Skip to main content
Log in

Eyelid cleansing with ointment for obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the efficacy of eyelid margin cleansing with ofloxacin ophthalmic ointment in obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) patients.

Methods

Thirty-one eyes of 31 patients diagnosed with obstructive MGD were enrolled. All subjects were instructed to rub the eyelid edge with ofloxacin eye ointment once daily prior to bathing. Lid margin abnormalities, meibum properties, and tear stability were observed before and 3 months after ointment treatment. A questionnaire relating to the severity of MGD symptoms was administered after the treatment.

Results

Vascular engorgement, meibum, dandruff-like debris, and fluorescein staining scores significantly decreased after the treatment, whereas tear break-up time significantly increased (p < 0.05). Symptoms related to MGD improved after the treatment in 86.2 % of cases.

Conclusions

Cleansing treatment ofloxacin ophthalmic ointment at the eyelid margin may be effective for patients with obstructive MGD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mishima S, Maurice DM. The oily layer of the tear film and evaporation from the corneal surface. Exp Eye Res. 1961;1:39–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tiffany JM. The lipid secretion of the meibomian glands. Adv Lipid Res. 1987;22:1–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bron AJ, Tiffany JM. The contribution of meibomian disease to dry eye. Ocul Surf. 2004;2:149–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Knop N, Knop E. Meibomian glands. Part I: anatomy, embryology and histology of the Meibomian glands. Ophthalmologe. 2009;106:872–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Knop E, Knop N, Schirra F. Meibomian glands. Part II: physiology, characteristics, distribution and function of meibomian oil. Ophthalmologe. 2009;106:884–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nichols KK, Redfern RL, Jacob JT, Nelson JD, Fonn D, Forstot SL et al. The TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort: Report of the Definition and Classification Subcommittee. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013;54:TFOS14-9.

  7. Goto E, Endo K, Suzuki A, Fujikura Y, Matsumoto Y, Tsubota K. Tear evaporation dynamics in normal subjects and subjects with obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:533–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McCulley JP, Shine WE. Meibomian gland function and the tear lipid layer. Ocul Surf. 2003;1:97–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mathers WD. Ocular evaporation in meibomian gland dysfunction and dry eye. Ophthalmology. 1993;100:347–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lemp MA. Report of the National Eye Institute/Industry workshop on Clinical Trials in Dry Eyes. CLAO J. 1995;21:221–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shimazaki J, Sakata M, Tsubota K. Ocular surface changes and discomfort in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:1266–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee SH, Tseng SC. Rose bengal staining and cytologic characteristics associated with lipid tear deficiency. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;124:736–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schein OD, Munoz B, Tielsch JM, Bandeen-Roche K, West S. Prevalence of dry eye among the elderly. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;124:723–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lekhanont K, Rojanaporn D, Chuck RS, Vongthongsri A. Prevalence of dry eye in Bangkok. Thailand. Cornea. 2006;25:1162–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lin PY, Tsai SY, Cheng CY, Liu JH, Chou P, Hsu WM. Prevalence of dry eye among an elderly Chinese population in Taiwan: the Shihpai Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1096–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Uchino M, Dogru M, Yagi Y, Goto E, Tomita M, Kon T, et al. The features of dry eye disease in a Japanese elderly population. Optom Vis Sci. 2006;83:797–802.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jie Y, Xu L, Wu YY, Jonas JB. Prevalence of dry eye among adult Chinese in the Beijing Eye Study. Eye (Lond). 2009;23:688–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. McCarty CA, Bansal AK, Livingston PM, Stanislavsky YL, Taylor HR. The epidemiology of dry eye in Melbourne. Australia. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1114–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Horwath-Winter J, Berghold A, Schmut O, Floegel I, Solhdju V, Bodner E, et al. Evaluation of the clinical course of dry eye syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:1364–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hom MM, Martinson JR, Knapp LL, Paugh JR. Prevalence of Meibomian gland dysfunction. Optom Vis Sci. 1990;67:710–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mathers WD, Shields WJ, Sachdev MS, Petroll WM, Jester JV. Meibomian gland dysfunction in chronic blepharitis. Cornea. 1991;10:277–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mathers WD, Lane JA. Meibomian gland lipids, evaporation, and tear film stability. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1998;438:349–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Key JE. A comparative study of eyelid cleaning regimens in chronic blepharitis. CLAO J. 1996;22:209–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Smith RE, Flowers CW Jr. Chronic blepharatis: a review. CLAO J. 1995;21:200–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. van Bijsterveld OP. Diagnostic tests in the Sicca syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol. 1969;82:10–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ibrahim OM, Matsumoto Y, Dogru M, Adan ES, Wakamatsu TH, Goto T, et al. The efficacy, sensitivity, and specificity of in vivo laser confocal microscopy in the diagnosis of meibomian gland dysfunction. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:665–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Korb DR, Henriquez AS. Meibomian Gland Dysfunction and Contact Lens Intolerance. J Am Optom Assoc., 1980;243–51.

  28. Knop E, Knop N, Brewitt H, Pleyer U, Rieck P, Seitz B, et al. Meibomian Glands: Part III—Dysfunction—Argument for a Discrete Disease Entity and as an Important Cause of Dry Eye. Ophthalmologe 2009; 966–79 (in German).

  29. Knop E, Knop N. Meibomian Glands: Part IV—Functional Interactions in the Pathogenesis of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD). Ophthalmologe, 2009, 980–7 (in German).

  30. Goto E, Dogru M, Fukagawa K, Uchino M, Matsumoto Y, Saiki M, et al. Successful tear lipid layer treatment for refractory dry eye in office workers by low-dose lipid application on the full-length eyelid margin. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142:264–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Matsumoto Y, Sato EA, Ibrahim OM, Dogru M, Tsubota K. The application of in vivo laser confocal microscopy to the diagnosis and evaluation of meibomian gland dysfunction. Mol Vis. 2008;14:1263–71.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Villani E, Beretta S, De Capitani M, Galimberti D, Viola F, Ratiglia R. In vivo confocal microscopy of meibomian glands in Sjögren’s syndrome. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;16(52):933–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ibrahim OM, Matsumoto Y, Dogru M, Adan ES, Wakamatsu TH, Shimazaki J. et al. In vivo confocal microscopy evaluation of meibomian gland dysfunction in atopic-keratoconjunctivitis patients. Ophthalmology 2012;119:1961-8.

  34. Norn M. Expressibility of meibomian secretion. Relation to age, lipid precorneal film, scales, foam, hair and pigmentation. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1987;65:137–42.

  35. Korb DR, Blackie CA. Meibomian gland diagnostic expressibility: correlation with dry eye symptoms and gland location. Cornea. 2008;27:1142–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Olson MC, Korb DR, Greiner JV. Increase in tear film lipid layer thickness following treatment with warm compresses in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction. Eye Contact Lens. 2003;29:96–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Nagymihalyi A, Dikstein S, Tiffany JM. The influence of eyelid temperature on the delivery of meibomian oil. Exp Eye Res. 2004;78:367–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Romero JM, Biser SA, Perry HD, Levinson DH, Doshi SJ, Terraciano A, et al. Conservative treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction. Eye Contact Lens. 2004;30:14–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Key JE. A comparative study of eyelid cleaning regimens in chronic blepharitis. CLAO J. 1996;22:209–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Maskin SL. Intraductal meibomian gland probing relieves symptoms of obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction. Cornea. 2010;29:1145–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Minako Kaido.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

M. Kaido, None; O. M. A. Ibrahim, None; M. Kawashima, None; R. Ishida, None; E. A. Sato, None; K. Tsubota, Consultant fees (Santen).

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 68 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOC 77 kb)

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaido, M., Ibrahim, O.M.A., Kawashima, M. et al. Eyelid cleansing with ointment for obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction. Jpn J Ophthalmol 61, 124–130 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-016-0477-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-016-0477-6

Keywords

Navigation