (2015) The labour market, psychosocial outcomes and health conditions in cancer survivors: protocol for a nationwide longitudinal survey 2 and 5 years after cancer diagnosis (the VICAN survey). BMJ Open 5:e005971. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005971
Corkum M, Hayden JA, Kephart G, Urquhart R, Schlievert C, Porter G (2013) Screening for new primary cancers in cancer survivors compared to non-cancer controls: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cancer Surviv 7:455–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-013-0278-6
Curtis RE, Freedman DM, Ron E, Ries LAG, Hacker DG, Edwards BK, Tucker MA, Fraumeni JF Jr (2006) New malignancies among cancer survivors: SEER cancer registries, 1973-2000. National Cancer Institute. NIH Publ. No. 05-5302, Bethesda
European Commission (2010) European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Colorectal Cancer Screening and Diagnosis. (1st ed.). Segnan N, Patnick J, von Karsa L (eds). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union
Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F (2015) Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012: GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 136:E359–E386. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.29210
Fon Sing M, Leuraud K, Duport N (2013) Characteristics of French people using organised colorectal cancer screening. Analysis of the 2010 French health, healthcare and insurance survey. Prev Med 57:65–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.03.008
Gangarosa LM (2011) New guidelines for cancer screening in older patients. AMA J Ethics 13:765–768. https://doi.org/10.1001/virtualmentor.2011.13.11.ccas3-1111
Goulard H, Boussac-Zarebska M, Duport N, Bloch J (2009) Facteurs d’Adhésion au Dépistage Organisé du cancer colorectal: étude Fado-colorectal, France, décembre 2006-avril 2007. Bulletin épidémiologique hebdomadaire (BEH). Numéro thématique - Dépistage organisé du cancer colorectal en France. N°2-3
Hoover S, Subramanian S, Tangka FKL, Cole-Beebe M, Sun A, Kramer CL, Pacillio G (2017) Patients and caregivers costs for colonoscopy-based colorectal cancer screening: experience of low-income individuals undergoing free colonoscopies. Eval Program Plann 62:81–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.01.002
Institut National du Cancer (2013) Identifier et prévenir les risques de second cancer primitif chez l’adulte. Collection Etat des lieux et des connaissances, Boulogne-Billancourt
Institut National du Cancer (2015) Estimation du risque de second cancer en France - Etude à partir des registres des cancers du réseau Francim. Collection Les Données. 14 p
Institut National du Cancer (2016) Éthique et dépistage organisé du cancer colorectal - Analyse du dispositif français. Collection Appui à la décision
Institut National du Cancer (2018) Les cancers en France. Edition 2017. Collection Les Données
International Agency for Research on Cancer (2018a) The global cancer observatory. Colorectal cancer
International Agency for Research on Cancer (2018b) The global cancer observatory. World
Maruthur NM, Bolen S, Gudzune K, Brancati FL, Clark JM (2012) Body mass index and colon cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev Publ Am Assoc Cancer Res Cosponsored Am Soc Prev Oncol 21:737–746. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0826
Mayer DK, Terrin NC, Menon U, Kreps GL, McCance K, Parsons SK, Mooney KH (2007) Screening practices in cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv Res Pract 1:17–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-007-0007-0
Navarro M, Nicolas A, Ferrandez A, Lanas A (2017) Colorectal cancer population screening programs worldwide in 2016: an update. World J Gastroenterol 23:3632–3642. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i20.3632
Santé Publique France (2018) Taux de participation au programme de dépistage organisé du cancer colorectal 2016-2017
Seibert RG, Hanchate AD, Berz JP, Schroy PC (2017) National Disparities in colorectal cancer screening among obese adults. Am J Prev Med 53:e41–e49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.006
Sewitch MJ, Rajput Y (2010) A literature review of complementary and alternative medicine use by colorectal cancer patients. Complement Ther Clin Pract 16:52–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2009.10.001
Shin DW, Kim Y-W, Oh JH, Kim SW, Chung K-W, Lee WY, Lee JE, Lee WC, Guallar E, Cho J (2011) Knowledge, attitudes, risk perception, and cancer screening behaviors among cancer survivors. Cancer 117:3850–3859. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.25951
Trask PC, Rabin C, Rogers ML, Whiteley J, Nash J, Frierson G, Pinto B (2005) Cancer screening practices among cancer survivors. Am J Prev Med 28:351–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2005.01.005
Wools A, Dapper EA, de Leeuw JRJ (2016) Colorectal cancer screening participation: a systematic review. Eur J Pub Health 26:158–168. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckv148
Yang YH (2014) A path analysis on factors influencing second primary cancer screening practices in stomach, colon, and breast cancer survivors. J Korean Acad Nurs 44:139–148. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2014.44.2.139
Funding
Adeline Monet was supported by La Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer. The VICAN study was funded by the French National Institute of Cancer (Institut National du Cancer, INCa) (Contrat de recherche et développement n°05-2011).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
No conflict of interest was reported by the authors of this paper.
Role of funding source
This content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official position of the French National Cancer Institute (INCa). The INCa had no role in the study design; analysis and interpretation of data; writing the research article and decision to submit it for publication.
Ethical approval
Three national ethics commissions have approved the methodology of the VICAN survey: the CCTIRS (Comité Consultatif sur le Traitement de l’Information en matière de Recherche dans le domaine de la Santé, registration n°11-143), the ISP (Institut thématique Santé Publique, registration n°C11-63) and the CNIL (Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés, registration n°911290).
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOC 150 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Monet, A., Touzani, R., Bouhnik, AD. et al. Colorectal cancer screening practices among cancer survivors five years after diagnosis. J Public Health (Berl.) 29, 805–813 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-019-01179-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-019-01179-w