Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prevalence of dry eye syndrome and risk factors in physical education and sports science graduates

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

There are only a few epidemiological studies of dry eye syndrome (DES) in populations with a common academic background. in this study, the prevalence of DES and associated factors were evaluated separately in men and women physical education and sports science graduates.

Study design

Cross-sectional survey.

Methods

A questionnaire about the diagnosis of DES and associated factors was mailed to 9507 graduates of the Faculty of Health and Sports Science, Juntendo University. The questions covered subjective DES using Schaumberg et al.’s questionnaire and the prevalence of diagnosed DES. Associated factors, age, sex, smoking, alcohol consumption, body mass index, daily screen viewing time, and contact lens (CL) use were analyzed.

Results

A total of 2048 valid responses were received. The prevalence of diagnosed DES was 2.9% in men and 9.3% in women. For subjective DES, the prevalence was 14.8% in men and 39.8% in women. The odds ratio for DES was high in men and women who used CLs and women whose daily screen viewing time was ≥ 4 h.

Conclusion

Both diagnosed and subjective DES were highly prevalent in men and women of all ages, particularly among those in their 20 and 30s. CL use was associated with DES in both men and women. Measures to deal with the factors that can be corrected might have a positive effect on the ocular health and quality of life of physical education and sports science graduates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shimazaki J, Yokoi N, Watanabe H, Amano S, Ohashi Y, Kinoshita S, et al. Definition and diagnosis of dry eye in Japan, 2016. Atarashii Ganka. 2017;34:309–13. (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Miljanović B, Dana R, Sullivan DA, Schaumberg DA. Impact of dry eye syndrome on vision-related quality of life. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143:409–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Management and therapy of dry eye disease: report of the Management and Therapy Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye Workshop (2007). Ocul Surf. 2007;5:163 – 78.

  4. Murakami S, Ohto-Fujita E, Kohmura Y, Shiraishi Y, Aoki K, Sawaki K, et al. Current situation regarding visual correction methods in university athletes and associated issues. Jpn J Clin Sports Med. 2013;21:658–63.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Murakami S, Kohmura Y, Shiraishi Y, Aoki K, Nakata M, Hamano R, et al. Dry eye among undergraduate students studying sports-related subjects: current status and associated issues. Gazz Med Ital. 2019;178:126–31.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Uchino M, Schaumberg DA, Dogru M, Uchino Y, Fukagawa K, Shimmura S, et al. Prevalence of dry eye disease among japanese visual display terminal users. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:1982–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Uchino M, Yokoi N, Uchino Y, Dogru M, Kawashima M, Komuro A, et al. Prevalence of dry eye disease and its risk factors in visual display terminal users: the Osaka study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;156:759–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Uchino M, Dogru M, Uchino Y, Fukagawa K, Shimmura S, Takebayashi T, et al. Japan Ministry of Health study on prevalence of dry eye disease among japanese high school students. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146:925–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Uchino M, Nishiwaki Y, Michikawa T, Shirakawa K, Kuwahara E, Yamada M, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of dry eye disease in Japan: Koumi study. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:2361–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Inomata T, Iwagami M, Nakamura M, Shiang T, Yoshimura Y, Fujimoto K, et al. Characteristics and risk factors associated with diagnosed and undiagnosed symptomatic dry eye using a smartphone application. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019;138:58–68.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Schaumberg DA, Sullivan DA, Buring JE, Dana MR. Prevalence of dry eye syndrome among US women. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;136:318–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gulati A, Sullivan R, Buring JE, Sullivan DA, Dana R, Schaumberg DA. Validation and repeatability of a short questionnaire for dry eye syndrome. Am J Opthalmol. 2006;142:125–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schaumberg DA, Buring JE, Sullivan DA, Dana MR. Hormone replacement therapy and dry eye syndrome. JAMA. 2001;286:2114–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stapleton F, Alves M, Bunya VY, Jalbert I, Lekhanont K, Malet F, et al. TFOS DEWS II Epidemiology Report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15:334–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tsugane S, Sasaki S, Tsubono Y. Under- and overweight impact on mortality among middle-aged japanese men and women: a 10-y follow-up of JPHC study cohort I. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2002;26:529–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee AJ, Lee J, Saw S-M, Gazzard G, Koh D, Widjaja D, et al. Prevalence and risk factors associated with dry eye symptoms: a population based study in Indonesia. Brit J Ophthalmol. 2002;86:1347–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sato N, Yamada M, Tsubota K. Visual display terminal work and dry eye. Atarashii Ganka. 1992;9:2103–6. (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nichols JJ, King-Smith PE. Thickness of the pre-and post-contact lens tear film measured in vivo by interferometry. Investig Opthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:68–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Maruyama K, Yokoi N, Takamata A, Kinoshita S. Effect of environmental conditions on tear dynamics in soft contact lens wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:2563–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chalmers R, Long B, Dillehay S, Begley C. Improving contact-lens related dryness symptoms with silicone hydrogel lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85:778–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sand BB, Marner K, Norn MS. Sodium hyaluronate in the treatment of keratoconjunctivitis sicca. A double masked clinical trial. Acta Ophthalmol. 1989;67:181–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hori Y, Muramatsu R. Tear supplementation: artificial tear and hyaluronate eye drops. Atarashii Ganka. 2015;32:931–4. (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nakamura M, Hikida M, Nakano T, Ito S, Hamano T, Kinoshita S. Characterization of water retentive properties of hyaluronan. Cornea. 1993;12:433–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yokoi N, Kato H, Kinoshita S. Facilitation of tear fluid secretion by 3% diquafosol ophthalmic solution in normal human eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;157:85–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Koh S, Ikeda C, Takai T, Watanabe H, Maeda N, Nishida K. Long-term results of treatment with diquafosol ophthalmic solution for aqueous-deficient dry eye. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2013;57:440–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shimazaki-Den S, Iseda H, Dogru M, Shimazaki J. Effects of diquafosol sodium eye drops on tear film stability in short BUT type of dry eye. Cornea. 2013;32:1120–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yamaguchi M, Ohashi Y. 3% diquafosol ophthalmic solution promotes mucin and tear fluid. Atarashii Ganka. 2015;32:935–42. (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kaido M, Uchino M, Kojima T, Dogru M, Tsubota K. Effect of diquafosol tetrasodium administration on visual function in short break-up time dry eye. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2013;29:595–603.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the graduates and the J-Fit + Study for their cooperation. 

This work was supported by the Joint Research Program of Juntendo University Faculty of Health and Sports Science and Institute of Health and Sports Science & Medicine, Juntendo University. The authors would also like to thank Forte Science Communications (Tokyo, Japan) for editorial assistance with the preparation of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shigeki Murakami.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

S. Murakami, None; Y. Kohmura, None; Y. Someya, None; K. Suzuki, None; K. Inoue, Grants or contracts (Teijin, Otsuka, Wakamoto), Lecture fee (Otsuka, HOYA, Pfizer, Senju, Santen, Allergan, Novartis, ZEISS); S. Amano, Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events (Santen, AMO, Senju, Alcon, HOYA, Otsuka); K. Aoki, None.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Corresponding Author: Shigeki Murakami

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Murakami, S., Kohmura, Y., Someya, Y. et al. Prevalence of dry eye syndrome and risk factors in physical education and sports science graduates. Jpn J Ophthalmol 67, 175–181 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-022-00973-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-022-00973-6

Keywords

Navigation