Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal management of Pinus pinea stands when cone and timber production are considered

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Forest Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pinus pinea is one of the most important tree species in the Mediterranean region due to the economic value of its edible seeds called “piñones”. Timber also represents an important source of income from this species. Generally, P. pinea stands have been managed to maximize either timber or seed production, optimization of the joint production of both products being rare. The difficulty in optimizing seed or joint production is the highly stochastic masting habit of P. pinea. The aim of the present study was to find the optimal management of P. pinea stands from the economic point of view when both seed and timber production are considered. A growth and yield model was employed to simulate the dynamics of P. pinea stands of the northern Iberian Peninsula. The novelty of the study is the implementation of a cone yield model that is able to predict expected cone harvests and seed yields when masting is stochastic. The model was linked with an optimization algorithm to obtain optimal schedules for two different stands. The results showed that seed production of P. pinea in the northern plateau of the Iberian Peninsula may increase the soil expectation value by more than 300 % in dense stands and 200 % in sparse stands. When seed yields were considered, rotation lengths were longer and thinnings were delayed. The results were highly sensitive to cone prices and discount rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amidon EL (1984) Notes: a general taper functional form to predict bole volume for five mixed-conifer species in California. For Sci 30(1):166–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Arias-Rodil M, Pukkala T, González-González JM, Barrio Anta M, Diéguez-Aranda U (2015) Use of depth-first search and direct search methods to optimize even-aged stand management: a case study involving maritime pine in Asturias (NW Spain). Can J For Res 45:1269–1279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calama R, Montero G (2004) Interregional non-linear height-diameter model with random coefficients for Stone Pine in Spain. Can J For Res 34:150–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calama R, Montero G (2005) Multilevel linear mixed model for tree diameter increment in Stone pine (Pinus pinea L.): a calibrating approach. Silva Fenn 39(1):37–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calama R, Montero G (2006) Stand and tree-level variability on stem form and tree volume in Pinus pinea L.: a multilevel random components approach. For Syst 15(1):24–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Calama R, Cañadas N, Montero G (2003) Inter-regional variability in site index models for even-aged stands of stone pine (Pinus pinea L.) in Spain. Ann For Sci 60:259–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calama R, Gordo FJ, Mutke S, Montero G (2008) An empirical ecological-type model for predicting stone pine (Pinus pinea L.) cone production in the Northern Plateau (Spain). For Ecol Manag 255(3–4):660–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calama R, Mutke S, Tomé JA, Gordo FJ, Montero G, Tomé M (2011) Modelling spatial and temporal variability in a zero-inflated variable: the case of stone pine (Pinus pinea L.) cone production. Ecol Model 222:606–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao T, Valsta L, Mäkelä A (2010) A comparison of carbon assessment methods for optimizing timber production and carbon sequestration in Scots pine stands. For Ecol Manag 260(10):1726–1734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao T, Hyytiäinen K, Hurttala H, Valsta L, Vanclay JK (2015) An integrated assessment approach to optimal forest bioenergy production for young Scots pine stands. For Ecosyst 2(1):1–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de-Miguel S, Pukkala T, Yeşil A (2014) Integrating pine honeydew honey production into forest management optimization. Eur J For Res 133(3):423–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Gonzalo J, Pukkala T, Borges J (2014) Integrating fire risk in stand management scheduling. An application to Maritime pine stands in Portugal. Ann Oper Res 219(1):379–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Güemes C, Montero G (1998) Influencia de ciertas variables selvícolas en la pudrición provocada por Phellinus pini sobre Pinus pinea L. Invest Agr Sist Rec For 7:203–218

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Güemes C, Cañadas N, Montero G (2002) Modelización de la distribución diamétrica de las masas de Pinus pinea L. de Valladolid mediante la función Weibull. Invest Agr Sist Rec For 11:262–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordo Alonso J (2004) Selección de grandes productores de frutos de Pinus pinea L. en la Meseta Norte. Tesis doctoral ETS Ingenieros de Montes, UPM. Madrid

  • Hooke R, Jeeves TA (1961) “Direct Search” solution of numerical and statistical problems. J ACM 8:212–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyytiäinen K (2003) Integrating economics and ecology in stand-level timber production. Finnish Forest Research Institute, Research Papers 908

  • Miina J (1998) Preparation of management models using simulation and optimisation. In: Pukkala T, Eerikäinen K (eds) Tree seedling production and management of plantation forests, pp 165–180 (University of Joensuu, Faculty of Forestry. Research notes 68)

  • Miina J, Pukkala T, Hotanen J-P, Salo K (2010) Optimizing the joint production of timber and bilberries. For Ecol Manag 259:2065–2071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montero G, Candela JA (1998) Manual de claras para repoblaciones de Pinus pinea L. EGMASA, Sevilla (Spain). 48 p (in Spanish)

  • Montero G, Calama R, Ruiz-Peinado R (2008) Selvicultura de Pinus pinea L. In: Serrada R, Montero G, Reque JA (eds). Compendio de Selvicultura Aplicada en España. INIA-Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia. Madrid, Spain 1178 pp (in Spanish)

  • Moreno-Fernández D, Cañellas I, Calama R, Gordo J, Sánchez-González M (2013) Thinning increases cone production of stone pine (Pinus pinea L.) stands in the Northern Plateau (Spain). Ann For Sci 70(8):761–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muchiri MN, Pukkala T, Miina J (2002) Optimising the management of maize—Grevillea robusta fields in Kenya. Agrofor Syst 56(1):13–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ovando P, Campos P, Calama R, Montero G (2010) Landowner net benefit from Stone pine (Pinus pinea L.) afforestation of dry-land cereal fields in Valladolid, Spain. J For Econ 16(2):83–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Palahí M, Pukkala T, Bonet JA, Colinas C, Fischer CR, Martínez de Aragón J (2009) Effect of the inclusion of mushroom values on the optimal management of even-aged pine stands of Catalonia. For Sci 55(6):503–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasalodos-Tato M (2010) Optimising forest stand management in Galicia (north-western Spain) Dissertationes Forestales 102, The Finish Society of Forest Science, Helsinki, Finland

  • Pasalodos-Tato M, Pukkala T, Rigueiro-Rodríguez A, Fernández Núñez E, Mosquera Losada MR (2009) Optimal management of Pinus radiata silvopastoral systems established on abandoned agricultural land in Galicia (north-western Spain). Silva Fenn 43(5):831–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasanen K (1998) Integrating variation in tree growth into forest planning. Silva Fenn 32(1):11–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira S, Prieto A, Calama R, Díaz-Balteiro L (2015) Optimal management in Pinus pinea L. stands combining silvicultural schedules for timber and cone production. Silva Fenn 49(3):1226. doi:10.14214/sf.1226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pohjola J, Valsta L (2007) Carbon credits and management of Scots pine and Norway spruce stands in Finland. For Policy Econ 9(7):789–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pukkala T (2009) Population-based methods in the optimization of stand management. Silva Fenn 43(2):261–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pukkala T (2011) Optimizing forest management in Finland with carbon subsidies and taxes. For Policy Econ 13(6):425–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pukkala T, Miina J (1997) A method for stochastic multi-objective optimization of stand management. For Ecol Manag 98(2):189–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pukkala T, Lähde E, Laiho O, Salo K, Hotanen JP (2011) A multifunctional comparison of even-aged and uneven-aged forest management in a boreal region. Can J For Res 41(4):851–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Peinado R, del Rio M, Montero G (2011) New models for estimating the carbon sink capacity of Spanish softwood species. For Syst 20(1):176–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Wets RJ (1989) The aggregation principle in scenario analysis and stochastic optimization. In: Wallace SW (ed) Algorithms and model formulations in mathematical programming. Springer, Berlin, pp 91–113

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The present investigation was financially supported by a short-term scientific mission under COST-FP0603 and the projects “STARTREE: Multipurpose trees and non-wood forest products a challenge and opportunity” (FP7-KBBE-2012-6) funded by the European Union’s Seventh Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under Grant Agreement No. 311919, AGL2010-15521 funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and RTA2013-00011-c2.1 funded by INIA. Authors wish to thank to Servicio Territorial de Medio Ambiente de Valladolid for permission and support to maintain all the field trials involved in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Pasalodos-Tato.

Additional information

Handling editor: Miren del Rio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pasalodos-Tato, M., Pukkala, T., Calama, R. et al. Optimal management of Pinus pinea stands when cone and timber production are considered. Eur J Forest Res 135, 607–619 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-016-0958-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-016-0958-7

Keywords

Navigation