Skip to main content
Log in

Minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position improves postoperative outcomes: role of C-reactive protein as an indicator of surgical invasiveness

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Esophagus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The aim of the study was to assess serum C-reactive protein (CRP) level immediately after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) as a surrogate of surgical invasiveness in patients who underwent esophagectomy.

Methods

In total, 104 patients were enrolled in the study: 37 patients underwent MIE in the left lateral decubitus position (MIE-LP) and 67 patients underwent MIE in the prone position (MIE-PP). Serum CRP levels were assessed on POD 1, 3, 5, and 7 after MIE, and were compared with surgical outcomes and duration of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) to investigate less invasiveness of the MIE.

Results

Reduced serum CRP level on POD 1 was associated with PP during MIE (P < 0.001) and decreased blood loss (P = 0.03). MIE-PP was identified as a significant independent predictor of reduced CRP level on POD 1 (odds ratio 3.65, P = 0.042). CRP level on POD 7 was associated with gender (P = 0.02), position of MIE (P = 0.011), blood loss (P = 0.02), and respiratory complications and/or anastomotic leakage (P < 0.001). Postoperative respiratory and/or anastomotic complication was identified as a significant predictor of elevated serum CRP level on POD 7 (odds ratio 3.44, P = 0.048). Shorter duration of SIRS was shown in the patients with reduced serum CRP level on POD 1 and 7 (P = 0.03 and P < 0.001, respectively).

Conclusion

Serial assessments of serum CRP level immediately after MIE may be a possible indicator that can reflect surgical invasiveness and postoperative complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tachimori Y, Ozawa S, Numasaki H, et al. Comprehensive registry of esophageal cancer in Japan, 2009. Esophagus. 2016;13:110–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Banting S. Endoscopic oesophagectomy through a right thoracoscopic approach. J R Coll Surg. 1992;37:7–11.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy outcome in 222 patients. Ann Surg. 2003;238:486–95.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Noshiro H, Nagai E, Shimizu S, et al. Minimally invasive radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Esophagus. 2007;4:59–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M, et al. A comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus with open operation. Br J Surg. 2003;90:108–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Koyanagi K, Ozawa S, Tachimori Y. Minimally invasive esophagectomy performed with the patient in a prone position: a systematic review. Surg Today. 2016;46:275–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Matsuda S, Takeuchi H, Kawakubo H, et al. Correlation between intense postoperative inflammatory response and survival of esophageal cancer patients who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;22:4453–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoeboer SH, Groeneveld ABJ, Engels N, et al. Rising C-reactive protein and procalcitonin levels precede early complications after esophagectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19:613–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ibuki Y, Hamai Y, Hihara J, et al. Role of postoperative C-reactive protein levels in predicting prognosis after surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. World J Surg. 2017;41:1558–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz M, Wittekind C. International Union Against Cancer (UICC). In: TNM classification of malignant tumors. 7th ed. New York: Wiley; 2009.

  11. Maas KW, Biere SSAY, van Hoogstraten IMW, et al. Immunological changes after minimally invasive or conventional esophageal resection for cancer: a randomized trial. World J Surg. 2014;38:131–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen L, Sun L, Lang Y, et al. Fast-track surgery improves postoperative clinical recovery and cellular and humoral immunity after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. BMC Cancer. 2016;16:449.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care. Medicine Consensus Conference: definition for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Crit Care Med. 1992;20:864–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Koyanagi K, Igaki H, Iwabu J, et al. Recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis after esophagectomy: respiratory complications and role of nerve reconstruction. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2015;237:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yatabe T, Kitagawa H, Yamashita K, et al. Better postoperative oxygenation in thoracoscopic esophagectomy in prone positioning. J Anesth. 2010;24:803–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ozawa S, Ito E, Kazuno A, et al. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy while in a prone position for esophageal cancer: a preceding anterior approach method. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:40–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kazuo Koyanagi.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Statement

This work followed the guidelines set forth in the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000, concerning Human and Animal Rights. This article does not contain human or animal subjects performed by any authors. This was a retrospective study approved by the institutional review board of the National Cancer Center Hospital.

Conflict of interest

There are no financial or other relations that could lead to a conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koyanagi, K., Ozawa, S. & Tachimori, Y. Minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position improves postoperative outcomes: role of C-reactive protein as an indicator of surgical invasiveness. Esophagus 15, 95–102 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-017-0602-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-017-0602-8

Keywords

Navigation