Skip to main content
Log in

Diquafosol sodium ophthalmic solution for the treatment of dry eye: clinical evaluation and biochemical analysis of tear composition

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of 3 % diquafosol sodium ophthalmic solution for dry eye, and to analyze the concentration of tear proteins and mucin-like substances after the treatment.

Methods

Fifty eyes of 25 patients with dry eye syndrome were prospectively enrolled. The patients were treated with diquafosol solution at a dose of 1 drop in each eye 6 times daily for 4 weeks. The parameters of clinical efficacy were tear osmolarity, tear breakup time (BUT), fluorescein staining scores for the cornea and conjunctiva, Schirmer test values, and subjective symptoms evaluated using the ocular surface disease index (OSDI). Tears collected with Schirmer test strips were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography, and the concentrations of the total protein and the 4 major tear proteins, namely, secretory IgA, lactoferrin, lipocalin-1, lysozyme, and N-acetyl-neuraminic acid (Neu5Ac), were measured. Neu5Ac is a major sialic acid, a marker of secretory mucins.

Results

The BUT, keratoconjunctival staining scores, and Schirmer test values were improved with statistical significance after the treatment with diquafosol solution, while changes in the other parameters, including tear osmolarity, corneal staining scores, and OSDI scores were not significant. The Neu5Ac concentration was significantly increased, which was not accompanied by changes in tear proteins.

Conclusions

Topical application of diquafosol significantly improved the clinical parameters of the BUT, keratoconjunctival staining scores, and Schirmer test values and was accompanied by increased sialic acid content in the tears of patients with dry eye.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pflugfelder SC, Geerling G, Kinoshita S, Lemo MA, McCulley J, Nelson D, et al. Management and therapy of dry eye disease: report of the Management and Therapy Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye Workshop (2007). Ocul Surf. 2007;5:163–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nichols KK, Yerxa B, Kellerman DJ. Diquafosol tetrasodium: a novel dry eye therapy. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2004;13:47–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cowlen MS, Zhang VZ, Warnock L, Moyer CF, Peterson WM, Yerxa BR. Localization of ocular P2Y2 receptor gene expression by in situ hybridization. Exp Eye Res. 2003;77:77–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Murakami T, Fujihara T, Horibe Y, Nakamura M. Diquafosol elicits increases in net Cl-transport through P2Y2 receptor stimulation in rabbit conjunctiva. Ophthalmic Res. 2004;36:89–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Takaoka-Shichijyou Y, Murakami T, Nakamura M. Stimulatory effect of diquafosol tetrasodium on tear fluid secretion in normal rabbits [in Japanese]. Atarashii Ganka. 2011;28:1029–33.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jumblatt JE, Jumblatt MM. Regulation of ocular mucin secretion by P2Y2 nucleotide receptors in rabbit and human conjunctiva. Exp Eye Res. 1998;67:341–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fujihara T, Murakami T, Nagano T, Nakamura M, Nakata K. INS365 suppresses loss of corneal epithelial integrity by secretion of mucin-like glycoprotein in a rabbit short-term dry eye model. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2002;18:363–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nakamura M, Imanaka T, Sakamoto A. Diquafosol ophthalmic solution for dry eye treatment. Adv Ther. 2012;29:579–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Takamura E, Tsubota K, Watanabe H, Ohashi Y. A randomised, double-masked comparison study of diquafosol versus sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solutions in dry eye patients. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96:1310–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Matsumoto Y, Ohashi Y, Watanabe H, Tsubota K. Efficacy and safety of diquafosol ophthalmic solution in patients with dry eye syndrome: a Japanese phase 2 clinical trial. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:1954–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tauber J, Davitt WF, Bokosky JE, Nichols KK, Yerxa BR, Schaberg AE, et al. Double-masked, placebo-controlled safety and efficacy trial of diquafosol tetrasodium (INS365) ophthalmic solution for the treatment of dry eye. Cornea. 2004;23:784–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Koh S, Maeda N, Ikeda C, Oie Y, Soma T, Tsujikawa M, et al. Effect of diquafosol ophthalmic solution on the optical quality of the eyes in patients with aqueous-deficient dry eye. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014;92:e671–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Arita R, Suehiro J, Haraguchi T, Maeda S, Maeda K, Tokoro H, et al. Topical diquafosol for patients with obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013;97:725–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yokoi N, Kato H, Kinoshita S. Facilitation of tear fluid secretion by 3% diquafosol ophthalmic solution in normal human eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;157:85–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shigeyasu C, Hirano S, Akune Y, Yamada M. Diquafosol tetrasodium increases the concentration of mucin-like substances in tears of healthy human subjects. Curr Eye Res. 2014;. doi:10.3109/02713683.2014.967871.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hwang HS, Sung YM, Lee WS, Kim EC. Additive effect of preservative-free sodium hyaluronate 0.1% in treatment of dry eye syndrome with diquafosol 3% eye drops. Cornea. 2014;33:935–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shimazaki J, Tsubota K, Kinoshita S, Ohashi Y, Shimomura Y, Tagawa Y, et al. Definition and diagnosis of dry eye 2006 [in Japanese]. Atarashii Ganka. 2007;24:181–4.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lemp MA, Baudouin C, Baum J, Dogru M, Foulks GN, Kinoshita S, et al. The definition and classification of dry eye disease: report of the Definition and Classification Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye Workshop (2007). Ocul Surf. 2007;5:75–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shimmura S, Ono M, Shinozaki K, Toda I, Takamura E, Mashima Y, et al. Sodium hyaluronate eyedrops in the treatment of dry eyes. Br J Ophthalmol. 1995;79:1007–11.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Koh S, Watanabe H, Hosohata J, Hori Y, Hibino S, Nishida K, et al. Diagnosing dry eye using a blue-free barrier filter. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;136:513–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. van Bijsterveld OP. Diagnostic tests in the sicca syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol. 1969;82:10–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schiffman RM, Christianson MD, Jacobsen G, Hirsch JD, Reis BL. Reliability and validity of the ocular surface disease index. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:615–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yamada M, Mochizuki H, Kawai M, Tsubota K, Bryce TJ. Decreased tear lipocalin concentration in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:803–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shigeyasu C, Hirano S, Akune Y, Mochizuki H, Yamada M. Evaluation of the frequency of ophthalmic solution application: washout effects of topical saline application on tear components. Curr Eye Res. 2013;38:722–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yasueda S, Yamakawa K, Nakanishi Y, Kinoshita M, Kakehi K. Decreased mucin concentrations in tear fluids of contact lens wearers. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2005;39:187–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nakamura Y, Yokoi N, Tokushige H, Kinoshita S. Sialic acid in human tear fluid decreases in dry eye. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2004;48:519–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kinoshita S, Kiorpes TC, Friend J, Thoft RA. Goblet cell density in ocular surface disease: a better indicator than tear mucin. Arch Ophthalmol. 1983;101:1284–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ralph RA. Conjunctival goblet cell density in normal subjects and in dry eye syndromes. Invest Ophthalmol. 1975;14:299–302.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Corrales RM, de Paiva CS, Li DQ, Farley WJ, Henriksson JT, Bergmanson JP, et al. Entrapment of conjunctival goblet cells by desiccation-induced cornification. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:3492–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Argueso P, Balaram M, Spurr-Michaud S, Keutmann HT, Dana MR, Gipson IK. Decreased levels of the goblet cell mucin MUC5AC in tears of patients with Sjogren syndrome. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:1004–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Danjo Y, Watanabe H, Tisdale AS, George M, Tsumura T, Abelson MB, et al. Alteration of mucin in human conjunctival epithelia in dry eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39:2602–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gipson IK, Hori Y, Argueso P. Character of ocular surface mucins and their alteration in dry eye disease. Ocul Surf. 2004;2:131–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chika Shigeyasu.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

C. Shigeyasu, None; M. Yamada, None; Y. Akune, None; K. Tsubota, Lecture fees (Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.).

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shigeyasu, C., Yamada, M., Akune, Y. et al. Diquafosol sodium ophthalmic solution for the treatment of dry eye: clinical evaluation and biochemical analysis of tear composition . Jpn J Ophthalmol 59, 415–420 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-015-0408-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-015-0408-y

Keywords

Navigation