Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Obesity-based labour market discrimination in South Africa: a dynamic panel analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Public Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Apart from obesity-related health care costs in South Africa, obesity is also seen to have far-reaching effects that seep into labour market outcomes. Using National Income Dynamics Survey (NIDS) panel data, this study aims to examine the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and employment status as well as wage levels of individuals to identify the optimal level of BMI from the labour market perspective in South Africa. Thereafter, the article uses ethnicity-backed obesity thresholds to measure the discrimination obese individuals face on the probability of becoming employed and their wages earned once employed.

Methods

The econometric analysis uses the OLS probit and tobit regression models as the starting point for analysis. However due to issues of reverse causality, the analysis thereafter utilises a system GMM model to take endogeneity into account. A further Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition technique is used to derive the discrimination component in the system GMM regressions for obese and non-obese individuals. Finallly, gender-specific analysis is undertaken to investigate whether obesity-related discrimination differs between males and females.

Results

The relationship between BMI and employment probability/wages is seen to be non-linear with increases in BMI leading to an increase in the probability of employment and wages up to a threshold beyond which this relationship becomes negative. Based on the system GMM estimation, the optimal BMI for employment probability and wage determination is identified as 30 and 27 respectively. Blinder-Oaxaca estimates show that 90% of the gap in employment status is accounted for by obesity-related discrimination. With regard to wages, obesity leads to a discrimination of 186%. Gen1der-specific Oaxaca analysis found that obese females face discrimination in employment probability of 109% compared to a negative discrimination of −184% for obese males. In determining wages, employed obese females face discrimination of around 73% whereas the discrimination endured by employed obese males is half of this, at 35%.

Conclusion

Our findings reiterate that increasingly obesity has adverse labour market implications. Obesity-based discrimination exists in South Africa and is predominantly faced by obese women entering the workplace and continues in the wage determination of both men and women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adeboye B, Bermano G, Rolland C (2012) Obesity and its health impact in Africa: a systematic view. Cardiovasc J S Afr 23(9):512–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specication for panel data:Monte carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58(2):277-297

  • Arellano M, Bover O (1995) Another look at the instrumental variables estimation of error components models. J Econ 68:29-51

  • Asgeirsdottir TL (2011) Obesity & Employment: the case of Iceland. University of Iceland, Department of Economics, Reykjavík

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett A, Kumar S (2009) Obesity & Diabetes, Second edn. John-Wiley & Sons, Southern Gate, United Kingdom

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baum C, Ford W (2004) The wage effects of obesity: a longitudinal study. Health Econ 13(9):885–899

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blinder AS (1973) Wage discrimination: reduced form and structural estimates. J Hum Resour 8:436–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J Econ 87:115-143

  • Cawley J (2004) The impact of obesity on wages. J Hum Resour 39(2):451–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cawley J, Han E, Norton EC (2009) Obesity and labor market outcomes among legal immigrants to the United States from developing countries. Econ Hum Biol 7(2):153–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dackleburg M, Gerdtham UG, Nordin M (2014) Productivity or discrimination? An economic analysis of excess-weight penalty in the Swedish labor market. Eur J Health Econ 16(6):589–601

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta P, Ray D (1986) Inequality as a determinant of malnutrition and unemployment: theory. Econ J 96(384):1011–1034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health (2015) Strategy for the Prevention & Control of obesity in South Africa 2015–2020. Department of Health, Republic of South Africa

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbrother KA (2009) Healthcare burden of obesity in South Africa: a reflection on the role of government. University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg Retrieved on 2/03/2017 at: http://wiredspace.wits.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10539/8792/AmyFairbrother_ResearchReport_FinalSubmission.pdf?sequence=1

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia J, Quintana-Domeque C (2006) Obesity, employment, and wages in Europe. Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res 17

  • Greve J (2008) Obesity and labor market outcomes in Denmark. Econ Hum Biol 6(3):350–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harkonen J, Rasanen P, Nasi M (2011) Obesity, unemployment, and earnings. Nordic Journal of working life studies 1(2):23–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper B (2000) Beauty, stature and the labour market: a British cohort study. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 62:771–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtz-Eakin D, Newey W, Rosen HS (1988) Estimating vector autoregressions with panel data. Econometrica 56:1371–1395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson E, Böckerman P, Kiiskinen U, Heliövaara M (2009) Obesity and labour market success in Finland: the difference between having a high BMI and being fat. Econ Hum Biol Mar 7(1):36–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollamparambil U, Razak A (2016) Trends in gender wage gap and discrimination in South Africa: a comparative analysis across races. Indian Journal of Human Development 10(1):5–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lechtenfeld T & Zoch A (2014) Income Convergence in South Africa: Fact or Measurement Error? Stellenbosch Economic Working Papers: 10/14, South Africa

  • Lindeboom M, Lundborgc P, der Klaauw Bc V (2010) Assessing the impact of obesity on labor market outcomes. Econ Hum Biol 8(3):309–319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morris S (2007) The impact of obesity on employment. Labour Econ 14(3):413–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) (2013) Assessing body mass index and waist circumference thresholds ethnic groups in the UK (PH 46) [Online]. Available from: http://www.thehealthwell.info/node/522752 [Accessed: 1st May 2016]

  • Ntuk U, Gill J, Mackay D, Sattar N, Pell J (2014) Ethnic-specific obesity cutoffs for diabetes risk: cross-sectional study of 490, 288 UK biobank participants. Diabetes Care 37(9):2500–2507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oaxaca RL (1973) Male-female wage differentials in urban labor markets. Int Econ Rev 14:693–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinkston JC (2015) The dynamic effects of obesity on the wages of young workers. University of Louisville, Department of Economics, Louisville

    Google Scholar 

  • Roodman D (2009) How to do xtabond2: an introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. Stata J 9(1):86–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargent J, Blanchflower D (1994) Obesity and stature in adolescence and earnings in young adulthood. Analysis of a British birth cohort. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 148(7):681–687 681–687.147

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sarlio-Lahteenkorva S, Lahelma E (1999) The association of body mass index with social and economic disadvantage in women and men. Int J of Epidemiol 28:445–449

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sen B (2014) Using the Oaxaca–Blinder decomposition as an empirical tool to analyze racial disparities in obesity. Obesity 22(7):170–1755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Some M, Rasheed N, Ohonba A (2016) The impact of obesity on employment in South Africa. Stud Econ Econ 40(2):87–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics South Africa (2014) Mid-year population estimates 2014. Statistics South Africa, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Treasury N (2016) Taxation of sugar sweetened beverages, economics tax analysis chief directorate policy paper. Government of South Africa, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Tugendhaft A, Hofman K (2014) Empowering healthy food and beverage choices in the workplace. Occupational Health Southern Africa 20(5)

  • Villar JG, Oreffice S & Quintana-Domeque C (2011) Physical Activity and Obesity in Spain: Evidence from the Spanish National Health Survey. The Economics of Sport, Health and Happiness: The Promotion of Well-being Through Sporting Activities

  • Wittenberg M (2011) The weight of success: the body mass index and economic well-being in South Africa. School of Economics. SALDRU and Data First University of Cape Town, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolridge JM (2002) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press, Cambridge (MA)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Economic and Business Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

    Junita Henry & Umakrishnan Kollamparambil

Authors
  1. Junita Henry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Umakrishnan Kollamparambil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Umakrishnan Kollamparambil.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest to report.

Funding

The authors acknowledge the financial support received from Economic Research Southern Africa (ERSA) for the research.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 3044 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Henry, J., Kollamparambil, U. Obesity-based labour market discrimination in South Africa: a dynamic panel analysis. J Public Health 25, 671–684 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-017-0822-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-017-0822-3

Keywords

JEL classification

Search

Navigation