Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of stand parameters on conifer regeneration success in pine shelterwood stands in Estonia

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Forest Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Shelterwood method is indispensable in many forests where common clearcuts are excluded due to nature conservation, recreational use, or need for special management. We evaluated the impacts of light conditions, site fertility, cutting intensity, and soil scarification on the natural conifer regeneration density and height growth in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) stands managed by shelterwood cutting. The aim of the study was to reveal functionally important site parameters in the shelterwood system that affects conifer regeneration most strongly in hemiboreal forest. In general, the number of shelter trees decreased conifer regeneration height increment and success index (density × mean height/time since initial cutting). After the first cut, the optimal amount of first storey shelter trees was around 200 trees ha−1, or half of the basal area of the normal stand. Soil scarification increased and higher proportion of deciduous regeneration decreased density-related parameters (density and success index) of conifer regeneration. The positive effect of scarification was pronounced on poor soils, where density increase was fivefold. The conifer regeneration characteristics were not affected by soil properties, except soil phosphorus, which was positively correlated with seedlings’ height growth. Site fertility increased height increment and success index after the second cut, when regenerated trees are larger. Although shelterwood cutting is commonly applied in less productive forest types in boreal and hemiboreal pine forests, this regeneration method can be just as successful also in fertile sites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Axelsson EP, Lundmark T, Högberg P, Nordin A (2014) Belowground competition directs spatial patterns of seedling growth in boreal pine forests in Fennoscandia. Forests 5(9):2106–2121

    Google Scholar 

  • Beese JW, Bryant AA (1999) Effect of alternative silvicultural systems on vegetation and bird communities in coastal montane forest of British Columbia, Canada. For Ecol Manag 115:231–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Béland M, Agestam E, Ekö PM, Gemmel P, Nilsson U (2000) Scarification and seedfall affects natural regeneration of scots pine under two shelterwood densities and a clear-cut in southern Sweden. Scand J For Res 15:247–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettinger P, Boston K, Siry JP, Grebner DL (2017) Estimation and projection of stand and forest conditions. In: Bettinger P, Boston K, Siry JP, Grebner DL (eds) Forest management and planning, 2nd edn. Academic Press, London, pp 87–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Brække FH, Salih N (2002) Reliability of foliar analyses of Norway spruce stands in a Nordic gradient. Silva Fenn 36:489–504

    Google Scholar 

  • de Chantal M, Leinonen K, Kuuluvainen T, Cescatti A (2003) Early response of Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies seedlings to an experimental canopy gap in a boreal spruce forest. For Ecol Manag 176(1–3):321–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Elfving B, Jakobsson R (2006) Effects of retained trees on tree growth and field vegetation in Pinus sylvestris stands in Sweden. Scand J For Res 21:29–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Erefur C, Bergsten U, de Chantal M (2008) Establishment of direct seeded seedlings of Norway spruce and Scots pine: effects of stand conditions, orientation and distance with respect to shelter tree, and fertilisation. For Ecol Manag 255:1186–1195

    Google Scholar 

  • Erefur C, Bergsten U, Lundmark T, de Chantal M (2011) Establishment of planted Norway spruce and Scots pine seedlings. Effects of light environment, fertilisation, and orientation and distance with respect to shelter trees. New For 41:263–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Fady B, Cottrell J, Ackzell L, Alía R, Muys B, Prada A, González-Martínez SC (2016) Forests and global change: what can genetics contribute to the major forest management and policy challenges of the twenty-first century? Reg Environ Change 16:927–939

    Google Scholar 

  • Forest Act. RT I 2006, 30, 232. https://www.riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/ee/525032015010/consolide/current. Accessed 5 Feb 2019

  • Granhus A, Metslaid M, Von Lüpke N (2016) Effects of nutrient supply on understory Picea abies seedling growth in partially cut stands in south-east Norway. Forestry 89:182–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigoriadis N, Spyroglou S, Grigoriadis S, Klapanis P (2014) Effect of soil scarification on natural regeneration of mature Scots pine Pinus sylvestris) stands in Greece. Global Nest J 16(4):732–742

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannerz M, Hånell B (1997) Effects on the flora in Norway spruce forest following clearcutting and shelterwood cutting. For Ecol Manag 90:29–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanssen KH, Granhus A, Brække FH, Haveraaen O (2003) Performance of sown and naturally regenerated Picea abies seedlings under different scarification and harvesting regimens. Scand J For Res 18:351–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Hille M, Den Ouden J (2004) Improved recruitment and early growth of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) seedlings after fire and soil scarification. Eur J For Res 123:213–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingestad T (1987) New concepts on soil fertility and plant nutrition as illustrated by research on forest trees and stands. Geoderma 40(3–4):237–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsson R (2005) Growth of retained Scots pines and their influence on the new stand. Ph.D. thesis. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Umeå

  • Järvis J (2013) Forest measurement with relascope. Practical description for fieldwork with examples for Estonia. Formaks, Tartu https://dspace.emu.ee/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10492/4607/Relascope_en_2013.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Accessed 04 July 2019

  • Jiménez Esquilín AE, Stromberger ME, Shepperd WD (2008) Soil scarification and wildfire interactions and effects on microbial communities and carbon. Soil Sci Soc Am J 72:111–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Kara F, Topaçoğlu O (2018) Influence of stand density and canopy structure on the germination and growth of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) seedlings. Environ Monit Assess 190:749

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson M, Nilsson U (2005) The effects of scarification and shelterwood treatments on naturally regenerated seedlings in southern Sweden. For Ecol Manag 205:183–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson C, Örlander G (2000) Soil scarification shortly before a rich seed fall improves seedling establishment in seed tree stands of Pinus sylvestris. Scand J For Res 15:256–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuuluvainen T, Pukkala T (1989) Effect of Scots pine seed trees on the density of ground vegetation and tree seedlings. Silva Fenn 23:159–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Laas E, Väät T (2004) Shelterwood system in Scots pine stands and pine regeneration under shelterwood (in Estonian, with summary in English). For Stud 41:86–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieffers VJ, Messier C, Burton PJ, Ruel J-C, Grover BE (2003) Nature-based silviculture for sustaining a variety of boreal forest values. In: Burton PJ, Messier C, Smith DW, Adamowicz WL (eds) Towards sustainable management of the boreal forest. NRC Research Press, Ottawa, pp 481–530

    Google Scholar 

  • Lõhmus E (1984) Eesti metsakasvukohatüübid. [Estonian forest site types.] Eesti NSV Agrotööstuskoondise Info- ja juurutusvalitsus. Tallinn, Estonia (in Estonian with English summary)

  • Matthews JD (1989) Silvicultural systems. Clarendon Press, Oxford, p 296

    Google Scholar 

  • Messina MG, Jenkins J (2000) Loblolly pine stand early development under reserve-tree silvicultural systems in East Texas. South J Appl For 24:11–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Moilanen M, Hytönen J, Hökkä H, Ahtikoski A (2015) Fertilization increased growth of Scots pine and financial performance of forest management in a drained peatland in Finland. Silva Fenn 49(3), 1301

    Google Scholar 

  • Örlander G, Egnell E, Albrektson A (1996) Long-term effects of site preparation on growth in Scots pine. For Ecol Manag 86:27–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Padari A (2004) Forest assessment software ‘‘RaieWin’’. M.Sc. thesis (in Estonian, abstract in English)

  • Palviainen M, Finér L, Kurka AM, Mannerkoski H, Piirainen S, Starr M (2004a) Decomposition and nutrient release from logging residues after clear-cutting of mixed boreal forest. Plant Soil 263:53–67

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Palviainen M, Finér L, Kurka AM, Mannerkoski H, Piirainen S, Starr M (2004b) Release of potassium, calcium, iron and aluminium from Norway spruce, Scots pine and silver birch logging residues. Plant Soil 259:123–136

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pitt DG, Hoepting MK, Parker WC, Morneault AE, Lanteigne L, Stinson A, Farrell JCG (2016) Optimum vegetation conditions for successful establishment of planted eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L.). Forests 7(8):1–2

    Google Scholar 

  • Prévosto B, Ripert C (2008) Regeneration of Pinus halepensis stands after partial cutting in southern France: impacts of different ground vegetation, soil and logging slash treatments. For Ecol Manag 256:2058–2064

    Google Scholar 

  • Pribyl DW (2010) A critical review of the conventional SOC to SOM conversion factor. Geoderma 156:75–83

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Puri BR, Murari K (1963) Studies in surface area measurements of soils: 1. Comparison of different methods. Soil Sci 96:331–336

    Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyes J, Thiers O, Gerding V (2014) Characterization of soil properties of Nothofagus spp. forest with and without scarification in the Andean region of southern Chile. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 14(1):101–113

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarvas R (1962) Investigations on the flowering and seed crop of Pinus sylvestris. Commun Inst For Fenn 53(4):1–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Saursaunet M, Mathisen KM, Skarpe C (2018) Effects of increased soil scarification intensity on natural regeneration of scots pine Pinus sylvestris L. and birch Betula spp. L. Forests 9(5), 262

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott RE, Mitchell SJ (2005) Empirical modelling of windthrow risk in partially harvested stands using tree, neighbourhood, and stand attributes. For Ecol Manag 218:193–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Simola H (2018) Persistent carbon loss from the humus layer of tilled boreal forest soil. Eur J Soil Sci 69(2):303–314

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strand M, Lofvenius MO, Bergsten U, Lundmark T, Rosvall O (2006) Height growth of planted conifer seedlings in relation to solar radiation and position in Scots pine shelterwood. For Ecol Manag 224:258–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamm CO (1991) Nitrogen in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol Stud 81:116

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullus T, Rosenvald R, Leis M, Lõhmus P (2018) Impacts of shelterwood logging on forest bryoflora: distinct assemblages with richness comparable to mature forests. For Ecol Manag 411:67–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullus T, Tishler M, Rosenvald R, Tullus A, Lutter R, Tullus H (2019) Early responses of vascular plant and bryophyte communities to uniform shelterwood cutting in hemiboreal Scots pine forests. For Ecol Manag 440:70–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Valkonen S (2000) Effect of retained Scots pine trees on regeneration, growth, form, and yield of forest stands. Invest Agr Sist Recur For Fuera de Serie 1:121–145

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by the Estonian Research Council (IUT34-9 and IUT21-4) and by the project of the Estonian Forest Management Centre No. 8-2/T11081MIMK. We thank Krista Lõhmus for discussion and many insightful comments, Ilmar Part and Hanna Sarta for the language revision of manuscript, Sirje Tullus for data entry. The handling editor and anonymous reviewers provided many helpful comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Forestry and Rural Engineering, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 5, 51014, Tartu, Estonia

    Raul Rosenvald & Erko Soolmann

  2. Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Lai 40, 51005, Tartu, Estonia

    Katrin Rosenvald

  3. Institute of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 62, 51006, Tartu, Estonia

    Tanel Kaart

Authors
  1. Raul Rosenvald
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Katrin Rosenvald
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tanel Kaart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Erko Soolmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raul Rosenvald.

Additional information

Communicated by Miren del Rio.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 13 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 15 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rosenvald, R., Rosenvald, K., Kaart, T. et al. Effects of stand parameters on conifer regeneration success in pine shelterwood stands in Estonia. Eur J Forest Res 139, 29–40 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-019-01255-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-019-01255-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation