Skip to main content
Log in

Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery for left sided colorectal cancer: is quality of surgery related with experience?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Introduction

Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy (HALC) is an alternative technique to conventional laparoscopic surgery: it is technically easier, learning curve, and operative time is shorter. Our aim was to determine how operative and postoperative results are affected gaining the experience.

Methods

A prospectively maintained database was used to identify all patients who underwent HALC for left-sided colorectal cancer by a single surgeon at the Institute of Oncology, Vilnius University, from April 2006 to December 2013. They were analyzed as two consecutive equal groups: first 100 and next 100 patients. Operative time and quality-related outcomes, including conversions, operative, and postoperative complications, length of hospital stay and reoperations were compared.

Results

A total of 200 HALC were performed. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, sex, cancer stage, body mass index, operative procedures, comorbidities, prior surgical experience. Conversion rate was similar between the two groups: 3 (2.9 %) versus 3 (2.9 %), p > 0.05. Group 2 showed significantly shorter operative time: 129 ± 49.5 versus 98 ± 35.8 min, p < 0.05; and length of hospital stay: 8.1 ± 4.3 versus 6.5 ± 3.2 days, p < 0.05. The rate of complications was not significantly higher in group 1: 14(14 %) versus 9 (9 %), p > 0.05.

Conclusions

HALC operative time and postoperative hospital stay decreased with surgeon experience. For quality-related outcomes, HALC had no learning curve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS. Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991;1:144–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Noel JK, Fahrbach K, Estok R, et al. Minimally invasive colorectal resection outcomes: short-term comparison with open procedures. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204:291–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Furst A, Heiligensetzer A, Sauer P, Liebig-Horl G. Evidenzlage der laparoskopischen Chirurgie beim Rektumkarzinom. Der Chirurg. 2014;85:578–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2050–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Boland JP, Kuminsky RE, Tiley EH. Laparoscopic minilaparotomy with manipulation: the middle path. Minimal Invasive Surg. 1993;2:263–7.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kang JC, Jao SW, Chung MH, et al. The learning curve for hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: a single surgeons experience. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:234–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ozturk E, da Luz MA, Vogel JD. Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: the learning curve is for operative speed, not for quality. Colorectal Dis. 2009;12:304–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pendlimari R, Holubar SD, Dozois EJ, et al. Technical proficiency in hand-assisted laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery. Determining how many cases are required to achieve mastery. Arch Surg. 2012;147:317–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dulskas A, Samalavicius NE, Gupta et al. Functional and clinical outcomes of hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a single-institution experience in 255 patients. Eur Surg. 2015;47:75–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Leblanc F, Delaney CP, Ellis CN, et al. Hand-assisted versus straight laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy on a training simulator: what is the difference? World J Surg. 2010;34:2909–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cima RR, Pattana-Arun J, Larson DW, et al. Experience with 969 minimal access colectomies: the role of hand-assisted laparoscopy in expanding minimally invasive surgery for complex colectomies. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206:946–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Targarona EM, Gracia E, Garriga J, et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing conventional laparoscopic colectomy with hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: applicability, immediate clinical outcome, inflammatory response, and cost. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:234–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. HALS Study Group. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery vs. standard laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2000;14:896–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Maartense S, Bemelman WA, van der Hoop GA, et al. Hand assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS): a report of 150 procedures. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:397–401.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cima RR, Pendlimari R, Holubar SD, et al. Utility and short-term outcomes of hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a single-institution experience in 1103 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 201;54:1076–1081.

  17. Lux P, Weber K, Hohenberger W. Laparoskopische Chirurgie des Kolonkarzinoms. Der Chirurg. 2014;85:593–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Aalbers AG, Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, et al. Hand-assisted or laparoscopic-assisted approach in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:1769–80.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Iqbal M, Bhalerao S. Current status of hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a review. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2007;17:172–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schadde E, Smith D, Alkoraishi AS, et al. Hand assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery (HALS) at a community hospital: a prospective analysis of 104 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:1077–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Marcello PW, Fleshman JW, Milsom JW, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic vs. laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:818–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dowson HM, Huang A, Soon Y, et al. Systematic review of the costs of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50:908–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ozturk E, Kiran RP, Geisler DP, et al. Hand assisted laparoscopic colectomy: benefits of laparoscopic colectomy at no extra cost. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:242–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Dulskas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dulskas, A., Samalavicius, N., Gupta, R. et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery for left sided colorectal cancer: is quality of surgery related with experience?. Eur Surg 47, 238–242 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-015-0341-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-015-0341-9

Keywords

Navigation