Summary
Background
Many studies have been carried out to find the optimal treatment for pilonidal sinus disease (PSD), but the gender-specific prevalence in Turkey has not been revealed. Therefore, this article evaluated patients diagnosed with pilonidal sinus disease in our hospital. We aimed to analyze the gender ratio in PSD.
Methods
We evaluated patients admitted and who underwent pilonidal sinus excision at the Istanbul Sultanbeyli State Hospital between January 2010 and January 2022. Patients with missing data, multiple admissions, and multiple surgeries of the same patient were excluded from the analyses. Patients were stratified according to age into two groups: < 18 (teenage) and ≥ 18 (adult). Age and gender, diagnosis at admission, and operation status were analyzed.
Results
A total of 10,324 PSD patients were analyzed. 24.8% (n = 2559) of the patients were female and 75.2% (n = 7765) were male. Patients’ ages ranged from 13 to 86 years; the mean age was 26.5 years. Of all patients, 1621 (15.7%) had an abscess at the time of diagnosis. 4345 pilonidal sinus surgery cases were evaluated; 25.3% (n = 1100) of the patients were female and 74.7% (n = 3245) were male. The girl/boy ratio of PSD in teenagers was 0.86, and the female/male ratio of PSD in patients aged 18 years and older was 0.27.
Conclusion
The female gender prevalence of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease is 25% in Turkey. Pilonidal sinus disease surgery is mainly performed in secondary care hospitals; therefore, unpublished data from these centers may contribute more to pilonidal sinus disease research.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Doll D, Orlik A, Maier K, Kauf P, Schmid M, Diekmann M, et al. Impact of geography and surgical approach on recurrence in global pilonidal sinus disease. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):15111. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51159-z.
Duman K, Girgin M, Harlak A. Prevalence of sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease in Turkey. Asian J Surg. 2017;40(6):434–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.04.001.
Harries RL, Alqallaf A, Torkington J, Harding KG. Management of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease. Int Wound J. 2019;16(2):370–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13042.
Luedi MM, Schober P, Stauffer VK, Diekmann M, Doll D. Global gender differences in Pilonidal sinus disease: a random-effects meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2020;44(11):3702–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05702-z.
Akinci OF, Bozer M, Uzunkoy A, Duzgun SA, Coskun A. Incidence and aetiological factors in pilonidal sinus among Turkish soldiers. Eur J Surg. 1999;165(4):339–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/110241599750006875.
Aysan E, Ilhan M, Bektas H, Kaya EA, Sam B, Buyukpinarbasili N, et al. Prevalence of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus as a silent disease. Surg Today. 2013;43(11):1286–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-012-0433-0
Yildiz T, Elmas B, Yucak A, Turgut HT, Ilce Z. Risk factors for pilonidal sinus disease in teenagers. Indian J Pediatr. 2017;84(2):134–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-016-2180-5.
Bostanoglu S, Sakcak I, Avsar FM, Cosgun E, Hamamci EO. Comparison of Karydakis technique with Limberg Flap Procedure in Pilonidal Sinus Disease: Advantages of Karydakis technique. Pak J Med Sci 2010;26(4):773–777.
Zorlu M, Sahiner IT, Zobaci E, Kocak C, Yasti AC, Dolapci M. Early results with the Mutaf technique: a novel off-midline approach in pilonidal sinus surgery. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2016;90(5):265–71. https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2016.90.5.265.
Emiroglu M, Karaali C, Esin H, Akpinar G, Aydin C. Treatment of pilonidal disease by phenol application. Turk J Surg. 2017;33(1):5–9. https://doi.org/10.5152/UCD.2016.3532.
Doll D, Stauffer V, Diekann M, Van Wyk P, Luedi MM. Turkey is leading in the 21(st) century pilonidal sinus disease research. Turk J Surg. 2020;36(3):284–90. https://doi.org/10.47717/turkjsurg.2020.4750.
Luedi MM, Schober P, Stauffer VK, Diekmann M, Andereggen L, Doll D. Gender-specific prevalence of pilonidal sinus disease over time: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg. 2021;91(7–8):1582–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.16990.
Bi S, Sun K, Chen S, Gu J. Surgical procedures in the pilonidal sinus disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):13720. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70641-7.
Mahmood F, Hussain A, Akingboye A. Pilonidal sinus disease: review of current practice and prospects for endoscopic treatment. Ann Med Surg. 2020;57:212–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.07.050.
Çaglayan K, Güngör B, Çınar H, Topgül K, Kesicioğlu T, Polat C et al. The effect of different surgical methods on complications and on the quality of life in pilonidal sinus disease. Turk J Surg. 2011;27:94–7. https://doi.org/10.5097/1300-0705.UCD.950-11.03
de Parades V, Bouchard D, Janier M, Berger A. Pilonidal sinus disease. J Visc Surg. 2013;150(4):237–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2013.05.006.
Nasr A, Ein SH. A pediatric surgeon’s 35-year experience with pilonidal disease in a Canadian children’s hospital. Can J Surg. 2011;54(1):39–42. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.028509.
Fike FB, Mortellaro VE, Juang D, Ostlie DJ, Peter StSD. Experience with pilonidal disease in children. J Surg Res. 2011;170(1):165–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2011.02.016.
Abraham MN, Raymond SL, Hawkins RB, Iqbal A, Larson SD, Mustafa MM, et al. Analysis of outcomes in adolescents and young adults with pilonidal disease. Front Surg. 2021;8:613605. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.613605.
Eryilmaz R, Şahin M, Alimoǧlu O, Yildiz M. Predisposing factors in chronic pilonidal sinus development. Turk J Surg. 2003;19(1):49–53.
Doll D, Friederichs J, Dettmann H, Boulesteix AL, Duesel W, Petersen S. Time and rate of sinus formation in pilonidal sinus disease. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23(4):359–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-007-0389-5.
Karahan Ö, Eryılmaz MA, Torun V, Sevinç B, Köksal H, Aksoy F, et al. Is the increase in the number of pilonidal sinus surgery normal? Turk J Surg. 2010;26(4):207–211. https://doi.org/10.5097/1300-0705.UCD.615-10.03
Funding
All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work at present nor had they within the previous 3 years. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All listed authors meet the ICMJE criteria. We attest that all authors contributed significantly to the creation of this manuscript, each having fulfilled criteria as established by the ICMJE. We confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all named authors. CRediT authorship contribution statement: conceptualization: Muhammer Ergenç and Tevfik Kıvılcım Uprak; methodology: Muhammer Ergenç and Tevfik Kıvılcım Uprak; formal analysis and investigation: Muhammer Ergenç and Tevfik Kıvılcım Uprak; writing—original draft preparation: Muhammer Ergenç and Tevfik Kıvılcım Uprak; writing—review and editing: Muhammer Ergenç and Tevfik Kıvılcım Uprak; funding acquisition: Muhammer Ergenç and Tevfik Kıvılcım Uprak; resources: Muhammer Ergenç and Tevfik Kıvılcım Uprak; supervision: Muhammer Ergenç and Tevfik Kıvılcım Uprak.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
M. Ergenç and T.K. Uprak declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethical standards
This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. This study was approved by the Istanbul Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kırdar City Hospital Clinical Research Ethics Committee (number: 2021.514.212.11).
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Availability of data and material
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Code availability
Not applicable
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ergenç, M., Uprak, T.K. Gender-specific prevalence of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease in Turkey: A retrospective analysis of a large cohort. Eur Surg 55, 43–47 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-022-00777-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-022-00777-5