Abstract
In face of climate change and global scale biodiversity loss, assessing the relationship between biodiversity and forest ecosystem functioning is essential, but poorly investigated in temperate forests of Iran. We examined plant diversity aboveground biomass relationships in unmanaged, and forests managed with a single-stem selection system in the Hyrcanian forests ecoregion in Northern Iran. Also, the effect of single-stem selection system on soil nutrient and plant species diversity of tree layer was investigated. Linear models were used to analyze the effect of management and soil characteristics on aboveground biomass and tree layer attributes. Moreover, the relationships between aboveground biomass and plant species diversity metrics and soil characteristics were investigated using simple linear and multiple linear regression analysis by using regression analysis. We found that tree layer species richness and Shannon diversity were significantly higher in managed forests compared to unmanaged forests. While simple regression analysis revealed no effect of tree layer diversity and soil characteristics on aboveground biomass, multiple regression analysis showed that the main positive driver of aboveground biomass was soil nitrogen content (or its equivalent soil organic carbon). These findings indicate that from a biodiversity point of view, the single-stem selection system can be considered a sustainable forest management approach in Hyrcanian forests because it has positive effects on tree layer diversity. This is probably driven by increased habitat heterogeneity and light availability at forest floor through cuttings, while keeping cutting intensity at a level that is too low to significantly affect tree biomass. While the relationship between soil nitrogen and biomass was positive, we found no relationship between species diversity and biomass. Finally, assessment of relationship between biomass and plant species diversity and other underlying factors such as soil nutrients can be considered an important tool to conserve and manage ecosystem services.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adamczyk B (2021) How do boreal forest soils store carbon? BioEssays 43:2100010. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.202100010
Akhani H, Djamali M, Ghorbanalizadeh A, Ramezani E (2010) Plant biodiversity of Hyrcanian relict forests, N Iran: an overview of the flora, vegetation, palaeoecology and conservation. Pak J Bot 42:231–258
Barton K (2019) MuMIn: multi-model inference. https://cran.r-project.org/package=MuMIn
Bouriaud O, Don A, Janssens IA, Marin G, Schulze ED (2019) Effects of forest management on biomass stocks in Romanian beech forests. For Ecosyst 6:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-019-0180-4
Brown S, Pearson T, Moore N, Parveen A, Ambagis S, Shoch D (2005) Impact of selective logging on the carbon stock of tropical forests: republic of congo as a case study. Winrock International, Virginia, 21 p
Cánovas FM, Cañas RA, de la Torre FN, Pascual MB, Castro-Rodríguez V, Avila C (2018) Nitrogen metabolism and biomass production in forest trees. Front Plant Sci 9:1449. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01449
Caspersen JP, Pacala SW (2001) Successional diversity and forest ecosystem function. Ecol Res 16:895–903. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1703.2001.00455.x
Castilho C, Magnusson WE, Araújo RN, Luizão RCC, Luizão FV, Lima AP, Higuchi N (2006) Variation in aboveground tree live biomass in a central Amazonian forest: effects of soil and topography. For Ecol Manag 234:85–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.06.024
Chen HYH, Klinka K (2003) Aboveground productivity of western hemlock and western redcedar mixed-species stands in southern coastal British Columbia. For Ecol Manag 184:55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00148-8
Comeau PG, Heinemann JL (2003) Predicting understory light microclimate from stand parameters in young paper birch (Betula papyrifera Marsh) stands. For Ecol Manag 180:303–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00581-9
Creed RP, Cherry RP, Pflaum JR, Wood CJ (2009) Dominant species can produce a negative relationship between species diversity and ecosystem function. Oikos 118:723–732. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.17212.x
Damptey FG, Birkhofer K, Nsiah PK, de la Riva EG (2020) Soil properties and biomass attributes in a former gravel mine area after two decades of forest restoration. Land 6:209. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9060209
De Simon G, Alberti G, Delle Vedove G, Zerbi G, Peressotti A (2012) Carbon stocks and net ecosystem production changes with time in two Italian forest chronosequences. Eur J for Res 131:1297–1311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-012-0599-4
DeWalt SJ, Chave J (2004) Structure and biomass of four lowland Neotropical Forests. Biotropical 36:7–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2004.tb00291.x
Diaz S, Hector A, Wardle DA (2009) Biodiversity in forest carbon sequestration initiatives: not just a side benefit. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 1:55–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2009.08.001
Dixon RKJ, Srown S, Houghton RA, Solomon AM, Trexler MC, Wisniewski J (1994) Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science 263:185–190. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.263.5144.185
Ehbrecht M, Schall P, Ammer C, Fischer M, Seidel D (2019) Effects of structural heterogeneity on the diurnal temperature range in temperate forest ecosystems. For Ecol Manage 432:860–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.10.008
Elliott KJ, Knoepp JD (2005) The effects of three regeneration harvest methods on plant diversity and soil characteristics in the Southern Appalachians. For Ecol Manag 211:296–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.02.064
Forestry and range organization (2011) Forest management plan. 289
Fridley JD (2003) The influence of species diversity on ecosystem productivity: how, where, and why? Oikos 93:514–526. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.930318.x
Gazda A, Miścicki S, Chwistek K (2015) Tree species diversity and above ground biomass of natural temperate forest montane versus lowland forest. Dendrobiology 73:3–10. https://doi.org/10.12657/DENBIO.073.001
Gross N, Suding KN, Lavorel S, Roumet C (2007) Complementarity as a mechanism of coexistence between functional groups of grasses. J Ecol 95:1296–1305. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01303.x
Hale SE, Edwards C, Mason WL, Price M, Peace A (2009) Relationships between canopy transmittance and stand parameters in Sitka spruce and Scots pine stands in Britain. Forestry 82:503–513. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpp020
Hooper DU, Adair E, Cardinale B, Byrnes JEK, Hungate BA, Matulich KL, Gonzalez A, Duffy JE, Gamfeldt L, Oconnor ML (2012) A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change. Nature 486:105–108. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11118
Horvat V, Biurrun I, Garcia- Mijangos I (2017) Herb layer in silver fir- beech forests in the western Pyrneese: Does management affect species diversity? For Ecol Manage 385:87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.11.037
Houghton RA (2007) Balancing the global carbon budget. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 35:313–347
Huston MA (1997) Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity. Oecologia 110:449–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050180
Jacob M, Leuschner C, Thomas FM (2010) Productivity of temperate broad-leaved forest stands differing in tree species diversity. Ann for Sci 67:503. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest/2010005
Jost L (2006) Entropy and diversity. Oikos 113(2):363–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14714.x
Lal R (2005) Forest soils and carbon sequestration. For Ecol Manage 220:242–0258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.08.015
Laurance WF, Fearnside PM, Laurance SG, Delamonica P, Lovejoy TE, Rankin-de Merona JM, Chambers JQ, Gascon C (1999) Relationships between soils and Amazon Forest biomass: a landscape-scale study. For Ecol Manag 118:127–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00494-0
Liang J, Zhou M, Tobin PC, McGuire AD, Reich PB (2015) Biodiversity influences plant productivity through niche-efficiency. Proc National Acad Sci USA 112:5738–5743
Loreau M, Hector A (2001) Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. Nature 412:72–76. https://doi.org/10.1038/35083573
Martinez J, Tigar B, Camara L, Castillo O (2016) Relationship between carbon stocks and structural diversity in humid and subhumid tropical forest of Mexico. Ecoscience 22:125–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/11956860.2016.1169384
Mazzei L, Sist P, Ruschel A, Putz FE, Marco P, Pena W, Ferreira JER (2010) Above-ground biomass dynamics after reduced-impact logging in the Eastern Amazon. For Ecol Manag 259:367–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.10.031
Medjibe VP, Putz FE, Starkey MP, Ndouna AA, Memiaghe HR (2011) Impacts of selective logging on above-ground forest biomass in the Monts de Cristal in Gabon. For Ecol Manag 262:1799–1806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.07.014
Mensah S, Veldtman R, Assogbadjo AE, Glèlè Kakaï R, Seifert T (2016) Tree species diversity promotes aboveground carbon storage through functional diversity and functional dominance. Ecol Evol 6:7546–7557. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2525
Mensah S, du Toit B, Seifert T (2018) Diversity–biomass relationship across forest layers: implications for niche complementarity and selection effects. Oecologia 187:783–795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-018-4144-0
Mohadjer MR (2007) Silviculture. University of Tehran Press. Iran. 388p
Mooney H, Saugier B (2001) Terrestrial Global Productivity: Past, Present and Future. Academic Press, San Diego. 573p
Mori AS, Lertzman KP, Gustafsson L (2017) Biodiversity and ecosystem services in forest ecosystems: a research agenda for applied forest ecology. J Appl Ecol 54:12–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12669
Mueller-Dombois D, Ellenberg H (1974) Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. Wiley, New York, p 547p
Nasiri N, Marvie Mohadjer MR, Etemad V, Sefidi K, Mohammadi L, Gharehaghaji M (2018) Natural regeneration of oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) trees in canopy gaps and under closed canopy in a forest in northern Iran. J for Res 29:1075–1081. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-017-0490-8
OdríguezSoalleiro R, EimilFraga C, GomezGarcia E, GarciaVillabrille JD, RojoAlboreca A, Munoz F, Oliveira N, Sixto H, PerezCruzado C (2018) Exploring the factors affecting carbon and nutrient concentrations in tree biomass components in natural forests, forest plantations and short rotation forestry. For Ecosyst 5:35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-018-0154-y
Paillet Y, Bergès L, Hjältén J, Ódor P, Avon C, Bernhardt-Römermann M, Bijlsma RJ, De Bruyn L, Fuhr M, Grandin U, Kanka R, Lundin L, Luque S, Magura T, Matesanz S, Mészáros I, Sebastiàn MT, Schmidt W, Standovár T, Tóthmérész B, Uotila A, Valladares F, Vellak K, Virtanen R (2010) Biodiversity differences between managed and unmanaged forests: metaanalysis of species richness in Europe. Conserv Biol 24:101–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01399.x
Parsapajouh D (2015) Wood technology, University of Tehran Press. Iran. 404
Peichl M, Arain MA (2006) Above- and belowground ecosystem biomass and carbon pools in an age-sequence of temperate pine plantation forests. Agric for Meteorol 140:51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.08.004
Penone C, Allan E, Soliveres S, Felipe-Lucia MR, Gossner MM, Seibold S, Simons NK, Schall P, Plas F, Manning P, Manzanedo RD, Boch S, Prati D, Ammer C, Bauhus J, Buscot F, Ehbrecht M, Goldmann K, Jung K, Müller J, Müller JC, Pena R, Polle A, Renner SC, Ruess L, Schönig I, Schrumpf M, Solly EF, Tschapka M, Weisser WW, Wubet T, Fischer M (2019) Specialisation and diversity of multiple trophic groups are promoted by different forest features. Ecol Lett 22:170–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13182
Pinard MA, Putz FE (1996) Retaining forest biomass by reducing logging damage. Biotropica 28:278–295. https://doi.org/10.2307/2389193
Potter KM, Woodall CW (2014) Does biodiversity make a difference? Relationships between species richness, evolutionary diversity, and aboveground live tree biomass across U.S. forests. For Ecol Manag 321:117–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.06.026
R Core Team (2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Reich PB, Knops J, Tilman D, Craine J, Ellsworth D, Tjoelker M, Lee T, Wedin D, Naeem S, Bahauddin D, Hendrey G, Jose S, Wrage K, Goth J, Bengston W (2001) Plant diversity enhances ecosystem responses to elevated CO2 and nitrogen deposition. Nature 410:809–810. https://doi.org/10.1038/35071062
Ruiz-Benito P, Gomez-Aparicio L, Paquette A, Messier C, Kattge J, Zavala M (2014) Diversity increases carbon storage and tree productivity in Spanish forests. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 23:311–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12126
Sagheb-Talebi K, Schutz JP (2002) The structure of natural oriental beech (Fagus orientalis) forests in the Caspian region of Iran and the potential for the application of the group selection system. Forestry 75:465–472. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/75.4.465
Schaedel MS, Larson AJ, Affleck DL, Belote RT, Goodburn JM, Page-Dumroese DS (2017) Early Forest thinning changes aboveground carbon distribution among pools, but not total amount. For Ecol Manag 389:187–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.12.018
Schall P, Gossner MM, Heinrichs S, Fischer M, Boch S, Prati D, Jung K, Baumgartner V, Blaser S, Böhm S, Buscot F, Daniel R, Goldmann K, Kaiser K, Kahl T, Lange M, Müller J, Overmann J, Renner SC, Schulze ED, Sikorski J, Tschapka M, Türke M, Weisser WW, Wemheuer B, Wubet T, Ammer C (2018) The impact of even-aged and uneven-aged forest management on regional biodiversity of multiple taxa in European beech forests. J Appl Ecol 55:267–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12950
Schnabel F, Donoso PJ, Winter C (2017) Short-term effects of single-tree selection cutting on stand structure and tree species composition in Valdivian rainforests of Chile. NZ J for Sci 47:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40490-017-0103-5
Sebastia MT, Casals P, Vojnikovic S, Bogunic F, Beus V (2005) Plant diversity and soil properties in pristine and managed standsfrom Bosnian mixed forests. Forestry 78:297–303. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpi027
Sonohat G, Balandier P, Ruchard F (2004) Predicting solar radiation transmittance in the understory of even-aged coniferous stands in temperate forests. Ann for Sci 61:629–641. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2004061
Su X, Wang M, Huang Z, Fu S, Chen HY (2019) Forest understory vegetation: colonization and the availability and heterogeneity of resources. Forests 10:1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10110944
Sun W, Liu X (2020) Review on carbon storage estimation of forest ecosystem and applications in China. For Ecosyst 7:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-019-0210-2
Szwagrzyk J, Gazda A (2007) Above-ground standing biomass and tree species diversity in natural stands of Central Europe. J Veg Sci 18:555–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2007.tb02569.x
Talbot JD (2010) Carbon and biodiversity relationships in tropical forests. Multiple Benefits Series 4. Report prepared on behalf of the UN-REDD Programme School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds / UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre. Cambridge, UK
Thompson Ian D, Ferreira Joice, Gardner Toby, Guariguata Manuel, Koh Lian Pin, Okabe Kimiko, Pan Yude, Schmitt Christine B, Tylianakis Jason, Barlow Jos, Kapos Valerie, Kurz Werner A, Parrotta John. A, Spalding Mark D, van Vliet N (2012) Forest biodiversity, carbon and other ecosystem services: relationships and impacts of deforestation and forest degradation (Chapter 2). In: Parrotta J.A., Wildburger C, Mansourian S. (eds.), Understanding relationships between biodiversity, carbon, forests and people: The key to achieving REDD+ objectives. A global assessment report prepared by the Global Forest Expert Panel on Biodiversity,Forest Management, and REDD+. IUFRO World Series Volume 31. Vienna. 161p.
Tilman D, Wedin D, Knops J (1996) Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems. Nature 379:718–720. https://doi.org/10.1038/379718a0
Tilman D, Reich PB, Isbell F (2012) Biodiversity impacts ecosystem productivity as much as resources, disturbance, or herbivory. Proc National Acad Sci 109:10394–10397. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1208240109
Torras O, Saura S (2008) Effects of silvicultural treatments on forest biodiversity indicators in the Mediterranean. For Ecol Manag 255:3322–3330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.02.013
Ujhazy K, Hederova L, Malis F, Ujhazyova M, Bosela M, Ciliak M (2017) Overstory dynamics controls plant diversity in age-class temperate forests. For Ecol Manag 391:96–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.02.010
Unger M, Homeier J, Leuschner C (2012) Effects of soil chemistry on tropical forest biomass and productivity at different elevations in the equatorial Andes. Oecologia 170:263–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-012-2295-y
Vahedi A (2016) Artificial neural network application in comparison with modeling allometric equations for predicting above-ground biomass in the Hyrcanian mixed-beech forests of Iran. Biomass Bioenerg 88:66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.03.020
Vahedi A (2018) Providing optimum models for predicting the water loss after harvesting and extracting trees aboveground biomass from the Hyrcanian mixed-beech forests. Int J Environ Sci Technol 15:2087–2094. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-017-1518-5
van der Putten WH, Bardgett RD, Bever JD, Bezemer TM, Casper BB, Fukami T, Kardol P, Klironomos JN, Kulmatiski A, Schweitzer JA, Suding KN, Van deVoorde TFJ, Wardle DA, Hutchings M (2013) Plant-soil feedbacks: the past, the present and future challenges. J Ecol 101:265–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12054
Vilà M, Vayreda J, Gracia C, Ibañez JJ (2003) Does tree diversity increase wood production in pine forests? Oecologia 135:299–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1182-y
Von Oheimb G, Härdtle W (2009) Selection harvest in temperate deciduous forests: Impact on herb layer richness and composition. Biodivers Conserv 18:271–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9475-4
Waide RB, Willig MR, Steiner CF, Mittelbach G, Gough L, DodsonSI JGP, Parmenter R (1999) The relationship between productivity and species richness. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 30:257–300. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.30.1.257
Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–38. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003
Wang CK, Bond-Lamberty B, Gower ST (2003) Carbon distribution of a well- and poorly-drained black spruce fire chronosequence. Glob Chang Biol 9:1066–1079. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00645.x
Wang X, Li J, Xing G, Mai S, Liu W, Jiang Y, Xu W, Yang Q, Yang H, Lu J, Long W (2022) Soil organic carbon distribution, enzyme activities, and the temperature sensitivity of a tropical rainforest in Wuzhishan. Hainan Island for 13:1943. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13111943
Wilcke W, Oelmann Y, Schmitt A, Valarezo C, Zech W, Homeier J (2008) Soil properties and tree growth along an altitudinal transect in Ecuadorian tropical montane forest. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 171:220–230. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200625210
Wu X, Wang X, Tang Z, Shen Z, Zheng C, Xia X, Fang J (2015) The relationship between species richness and biomass changes from boreal to subtropical forests in China. Ecography (cop) 38:602–613. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.00940
Zarrinkafsh M (2001) Soil pedology. Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands press. Iran. 361p.
Zhang Y, Duan B, Xian J, Korpelainen H, Li C (2011) Links between plant diversity, carbon stocks and environmental factors along a successional gradient in a subalpine coniferous forest in Southwest China. For Ecol Manag 262:361–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.03.042
Zhang Y, Chen HYH, Taylor AR (2016) Aboveground biomass of understory vegetation has a negligible or negative association with overstorey tree species diversity in natural forests. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 25:141–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12392
Zobeiry M (2005) Forest inventory. University of Tehran press, Iran. 400 p.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Lauri Mehtätalo.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Khanalizadeh, A., Eshaghi Rad, J., Amiri, G.Z. et al. The relationship between plant diversity and aboveground biomass in managed and unmanaged temperate forests. Eur J Forest Res 142, 1167–1175 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-023-01583-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-023-01583-8