Skip to main content
Log in

Reduction of coronary risk factors immediately and 1 year after inpatient rehabilitation in a highly motivated patient cohort

Reduktion koronarer Risikofaktoren unmittelbar und 1 Jahr nach stationärer kardialer Rehabilitation in hoch motivierten Patienten

  • original article
  • Published:
Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Adherence to medical advice, driven by high patient motivation, could lead to a significant reduction in risk factors during cardiac rehabilitation.

During a 1-year period, 9082 patients were admitted to six cardiac rehabilitation centres. A total of 1195 highly motivated subjects were selected based on their reliable completion of a survey regarding cardiac risk factors.

Study subjects had lower risk factors at baseline compared with a contemporary Austrian database. At discharge from the rehabilitation programme subjects showed further reductions in median weight, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, blood pressure and resting pulse rate (due to increased levels of daily exercise). Smoking also decreased. Most of these changes were still significant after 1 year.

The risk factors in these highly motivated patients were low to begin with and were further reduced by an inpatient rehabilitation programme. The content and method of delivery of this programme seem to be effective. Efforts should focus on increasing motivation.

Zusammenfassung

Eine konsequente Befolgung ärztlicher Ratschläge durch hoch motivierte Patienten in der kardialen Rehabilitation könnte zu einer signifikanten Reduktion koronarer Risikofaktoren führen.

Von 9082 in einem Jahr zur Rehabilitation zugewiesenen Patienten haben wir 1095 auf Grund eines verlässlich ausgefüllten Fragebogens zu koronaren Risikofaktoren als hoch motiviert ausgewählt.

Diese zeigten – verglichen mit einer österreichischen Datenbank aus der gleichen Zeit – schon bei der Aufnahme niedrigere Risikofaktoren.

Bis zur Entlassung konnten sowohl das Körpergewicht, als auch das LDL-Cholesterin, der Blutdruck und die Ruheherzfrequenz (diese als Ausdruck vermehrter Bewegung) noch weiter signifikant erniedrigt werden. Auch die Anzahl der Raucher sank.

Die meisten dieser Veränderungen waren nach einem Jahr noch immer signifikant.

Die koronaren Risikofaktoren waren bei diesen hoch motivierten Patienten bereits am Beginn des Rehabilitationsprogrammes niedrig und konnten weiter reduziert werden.

Offensichtlich sind die angebotenen Programme wirkungsvoll—wichtig wäre vor Allem die Verstärkung der Motivation unserer Patienten in der kardialen Rehabilitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lawler PR, Filion KB, Eisenberg MJ. Efficacy of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation post-myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am Heart J. 2011;162:571–84.e2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Heran BS, Chen JM, Ebrahim S, et al. Exercise based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;7:CD001800.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Taylor RS, Brown A, Ebrahim S, et al. Exercise-based rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Med. 2004;116(10):682–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Humphry R, Guazzi M, Niebauer J. Cardiac rehabilitation. Europe Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2014;56(5):551–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith SC, Jr, Benjamin EJ, Bonow RO, et al. AHA/ACCF secondary prevention and risk reduction therapy for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2011 update. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(23):2432–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Piepoli MF, Corrà U, Benzer W, et al. Secondary prevention through cardiac rehabilitation: from knowledge to implementation. A position paper from the Cardiac Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010;17(1):1–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Balady GJ, Williams MA, Ades PA, et al. Core components of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs: 2007 update. Circulation. 2007;115:2675–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Perk J, De Baker G, Gohlke H, et al. European Guidelines on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (Version 2012). Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012;19(4):585–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jannsen V, De Gucht V, Dusseldorp E, Maes S. Lifestyle modification programmes for patients with coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013;20(4):620–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Eckel RH, Jakicic JM, Ard JD, et al. 2013 AHA/ACC guideline on lifestyle management to reduce cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(25 Pt B):2960–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Giannuzzi P, Temporelli PL, Marchioli R, et al. Global secondary prevention strategies to limit event recurrence after myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(20):2194–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Müller R, Kullich W, Graninger U, et al. Stationäre kardiologische Rehabilitation in Österreich: Ergebnisse einer prospektiven Studie zu den kardiovaskulären Risikofaktoren in der Sekundärprävention. J Kardiol. 2009;16:14–8.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Aldana SG, Whitmer WR, Greenlaw R, et al. Cardiovascular risk reductions with aggressive lifestyle modification and cardiac rehabilitation. Heart Lung. 2003;32(6):374–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. West RR, Jones DA, Henderson AH. Rehabilitation after myocardial infarction trial (RAMIT): multi-centre randomised controlled trial of comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation in patients following acute myocardial infarction. Heart. 2012;98:637–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Detry JR, Vierendeel IA, Vanbutsele RJ, et al. Early short-term intensive cardiac rehabilitation induces positive results as long as one year after the acute coronary event: a prospective one-year controlled study. J Cardiovasc Risk. 2001;8:355–261.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Küpper-Nybelen J, Rothenbacher D, Hahmann H, et al. [Changes of risk factors in patients with coronary heart disease after in-patient rehabilitation]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2003;128(28–29):1525–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Willich SN, Müller-Nordhorn J, Kulig M, et al. Cardiac risk factors, medication and recurrent clinical events after acute coronary disease. Eur Heart J. 2001;22:307–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dalal HM, Zawada A, Jolly K, et al. Home based vs. centre-based cardiac rehabilitation: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2010;340:b5683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schwaab B, Waldmann A, Katalinc A, et al. In-patient cardiac rehabilitation vs. medical care—a prospective multicentre controlled 12 months follow-up in patients with coronary disease. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010;18(4):581–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bestehorn K, Jannowitz C, Horack M, et al. Current state of cardiac rehabilitation in Germany: patient characteristics, risk factor management and control status, by education level. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2011;7:639–47.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Harb BM, Wonisch M, Brandt D, Müller R. Long-term risk factor management after inpatient cardiac rehabilitation by means of a structured post-care program. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010;18(6):843–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2012. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org/.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bruckert E. Impact of lipid treatment on cardiovascular risk reduction: new therapeutic targets. Eur Heart J Suppl. 2005;7(Suppl L):L16–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Law M, Wald N, Morris J. Lowering blood pressure to prevent myocardial infarction and stroke: a new preventive strategy. Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(31):1–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Drozda J, Jr, Messer JV, Spertus J, et al. ACCF/AHA/AMA-PCPI 2011 performance measures for adults with coronary artery disease and hypertension: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures and the American Medical Association-Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement. Circulation. 2011;124(2):248–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Blackburn D. Medication adherence is not our problem? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;58(15):1641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Penning-van Beest FJ, Termorshuizen F, Goettsch WG, et al. Adherence to evidence-based statin guidelines reduces the risk of hospitalizations for acute myocardial infarction by 40 %: a cohort study. Eur Heart J. 2007;28(2):154–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Timlin MT, Shores KV, Reicks M, et al. Behavior change outcomes in an outpatient cardiac rehabilitation program. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002;102(5):664–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pinto BM, Goldstein MG, Papandonatos GD, et al. Maintenance of exercise after phase II cardiac rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med. 2011;41(3):274–83.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Miller NH. Adherence behavior in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2012;32(2):63–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Russell KL, Bray SR. Promoting self-determined motivation for exercise in cardiac rehabilitation: the role of autonomy support. Rehabil Psychol. 2010;55(1):74–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Russell KL, Bray SR. Self-determined motivation predicts independent, home-based exercise following cardiac rehabilitation. Rehabil Psychol. 2009;54(2):150–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rozanski A. Behavioural cardiology: current advances and future directions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(1):100–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Taylor GH, Wilson SL, Sharp J. Medical, psychological, and sociodemographic factors associated with adherence to cardiac rehabilitation programs: a systematic review. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2011;26(3):202–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lane D, Carroll D, Lip GY. Psychology in coronary care. Q J Med. 1999;92:425–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Maurer DM. Screening for depression. Am Fam Physician. 2012;85(2):139–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Rumsfeld JS, Ho PM. Depression and cardiovascular disease. A call for recognition. Circulation. 2005;111:250–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Larsen KK. Depression following myocardial infarction—an overseen complication with prognostic importance. Dan Med J. 2013;60(8):B4689.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Cleland JG, Ekman I. Enlisting the help of the largest health care workforce—patients. JAMA. 2010;304(12):1383–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Newman S. Engaging patients in managing their cardiovascular health. Heart. 2004;90(Suppl IV):iv9–13.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Waugh RF. Creating a scale to measure motivation to achieve academically: linking attitudes and behaviors using Rasch measurement. Br J Educ Psychol. 2002;72(1):65–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Mayer JD, Faber MA, Xu X. Seventy-five years of motivation measures (1930–2005): a descriptive analysis. Motiv Emot. 2007;2:83–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Professor Martin Klicpera and his team at the Rehabilitationszentrum Hochegg for their help with data-collection. They also wish to thank Professor Dieter Brand for designing and implementing the “Health Guide”.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Felix Schnöll MD, FESC.

Additional information

Part of the work included in this article was presented at the Congress of the European Society of Cardiology in Amsterdam, 2013.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schnöll, F., Laimer, H., Altenberger, J. et al. Reduction of coronary risk factors immediately and 1 year after inpatient rehabilitation in a highly motivated patient cohort. Wien Med Wochenschr 165, 71–78 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354-014-0339-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354-014-0339-0

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation